Planned improvements:[...] - Community voting system to let users influence metric weights[...] Feedback and suggestions are very welcome 🙏
I'm having mixed feelings about the addition of a voting system in the future... I don't think there's a bulletproof way against those users who keep on finding workarounds for altering the overall ratings.
- BTW, I'd like to suggest adding a report button for incorrect & invalid links.Thank you very much for your feedback.
As you pointed out, a voting system does carry the risk of manipulation. That’s why we are not planning to let it directly dictate the scores. Instead, it will serve as a
supplementary signal with limited weight, combined with
outlier detection and
trust-based adjustments to minimize abuse.
The reason we want to introduce voting is that it allows us to capture the
community’s real sentiment and “on-the-ground health” that can’t always be reflected in market or development data alone. By incorporating this layer, we believe the ratings can better reflect actual reality.
Your suggestion of a
report button for incorrect or invalid links is also extremely valuable. We plan to add this feature early so that users can directly flag issues, helping us maintain quality and transparency alongside the voting input.
Ultimately, our goal is to build CoinScore on
three pillars: transparent evidence, objective data, and community input. In this way, the scores can remain balanced and credible from every perspective. We truly welcome further feedback. 🙏
