Do you remember when Trump said "DRILL, BABY, DRILL?"

[BADecker]

Seems that it is working. I have a friend who has some oil land in Texas. Maybe I should go visit him.


“DRILL, BABY, DRILL” WORKED: U.S. oil hits all-time high as Trump dismantles Biden’s war on fossil fuels


https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-08-21-trump-dismantles-bidens-war-on-fossil-fuels.html
U.S. oil output hits all-time highs under President Donald Trump's pro-energy policies, defying Biden-era constraints. The Trump administration reverses Biden's climate agenda at unprecedented speed, prioritizing domestic energy dominance. Gasoline prices are now forecasted to drop below $3 per gallon next year, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

The shift marks a dramatic reversal from the Biden era, when production was driven not by policy but by high global oil prices—often exceeding $60 per barrel, a testament to the administration's aggressive deregulation and pro-drilling stance. "Drill, baby, drill is working," declared the Committee to Unleash Prosperity in an August report, noting that Trump's policies have tripled U.S. output in 15 years through advances in fracking and horizontal drilling.

The stakes extend beyond economics. Trump's energy revival is a direct rebuttal to the globalist push for "net-zero" emissions, which critics argue would cripple the U.S. economy while enriching foreign adversaries like China. "This isn't just about cheap gas—it's about national security," said Alex Stevens, communications director for the Institute for Energy Research. "Biden's first act was killing Keystone XL. Trump's first act was declaring energy a national priority."

The 200-day blitz: How Trump outpaced his first term

Trump's second-term energy offensive has moved faster than his first, with 200 deregulatory actions logged in just 200 days—double the pace of his initial presidency. Key moves include:

Day 1 executive orders: Reversed Biden's climate declarations, exited the Paris Accord (again) and froze offshore wind projects.

Keystone XL revival: Undid Biden's 2021 cancellation, accelerating pipeline construction to transport Canadian crude to U.S. refineries.

LNG export surge: Lifted Biden's pause on liquefied natural gas permits, with the Department of Energy approving multiple export terminals.

EPA overhaul: Proposed repealing the Obama-era "endangerment finding"—the legal foundation for vehicle emissions rules—while targeting 31 Biden-era regulations.

Congressional backing: Republicans passed bills to block fracking bans and end methane fees on oil producers, with more legislation pending.

The American Energy Alliance (AEA), which tracked Biden's 250 anti-energy actions, now documents Trump's 200 pro-energy countermeasures—from lease sales in Alaska's ANWR to rolling back EV mandates. "Biden spent four years making energy harder to produce. Trump spent six months making it impossible to stop," Stevens said.

Yet challenges loom. Environmental groups and blue-state attorneys general are gearing up for litigation, particularly over the EPA's proposed repeals. "The next 200 days will be about defending these actions in court," Stevens predicted.
...

[Hispo]

It is not about democrats being against energy production, it is a fact climate change is a phenomenon which existsnans could be a threat to humanity in some decades, so it makes sense any responsible administration (which is dominant in the field of technology) to start a process of transition from fossil energy towards green and renewable energy.

Underground, there is more energy than we will ever need to sustain humanity and the sun is pretty much a source of infinite power if it is exploited in the correct way. Oil is going to be depleted sooner or later, even Arabs not that, so they invest in hydrogen technology an other alternative ways to keep world moving.

[BADecker]

^^^ Climate change is BS, and the global warming movements prove it. How do they prove it?

Back in 1883 the Krakatoa volcano erupted with such a big explosion that it caused global cooling for a year, all around the world. And there was another big volcano back then that did similar. What does that have to do with climate change?

If anybody was serious about climate-change/global-warming, they would simply nuke one of those big volcano's into activity and cool everything down.

Mans' piddly little activity doesn't have anything to do with climate change. It's all natural cycles, some from the earth and some from the sun.

All climate change blab is somebody trying to place the fear into people so that they turn their authority over to the globalists.

[Hispo]

^^^ Climate change is BS, and the global warming movements prove it. How do they prove it?

...

If anybody was serious about climate-change/global-warming, they would simply nuke one of those big volcano's into activity and cool everything down.

That sounds like something a middle school kid would write, to be honest. It is very silly. You did not even mention the possibility of using rockets or high altitude planes to disperse ash or pasticules in the atmosphere in order to block a fraction of sunlight, Cooling the planet down. You literally had to go with a nuke into a volcano. It makes me think you are about sixteen years old and have zero knowledge on geology and actual science.

Nuking a volcano do not guarantee it will start to erupt and free ash into the atmosphere, even if it did, it could kill many people (depending on the location of the volcano.

[BADecker]

^^^ Climate change is BS, and the global warming movements prove it. How do they prove it?

...

If anybody was serious about climate-change/global-warming, they would simply nuke one of those big volcano's into activity and cool everything down.

That sounds like something a middle school kid would write, to be honest. It is very silly. You did not even mention the possibility of using rockets or high altitude planes to disperse ash or pasticules in the atmosphere in order to block a fraction of sunlight, Cooling the planet down. You literally had to go with a nuke into a volcano. It makes me think you are about sixteen years old and have zero knowledge on geology and actual science.

Nuking a volcano do not guarantee it will start to erupt and free ash into the atmosphere, even if it did, it could kill many people (depending on the location of the volcano.

Well, what would you expect in a forum like this one. This is simply a basic idea. Of course everything would have to be check out before doing it.

But the point is the same. Let nature work. There will always be hot spells and cold spells. If people try to mess with either one, all they will do is cause nature to fight back harder, according to the way it (nature) is set to operate. And when nature fights back to correct the stupidity of man, it just might destroy man accidentally.

People are too dumb to correctly control nature this way.