Can you tell what that useless Proro is looking for?

[Free Market Capitalist]

The useless guy doesn't like the answers he got in a thread, so he deletes it and opens another one quoting the only response he liked from the other thread. Could you be any more of a jerk?. Since it's not clear whether he'll like the answers and delete it again, I'm opening a thread so we can discuss this guy's suspicious behavior. Censorship does not work in this forum. If you do not like the responses in a thread and delete it, we can open another one to say what you do not want us to say.

I hope that after this you won't show up here again for a couple of years, otherwise I think JG's won't be the only tag on your profile.

I would like to take this opportunity to quote:

As a Free Market Capitalist says, neutral tag, it's not something you need to worry too much about.
It is certainly strange that you, as someone who is not excessively active on the forum, care about signature campaigns and the way some managers lead them. Also, it is quite logical for someone like JollyGood to set off an alarm that it is a posting from an alternative account. We have seen it many times.

If my nickname was mentioned, then I will give my opinion, but first, I will agree with Free Market Capitalist, who says that JG has a sense for alternative accounts. After reviewing your post history, I can also confirm that I had the same feeling that you were simply "spinning" your activity by posting in the politics section. There are many similar accounts that write empty posts on various topics that are completely unrelated to crypto, and they do this for quite a long time, as if they completely forget what thematic forum they are on. But the fact is that this is done only to increase activity and, as a result, to participate in signature companies in the future. Quite an old pattern.

Curious isn't it? I think JG might have found a new can of worms here.

This might end up as being another case where someone complaaint over mainly irrelevant feedback, just to end up getting even more. 

[LoyceV]

I keep seeing him in my notifications, and he's trying to get attention from many other users. I just ignored it.

[Free Market Capitalist]

I keep seeing him in my notifications, and he's trying to get attention from many other users. I just ignored it.

Better, because if you pay attention to him and say something he doesn't like, he'll delete the thread.

[yahoo62278]

I keep seeing him in my notifications, and he's trying to get attention from many other users. I just ignored it.

Better, because if you pay attention to him and say something he doesn't like, he'll delete the thread.

The thread isn't actually deleted, neither of them are. They have been moved to archival section, but he basically ends the discussion when he does that. I don't think the user understands or knows anything really about how the forum works. Like the neutral tag, I don't really thing he understands that only JG can remove that and there is no need for a thread as a 1st action. Pm JG and see what can be done, then open a thread.

[Zoomic]

I keep seeing him in my notifications, and he's trying to get attention from many other users. I just ignored it.

Better, because if you pay attention to him and say something he doesn't like, he'll delete the thread.

The thread isn't actually deleted, neither of them are. They have been moved to archival section, but he basically ends the discussion when he does that. I don't think the user understands or knows anything really about how the forum works. Like the neutral tag, I don't really thing he understands that only JG can remove that and there is no need for a thread as a 1st action. Pm JG and see what can be done, then open a thread.

Obviously, he doesn't know how things work here. That is the reason for the thread title "Judgement recieved".
He is seeing the reputation board as a place with many judges and after every discussion, the judges pass the judgement.

This accounts for why the first judgement didn't go in his favour, then he decided to appeal the judgement in the second thread quoting Hugeblack who happened to be the lawyer that wrote in his favour

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Maybe he is trying to f**K around and hopefully, he finds out what he is seeking soon 
Lots of the low ranking brand new looking accounts come around the reputation board to complain, only for more truths to be uncovered about their accounts. Usually cheats, ban evaders, scammers etc., and they end up with worse trust ratings than they even initially had.

[Rikafip]

He is obviously looking for for attention, but if he continues doing the same thing, he might end up with the kind of attention he won't like. 

[Free Market Capitalist]

The thread isn't actually deleted, neither of them are. They have been moved to archival section, but he basically ends the discussion when he does that. I don't think the user understands or knows anything really about how the forum works. Like the neutral tag, I don't really thing he understands that only JG can remove that and there is no need for a thread as a 1st action. Pm JG and see what can be done, then open a thread.

Obviously, he doesn't know how things work here. That is the reason for the thread title "Judgement recieved".
He is seeing the reputation board as a place with many judges and after every discussion, the judges pass the judgement.

Yes, that's probably it. He doesn't really understand how the forum works, especially the trust system.

He is obviously looking for for attention, but if he continues doing the same thing, he might end up with the kind of attention he won't like. 

I think it's almost a rule now that anyone who shows up here complaining about some supposed injustice is out for a fight and ends up getting beaten.

Since he hasn't commented here or started another thread, I'm going to lock this one for now. I don't think we should be too hard on him if he doesn't go further.