Finestel: API-Trading SaaS for Crypto & FX Asset Managers & Pro Traders

[Finestel]

Overview
Finestel.com is a new enterprise-grade SaaS platform designed for professional traders, asset management teams, and individual investors, offering tools to streamline cryptocurrency trading and portfolio management. It integrates with major exchanges like Binance, Bybit, KuCoin, OKX, Gate, Bitget, Mexc, Coinbase, and Binance US, with plans to support Kraken, Bitfinex, and Forex markets via MT4/MT5 by 2026. Below is an overview of its key features and how it can support traders and asset managers in the crypto space.

Key Features:

Advanced Trading Automation: Finestel provides Copy Trading Software (Trade Copier), TradingView Bot, Signal Bot, and Telegram Bot, enabling automated strategies across all supported exchanges. These tools support bulk order execution, ideal for high-volume trading portfolios. 

Unified Trading Terminal: A powerful terminal offers real-time portfolio tracking, risk management, and multi-exchange account management via secure, non-custodial API trading, achieving sub-0.5-second order execution and 99.9% uptime. 

White-Labeled Solutions: Finestel allows asset management teams to create branded private funds or social trading platforms with customizable dashboards, automated billing, and integrated affiliate/MLM software for client management and growth. 

Portfolio Tracker & Comprehensive Analytics: Real-time P&L, drawdown, and performance charts provide actionable insights, accessible across exchange accounts. 

Customizable Billing: Flexible subscription or performance-based billing models (daily, weekly, or monthly) tailored to specific strategies or traders. 
Private Strategy Marketplace: Connects traders with platform owners to share proven strategies, expanding AUM and client options. 

Custom Development: Finestel offers enterprise clients tailored features, services, or bespoke trading bots to meet unique business needs.

Benefits for Traders and Asset Managers
Finestel simplifies multi-exchange trading with API-driven tools, reducing operational complexity for high-volume traders. Its white-labeled investment apps enable asset managers to launch branded platforms, boosting client engagement. The platform’s reliability (99.9% uptime) and 24/7 support ensure consistent performance. Planned Forex and MT4/MT5 integrations by 2026 will broaden its applicability. According to Finestel’s data, asset managers using the platform have achieved significant ROI and Profits, with firms reporting $297K margins on $15M-$20M AUM since January 2025.

Community Discussion
This topic aims to introduce Finestel to the Bitcointalk community. What are your thoughts on Finestel's features, like trade copier, bulk order execution, or white-labeled investment web-app/social trading? Are there specific tools you’d like to see in a platform like this?
If you have heard of Finestel before, we'd be happy to hear about your story and about your experience with Finestel. We also intend to announce our updates here as well if the community find it helpful.

For more details, visit Finestel.com Let’s discuss how such tools can enhance trading strategies or asset management workflows!Note: This is not a promotional ad but an introduction to foster discussion. All feedback is welcome to explore how Finestel fits into the crypto trading ecosystem.

[BattleDog]

Interesting pitch. On paper Finstel looks like another "pro stack" bundling a trade copier, multi-exchange terminal, copy/social features and white-label apps. That can be useful for desks that live inside API rate limits all day and don't want to duct-tape 6 dashboards together. A few things I'd want to see before trusting it with real flow:

You say non-custodial via API -- good -- but do you support IP allow-lists, key scopes, per-role API segregation and read-only by default? What is your blast radius if a bot token is compromised?
"Sub-0.5s order execution" across Binance/OKX/Bybit is highly path/exchange dependent.

Copy-trading and branded social Platforms are regulatory minefields in many jurisdictions. What is your stance on licensing and registrations and how do you prevent things like slippage games?

Do you have 3rd-party security review, pen-test summary, SOC2/ISO 27001 roadmap? Supply-chain controls for your bots and web extensions?

Performance-based is attractive, but in my opinion fee drag kills edge. Clear, capped pricing is better for pros.

If you can publish hard numbers (latency histograms, exchange uptime, failure modes) and a security whitepaper, you'll get more serious teams to kick the tires. Until then, I'd treat it as promising but "trust, then verify" -- start read-only, paper trade, then canary with tiny size.

[monoruz]

Finestel’s white-label platform is a lifesaver for presenting a professional front to my clients. Their custom development for managing client accounts is top-notch—I can set up unique strategies without the headache of manual tracking or juggling exchange logins. Before, I was drowning in spreadsheets and disjointed tools. My direct agent Alex has beem super responsive, which is critical during market swings. That said, I’m waiting for a trading terminal to simplify execution and maybe MT5 integration for broader trading options. More exchanges like Bitfinex would be nice too.

[Finestel]

Interesting pitch. On paper Finstel looks like another "pro stack" bundling a trade copier, multi-exchange terminal, copy/social features and white-label apps. That can be useful for desks that live inside API rate limits all day and don't want to duct-tape 6 dashboards together. A few things I'd want to see before trusting it with real flow:

You say non-custodial via API -- good -- but do you support IP allow-lists, key scopes, per-role API segregation and read-only by default? What is your blast radius if a bot token is compromised?
"Sub-0.5s order execution" across Binance/OKX/Bybit is highly path/exchange dependent.

Copy-trading and branded social Platforms are regulatory minefields in many jurisdictions. What is your stance on licensing and registrations and how do you prevent things like slippage games?

Do you have 3rd-party security review, pen-test summary, SOC2/ISO 27001 roadmap? Supply-chain controls for your bots and web extensions?

Performance-based is attractive, but in my opinion fee drag kills edge. Clear, capped pricing is better for pros.

If you can publish hard numbers (latency histograms, exchange uptime, failure modes) and a security whitepaper, you'll get more serious teams to kick the tires. Until then, I'd treat it as promising but "trust, then verify" -- start read-only, paper trade, then canary with tiny size.

Your insights are very accurate and clearly show your experience in this area. I’ve addressed each of your questions below:

1. IP Whitelisting & API Permissions
We will provide the IPs that need to be whitelisted for each API key.
If an account does not use services that require trade execution (such as becoming a master account or using the portfolio-tracking service), read-only permission is enough—unless they specifically need trading permission.
The 0.5-second figure refers to the slowest order execution time, including all processing and network delays, in 99.9% of cases.

2. Please note that copy trading is offered as a service, not a standalone platform.
At the individual level, traders only copy their own accounts; there are no publicly available strategies.
At the enterprise level, Finestel only provides the technical infrastructure. Enterprises operate under their own company, brand and license through a white-label setup.

3. Finestel is audited by third-party firms, and we are preparing a dedicated landing page to publish all audit updates. We will share the link once the page is ready.

4. There are multiple pricing models available; performance-based pricing is just one of the options.

5. Thank you for the helpful feedback. Building trust is one of the most important factors in this market, and we are continuously adding more transparency and verified statistics.

[Myleschetty]

Interesting overview. On paper, this looks like a consolidated execution stack rather than a retail trading product, which is usually what desks look for once they’re tired of stitching tools together.

Before trusting it with real flow, a few execution level things I would want clarity on:

Can a trading team without an asset management license use this purely as software and execution tooling, or does client facing usage depend on regulatory frameworks like MiCA or VARA?

[tobi4255]

White label appears to run as a managed runtime rather than a simple UI layer.

Is each white label instance deployed with isolated API pools, billing engines, and strategy namespaces or is it shared infrastructure with logical separation?

want to also know if pricing scale on AUM, active copier instances or total execution throughput across the white label runtime?

[Wakate]

It seems your service is only meant for professional traders alone and this is what I've read from your description.
I know exchanges have their own copy trading bots users can use on their platforms and I will need to be convinced on how using the Finestel copy trading bot could be much reliable in this current bear market.

I have gone through your website before now and I've seen your comprehensive thread on the service board about a well detailed services your company offers. You know this space is very competitive and what new users would like to see is high profits from their trades if they would have to switch to your product. How reliable can users be profitable using your seevice if I may ask?

[Joy- maker]

I can see that Finestel looks like a serious enterprise learning cryptocurrency trading infrastructure platform, not a casual retail toy.

And the future set you have outlined so far which are: multi exchange API trading automation, white labelling, billing, and analytics. All put together in the same category as platform, like Bitsgap, 3Commas, Kryll, and CTrading style ecosystems. But with the look of things, Finestel stands out to be different from all the platforms I just mentioned, why because it is with a strong asset manager/fund operator Angle. And if that is the case, then it is a legit value proposition for professional traders and for small mid AUM managers, according to how I am seeing things from my own perspective.

[Finestel]

Interesting overview. On paper, this looks like a consolidated execution stack rather than a retail trading product, which is usually what desks look for once they’re tired of stitching tools together.

Before trusting it with real flow, a few execution level things I would want clarity on:

Can a trading team without an asset management license use this purely as software and execution tooling, or does client-facing usage depend on regulatory frameworks like MiCA or VARA?

Hello, thanks. Finestel is professional software with a wide toolkit (unified terminal, bots, portfolio tracking, white-label dashboards, automated billing/reporting/onboarding, etc.), not just an execution stack.
To your questions: Yes, anyone can set up and use Finestel's services, no license required at all. If you and your clients have exchange accounts, so you can use our software.
BTW, depending on the jurisdiction and the level of the business you want to run with Finestel, you might need some asset management licenses (not to work with our software) but to do real "asset management" for clients. Anyways, there are lots of clients of ours using the software for their business without a license without any problem.

Connect the exchanges APIs, trade normally, and use the platform's tools (bots, replication, terminal, etc.) for managing a few to multiple accounts of you and your clients at the same time, using any of our services. No regulatory approval is needed to get started.

[Myleschetty]

... Connect the exchanges APIs, trade normally, and use the platform's tools (bots, replication, terminal, etc.) for managing a few to multiple accounts of you and your clients at the same time, using any of our services. No regulatory approval is needed to get started.

Thanks for sharing the details, it’s helpful to see this laid out properly. On the white label side, I'm curious how flexible it really is beyond branding. Also I think white label can mean very different things depending on the platform.

[Finestel]

White label appears to run as a managed runtime rather than a simple UI layer.

Is each white label instance deployed with isolated API pools, billing engines, and strategy namespaces or is it shared infrastructure with logical separation?

want to also know if pricing scale on AUM, active copier instances or total execution throughput across the white label runtime?

Hey, thanks for the insightful question.
Finestel operates as a managed SaaS runtime with shared infrastructure and logical separation for white label instances: each is isolated via dedicated namespaces for strategies, security, client data, and customizations (branding, domains, menus), but the billing engines, and core execution are centralized for efficiency & scalability.

BTW, you can take the speed and scalability even higher if you opt for dedicated servers (available on demand for high-volume/enterprise needs).
and here's a clear breakdown of our pricing:
If your AUM (Assets Under Management) or number of connected accounts (including your own + all clients/followers) goes high enough, you get upgraded to Enterprise user status.
The minimum threshold to trigger this is $1M AUM (or 100 connected accounts scale).

Once you hit or exceed that, pricing becomes AUM/#account/feature-based; it increases incrementally as your AUM grows or you add more connected accounts beyond the base limits.
Plus, if you want to activate the full Business Suite (advanced white-label, extra client tools, etc.), there's a one-time setup fee + an additional monthly amount added to your subscription.

For exact thresholds, custom scaling, or your specific numbers, best to reach out directly on Telegram https://t.me/finestel_support_team , we tailor it based on your setup. Check out our pricing page: https://finestel.com/pricing/

[tobi4255]

... For exact thresholds, custom scaling, or your specific numbers, best to reach out directly on Telegram https://t.me/finestel_support_team , we tailor it based on your setup. Check out our pricing page: https://finestel.com/pricing/

How do you handle state reconciliation between websocket streams and REST polling when they disagree? Many platforms look fine until positions drift during volatility or exchange side rejections arrive out of order.

On the copier side, how is allocation fairness handled across followers when liquidity is thin? Is there deterministic sequencing, or does fill quality degrade unpredictably as follower count grows?

For SMA style setups, where does risk enforcement actually live? Pretrade at the execution engine, or post trade via reconciliation and corrective orders? That distinction matters a lot during fast markets.

On white label deployments is tenant isolation backed by separate execution workers and API pools, or shared infrastructure with logical separation only?

sorry for the tons of questions and thank you for earlier reply

[Finestel]

... For exact thresholds, custom scaling, or your specific numbers, best to reach out directly on Telegram https://t.me/finestel_support_team , we tailor it based on your setup. Check out our pricing page: https://finestel.com/pricing/

How do you handle state reconciliation between websocket streams and REST polling when they disagree? Many platforms look fine until positions drift during volatility or exchange side rejections arrive out of order.

On the copier side, how is allocation fairness handled across followers when liquidity is thin? Is there deterministic sequencing, or does fill quality degrade unpredictably as follower count grows?

For SMA style setups, where does risk enforcement actually live? Pretrade at the execution engine, or post trade via reconciliation and corrective orders? That distinction matters a lot during fast markets.

On white label deployments is tenant isolation backed by separate execution workers and API pools, or shared infrastructure with logical separation only?

sorry for the tons of questions and thank you for earlier reply

Thanks folr your highlt technical Qs! Better to to ask these Qs from our support on Telegram: t.me/finestel_support_team so our technical support answer

[tobi4255]

Thanks folr your highlt technical Qs! Better to to ask these Qs from our support on Telegram: t.me/finestel_support_team so our technical support answer

I have few less technical questions, please be so kind to answer them

How well does the platform handle daily operational tasks like adjusting exposure or pausing strategies across selected accounts?

On the asset management side, I assume SMA and white label users care more about structure and oversight.
Is the same system used underneath, just with added layers for client management, or are these almost separate environments?

[Barikui1]

Based on what op wrote and the asset & portfolio management rendered by Finestel, am just curious, do Finestel engage in real time trading with people asset they are managing?
Or they only provide insightful information and opportunities that are available in the market?

Additional, I don't exactly know how long you guys have been in the business but I would be interested to hear of other people's testimonies or opinions on your guys. So I don't know if their is anywhere someone can look at, like where a review of your services is done, so that we all in the community can check and be certain of what to expect while using your service.

And lastly, the unified trading terminal you spoke of, I think you should throw more light on it, is it the Finestel team that will make use of it to manage a customer portfolio or it's the customer that will make use of the informations it provide, pertaining to risk management, portfolio tracking and multi exchange account management?