Does sign campaign payments directly to the casino make you to gamble?

[mcdouglasx]

As long as we can do whatever we want with the payment, it doesn't matter where it's sent. It's up to us whether we decide to gamble with that money or not. Although we can't fool ourselves, that's an incentive to gamble. That is, having the money already in the casino, if you were unsure whether to gamble or not, is a little more tempting than the idea of ​​​​loading your balance at the casino on your own.

But in the end, it's still a personal decision whether you want to gamble or not, because I like to think they don't force you to gamble in order to make the withdrawal.

[Bright0515]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?  

What about you?

Since the first day I joined a signature campaign I have not received any payments directly to a casino account (although this will make me 2 weeks joining a signature campaign) because the managers don't pay to the casino account but I since they normally pay to my Bitcoin wallet address which I provide. It will be nice to gamble with signature campaign payments once in a while because "Why Not? But the real truth is that it is not everytime that the campaign participants will gamble with their payments, sometimes they add it to their anonymous wallets to increase the asset on their portfolio. It's not a must to gamble with payment , you can do anything you want with it.

[Maslate]

Not really. Sure, I might get tempted sometimes, but I don’t usually spend all my earnings in a casino even if they’re credited there. Even if it’s not “hard earned” money, it’s still Bitcoin, and I’d rather hold it and let the value grow long term.

I also think most campaigners don’t gamble their rewards either, since a lot of signature campaigns nowadays don’t pay directly into casino accounts.
That just shows casinos don’t see it as effective to credit participants there to make them gamble.

[Nightwatchmare]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?  

What about you?

If i am accepted into a signature campaign where i will receive my payment directly to the casino website, i will not use it to gamble so that i will not be tempted any week to use all my payment to gamble. But if the money is not up to the minimum withdrawal of the casino, i will try to gamble with it if i can increase the money to reach the minimum withdrawal of the casino so that i will have a chance of withdrawing my money to my personal wallet, but i can decide to withdraw my money bi-weekly if i am not certain of increasing  the money to the minimum withdrawal of the casino.

[Hewlet]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

My only issue with that is that there's always a limit that's set below which you can't make your withdrawal. So for instance if you only participated in the campaign for just a week and the pay is not upto the minimum withdrawal amount, you have to either use It to gamble or made an extra deposit for you to be given access to withdraw or spend your fund.

Obviously, it's a strategy of using one stone to kill two or more birds since on the  one hand, you're promoting them on the forum and all promoters are kind of direct users of Thier platform. Some might just spend it while others will want to use It to get more money which if they lose it means that the campaign has gotten it money back. It's just left for you to choose what to do with your paid money. It's not a must that you must use It on Thier platform.

[$crypto$]

Participants in the campaign are not required to sign up for direct payment to a casino account to play that is up to the individual but it makes more sense to play because you have to experience what is being promoted.

It doesn't matter if you only use $10-$20 to play and withdraw the rest, but I usually spend about 20% of the total campaign income on casino betting.

So far, we've only bet about 20% on sports betting, and the rest goes towards food or other necessities.
With 20% used for betting, that's more than enough for now.

[LogitechMouse]

---
To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Like him, there's also a time where I've being paid directly into my account on that Casino.
First was Yolodice back in 2018-2019 I think, and then there's Stake.

Well, I'm using a portion of those signature campaign payments to gamble because... why not? I mean if you see a balance in your account, you will always be tempted to use that to gamble hoping to make more money, right? Now that I'm being paid directly thru my own wallet, there are times where I don't use that money to gamble for personal reasons.

Looking at the current signature campaigns that are currently running, there are only few of them where the participants are being paid thru their own gambling website's account. Stake and I think even Jackbit and Crypto.games are the ones, and most of them are thru their own wallets. Whether it's on our personal wallet, or casino account, for me it doesn't matter because if you feel that you need to gamble, you will just use that money for gambling.

[tsaroz]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

No doubt its an strategy by the sponsors of the signature campaign to make the participants try the platform. At least test the withdrawal option. And for most, they'd certainly try something just to experience what they are advertising. People might be unwillingly losing their reward when they feel they ought to try gambling but no one is actually forcing you to do it. I don't think any of the gambling signature campaign has a minimum playing amount before withdrawal. If you don't reach the minimum withdrawal requirement, you could just wait for the next weeks payment and in another argument, you should also be well informed of what you are advertising for.

[BitMaxz]

Obviously, it's a strategy of using one stone to kill two or more birds since on the  one hand, you're promoting them on the forum and all promoters are kind of direct users of Thier platform. Some might just spend it while others will want to use It to get more money which if they lose it means that the campaign has gotten it money back. It's just left for you to choose what to do with your paid money. It's not a must that you must use It on Thier platform.

I agree with this, but in my case I do sometimes gamble with a small amount, not the whole payment, because I use the weekly payment on trading and convert it to USDT and get benefits from holding it on the exchange, and I use some for doing tasks like depositing BTC and getting free airdrops. Exchange offers these and get free rewards every week. That's way more guaranteed profit than gambling, but I still try my luck sometimes while having fun.

[libert19]

~
I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   
What about you?

Nope. If I remember correctly, I have about 6,000 dollars on my casino balance and I don’t touch it. I have a separate budget for gambling and I have no problems sticking to it. And I can’t say that I’ve disciplined myself too much or anything like that, it’s just that for me, not spending the money that I have on my balance is not difficult at all. I don't like gambling enough to spend unplanned money on it.

Libert, having your winnings deposited directly into your casino account?  Since it eliminates all of the inherent pain points associated with sending money, that is a powerful incentive to spend.  You are much more likely to spend money & lose more when it is already in your gambling account.  On the other hand, it causes friction & makes you reconsider if you have it in your Bitcoin wallet.

Kudos to KTChampions for maintaining that mental distance between your fun budget & the rest.  I think people who could wait to cash out that  huge amount are less likely to overspend, and that is good self control.  However, most people find it easier to navigate cashless money on a screen.

I saw you had accusation of using AI in reputation board, is that why you are referring to us individually, so you are not flagged for using AI? 

[Agbamoni]

I think this is based on individuals, some perons can actually be moved to gamble when the received their pay from signature campaigns that pays directly in the account if their participants in their site...

I respect individual choices. But the idea of gambling using a pay into the casino is wrong to me, and I cant back down on my words. It is obvious they no longer adhere to bankroll management.

The only reason I can accept that idea is if they derive their bankroll from the pay and send the rest out.

[hyudien]

Why not? I personally use it for betting or playing slots, hoping to win more when I withdraw but of course I only use a few cents. Essentially before I start playing, I'll withdraw the weekly payout from the campaign early to avoid the temptation to gamble longer. Ultimately it's your decision whether to withdraw it all or use it for gambling, as the payer gives you that flexibility.

[dimonstration]

Essentially before I start playing, I'll withdraw the weekly payout from the campaign early to avoid the temptation to gamble longer. Ultimately it's your decision whether to withdraw it all or use it for gambling, as the payer gives you that flexibility.

This is a good move to guarantee that you will not risk the money that you hard earned through posting here in forum. Usually, user will play a few bets before they withdraw the while money because they consider the transaction fees since salary on signature campaign is Bitcoin while the fee on this currency is high.

I wouldn’t mind placing few bets before I withdraw if I received the funds on my casino account during my free time.

Most of my funds that I acquired through signature campaign is I use for casino purposes.

[MainIbem]

I dont remember receiving signature campaign reward directly on a casino balance, but, if I would have received it, I think I would have gambled Because yeah, why not? Couple of small bets, once a week wont hurt. I dont think anyone would dumb all of his weekly reward at once in gambling. I dont think that casinos do that on purpose (however they have that in mind). Imho they do it to make casino more popular, more remembering.

I'm aware that some gambling sig campaigns pay directly into members casino wallets but then hope you know that gambling is a choice and not compulsory for everyone well if the casino requires one to wager or bet before withdrawal then it's enough for them to complain since they don't want to gamble but the casino is leading them to it, but then when there's no requirement for withdrawal then I don't see any issues with paying directly to their casino wallets since gambling is a choice and shouldn't be by force on anyone whether directly or indirectly.

[Stepstowealth]

What about you?

The motivation for different people gambling is different and while receiving your signature payments into your casino account may make gambling easier for you, there are still many signature campaign participants who have not made it turn them into irresponsible gamblers who are gambling without control and budget. I don't think it is the entire plan of any casino running a signature campaign in this forum and paying directly to their platform that each gambler they pay uses the money in gambling on their platform to the extent that they become addicts. They just want you to constantly try out their withdrawal services so that you can recommend them to other gamblers seeking casinos with efficient withdrawals.

[red4slash]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

As long as we have no problem with that, why not? I could do the same thing, even though for now I am still paid in bitcoin, not directly to the casino, but if that happens, then I can do that.

But on the other hand, I also won't use all the money I earn from the campaign for gambling because, to be honest, it slightly violates the limits I currently have in terms of the amount I have to spend each week.
Therefore, I will still withdraw a portion but leave the rest in line with the limits I always set for myself—not exceeding that amount, even though the money comes from the same gambling signature campaign. Of course, the choice is up to each individual, and I certainly don't expect the entire amount I receive to be spent, because if this habit develops, it will be dangerous for me.

[acroman08]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I used to be part of a signature campaign that paid directly into my account in their casino in the past, but I don't really get the urge to gamble just because "I can" or have funds in the casino. But there were times I didn't withdraw the payment and use that fund for my gambling session since I thought it was more practical than depositing in the casino from my wallet.

[Wapfika]

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

I used to be part of a signature campaign that paid directly into my account in their casino in the past, but I don't really get the urge to gamble just because "I can" or have funds in the casino. But there were times I didn't withdraw the payment and use that fund for my gambling session since I thought it was more practical than depositing in the casino from my wallet.

It proves that you have total control with your gambling urges if you can’t be tempted to play if you don’t have plan to gamble while your funds is already there.

For some user it’s very hard to control the urge of gambling if they have the opportunity to do it. I believe there’s already a thread before that share his experience about his gambling addiction and how the frequent browsing in the casino makes him to urge more on gambling.

Same like you, I’m not that having urge to gamble if I don’t really feel to play. In my case, I don’t have time to gamble whenever I want due to my work load.

[r_victory]

I think it's a way to get you to use the casino, even if it's just with a little of what you received. It's great for you to give your opinion about the features, how withdrawals work, and talk about the games available. Although managers say that posting in the casino's ANN threads isn't mandatory, it's desirable to have interaction in them, and this is a way to generate this engagement.

Whether or not to bet is a choice, you are certainly not obliged to do so, unless you need to meet wagering requirements to withdraw, in which case I don't think it's viable, as your intention won't always be to bet.

[Dunamisx]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

This is all about what we want or have decided to do, receiving payment on the casino wallet does not mean anything, if we want to gamble, we are going to use it for the purpose, either the entire payment or part of it, secondly, we have to consider if it were to be sent to our personal wallet, nothing still changes, because we can still send to our casino for gambling, while receiving it on our wallet already save some gamblers from transaction fees, whereby they have to send fund to their casino wallet.