If single bet is that preferable why people still don't become what they wanted?

[SmartGold01]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

[Charles-Tim]

Who said betting on a single match is reliable? As we say that the money you deposited in a casino is highly likely to be lost, so is the money you deposited on sport betting sites, regardless of the odds that you go for. Only what people can say is that parlay is riskier, but it has its own advantages.

[SmartGold01]

Who said betting on a single match is reliable? As we say that the money you deposited in a casino is highly likely to be lost, so is the money you deposited on sport betting sites, regardless of the odds that you go for. Only what people can say is that parlay is riskier, but it has its own advantages.

I think the area which i found parlay betting interesting is due to higher odds possibility.
Which in turns has been saying that people should go for lower odds bets than going to place bet with 10k=100k odds, which i think the winning could be that difficult for the said gambler to win and over with such volume of odds, so people mostly advised that they should be limiting themselves on the total odds they accumulate while gambling.

[Darker45]

Single bets are generally better than multi-bets basically because you only have to win one in order to win your bet. Whereas, in a parlay, you have to win 2 or more bets to win your bet. That alone explains why single bets are better. The odds further show you that. Parlay gives you considerably higher odds because it's harder to win. The chances are low, risks are high, therefore, rewards are also big.

However, betting on single bets doesn't mean you should be profitable. It's hard to make money in gambling. It's just that it's a lot harder in parlay betting. Placing single bets doesn't guarantee profit. On the contrary, you're even most likely to lose in the long run. It's just that in multi-betting, it's much more possible your bankroll is drained of its last Sat without winning any.

[cryptoaddictchie]

if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Single bets are often recommended because they give you the highest chance of winning compared to parlays, where every added leg multiplies the risk. The downside is that single bets usually bring smaller returns, which is why people don’t just become millionaires from them. On the other hand, parlays attract players with the dream of a big payout from a small stake, but most of the time they fail because the odds are stacked heavily against hitting every outcome.

Just like what Darker45 emphasised on his comment.

[SmartGold01]

if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Single bets are often recommended because they give you the highest chance of winning compared to parlays, where every added leg multiplies the risk. The downside is that single bets usually bring smaller returns, which is why people don’t just become millionaires from them. On the other hand, parlays attract players with the dream of a big payout from a small stake, but most of the time they fail because the odds are stacked heavily against hitting every outcome.

Just like what Darker45 emphasised on his comment.

That is it! people do not know and they want to use little amount to hit jackpot on a particular bet, there's a very high chance of winning with parley but based on their risk index could make them lose focused that is why it is that important for everyone to look at there games study them very well before staking.
It would be good to gradually win money since the odds are usually poor, this means that anyone who is gambling should be coming from our background forum and increase their bet sizes to know how the results would come out for that day/week.

[Nightwatchmare]

Single bet is the safest way to gamble and is more reliable than accumulation bet because there's a big chances your bet would play exactly the way you predict it, but I didn't think plenty gamblers adopt the single bet option when they are gambling because they need to stake with big amount of money in single bet before they can win good amount of money. It seems the gamblers who adopt the single bet use to stake with little amount of money, and that could be the reason why many gamblers haven't become millionaires or even resigned from gambling.

[bitzizzix]

I'm sure all gamblers can place more than one bet if they wish, but I personally don't want to take big risks just to win big. With single bets, I enjoy the thrill of winning or losing, and with small bets, I don't feel stressed or regretful if I lose, because I want to continue enjoying the game and the thrill of watching it.
Don't get hung up on the idea of ​​becoming a millionaire through any form of gambling or betting method, as that can lead to uncontrolled betting. Even with adequate skill and knowledge, luck still plays a significant role in winning. It's better to bet casually and within your means and financial resources. Any bet, if the goal is to have fun in the long run, is fine, and always taking advantage of every win, no matter how small, to enjoy it is a very wise choice.

[junder]

Single bets are generally better than multi-bets basically because you only have to win one in order to win your bet. Whereas, in a parlay, you have to win 2 or more bets to win your bet. That alone explains why single bets are better. The odds further show you that. Parlay gives you considerably higher odds because it's harder to win. The chances are low, risks are high, therefore, rewards are also big.

However, betting on single bets doesn't mean you should be profitable. It's hard to make money in gambling. It's just that it's a lot harder in parlay betting. Placing single bets doesn't guarantee profit. On the contrary, you're even most likely to lose in the long run. It's just that in multi-betting, it's much more possible your bankroll is drained of its last Sat without winning any.

But essentially, the money we deposit into gambling still carries the same high chance of losing, but some people may be lucky enough to achieve profits equal to or greater than their initial investment. Some people may prefer parlays, and even if parlays aren't widely popular, that's understandable because the odds and risks are vastly different, so only the brave enough to try them are willing to do so.
The difference you mentioned about single and double bets is true. The chances of losing are the same, but the way you lose them depends on the speed. With single bets, it might take a while or be a series of bets, while with double bets, you can lose everything instantly.

[GreatArkansas]

It also depends on the size, let's say a single bet, but the size really matters here. Some are also controlling their hands, especially in proper risk management. The longer you can play, the higher the chance you will win and be able to make profits.
There's a lot to consider also in a single bet here, the odds, and also risk tolerance, and consider also the game you are betting, is that a fast-paced game? like a sports game where you need to wait for a long time before you can open a bet again, or you either bet on the loser/winner side?

[Samlucky O]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

although single bet has more chances of wining or moreover its preferable than the multiple stake, but that doesn't mean that the wining is guaranteed. we all knows that gambling is all about luck. and no matter how hard people try to become rich through gambling it is not as easy as we thought even though the single stake offers more chances of wining than the other, the fact is that gambling is all about luck and no matter how we try to make it look like we have a special strategy, it still dont change the fact that its all about luck.

[Questat]

I don’t really get what you’re implying, what do you mean by single bet? Like going all-in with everything you have?

If you mean a straight bet, then yeah, that’s the most reliable approach compared to parlays. But that alone doesn’t guarantee profit as it’s just a betting style. Bankroll management still matters a lot, and most important of all are the skills of the gambler. And honestly, only around 1% of sports bettors (maybe even less) really have that edge.

[bagalkot]

single bet means pure luck or else you should have inside information, then only u can win, but if u really want to win profit then it is best to do trading because in long term trading in gambling  u will be in profit

[Fivestar4everMVP]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

I don't know about others persons but I've always preferred multi bets, that is, parley even though I understand well that is more risky due to it been harder to win because of the multiple games or matches in one ticket.
Speaking of single bet, there is always a better chance of winning a single bet because it's just one game, once played and the result is out and you won, there won't be any other game or match that would be played that could make your ticket become a losing one even after having won the other games, like we normally here people say "ticket cut".

This is one of the reasons why single bets tickets have better chances of winning than multiple bet ticket, but like I said before, I always prefer multi-bet because of the higher multiplier, though winning is a bit harder.

[freedomgo]

Where did you get that idea that it’s preferable or that someone can become a millionaire with just a single bet?

In general, gambling isn’t designed to make us rich. It’s built the opposite way, so the house wins in the long run. Sure, there are gamblers who hit it big, but that’s mostly luck - like landing a huge parlay multiplier.

For those who stick to single bets, the key is consistency. That’s the only way they can stay profitable, and like I said, most people don’t have the skills to win consistently, and that’s why the majority end up losing.

[Zlantann]

That is it! people do not know and they want to use little amount to hit jackpot on a particular bet, there's a very high chance of winning with parley but based on their risk index could make them lose focused that is why it is that important for everyone to look at there games study them very well before staking.
It would be good to gradually win money since the odds are usually poor, this means that anyone who is gambling should be coming from our background forum and increase their bet sizes to know how the results would come out for that day/week.

When I was new in gambling. A single bet was my best option because it is easier to understand, control, and the chances of winning were high. Then I found parlay bet so complex that the simplicity of a single bet attracted me more. So I would say  one of the benefits of a single bet is that it is easy to understand.  But when it comes to winning big in sports betting, single bets are not a good option except you are betting with a substantial amount. Using a small amount to win big is more feasible in parlay betting.

[maydna]

It is because they can't analyze correctly, they may pick the wrong choice. But if they can predict who will win with right, they may have a chance to win. That will depend on what happens in the match because the match can change anytime so they don't have a bigger chance to win. When the match begins, our probability of winning may reduce until the match ends. It is why not many people become millionaires from gambling. Not to mention those who become greedy and want to win more but they lose money.

[giammangiato]

With a single bet, specifically on a soccer match, you won't get what you want; you'll have to invest a very large sum to get a decent return.
A single bet with a very good chance of winning always has low odds, where at best you can double your stake (and it's not always a sure win).
Many prefer single bets, but that doesn't mean you have a guaranteed win; in gambling, there are no certainties, only possibilities.

[qwertyup23]

Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

I think this claim is somehow far-fetched and overly stated. Some claimed that single betting is preferable given that it lessens more risks on your part. But no way does it guarantee any absolute result or winnings on a person. If that were the case, then everyone would be a millionaire thus making gambling businesses
unprofitable.

single bet means pure luck or else you should have inside information, then only u can win, but if u really want to win profit then it is best to do trading because in long term trading in gambling  u will be in profit

I also agree with your statement.

A single bet can only be reliable if you have inside information in sports-betting. Additionally, it can also guarantee an absolute positive result if matches are fixed.

[Yamifoud]

Well, it is recommended, but it doesn't mean it is reliable. Some gamblers also say that multi-bets give them a better chance. Whatever strategy we used, none of them ensured winning. Even if we say that a single bet has higher odds of winning, nothing could prove it.

So I say that to choose the strategy we believe will work for us or at least give us a chance to win. If others win using multiple bets, they were just lucky, and the same thing happens to those who choose a single bet.