If single bet is that preferable why people still don't become what they wanted?

[Findingnemo]

Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

In comparison with parlay, a single bet where you will likely to win more often but it doesn't mean you will win every bet.

The fact is even if we have 99.9% chance of winning the bet still the remaining 0.1% edge is what hangs in between and if you lose that bet once for every 100 bet still your will lose all your previous 99 bets' progress.

[mcdouglasx]

It's said that a single bet is better because it gives you a higher probability of success. In the case of sports betting, parlay bets aren't the same. It's like flipping a coin; you have a 50/50 chance. But if you bet on three coin tosses, the probability changes.

What you're interpreting is wrong because you're assuming a single bet equals a guaranteed win, which it doesn't.

[Agbe]

There is no guarantee about you winning when you place a bet on a single game what you should know is that the probability of every game winning and losing is equal, so any one with the view that playing a single game have higher chances of winning is not True.

[Proty]

The reason behind such mindset is purely because some person feels that playing a single game feels more safe than when it is more than one. For me as long as it still remains gambling, it doesn't matter if it is a single game. is still a game of luck so there is chances of one winning or losing. It may feel more safe playing only one game but the reality is the potential of lossing is still the same since we can say for sure if we are going to win.

[skarais]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Not many gamblers can afford to bet $1,000 to $10,000 on a single bet, but I'm sure the average gambler can only afford to bet $5 to $100 on a single bet. This is why the average gambler doesn't become wealthy in the medium or long term at 2x to 3x odds. After all, while public opinion suggests that gambling is a place to have fun, they rarely talk about it as a way to get rich or change one's destiny.

Gambling whales are those who can afford to bet large amounts and are the ones who can potentially win big on a single bet. I don't know the maximum payout on a single bet at the average casino for sports betting, but I'm sure there are some whales who take advantage of it and can win there.

[Alphakilo]

if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling is because that it not the way that the system is designed. It is designed to be against you- you must have heard that the odds are not in your favour and that is it. If the reverse were the case, there would not be any casino to bet in anymore because, every day they are making people richer while they go bankrupt. That is not the business model.

The business model makes it that you are likely to become a millionaire faster if you are high roller or you bet more but it is an illusion. Just bet for entertainment.

[Lida93]

Who said betting on a single match is reliable? As we say that the money you deposited in a casino is highly likely to be lost, so is the money you deposited on sport betting sites, regardless of the odds that you go for. Only what people can say is that parlay is riskier, but it has its own advantages.

No pattern of bet can be reliable as far as these games are unpredictable, the same way a parlay bet can spoil your bet slip that's how a single bet game can do too.  What is there about single bets is that they have higher winning rates when played much often than a parlay bet would have for the gambler. For you to be playing single bets you must have a huge staking power to boast your potential win that's why many gambler that don't have the funds don't go regularly with it.

[Fortify]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

You seem disconnected from reality. Betting is a game where casinos and bookmakers are the winners 99% of the time, occasionally people might get super lucky but we don't calculate very well how rare that is. There's a reason that they can throw "free money" at you in the shape of welcome bonuses and that's because each game they offer has an advantage built in. Single bets, or multibets, it doesn't matter because it's completely redundant - they're going to take your money slightly faster or slower on each type. Each sports bet will have a margin built into it that says the bookmaker made these odds on the bet, but are never sure on the outcome so they layer a bit on top and the punters have the option to take the bet or not.

[rachael9385]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

I believe that most of us had this idea of getting financially stable with betting at one point or the other but after a while reality sets in and you accept the fact that it's not really possible to achieve. A lot of people prefer the idea of single bets not because it's capable of changing thier life but the chances of making profit from it is higher than that of playing parlays. Strategic bettors prefer to use this system

[DiMarxist]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

Betting a single bet isn't actually reliable as maybe you feel it may be, but let's say it actually turned out for your favour may be the single bet you play on eventually enters for you, the profit you aim to get isn't that high only playing multiple game's. Let's use football for example, you Olay bet of a particular team let's say a small team and big team and just a single bet, and the game ended up as you predicted, it's a luck for you but the profit won't be high at all no matter the amount you use in staking. So playing games and expecting to be successful from it, is impossible and even if it is, it will take a long period of time. And sometimes your thrusted single bet games might not even come in your favor.

[acroman08]

Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

I assume you are talking about sports betting's single bets and parlay. anyway, no one said that only doing single bets at a time will make you rich. the reason people "prefer" single bets is because it is a lot easier to win on that than doing parlay but just because it is easier to win on single bets does not mean you will be succesfull in it.

[DaNNy001]

Single bets are more reliable but this doesn't mean that making profit from them are hundred percent guaranteed..high stakers focus more on single games because the risks are reduced and the chances of winning is very high...selecting a single game takes a lot of analysis, you need to study a lot of games and decide to go with just one...But like I said, it's not guaranteed so you must be careful of the amount you stake

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

Yes, it's true that the chance of winning a single bet is always far more higher than that of a parlay bet, since it involves less risk and odd due to it being single. And as such, for the fact that you win today, doesn't guaranteed that you will always win per every single bet played. Which is the exact reason why a single bet gambler can not turn millionaire with small odds ranging from 1.2 to 4odds, depending on the game. Unlike a parlay bet that could have odds ranging from 1 to 100,000x or infinity, and by mere staking of $10 on a 100,000x parlay bet, such gambler might stand the chance of winning a million dollars. (i.e $10 x 100,000 odds = $1,000,000). Hence single bet is easy to win, but it doesn't guaranteed success always.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Everything goes with understanding before we even play a bet in gambling, that we have up to 5 matches for today does not mean we should play them all, we may decide base on our own discretion to play one or two as we may be convinced to play, but some have already taken it more extremely, that they sees gambling as their only surviving means, which playing a single game or more does not change anything about what we stand to gain at the end, you can be playing and single game and never have the winning opportunity, while it is not also proven that if you play a single game increases your chances of winning in gambling.

[Su-asa]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

First of all, winning depends on luck and betting on a single game doesn't even guarantee your winning but it only makes it kinda easier but doesn't guarantee you to win. However when it comes to soccer games, there's always a three options, which are the home to win, away to win and draw. If you think the bigger team will win the bet and you play it, funny enough that the team will draw to the weaker team of they don't lose, which is why the game is always for luck.

[robelneo]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Could you be more specific and point out the discussion where members prefer single bets because they have a good chance of winning? It's still 50% whether a single or multiple bet wins.
The house edge applies to every bet; it's a game of uncertainty, but betting on single bets isn't enjoyable. Imagine logging in, betting everything, and losing; you log off with a void feeling because you didn't get to enjoy the game. Although I don't rule out that some enjoy single bets, I don't see myself doing it.

[iBaba]

It's said that a single bet is better because it gives you a higher probability of success. In the case of sports betting, parlay bets aren't the same. It's like flipping a coin; you have a 50/50 chance. But if you bet on three coin tosses, the probability changes.

What you're interpreting is wrong because you're assuming a single bet equals a guaranteed win, which it doesn't.

I think there's a bit of confusion in the analogy here though I think I understand where you're coming from but while a single bet does not give you a guaranteed win, it gives you a higher probability of success as compared to when you're multiplying the odds of each individual bets in parlays to win which even exposes you into more risks.

Let me try and give you an example in this case, let's take for instance with when you're betting on multiple coin tosses in a parlay, it does not really gives you the a 50/50 chance for each individual one, it actually compounds the risks for you as all outcomes has to be correct before you can win. So when it comes to the option that has lesser risks  in terms of probability, you will go for single bets not because it's truly a sure bet but you're less exposed to risks and a bit more guaranteed since a win is a win in a single bet but otherwise in the parlays.

There is no guarantee about you winning when you place a bet on a single game what you should know is that the probability of every game winning and losing is equal, so any one with the view that playing a single game have higher chances of winning is not True.

Believing that playing a single game have higher chances of winning is not entirely true like you mentioned but when it comes to the issue of managing risks and odds, single bets can be more assuring or guaranteed since it posses you more or less in less risks and less pressure of wanting to win all combined odds to win.

[Abu-Naim]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

Single bet in gambling?
I think this can only for rich gamblers whom are just gambling for fun and not to earn money, because you need a lot of bets to accumulate reasonable odds, because without big odd, you can’t get a better win in gambling since your stake is always multiply by your number of odds.

Most gamblers will always pick more than one games to accumulate big odds before staking their games because one match is very risky and for any one game that brought a bigger odd, it simply means that it isn’t reliable and the probability of that game winning is very slim because the bookmakers knows what they are doing whenever they are attaching odds to some most games.

[Floxynice]

From my stability in the forum and happens that I began putting interest into gambling discussions people always point at the single bet as the most preferred way of gambling and it increases our chances of winning. Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Please do not get me wrong, but I am trying to filter our something that could help us. Your input could change and help a soul here.

It is not because it is an easy or simple way to win, but because those who go for this option or strategy are also looking for ways to minimise risks as  well.

Gambling will always be gambling, in most cases in gambling, the gamblers consciously and unconsciously choose their most preferred risks while still putting into consideration their  chances of winning.

No strategy guarantees the best, gambling just remains unpredictable.

[Rgram]

Now my question is; if gambling on single bet is that reliable why not many people becoming a millionaire or even resigned from gambling because they could have ended up accumulating the amount they wished to have in their possession.

Single bets aren’t reliable as well as accumulation bets. No bet is reliable actually but, you take less risk by gambling on a single bet when compared with accumulation bet. In accumulation bet, you have all the possible scenarios you consider across several games while, on single bet, you’ve got just a single game to consider these scenarios. Having to gain it all on a single bet means, you’ve got to take risk with the odds and stake, you don’t need to stake too high else, you could loss just as much.