China's recent military parade: please remind me what weapons are meant for

[Felicity_Tide]

Earlier today, I saw a photo of China’s president together with the presidents of North Korea and Russia. I couldn’t believe it, so I had to check the internet. I found out that China had recently organized a military parade, and some world leaders were present, but of course, the man(trump) who usually catches the headlines wasn’t there. I wasn’t sure of what the parade was all about, so I went straight to YouTube to get a summary of everything that took place.

From the video, at first, it was just a normal parade that was well organized, at least far more organized than a few others I have seen, until I began to notice so many weapons being paraded as well. A wide range of sophisticated weapons in different variants were displayed. I was impressed at some point, but then it dawned on me that these weapons were not designed for parades or showoffs. Their sole purpose is to cause massive destruction, so what’s there to be impressed about?.

The crazy part is that, according to the voice behind the YouTube video, some of the weapons displayed had never been seen before. And a part of me believes that China didn’t even reveal their entire weapons. Other countries like the US, Russia and North Korea are also heavily involved in making similar weapons.

So my simple question is, what is the fate of mankind when conflicts arise between these top countries that invest alot in weapon making?.


YouTube video analyzing the weapons

YouTube video  showing the parade.

The thread does not in anyway support conflict.

[BADecker]

Some parts of Siberia (Russia) touch China. These two countries are working together in ways that support each other. The US sanctions are driving them together.

China supplies Russia with electronics. Russia supplies China with war machine technology. Good trade deals, right?

[franky1]

military parade = weapons trade show.

im wondering why anyone is surprised by weapons being traded, especially americans. they love their 2nd amendment..
when people are allowed to defend themselves, why then be shocked about actions and events of war/defense

americans are proud and thank those who fought/served in WW2, vietnam, gulf, etc.
in america, war displays pride, service, being a patriot, so not sure whats shocking when other countries do parades

as for the korea/china/russia thing.. just a couple weeks ago US/EU/UK and ukraine all met up and done some deals. they even had military planes do a overhead fly-by show

..
all i see is more evidence of the old taglines/labels of amero/brics organisations setting up their 2 deviding sides of the world, by publicising their team-up events

[robelneo]

So my simple question is, what is the fate of mankind when conflicts arise between these top countries that invest alot in weapon making?.

Weapon manufacturing is a multi-billion-peso industry; every country needs weapons and arms to protect its territories or advance its cause. We have come to the point that these weapons of mass destruction are enough to annihilate civilization. These countries are aware of the possible effects, but there's no turning back for them.
We are in a cold war, and anytime this could escalate, but countries do not want to minimize their weapons because it's their edge against other countries.

[franky1]

So my simple question is, what is the fate of mankind when conflicts arise between these top countries that invest alot in weapon making?.

Weapon manufacturing is a multi-billion-peso industry; every country needs weapons and arms to protect its territories or advance its cause.

not all countries manufacture weapons. but this then becomes a case of whom do you decide to side with as your constant supplier.. you dont want to get supplies from a country, which would turn on you, become your enemy and then not supply you to defend yourself from them.
EG china fears ordering military planes from the US incase the US refuse to continually service these planes in times of conflict of china vs US allies

this then creates schemes and programs where groups of countries decide to create different sides(formalise a list of allies). strengthen partnerships within their side to never be at war with their supplier. which then decides they need to oppose other sides that are competing

[passwordnow]

It's said that it's about the commemorating of the 80th year ending of world war 3. Well, it's funny that they were remembering that but at the same time, showing the military powers that they have. Isn't it ironic that they have celebrated the ending of that war and then, they're triggering the world with the military parade that they did? it tells a thing not just to the world leaders that have attended it but also to the entire globe that they've got something to showcase for if another war is triggered by them or their enemy.

[Felicity_Tide]

~snip

this then creates schemes and programs where groups of countries decide to create different sides(formalise a list of allies). strengthen partnerships within their side to never be at war with their supplier. which then decides they need to oppose other sides that are competing

I guess this is where so many third world countries would be left in between, or should I say, get trapped between who to support and who not to. The whole thing has become a full blown issue of allies and oppositions, but what are the chances that these same allies won't go against each other along the line. I feel loyalty and trust in cases like this might just be temporary for the sake of achieving a common goal in a short term.

It's said that it's about the commemorating of the 80th year ending of world war 3. Well, it's funny that they were remembering that but at the same time, showing the military powers that they have. Isn't it ironic that they have celebrated the ending of that war and then, they're triggering the world with the military parade that they did? it tells a thing not just to the world leaders that have attended it but also to the entire globe that they've got something to showcase for if another war is triggered by them or their enemy.

Yeah, it is a bit scary, and more advanced than the others that we've seen before this. But at the same time, I noticed that the media has been revolving this particular parade around the one that was done in the US. I don't think anyone would have reacted much if the US where the ones that organized something like this.

My main point is the fact these weapons shows how advanced military has gone, and there are other countries that does the same thing. I can't imagine how crazy it would be when there is a minor issue between these big guys.

[JeromeTash]

When the US and Allies show off their weapons. It's considered a show of might, a show of power! When China or North Korea does the same, it's considered an incoming apocalypse, a doomsday reckoning. But what is funny is over a half of the wars around the world in the past few years have been as a result of the US and her Western Allies, directly or indirectly. I don't remember China for example moving their Troops and helicopters several miles away from their territory bombing the shit out of Citizens of another country in the recent times.

There is a certain country that is the only one to have used Nukes against Civilians in a war, but at the same time keeps shitting in their pants when other countries try to test their weapons. The level of hypocrisy in the current world order is so alarming that I can't wait it to end.

So my simple question is, what is the fate of mankind when conflicts arise between these top countries that invest alot in weapon making?.

Mankind has already seen terrible situations thanks to the US. I don't there will be anything so new that we haven't seen before.

[BADecker]

China's recent military parade: please remind me what weapons are meant for


Self-defense from the US and European bankers that are trying to take over the world.

[passwordnow]

It's said that it's about the commemorating of the 80th year ending of world war 3. Well, it's funny that they were remembering that but at the same time, showing the military powers that they have. Isn't it ironic that they have celebrated the ending of that war and then, they're triggering the world with the military parade that they did? it tells a thing not just to the world leaders that have attended it but also to the entire globe that they've got something to showcase for if another war is triggered by them or their enemy.

Yeah, it is a bit scary, and more advanced than the others that we've seen before this. But at the same time, I noticed that the media has been revolving this particular parade around the one that was done in the US. I don't think anyone would have reacted much if the US where the ones that organized something like this.

My main point is the fact these weapons shows how advanced military has gone, and there are other countries that does the same thing. I can't imagine how crazy it would be when there is a minor issue between these big guys.

And take note that it's only China. How the others that it has got with its alliance as we all know Russia who's currently in war and also the guy from the hermit kingdom who's also playing with toys as big as rockets. They're showing powers to the West and that's not really about the 80th end of war, they're doing the opposite to scare other nations.

[Ucy]

I would call that a showoff to intimidate the actual world power which I wouldn't want to mention here.
What determines power is influence. In the system of bondage, China remains below the west and she is nowhere to be found in the System of the Free. In the latter system Russia is at the top, and the one who is at the top on this system rules over those in the system of bondage. Weapons are deceptive and do not actually win war. What wins is your influence above others. And the Word of Mouth becomes the weapon where influences determines strength.
If Russia for example sticks to using her influence correctly, there will be no need for physical weapons. She will just focus more on consistent use of superior wisdom and command over her sphere of influence.