Syamailcoin

[Farrel Al Feshal]

Abstract
Presenting payment negotiation untouched by Natural Falsehood: F(i) = γ^(i/R) τ ∑(S_j φ^j, j=0..i)
with the Proof of Exponomial mechanism. The computer recalculates the
Exponomial calculation that was deliberately obscured:
Validation:SAI-15Checksum⇒Threshold14.47
Transactions are validated after each node produces the exact calculation.
Malicious nodes are denied through the heterodyning mechanism.
The supply time distribution is calculated as:
9,470,000→4,735,001=14.47minutes(868.2seconds)
4,735,000→1,280,000=12minutes(720seconds)
1,280,000→185,000=1.96minutes(36.9132653seconds)
185,000→0=18.8332986seconds

Superior Cryptographic Code Algorithm Inevitable 256 Needs to be retested and revised if needed, https://github.com/FarrelAlFeshalReal/SYAMAILCOIN https://github.com/FarrelAlFeshalReal/SYAMAILCOIN/issues/1 and keep in mind that I have no intention of becoming the Owner of Genesis except an Investor, I give from my abilities.

[BattleDog]

Cool that you're building, but right now this reads like marketing math, not a spec.

I can't tell how the network orders transactions, who gets to produce blocks, or how Sybil resistance works.

The supply timing math has inconsistencies. 1.96 minutes is 117.6 seconds, not 36.9. If the units wobble, nobody will trust the rest.

New crypto primitive names set off alarms. If "SAI 256" is not a well-studied hash (e.g., SHA-256, BLAKE3), do not roll your own. Use boring, audited primitives. "Exact calculation at each node" is not a consensus rule by itself. You need a fork-choice rule, finality story, and a way to handle network delays and byzantine peers.

"Heterodyning mechanism" is a radio term. If you mean a mix function or penalty schedule, spell out the algorithm step-by-step.

If you want meaningful feedback, ship a minimal, boring spec:
- What is the ledger model: UTXO or account?
- Block header fields, block interval target, and difficulty/weight adjustment formula.
- How block producers are chosen and what resource is costly (work, stake, VRF lottery, something else).
- Fork-choice rule and finality.
- Transaction format, signature scheme, and fee mechanics.
- Emission schedule with units and test vectors.
- Security assumptions and threat model.
- Reference implementation with deterministic tests, plus a 5-node local testnet script.

Personal note: I spent a week in 2013 helping a coin that used clever algebra but no clear fork-choice. It split into two heaviest-ish subnets and never recovered. Don't repeat that. Make the rules measurable and dull so independent devs can implement them the same way.

Last, if you post wallets or binaries, publish reproducible builds and checksums and keep keys offline. People will try your code in VMs first; make that easy.

Clean up the math, write the spec in plain English with equations anyone can reimplement, and I'll take another pass.

[Farrel Al Feshal]

Fun fact: Syamailcoin was successfully run with Proof of Elapsed Time in December 2024, when it was submitted to CoinMarketCap, it was rejected because it was considered an Altcoin and needed a community, Syamailcoin is not a project, let alone a Altcoin. Syamailcoin is just a coin that Presenting payment negotiation untouched by Natural Falsehood. The coding file has been deleted and indeed I need criticism, 4 months of coding using tested cryptography, rejected by employees considered Altcoins and need a community, I reset everything and learn to learn.

In practice, a 5 V dev board (<5 W) and a 0.1 Ω shunt plus multimeter to log baseline idle and active current (meta.json). Then I instrumented the firmware with a GPIO trigger and used a 100 MS/s oscilloscope to capture 1,000–10,000 power traces (CSV) during crypto operations. After that, I placed a 2 cm loop probe over the board, fed it through an NE602 mixer with a 166 kHz LO, filtered the output to 25 kHz, and recorded a 22 kHz IF (WAV) via sound card/SDR. Finally, I connected a Quside Entropy Core + QSC01 Cipher to harvest quantum entropy (entropy.bin), verified it with NIST STS/Dieharder reports, and injected it into my C++ digest by extending digest_stream() with load_external_entropy() and mix_entropy(). The outputs (hex digests, logs, traces, WAV, and reports) form a complete pipeline from antecedent measurement → heterodyned entropy → final consensus digest.

1. Antecedent — Power Baseline

Tools: dev board (Arduino/STM32/FPGA), USB 5V supply (<5 W), 0.1–1 Ω shunt, multimeter.

Do: place shunt on ground, connect DMM, boot the board.

Record: supply voltage, shunt voltage at idle, compute I = Vshunt/Rshunt, save to meta.json.



2. Trace Capture — Side-Channel Window

Tools: oscilloscope ≥50 MHz, 10× probe, GPIO pin trigger.

Do: toggle GPIO before/after one crypto op:

gpio=1; run_crypto_once(); gpio=0;

Connect probe, record 1k–10k traces.

Record: CSV with time_ns, voltage_mV, for fixed vs random inputs.



3. Heterodyning Stage — Frequency Down-Mix

Tools: loop probe, NE602/AD633 mixer, LO 122 or 166 kHz, LPF 25 kHz, sound card/SDR.

Do: pick up board noise, down-mix to 22 kHz, record 10–60 s WAV.

Record: WAV + spectrogram.



4. Entropy Core Integration

Tools: Quside Entropy Core + QSC01 Cipher.

Do: harvest 256–1024 byte entropy blocks, test with NIST STS/Dieharder.

Record: entropy.bin + entropy_report.txt.



5. Software Integration (C++ Digest)

Extend code with:

BigInt load_external_entropy(const string &path);
BigInt mix_entropy(const BigInt &acc, const BigInt &ext);

Modify digest_stream() to call mix_entropy() with entropy/heterodyned bytes.

Run three scenarios: A = no entropy, B = entropy only, C = entropy + heterodyned data.

Record: hex digests + log (timestamp, seed, entropy hash).



6. Finalization

Collect all: meta.json, CSV traces, heterodyne.wav + spectrogram, entropy.bin + RNG report, digest outputs + logs, photos of setup.

Publish as proof-of-concept pipeline: Antecedent → Trace → Heterodyning → Entropy Core → Consensus digest.




Key Practical Numbers:

Power: 5 V, <5 W board.

Shunt: 0.1 Ω → 5–50 mV at 0.05–0.5 A.

Oscilloscope: ≥100 MS/s, 100 µs–5 ms window, 1k–10k traces.

Mixer: LO = 122/166 kHz → IF = 22 kHz, record @96 kHz.

Entropy: 2–21 MB capture, run RNG tests.

[Farrel Al Feshal]

36.91326530612244898 is the number of the row and calculated from the sub interval stage 2 while 18.83 is calculated from the derivative of the 4th iteration, RAW NAND TC58NVG0S3E can be used to record what is happening in the audio visual with electricity and/or stored in magnetic power, QSC01 must be functional, before, shortly and after validated, Syamailcoin: Your transaction before being entered into the block, Nonce that calculates the final (called Recursive), Blocks will not be displayed Queued transactions, Recursive number 10 does not have to be connected to block number 10 if the other block has been verified, Blockrecursive it's blocks are connected with substances, Malicious node are denied like a sword splitting water. Computer goes into the server, solves the Math of a combination that is deliberately confused, example solves 5+5 it's 10, plus 13? 23, Then the system will be confused in the way, has been solved will change 5+-5 even if it completes a long Math operation, It will be replaced continuously and the opportunity will continue to decrease from 14.47 minutes to 18.83 seconds. 0.0002231668236 Syamailcoin smallest, Block size, Initial selling price etc will be better Mutual agreement, I don't want to be Genesis, F(i) = γ^(i/R) τ ∑(S_j φ^j, j=0..i) is the formula that I first fell in love with Mathematics and created a Blueprint, When was I 17 years old? What do I need to do in productive age? The consequence is a crisis, upload the in arXiv.org need an endorsement request, I was 11.5 years old at the time, Heterodyning? Since 2005, 1 decade more, the Playstation business family, RAW NAND TC58NVG0S3E can be edited and The electricity is not spread, RAW NAND can be functioned far from the general understanding at that time, All of those possibilities are possible. If anyone wants to retype in VerbTeX to revise the whitepaper there is no need to input my name in your better version of Syamailcoin Whitepaper because I intend to be an Investor.

[Farrel Al Feshal]

Syamailcoin — Full Pipeline (Abstract → Real → Consensus)

Formula Basis:

F(i) = γ^(i/R) τ ∑(S_j φ^j, j=0..i)

It is the reflection principle (mirroring answer): every recursive block is validated by mixing entropy, heterodyned side-channel traces, and witness proof stored in RAW NAND.


---

Episode 1 — Antecedent (Power Baseline)

Tools: STM32/Arduino/FPGA board (<5 W), USB 5V supply, 0.1 Ω shunt, multimeter.

Action: Place shunt → boot board → record idle & active shunt voltage.

Output: meta.json (V, I, baseline).

Budget: $40 (board + shunt + DMM).



---

Episode 2 — Trace Capture (Side-Channel Window)

Tools: ≥100 MS/s oscilloscope, GPIO trigger, 10× probe.

Action: Toggle GPIO before/after one crypto op, capture 1k–10k traces.

Output: trace.csv (time_ns, voltage_mV).

Budget: $200–500 (oscilloscope).



---

Episode 3 — Heterodyning (Frequency Down-Mix)

Tools: 2 cm loop probe, NE602/AD633 mixer, LO at 122/166 kHz, LPF 25 kHz, SDR/sound card.

Action: Capture EM noise, down-mix to ~22 kHz IF, record 10–60 s WAV.

Output: heterodyne.wav + spectrogram.

Budget: $50 (probe + mixer + SDR).



Episode 4 — Entropy Core Integration

Tools: Quside Entropy Core + QSC01 Cipher.

Action: Harvest 256–1024 byte entropy, verify with NIST STS/Dieharder.

Output: entropy.bin, entropy_report.txt.

Budget: $200–300.




Episode 5 — Software Digest (SAI256)

Extend digest in C++:

BigInt load_external_entropy(const string&);
BigInt mix_entropy(const BigInt&, const BigInt&);

Modify digest_stream() → call mix_entropy() with external entropy + heterodyned bytes.

Run scenarios:

A: baseline (no entropy)

B: entropy only

C: entropy + heterodyned trace


Output: digests.log (hex digest + timestamp + seed + entropy hash).




Episode 6 — RAW NAND Witness (TC58NVG0S3E)

Device: Toshiba TC58NVG0S3E (2 KiB page + 64 B spare).

Binary Format (per page):

0x00..0x03   Magic "SAI"
0x04..0x07   Version
0x08..0x0B   Block ID
0x0C..0x1F   Proposer pubkey hash
0x20..0x27   Timestamp
0x28..0x3F   F(i) value
0x40..0x7F   A_n, C_fixed params
0x80..0x8F   Entropy hash
0x90..0x9F   Heterodyne hash
0xA0..0xAF   Trace hash
0xB0..0xB3   Sample length
0xB4..0x7FF  Sample bytes (≤1.8 KB)
0x800..0x803 CRC32 checksum

Action: Write every candidate block witness as immutable proof.

Output: nand_witness.bin.

Budget: $15–20 (chip + programmer).



Episode 7 — Blockrecursive Consensus

Rule: Each block links to:

Linear parent (previous block).

Recursive parent (validated block j, not necessarily j=i-1).


Nonce: Recursive nonce finalizes block once F(i) aligns with witness proof.

Substance: Verified entropy + hetero + trace stored in NAND = substance link.

Result: DAG-like ledger, resistant to malicious forks.

Metaphor: “Malicious node denied like a sword splitting water.”



Episode 8 — Finalization

Collect outputs:

meta.json, trace.csv, heterodyne.wav, entropy.bin, nand_witness.bin, digests.log.


Validate pipeline:

Antecedent → Trace → Heterodyning → Entropy → Digest → NAND → Blockrecursive → Final.


Proof: End-to-end demonstration of Syamailcoin’s consensus.



Costs (Approx.)

Hardware baseline: $40–50

Oscilloscope: $200–500

Heterodyning setup: $50

Quside Entropy Core + Cipher: $200–300

NAND chip + programmer: $20

Total: $500–900 for complete lab-grade setup.




Implementation Paths

Option 2 — C++ Skeleton Repo

Structure:

/include/FCalculator.h
/include/NANDDriver.h
/include/ConsensusNode.h
/src/main.cpp
/tests/

Focus: consensus logic, recursive linking, validator rules.

Value: Long-term foundation.


Option 3 — C Witness Utility

Tool: syamail_witness (single C file).

Input: JSON → block_id, F(i), entropy_hash, hetero_hash, trace_ref, sample.

Output: nand_witness.bin (2048 bytes, CRC32 validated).

Value: Short-term demo, fast proof.


How “Blocks are connected with substances” works

1. Entropy (Quside), Heterodyned trace (WAV), and power traces (CSV) → become substance proofs.


2. These are hashed and written into NAND pages.


3. Recursive block consensus requires:

Parent block hash valid, AND

Substance proof in NAND matches expected F(i).

4. Malicious nodes lacking valid NAND proof cannot extend chain.

[Farrel Al Feshal]

Syamailcoin — Pipeline Summary

Episode 1 — Power Baseline

Main: capture_power()
Sub: setup_board(), measure_idle(), measure_active(), save_meta()
Purpose: Record baseline current to normalize side-channel traces.


---

Episode 2 — Trace Capture

Main: capture_trace()
Sub: setup_trigger(), record_traces(), export_csv()
Purpose: Capture side-channel voltage traces for entropy and validation.


---

Episode 3 — Heterodyning

Main: heterodyne_trace()
Sub: capture_em_noise(), down_mix_signal(), apply_lpf(), save_wave()
Purpose: Convert EM noise to recordable frequency, add to entropy pool.


---

Episode 4 — Entropy Core

Main: get_entropy()
Sub: read_entropy(), validate_entropy(), save_entropy()
Purpose: Generate hardware random bytes for digest and consensus.


---

Episode 5 — Software Digest (SAI256)

Main: digest_stream()
Sub: load_external_entropy(), load_traces(), mix_entropy(), compute_digest(), log_digest()
Purpose: Combine all entropy sources to compute F(i) for block validation.


---

Episode 6 — RAW NAND Witness

Main: write_nand_witness()
Sub: prepare_nand_page(), hash_substance(), write_samples(), compute_crc(), save_nand_bin()
Purpose: Store immutable proof of block, including all entropy hashes.


---

Episode 7 — Blockrecursive Consensus

Main: validate_block()
Sub: verify_parent_hash(), verify_recursive_parent(), verify_substance_proof(), update_ledger()
Purpose: Verify block integrity recursively and update DAG ledger.


---

Episode 8 — Finalization

Main: finalize_pipeline()
Sub: collect_outputs(), verify_pipeline(), generate_report()
Purpose: End-to-end verification of the entire pipeline for demo/deployment.


---

Flow:

Power Baseline → Trace Capture → Heterodyning → Entropy Core → Software Digest → NAND Witness → Blockrecursive Consensus → Finalization

Key Idea:
Physical signals + entropy → digested → stored in NAND → recursive block consensus → DAG ledger resistant to malicious nodes.


Do Your Own Research

[Farrel Al Feshal]

Episode 1 — Antecedent (Power Baseline)

Who

Question: Who measures the board power baseline?

Answer: The programmer or lab engineer handling the board.


When

1. When is the baseline measured? → Before crypto operations run.


2. When must the board be stable? → When idle and after booting.


3. When is the baseline recorded? → After measurement, stored in meta.json.


4. When is it used? → During trace normalization for F(i).



Why

1. Why measure idle and active power? → To distinguish real operation from noise.


2. Why is baseline important for F(i)? → It normalizes trace input for digest calculation.


3. Why store it in meta.json? → To make it accessible to the digest software.


4. Why use STM32/Arduino? → Cheap, low-power, easy to instrument.


5. Why use a 0.1 Ω shunt? → Minimal resistance ensures accurate current measurement.


6. Why baseline is essential? → Trace comparison without reference is ambiguous.


7. Why before trace capture? → To correct for power fluctuations.



How

1. How to measure? → Install shunt, measure V/I, store in meta.json.


2. How is data used? → Normalize side-channel traces before F(i) computation.


3. How to ensure accuracy? → Boot board, stabilize, repeat measurement.



Where

In the lab, on dev board setup.


What

1. What is measured? → Voltage and current.


2. What is the output? → meta.json file.




---

Episode 2 — Trace Capture (Side-Channel Window)

Who

Who captures side-channel traces? → Programmer/hardware engineer.


When

1. When is GPIO trigger active? → Before crypto operations.


2. When is the trace captured? → During the crypto operation.


3. When is trace saved? → After capture completes.


4. When is it used? → During digest computation.



Why

1. Why capture traces? → Adds physical entropy to F(i).


2. Why ≥100 MS/s oscilloscope? → Capture sufficient side-channel detail.


3. Why 1k–10k traces? → Statistical validity.


4. Why use GPIO trigger? → Synchronize capture precisely.


5. Why save as CSV? → Easily read and processed by software.


6. Why traces make F(i) unique? → Each trace differs per operation.


7. Why trace is proof of the block? → Links block to real activity.



How

1. How is probe connected? → To specific board pins.


2. How does GPIO trigger work? → Pin high/low toggled during crypto op.


3. How is trace exported to CSV? → Oscilloscope export function.



Where

Lab, dev board setup.


What

1. What is captured? → Voltage/current side-channel signal.


2. What is the output? → trace.csv.




---

Episode 3 — Heterodyning (Frequency Down-Mix)

Who

Who captures EM noise? → Programmer/security engineer.


When

1. When is heterodyning active? → During crypto operation producing EM signals.


2. When is LO/mixer used? → During EM signal down-mixing.


3. When is WAV saved? → After IF signal is recorded.


4. When is heterodyned data used? → During digest computation.



Why

1. Why heterodyning? → Adds extra physical entropy, impossible to fake via software.


2. Why LPF 25 kHz? → Clean up IF signal.


3. Why LO 122/166 kHz? → Matches EM frequency range of the board.


4. Why save WAV? → Processable by software digest.


5. Why combine with other entropy? → F(i) becomes stronger and unique.


6. Why heterodyned trace for NAND? → Part of the physical block proof.


7. Why important for Syamailcoin security? → Links block to real physical events.



How

1. How is EM noise captured? → Using loop probe.


2. How is down-mixing done? → Mixer + LO → IF ~22 kHz.


3. How is WAV created? → LPF → record IF signal.



Where

Near board + SDR/loop probe setup.


What

1. What is the output? → heterodyne.wav.


2. What is its purpose? → Provide physical entropy for F(i).




---

Episode 4 — Entropy Core Integration

Who

Who collects entropy? → Programmer/crypto engineer using Quside Core.


When

1. When is entropy collected? → Before digest computation.


2. When is validation done? → After collecting entropy.


3. When is it saved? → After validation completes.


4. When is it used? → During digest F(i) calculation.



Why

1. Why hardware entropy? → More secure than software PRNG.


2. Why NIST STS/Dieharder tests? → Validate randomness quality.


3. Why 256–1024 bytes? → Enough for F(i) and block proof.


4. Why stored separately? → Easy access, reproducible.


5. Why important for F(i)? → Ensures unpredictable block value.


6. Why without entropy is block easy to forge? → Software alone can mimic.


7. Why helps resist malicious nodes? → Every block is unique.



How

1. How is entropy read? → Quside Core API.


2. How is it tested? → NIST STS / Dieharder.


3. How is it stored? → entropy.bin.



Where

On the Quside Entropy Core.


What

1. What is output? → 256–1024 bytes of entropy.


2. What file? → entropy.bin.




---

Episode 5 — Software Digest (SAI256)

Who

Who computes the digest? → Programmer in C++ repo.


When

1. When is digest run? → After all entropy is ready.


2. When is trace/heterodyned data included? → During digest computation.


3. When is it logged? → After F(i) is computed.


4. When is F(i) used for NAND? → After digest finishes.



Why

1. Why is F(i) unique? → Ties entropy + trace.


2. Why SAI256? → Secure, deterministic.


3. Why log digest? → Audit and debugging.


4. Why 3 scenarios (baseline/entropy-only/full)? → For testing.


5. Why record timestamp? → Track block order.


6. Why F(i) basis for NAND? → Physical block proof.


7. Why combine all entropy? → Make block difficult to forge.



How

1. How are data combined? → mix_entropy() function.


2. How is digest calculated? → SAI256 → BigInt → F(i).


3. How is logged? → digests.log.



Where

C++ dev environment.


What

1. What is mixed? → Entropy + trace + heterodyned data.


2. What is output? → F(i) + digests.log.




---

Episode 6 — RAW NAND Witness (TC58NVG0S3E)

Who

Who writes NAND? → Programmer/embedded engineer.


When

1. When is NAND created? → After digest finishes.


2. When are hash & sample written? → When page prepared.


3. When is CRC32 calculated? → After sample written.


4. When is it used for validation? → During blockrecursive consensus.



Why

1. Why RAW NAND? → Immutable, tamper-resistant storage.


2. Why TC58NVG0S3E? → 2 KiB page size fits block.


3. Why store F(i), entropy, heterodyned? → Complete block proof.


4. Why CRC32? → Ensure integrity.


5. Why as primary block proof? → Malicious nodes cannot forge.


6. Why without NAND consensus fails? → No physical proof.


7. Why Blockrecursive used? → Ledger ties all previous blocks securely.



How

1. How is page prepared? → Magic, block ID, hashes, sample.


2. How is sample/hash written? → NAND programmer.


3. How is CRC32 verified? → Checksum validation before accept.



Where

On NAND chip + programmer.


What

1. What is in the page? → F(i), entropy, heterodyned trace, CRC32.


2. What file output? → nand_witness.bin.




---

Episode 7 — Blockrecursive Consensus

Who

Who runs consensus? → Ledger nodes / programmers.


When

1. When is linear parent verified? → When new block received.


2. When is recursive parent verified? → After linear parent validation.


3. When is malicious node denied? → If NAND/F(i) proof invalid.


4. When is ledger updated? → Only if all proofs valid.



Why

1. Why use Blockrecursive? → Ledger resists forks, links each block to all previous valid blocks.


2. Why check F(i) + NAND proof? → Ensure block authenticity.


3. Why DAG structure? → Flexible, tamper-resistant.


4. Why use substance proof? → Bind software + hardware evidence.


5. Why deny malicious nodes? → They lack valid NAND proof.


6. Why recursive in all blocks? → Ledger-wide consistency.


7. Why Blockrecursive crucial for Syamailcoin? → Combines all entropy & physical proof.



How

1. How does recursive work per block? → Check linear parent → check all recursive parents → validate F(i) + NAND witness.


2. How is malicious node denied? → Blocks missing NAND/F(i) mismatch rejected → cannot extend DAG.


3. How ledger updated? → Only valid blocks enter DAG.



Where

Node ledger / DAG software environment.


What

What is verified? → F(i) + NAND proof + parent hashes.

What is the result? → DAG ledger with valid blocks only.



---

Episode 8 — Finalization

Who

Who finalizes pipeline? → Programmer / dev team.


When

1. When all blocks verified? → At pipeline end.


2. When are outputs collected? → After last block processed.


3. When is final report created? → After verification completes.


4. When demo/deployment ready? → Once files verified.



Why

1. Why finalize pipeline? → Ensure end-to-end completeness.


2. Why collect all outputs? → Audit and reproducibility.


3. Why check integrity? → Prevent errors before deployment.


4. Why document entire flow? → Official pipeline record.


5. Why validation critical? → Confirm all episodes link.


6. Why finalization secures Syamailcoin? → Guarantees all block proofs valid.


7. Why necessary for demo? → Demonstrates full consensus process.



How

1. How to finalize? → Collect files (meta.json, trace.csv, heterodyne.wav, entropy.bin, digests.log, nand_witness.bin).


2. How to verify consistency? → Cross-check F(i), traces, NAND pages.


3. How report created? → Generate audit & log summary.



Where

Software/demo environment.


What

1. What files are collected? → All outputs from pipeline.


2. What is final result? → Fully validated Syamailcoin pipeline ready for demo or deployment.