Team's Failure, who is Responsible?

[Iamgoat]

Both the team players and coach all have to be be identified as unique contributors that determines what the team achievement is, we also have to go furthermore looking into the internal conditions with some of these teams and see how things are going on beyond all we only see online through their performance during their matches, a lot are going under from the decision making process and this also have something to do with how the team players or coach performs.

Even team's win or lose is unique and the cause to such win or lose is always tied to one indices or the other which is mostly analyzed by the sports analysts. However based on experience, people often tied the win or lose of clubs to the head coach for not being able to other use the right formation or for benching a player or the other plus other tactical errors identified.

Unless if a particular player misses an obvious opportunity available to him to score, until then the blame still lies on the neck of the coach. People often neglect the management for not making the right investments, forgetting these coaches have limited capacity to perform unless being properly supported by the management.

[Obim34]

I'm in a team where we have good players, but the performance of these players as a team is very poor, resulting in no good outcomes. In this case, the coach should be held responsible because the players are already available, and it is up to the coach to manage them. However, when we have a good coach and poor players, then the players should be held responsible for the poor performance. I believe that both players and coaches have the same goals: to give their best. If this is not happening, then both the players and the coach should be blamed.

I don't necessarily think it is the fault of the coach when a team has big players and still underperform, a coach can have the best of players and best tactics but when there is no dedication from players, the expected outcome is always failure.

There have been several occasions when good coaches with good records come to a club with the best of players but underperform as most of the players play out of interest, so basically its the job of the players who are on the pitch to put in the best performance even with the worse coach they can still make the team have a great run.

[Nathrixxx]

Team's Failure, who is Responsible?

The coach is the one who should take the blame because he is the one in charge and should handle all responsibility. Aside the quality of players that can make a team good, strategy and tactics from the coach also contribute largely to it.
 A good coach can do very well with an average team, it will be difficult, but not impossible. A bad coach even with quality player will not be able to do well.

So the teams failure is the responsibility of the coach.

Is the coach the one responsible for the way the players too should perform either individually or as a team, if the coach made the plan and strategize how they are going to perform in playing their match, then the next to discover was how they are playing off the radar from what was on the original plan, we should know that the players also can be so annoying and at the same time disappointing when they are not delivering as you expected being the coach, what will you do in such situation than to take heart and bear with what they deliver, after the match you may also wish to take action at your discretion being the coach against any underperformance made by the players.

[2Pizza410000BTC]

The coach takes most of the responsibility for winning or losing a game, because it's in his hands to build strategies and also feature players he assumes would do fine or come back victorious. The players are mainly the mind of the coach in action, they'll play according to the Manager's instructions and tactics.

My argument is very similar to yours because the victory or defeat of a team depends a lot on the coach. If the coach can give good advice or good guidance, then a team and the players of a team can perform well and lead the team to victory. Now if someone thinks that the coach is not responsible for the victory or defeat of a team, then I think there is no point in having a coach. So whatever anyone says, I always think that the defeat of a team is the failure of the coach.

[MainIbem]

The coach is the one who should take the blame because he is the one in charge and should handle all responsibility. Aside the quality of players that can make a team good, strategy and tactics from the coach also contribute largely to it.
 A good coach can do very well with an average team, it will be difficult, but not impossible. A bad coach even with quality player will not be able to do well.

So the teams failure is the responsibility of the coach.

Is the coach the one responsible for the way the players too should perform either individually or as a team, if the coach made the plan and strategize how they are going to perform in playing their match, then the next to discover was how they are playing off the radar from what was on the original plan, we should know that the players also can be so annoying and at the same time disappointing when they are not delivering as you expected being the coach, what will you do in such situation than to take heart and bear with what they deliver, after the match you may also wish to take action at your discretion being the coach against any underperformance made by the players.

It's now a norms that coaches mostly get blamed for a team's failure to win a match but it's not supposed to be so, winning a match is a collective effort by professionals, using a coaches tactics and drills, so the entire team should take the blame, sometimes it's some players poor performance and inability to carry out the instructions to a coach that causes it. I'll only blame a coach when he has a perfect squad and fails to manage them properly with a good tactics, in and out the dressing room. Although cases like fatigue, injuries  and key players being booked could contribute to a team's failure too. Well, I understand that most people who thinks coaches should be blamed mostly feels that coaches are in charge of Managing a team and should have good football management skills to handle the team, cause he a professional too but they should understand that it's not always the coaches fault so they should know when and when not to blame a coach.

[SATWAT]

The coach takes most of the responsibility for winning or losing a game, because it's in his hands to build strategies and also feature players he assumes would do fine or come back victorious. The players are mainly the mind of the coach in action, they'll play according to the Manager's instructions and tactics.

My argument is very similar to yours because the victory or defeat of a team depends a lot on the coach. If the coach can give good advice or good guidance, then a team and the players of a team can perform well and lead the team to victory. Now if someone thinks that the coach is not responsible for the victory or defeat of a team, then I think there is no point in having a coach. So whatever anyone says, I always think that the defeat of a team is the failure of the coach.

This is an important argument because while playing as a team means that everyone needs to give their best the coach is always the backbone of the team. players are also necessary to perform well with a solid strategy and maintain balance which is the responsibility of the players on the ground.
The coach's role is to fix issues and provide guidance to players from the sidelines while also assigning tasks to be completed during the game but if a player fails to meet their obligations during the game it will inevitably lead to problems and losses in such cases blaming the coach will not help the team achieve positive results.

It's essential for both the coach and players to understand that having good balance in all departments is crucial the coach must also be aware of issues that can increase team performance, which should always be at the top.

[Zoomic]

Team's Failure, who is Responsible?

This is the question we should always ask ourselves in gambling whenever we are are playing bets, then discovered that the team we supported in sport bets for instance does not perform as we expected in their match.

Who do we often often blame to be responsible for the failure to deliver, is it the coach or the players, because the two plays the most important roles towards the performance of a team in winning or loosing a match play, so let's discuss about who's responsible and should receive the blame.

As we have seen in the present day reality, the coach takes the major part of the blame and it is the reason why coaches are often sacked after an unsuccessful season and players are not always sold. The coach makes decisions as;
1. Who to play
2. How long to play
3. Formation to play
So, why will the blame come on the players. Although, players obviously have their bad days.

[Adbitco]

As we have seen in the present day reality, the coach takes the major part of the blame and it is the reason why coaches are often sacked after an unsuccessful season and players are not always sold. The coach makes decisions as;
1. Who to play
2. How long to play
3. Formation to play
So, why will the blame come on the players. Although, players obviously have their bad days.

So if it's mainly the coach that is responsible for the players as you stated, so why is it that when a team wins the match, it's mainly the players that gets all the credits for the win, only few times that coaches are acknowledged, why? For me, it's the players that's should take majority of the blame when the lose same way they take majority of the credit when they win.

[JunaidAzizi]

A team means a collective responsibility of all the players. When they are on the field, everyone has to complete their role perfectly. When a team loses, there must be some faults, such as injuries or the absence of key players, but it can't always be figured out who is responsible for that loss. Maybe it's the opposing team that can perfectly adopt your plan and strategies and apply them against you, and sometimes it's the coaches. But in the end, the fault is collective, the whole team is responsible for the loss.

[Makus]

Team's Failure, who is Responsible?

This is the question we should always ask ourselves in gambling whenever we are are playing bets, then discovered that the team we supported in sport bets for instance does not perform as we expected in their match.

Who do we often often blame to be responsible for the failure to deliver, is it the coach or the players, because the two plays the most important roles towards the performance of a team in winning or loosing a match play, so let's discuss about who's responsible and should receive the blame.

For me, when a team fails, it is not fair to point the finger at just one person…. Because I think football is a collective effort, the coach and the players should both be held for the outcome…. The coach sets the tactics, motivates the team, and makes decisions during the game, but none of that will works if the players do not execute or put in the effort while playing on the pitch…  At the same time, even the most talented players can struggle if the coach makes poor choices or uses the wrong strategy..

So I will say responsibility is shared..  Sometime the players let themselves down, other times it is the coach decisions..

[_BlackStar]

-snip-

Is the coach the one responsible for the way the players too should perform either individually or as a team, if the coach made the plan and strategize how they are going to perform in playing their match, then the next to discover was how they are playing off the radar from what was on the original plan, we should know that the players also can be so annoying and at the same time disappointing when they are not delivering as you expected being the coach, what will you do in such situation than to take heart and bear with what they deliver, after the match you may also wish to take action at your discretion being the coach against any underperformance made by the players.

When players don't perform as instructed, they'll usually receive advice and improve in the next match. You shouldn't directly punish players just because they don't perform to your hope - but if they're being disruptive, punishment may be the final solution. Many players are benched when the manager deems them incapable of following instructions - some are also sold or loaned out for the same reason.

As a professional player, your primary responsibility is to play according to the coach's instructions. They can play however they want if the coach allows it, but in most cases, players will always be expected to play according to instructions.

[ChiBitCTy]

Team's Failure, who is Responsible?

This is the question we should always ask ourselves in gambling whenever we are are playing bets, then discovered that the team we supported in sport bets for instance does not perform as we expected in their match.

Who do we often often blame to be responsible for the failure to deliver, is it the coach or the players, because the two plays the most important roles towards the performance of a team in winning or loosing a match play, so let's discuss about who's responsible and should receive the blame.

I don't think that there's any ONE person you can blame in any win or loss really at the end of the day.  It doesn't matter whether a team lost by 1 point or 100 points, everyone is a part of the team and there's so many factors that come in to play and putting that blame on any one persona or area (coaching being an "area", so to speak).
Like last night the NFL the Ravens had an epic downfall after it looked like they had the game all but locked up.  I could point fingers in a lo of areas and so this is why I don't think you can ever just blame players, coaches, play calling etc.

[Yaunfitda]

As we have seen in the present day reality, the coach takes the major part of the blame and it is the reason why coaches are often sacked after an unsuccessful season and players are not always sold. The coach makes decisions as;
1. Who to play
2. How long to play
3. Formation to play
So, why will the blame come on the players. Although, players obviously have their bad days.

So if it's mainly the coach that is responsible for the players as you stated, so why is it that when a team wins the match, it's mainly the players that gets all the credits for the win, only few times that coaches are acknowledged, why? For me, it's the players that's should take majority of the blame when the lose same way they take majority of the credit when they win.

And probably this is also the reason that coaches are being fired first when teams have problem, like not winning or being eliminated for years. Although there could be circumstances that beyond the coach, like players are injured that's why they played so bad that they've lost even if they are the betting favorite. Players just followed what their coaches design in play. Otherwise if they don't follow it, then it's either they are going to be bench or not given enough playing time. Players might be to blame but it's not totally their fault if coach has other things in mind that's why they lost.

[maydna]

In this matter, you should blame yourself because you were not careful enough in analyzing so you chose the wrong team. Anything can happen in the match so you need to gather all the information so you can analyze it and find the right team.

But if you don't place a bet and just watch the match, perhaps you will blame the coach and the player. You will say that the player can not respond to the situation and the coach can not change their strategy. But if you are in the field and like them, it is not easy to change fast because it needs cooperation with others.

It is why placing a bet needs to be carefully analyzed of the team. Related to who's to be blamed, no one is wrong because they are trying their best to beat the opponent but they are not as strong as the opponent.

[TheUltraElite]

As far as I see it, excluding those teams which are having poor performance due to a poor player or any reason is the best choice we have because our goal here is to win and not ponder over which player led to a bad outcome.

It is selfish but it is the way to go in gambling.

So screen the teams and when you see bad teams and bad players, judt blacklist them for that season.

[Lanatsa]

As we have seen in the present day reality, the coach takes the major part of the blame and it is the reason why coaches are often sacked after an unsuccessful season and players are not always sold. The coach makes decisions as;
1. Who to play
2. How long to play
3. Formation to play
So, why will the blame come on the players. Although, players obviously have their bad days.

So if it's mainly the coach that is responsible for the players as you stated, so why is it that when a team wins the match, it's mainly the players that gets all the credits for the win, only few times that coaches are acknowledged, why? For me, it's the players that's should take majority of the blame when the lose same way they take majority of the credit when they win.

And probably this is also the reason that coaches are being fired first when teams have problem, like not winning or being eliminated for years. Although there could be circumstances that beyond the coach, like players are injured that's why they played so bad that they've lost even if they are the betting favorite. Players just followed what their coaches design in play. Otherwise if they don't follow it, then it's either they are going to be bench or not given enough playing time. Players might be to blame but it's not totally their fault if coach has other things in mind that's why they lost.

The coach really is like the brain of the team setting the strategy deciding who plays and for how long and choosing the formation but once the whistle blows it’s the players that carry out the plan and people naturally celebrate what they see with their eyes like a striker scoring a last minute goal or a keeper pulling off a big save fans connect to those visible moments more than the invisible tactical work from the sidelines.When a team wins the players become heroes because it’s their effort that everyone notices and that’s why they usually get most of the credit the coach might be mentioned but only rarely does the spotlight stay on them unless they made a bold tactical decision that clearly changed the game.

On the flip side when the team keeps losing the coach becomes the scapegoat because it’s easier for clubs to change one coach than to sell ten players and also it sends a message to fans and media that the club is trying to fix things even though sometimes the real issues are deeper like injuries poor recruitment or just bad form from the squad.Players definitely deserve some blame too because even the best tactics won’t work if the effort and discipline on the pitch is missing but coaches are held to a higher standard since they are supposed to bring out the best in their players and adapt when things go wrong so the cycle continues wins go to the players losses go to the coach.

[Yablee0]

Team's Failure, who is Responsible?

This is the question we should always ask ourselves in gambling whenever we are are playing bets, then discovered that the team we supported in sport bets for instance does not perform as we expected in their match.

Who do we often often blame to be responsible for the failure to deliver, is it the coach or the players, because the two plays the most important roles towards the performance of a team in winning or loosing a match play, so let's discuss about who's responsible and should receive the blame.

There is one thing about sports games especially football, this is a game that needs a collective offort, both the players and choach must play their role respectively to be able to achieve success, it is not a one man stuff.

When experience a lose In a match, for me I will likely hold the players responsible because they are the people putting out the physical work, they are the once playing the games, coaches will only do what his supposed to do by featuring the best on ground that he know can deliver success and it's left for you as a player to do your best, and it's also the duty of a coach to make positive changes when due that can enhance success in a match, however the players should be the one to be heard responsible for any lost game because you aren't expecting the coach to come on field and play it his self.

[bubilas]

In small sports leagues, including eSports, there are often cases where fixed matches are made, in which not a team participates, but one player who will pretend that he is very fit today and thus will drag the whole team to defeat. Such cases are known in small tournaments in Dota 2, and I think you know all the cases in small football leagues.
There are films about the investigation of such cases, which even show the correspondence of the compromised player with the customers.

[M47AK16]

I don't necessarily think it is the fault of the coach when a team has big players and still underperform, a coach can have the best of players and best tactics but when there is no dedication from players, the expected outcome is always failure.

It's actually pretty unfortunate because both coaches and captains are mostly treated unfairly, because if the team wins a game, the player who performed very well in the game is praised and he is considered the person behind the win, and the coach or the captain receives no credit for it.

However, if a team loses a game, people start blaming both the coach and the captain for it, saying their tactics weren't good, they weren't able to control the game very well, and whatnot, and no one ever says that the players didn't perform well, and that's why the team lost the game and it's not the fault of the coach or the captain.

This isn't only about football, though; it happens in every sport, especially in team sports. This shouldn't happen, if the coach and the captain aren't receiving any praise for a winning match then they don't deserve to receive any negative comments for a loss as well, because that makes it unfair and it's a biased thing to do. They should only be blamed if they are actually at fault, and not because their team couldn't win because if it's a team sport, the whole team is supposed to perform.

[Justbillywitt]

but you don't blame a coach when a play has a clear opportunity to put the ball in the net and misses, then you have to blame that particular player. Imagine if that's the only goal you need to win the game. I don't think you need a coach to help you score a tap in.

If the team build up is fine and working well and goal scoring is the only problem that the team is facing then it will be obvious that the striker is not doing his job well and it is the job of the coach to bench that striker and go with another option. In a situation were he lacks quality strikers that can help the team, he should be vocal with the team management and let them know he need new recruits. It his duty to identify the problem of a team and fix it. The coach takes all the credits if the team is doing well and also take the blame if the team is doing badly. If a striker is misfiring and missing all goal scoring opportunities, it is the duty of the coach to make him play better.