Parlays vs straight bets

[DPHOR]

No matter what strategies we deploys while gambling we should first believe that winning is never determined by those strategies rather a chance based stuff, so even though these strategies would increase our chance of winning it would only boost it to around 20 percent, which is still very low. There are people who may decides to bet on parlay bet and still win if they are that careful with their predictions, while there are people who could still bet on single bet and still win, the whole depends on individuals analysis and predictions.

[Kelward]

I can do parleys or straight bets depending on what I feel like at anytime I want to bet, I'm not a serious gambler who is so keen on making money from it. But my preference among the two would be parley, I don't mind waiting for all the games to play out, I like to endure and test my luck. It's part of the thrill and fun for me and if my luck stretches far I like to consider cash out or to see the games through to the end. No rigidity for me when it comes to gambling because I  don't depend on it to get rich, most bettors who do ends up being addicted and that is a lesson for me.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

So here’s my question to everyone, especially those who really understand sports betting and have been playing it regularly: Do you find more value in parlays or in straight bets?

I find more value in parlays, but when it comes to parlays, they are of two types, the one made up of very few games and the long parlay made up of many games. Whenever I want to increase my chances of winning to a great extent, I go for maximum of 5 games and increase my stake a bit.

Those fewer games give me more confidence as compared to longer parlays. Straight bets are good but the lack of multipliers in it makes me involve more capital in its staking and it uses up my gambling budget too soon which makes me avoid it

[rdluffy]

Most of my bets are simple, on a team's victory, but I also usually make parlays when the situation allows
In the Portuguese league, for example, where there is a high consistency of victories for the three main teams, I make parlays and they usually work out well
In the Brazilian league, for example, it is much more difficult to get 2, 3, or more bets right to make this multiple
So it depends a lot; I use both types of bets

Sometimes, just for fun  , I do some very "extreme" parlay hehehe, something to give 50x or 100x hahaha, but knowing that it is an extremely unlikely chance, as I said, just for fun

[Charles-Tim]

Almost all those who understand sports betting and see it as a way to make some profit from time to time usually go for straight bets, because the risk involved is not as high as with parlay bets so the chances of winning is less compared to parlay method of betting. honestly, it usually takes me a long time before I experience a win.

You are right but people should still be very careful. If someone is betting frequently and go for betting on a single match, betting frequently can still make such person to be losing. I prefer single bet but l am not betting frequently. Although, most important, I am using the amount of money that I can afford to lose.

[AVE5]

I believe straight bets can actually be a profitable strategy in the long run. Most professional sports bettors don’t promote parlays, because to them it’s just a waste of money as the percentage of winning is way too low. If we’re talking long term, it’s all about consistency, while parlays are mostly just about luck.

That's true, if we're emphasizing on being successful in the long term, taking the winning on the gradual with lower risks on straight bets would enhance our probability position of success in the long term but parlay may be disruptive because you'll have a lot to work on and when some few games in the parlay has been won, it the rest of it can be troubling because sport bets can not be guaranteed which is why some bettors have to react on cashing out even while the games hasn't ended because heartfelt outcomes that can be disrupt the winning is always there.

[Findingnemo]

~
You're right, parlay has a big risk, and we have seen threads about complaining or at least they just want to vent their frustrations of like winning 9 out 10 and then thought that they are going to win that huge odds but suddenly, the last game as a disaster and it ruined their bet. I also haven't had a good percentage win on parlay, even 3-4 or very hard to hit as there will be one game that will rekt you out. So it's better to just go for singles, maybe you can hit a incredible run in days just betting on one game at a time and then winning it even if the odds is not that big. Maybe in accumulation, it will be different for us.

The only downside with the single bet is it needs more deposits if they want to bet on multiple games or go with smaller bet that potentially reduce the winning amount if they are in hot streak while in parlay they may have chance to make their bet amount into like 20x is possible but needs more luck that just winning a single bet.

So it all depends on the individual preference and what they want to risk and my only tip will be play responsibily.

[Wapfika]

So here’s my question to everyone, especially those who really understand sports betting and have been playing it regularly: Do you find more value in parlays or in straight bets?

Obviously parlay is more valuable than straight bet since it increase the odds on each successful win compared to straight bet but the challenge is you need to have winning streak in able to have benefits on parlay or else it’s a disaster.

Parlay is much better if you have multiple high confidence bet because you can earn big by just risking the same amount on multiple bet.

Straight bet is perfect if you don’t want to rely on 100% accurate bet is the safest route on sports betting.

[Japinat]

I believe straight bets can actually be a profitable strategy in the long run. Most professional sports bettors don’t promote parlays, because to them it’s just a waste of money as the percentage of winning is way too low. If we’re talking long term, it’s all about consistency, while parlays are mostly just about luck.

That's true, if we're emphasizing on being successful in the long term, taking the winning on the gradual with lower risks on straight bets would enhance our probability position of success in the long term but parlay may be disruptive because you'll have a lot to work on and when some few games in the parlay has been won, it the rest of it can be troubling because sport bets can not be guaranteed which is why some bettors have to react on cashing out even while the games hasn't ended because heartfelt outcomes that can be disrupt the winning is always there.

Cashing out is just one feature of the casino, but that’s only a small part of it. What we’re really talking about here is long-term profitability. And that means a series of bets, not just one or two.

When we say long-term, it’s over months or even a year (depending on how long the league runs before the season ends). After that span of time, you can clearly see if you’re successful or no, just by looking at whether your bankroll grew or dropped.

[Cointxz]

I always do parlay bet by combining low odds bet mostly below 1.5 odds until the combined odds is over 2.0. I have much better profitability on doing this method rather than straight bet on each odds since 1 lose bet will wipe out 100% of my bet while my profit is just small when bet win.

At least on parlay bet you have higher profit by relying only on combined small odds.

[Altryist]

I always do parlay bet by combining low odds bet mostly below 1.5 odds until the combined odds is over 2.0. I have much better profitability on doing this method rather than straight bet on each odds since 1 lose bet will wipe out 100% of my bet while my profit is just small when bet win.

At least on parlay bet you have higher profit by relying only on combined small odds.

I always make sure that the odds in my bets are not lower than 2, this works well for me. And it does not matter to me whether it is a single bet or a parlay, the most important thing is to adhere to the odds criterion. But this approach will only work if you win more bets than you lose, everything is simple and clear for everyone. More often I bet a parlay to achieve such a coefficient, but I am also in no hurry to play too high odds, maybe even because I have already gotten used to this order and do not try to change anything.

[hyudien]

Coming back to each bettor's perspective and expertise, both parlays and straight bets can provide value if you are good at analyzing. I personally prefer parlay bets, not that I'm an expert, but I just want more adrenaline when betting. Usually, 3 to 4 matches per week are enough with the small capital I can afford. But of course, in the long run, straight bets provide more opportunities, and indeed, most professional gamblers usually focus on straight bets or moneylines.

[Slow death]

In my opinion, people should choose to bet on the market they like or the option they like, because at the end of the day, both options will result in losses. So, at least in a parlay, if someone wins, they win a lot. Of course, there is a lot of risk in a parlay, but it can be minimized if the person knows what they are doing. It all depends on each person's strategy.

For example, there are people who bet on a parlay with 25 games, which is insane. They manage to get all 25 games right, and even when they lose, they get more than 15 games right. I even advised such people that they could only bet 15 games, thus increasing their chances of winning, but they refused. I understand that each person uses the strategy they think is best.

[Agbamoni]

I am part of the people that says straights bet will make your profitable in the long term, if you keep consistently betting on well analyzed games. Of course you will lose a few but in the long term you will be profitable.

When you bet on parlays, trust me it increases you to risk. I dont like that, unless I want to take advantage of the bonus using high odds.

[rachael9385]

I was just thinking of starting a discussion about this to see how everyone views the difference when it comes to winning value. Some say parlays are just for fun and flashy payouts, while others argue that straight bets are the only way to stay profitable long term.

So here’s my question to everyone, especially those who really understand sports betting and have been playing it regularly: Do you find more value in parlays or in straight bets?

Of course, newbies can still butt in - sometimes fresh perspectives are interesting.
Let’s see how knowledgeable everyone is and maybe we can all learn something from different experiences.

Winning straight bets are way easier than winning from parlays, although there are no guarantees to this. There are people that might claim to make more profit from parlays than straight games. But we all know that that more you combine a lot of games the chances of winning reduces. Strategic bettors that plays straight games mostly play singles but the only down side to this is that you must stake hight to get a good value

[OgNasty]

Parlays have advantages besides just bigger payouts when you win. If your casino offers the ability to close out a bet early l then you are able to sometimes profit from your parlay bet before you see it head south. This gives gamblers more options and more opportunities to use their “skills” to avoid losses and realize profits.

[Churchillvv]

Straight bets on high stakes and parlay on low stakes but to win higher, but in matter of preference straight bet is most preferred but I’m not your favorite kind of bettor, I like parlay no matter how long it takes, if you ever hit one it covers a lot of your straight bet losses.

parlay consumes times, either for the outcome as games do not play once or time used in arranging the potential winning, so most guys will say straight games but in reality they like parlay or use parlay most.

[terrific]

I was just thinking of starting a discussion about this to see how everyone views the difference when it comes to winning value. Some say parlays are just for fun and flashy payouts, while others argue that straight bets are the only way to stay profitable long term.

So here’s my question to everyone, especially those who really understand sports betting and have been playing it regularly: Do you find more value in parlays or in straight bets?

Of course, newbies can still butt in - sometimes fresh perspectives are interesting.
Let’s see how knowledgeable everyone is and maybe we can all learn something from different experiences.

There is more value in parlays but I am avoiding it. Because I'm not good with group of bets and only one loss there, you're out.
While in straight bets, it won't affect your other bets if you ever have them. But the odds aren't that way higher if added altogether.
So compared to parlay bets, it's a choice of those who have more knowledge to the sports that they are betting.
But if someone who just wants to casually have fun and have hope of getting some profits, straight bets are way to go.

[DaNNy001]

Indeed, parlays are basically for fun and flashy payouts that are really hard to get...winning from parlays isnt really that easy compared to straight bets...sometimes straight bets are always of high value so there might be no need combine too many games, just a single game can end up giving you enough profit...parlays on the other hand can be ruined by just a single game out of the numerous ones on the bet slip

[Hispo]

I was just thinking of starting a discussion about this to see how everyone views the difference when it comes to winning value. Some say parlays are just for fun and flashy payouts, while others argue that straight bets are the only way to stay profitable long term.

So here’s my question to everyone, especially those who really understand sports betting and have been playing it regularly: Do you find more value in parlays or in straight bets?

Of course, newbies can still butt in - sometimes fresh perspectives are interesting.
Let’s see how knowledgeable everyone is and maybe we can all learn something from different experiences.

To me it is better to stay stuck to straight bets and avoid parlays, of one is actually seeking to get profit and become somewhat consistent within the world of sport betting, which is something difficult and only a few people manage to do it.
Parlays are okey if one is mainly betting for fun and just wants to feel adrenaline in one's blood, the thrill of the chance of winning big is worth it for the money one could throw away.

To me, betting in parlays are reminiscents to playing slots, very low chances of winning but extra exciting as one gets closer to score big.