Does sign campaign payments directly to the casino make you to gamble?

[Solosanz]

Well I don't understand why people are calling users who gamble since the money are on their accounts as "low self control".

What's wrong for someone who gamble small amount of money from the effort they spent for a week? it's not even low self control, it's responsible. As long as they don't gamble excess than what they get or the money supposed to be used for emergency needs, it's completely fine.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Signature campaign is actually a promotion casinos make in other to create awareness for their services to the gambling community, and as such, some may choose to make payment directly into their casino account, simply because they just want it's participants get use to it, and likewise other casinos that may choose to sent payment directly to the participants Bitcoin wallet, but thou encourages it's participants to gamble on the casino they are promoting. So when it comes to the question if does depositing payment on a casino make a user gamble? Then literally, it is a personal decision, but of course, its still it wouldn't be bad if the gambler can spare a fraction of his payment to gamble, while testing the casino features.

[_BlackStar]

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Why not? It's perfectly acceptable for signature campaign participants to spend some or all of their payment directly at the casino if they really want to. Rather than depositing from another wallet, I think it's easier for most gamblers to spend 50% of their campaign payment at the casino directly. Some participants might withdraw 100% for various financial reasons, but that's not their fault. It's up to the participants how they want to do it - the point is the casino never forbids it from being done.

[ShowOff]

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Why not? It's perfectly acceptable for signature campaign participants to spend some or all of their payment directly at the casino if they really want to. Rather than depositing from another wallet, I think it's easier for most gamblers to spend 50% of their campaign payment at the casino directly. Some participants might withdraw 100% for various financial reasons, but that's not their fault. It's up to the participants how they want to do it - the point is the casino never forbids it from being done.

That's right, there's nothing wrong with doing it just for entertainment, the important thing is not to go overboard. But if there are other needs that must be met, then it's better to rearrange your priorities. Gambling can be done at any time, by setting personal limits, you can take control of your gambling journey.

I think allocating ten percent of a payment is very reasonable. If you're lucky, you can enjoy a bigger win and make a larger withdrawal. But if not, then it should be considered a form of entertainment. I think it all comes back to each individual, but I'm sure many people have done it.

[Z-tight]

I would prefer to receive signature campaign earnings directly to my BTC address, but i don't also mind receiving my signature earnings directly to the casino making the payment, especially if there is no wagering requirement and if withdrawal fee is low. I make sure to gamble in any casino i advertise, so even if i receive funds in my wallet, i move some funds to the casino when i want to gamble. I am advertising Whale.io now and that is where i gamble, even though i receive payments into my wallet.

[Joy- maker]

I have once received my signature campaign payment direct to the casino site, but I was not comfortable with it not because it will make me gamble with my payment, because even receiving my payment direct to the casino site can't make me gamble with my signature campaign payment, just that I wasn't just comfortable with receiving my payment direct to the gambling site and even  the charges is something else. Right now am receiving my signature campaign payment direct to my bitcoin wallet which am comfortable with that one.

[Wiwo]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

This is all about what we want or have decided to do, receiving payment on the casino wallet does not mean anything, if we want to gamble, we are going to use it for the purpose, either the entire payment or part of it, secondly, we have to consider if it were to be sent to our personal wallet, nothing still changes, because we can still send to our casino for gambling, while receiving it on our wallet already save some gamblers from transaction fees, whereby they have to send fund to their casino wallet.

Decipline and determination is what make the difference, i still remember when i was in campaign that make my weekly payments into my casino accounts and as time goes on i started using that money to gamble i first set aside $10 each week but as time goes on I began to use my whole week payments to gamble and without any results or winning, this made me to have a rethink and startedto look away from gambling each or eventually changing signature campaign to avoid getting my payments into my casino account which causes the temptations to gamble them away.

[Slow death]

I never saw this as something that could encourage more people to play, because even if people received it in their wallet, they could easily deposit it in the casino. For example, I've been placing sports bets, I bet using Litecoin deposits and also USDC when I receive payment, so I don't see anything wrong with receiving it directly into the casino account. When someone is responsible, there won't be a problem. Now, if the person already has a gambling problem, then that person will use everything they received and gamble.

[Cantsay]

There was a time when we received our payment in our casino account and normally we were supposed to be given the opportunity to withdraw without having to meet any wagering requirements but it wasn’t as we expected so we had to wager it just once, although, we were compensated for it the following week and that was how we stopped using it.

And again, seeing your money in your gambling account is really tempting and even if you manage to take some out of the account you’ll still want to leave some behind just to gmable, so I think receiving your payment via casino account will make you gamble even when you don’t want to.

[Onyeeze]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

if you are receiving your signature payment directly to your casino account that will prompt you to spend more than your expectation in gambling because it will be easier for you to make your bet through the casino platform, but for the aspect of people who is betting because of they are into signature payment, that should be a true story because sometimes does people who have the mindset to gamble will but they don't have the capital, and immediately they started in Bitcoin they have the privilege to make a deposit to a casino platforms that will give them access to make their bet, because there's some people who does not know how to buy Bitcoin and fund to the platform.

[Issa56]

Well I don't understand why people are calling users who gamble since the money are on their accounts as "low self control".

Is there any difference in receiving payment on gambling site and receiving payment in our bitcoin wallet? If you really want to gamble, then you still going to do it, depositing money on gambling site is something that’s so easy, so even after receiving payment in our bitcoin wallet, then we can still easily deposit on gambling site.

You might be receiving your weekly payment on the gambling site and you might still decide not to gamble with it, gambling is all about self control, if you can control yourself, then anywhere you receive your payment, you not still going to gamble with the money. I think it’s even better we receive our payment on gambling site, at least we should try out the gambling site which we promoting, I don’t see anything wrong with that, as long as their won’t be any additional charges attached to withdrawal, then it’s a good idea.

[Oluwa-btc]

Whichever way a payments is done a gambler with irresistible gambling habits would still gamble having been paid directly to the casino and certainly why won't you give in a little, there'll always be this thoughts of wanting to do a little gambling just for fun but all of this depends on one's decision, basically receiving payment through that medium and be discipline enough not to spend a dime.

[DaNNy001]

This might be a wrong move for anyone, I know that getting your signature pay straight into your casino account might propel you to gamble but you must be careful and learn to apply wisdom...as a stake participant even though I do gamble when I receive payment sometimes I make sure that it's just a little percentage that goes into gambling, throwing away all your payments is actually stupid thats why you must exercise self control

[Ivystar5]

It's a trap lol  , you're going to f***king keep gambling as long as you have it paid directly there, that's for me! I don't know about others but I did do such in my first or campaign payment, still have some left over to keep watering but I gave up since no win came in.

It's very difficult for someone like me to see a spin and win opportunity in a casino when I have some amount of money in there and knowing fully well that even if I used 50% of the pay to gambling it wouldn't affect me in any way so I just gamble and when I'm feed up or have exhausted the set outside amount to wager I just quit.

[AmoreJaz]

Whichever way a payments is done a gambler with irresistible gambling habits would still gamble having been paid directly to the casino and certainly why won't you give in a little, there'll always be this thoughts of wanting to do a little gambling just for fun but all of this depends on one's decision, basically receiving payment through that medium and be discipline enough not to spend a dime.

That is true, it is up to you if you will deplete your campaign payments to the casino. Yes, you can always play as it is quite easy to access. You don't need to deposit as the money is already there, but how much you will spend depend on you. But yes, if you have that money already in the casino, you can really play for a bit but not to the point that you will lose it all. Just think of the days that you put effort to get such amount. And you will lose it for few minutes. You need to plan and be strict with yourself when you get such payment.

[Darker45]

My answer is yes. And it's more or less expected. You're very much exposed to gambling because you're promoting a gambling site, you're discussing about gambling topics everyday, you're betting, and so on. And you're paid directly to your casino account's wallet. The money is already there. It's very difficult not to gamble at least a portion of it. Not to mention that you're probably also interested to try playing in the casino you're promoting.

It's more tempting to gamble this way than you taking the effort to create an account or make a deposit first.

[Eternad]

This might be a wrong move for anyone, I know that getting your signature pay straight into your casino account might propel you to gamble but you must be careful and learn to apply wisdom...as a stake participant even though I do gamble when I receive payment sometimes I make sure that it's just a little percentage that goes into gambling, throwing away all your payments is actually stupid thats why you must exercise self control

Who knows maybe there is a forum member here who does that. Using our signature campaign payment to fuel our gambling activities is not a bad idea if our other priorities is well taken care off excluding the amount we get weekly.

I myself is also guilty doing it since you have nothing else to do and the amount you need to gamble is automatically deposited to your account. Usually I do this at the end of the month where all bills are paid and my salary is being divided until next salary. What I have remaining on my gambling account is mine to enjoy and I usually pay my luck on slots or dice.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Motivation behind this thread:

...So i can say that i started gambling right from when i got some signature payment made i to my casino account like stake is paying it participants into their stake account and i started gambling from that place.

To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

The only reason I would spend my campaign payment on gambling no matter or regardless of where it is paid is if i don't have any very important thing to do with the money, then in a situation like this, receiving the payment on a casino is even preferred as it saves me the stress of trying to deposit to the casino again.

But in times when I have a lot of things requiring financial attention and I imagined that my campaign payment would go along way in helping me settle those financial issues, I would withdraw the money even if it was paid into my casino account.
I think it's once (if I still remember correctly) I lost my entire campaign fund on gambling because it was paid directly to my account on the casino, since then, I sometimes would spend a small part of the fund, then withdraw the rest if I am not winning, but In times of financial issues, I withdraw without spending any part of the fund on any game.

[SATWAT]

It's a trap lol  , you're going to f***king keep gambling as long as you have it paid directly there, that's for me! I don't know about others but I did do such in my first or campaign payment, still have some left over to keep watering but I gave up since no win came in.

It's very difficult for someone like me to see a spin and win opportunity in a casino when I have some amount of money in there and knowing fully well that even if I used 50% of the pay to gambling it wouldn't affect me in any way so I just gamble and when I'm feed up or have exhausted the set outside amount to wager I just quit.

When everything is set to encourage members for playing gambling then still avoiding is near to zero percent for me because few are having rule you have to wager 1 time which is more problematic even many avoid these rules because they understand, but things like these always for encouraging to gamble.

Here most of the peoples are having different needs and way of life few strictly avoid this despite they understand they are promoting and working for casino, but they have other things in life which are more important than gambling but many loves to take this advantage because they feel they can do this also have chance of keeping things on level which will not hurt them financial which is always preferable.

[nullama]

~snip~
To answer my own question in title:

I am receiving current sign payments directly to casino, and I have spent some. Because why not?   

What about you?

Yeah, I think that's quite self evident, and the reason why some campaigns choose to do it like that.

At a minimum you would be paying the mining fees to move it to your own wallet (if it's paid into a wallet you don't control).

So, based on that some people might prefer to just gamble it directly, skipping the fees.

But in the end, the most probable outcome is to lose it while gambling.