Would you rather….

[Sim_card]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I wouldn't play in any of them. Which means that, I wouldn't gamble because it's not a compulsory thing. Why will I gamble in a casinos with a harsh condition. Cashing out becomes a problem or casino wouldn't be provably fair on their games. I love to gamble in a casino that's reputable, provably fair with easy withdrawal. That's what keeps the fun going.

[Zigabel]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

I will say if I see a combination of both profit and privacy I will go for it, I mean who doesn't want good profit while  they enjoy privacy in every form possible it can come, privacy is very very important and we all know that because it's the only  way we can be assured that our assets and funds are secured and it will also aid building trust on the casino so every gambler mostly wants that privacy and good profit because for the vast majority, the profit is the primary reason they did ventured into gambling.

If it happens I have to choose between both I will go for the low profit and privacy because all I need is patience and I can be sure to accumulate the money to the point it will get big aswell just like what I would have gotten if I were to gamble on then casino that promises big profit without privacy, and in this case I will have peace of mind and be rest assured of my security.

[crwth]

I would rather play in a casino where I have a chance to win big. Personally, I see no issue with doing KYC as long as the casino is trustworthy and reputable.

Casinos must do this to make sure that they are abiding the AML laws that makes the mandate. As long as there are preventions and security for this, I think it's okay.

[mcdouglasx]

It all depends on each person's individual thoughts, which is why many don't mind having to enter their personal data on these sites. In fact, I think the vast majority of gamblers aren't too concerned about their privacy. The fact that most people here on the forum are concerned about it is because we have a more or less equal view on security and privacy, but that can lead you to mistakenly think that most people generally think that way.

[Awaklara]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Privacy remains important, but I don't mind doing KYC at casinos that have proven to pay winnings, both small and large. When you gamble to win bets, you might disregard privacy.
Now, many casinos also ask for KYC, but for most gamblers, I think the most important thing is that they pay out winnings. I would choose to leave a casino that complicates the withdrawal process. Even if they pay out, but with a lot of annoying processes, I would make it my last experience playing there.

[Samlucky O]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

What is the point gambling in a casino where you find it difficult to cashout after wining or having strick kyc implementation? And what is the point of gambling in a casino that is secured with no KYC but hard to win? Of course there is no such thing in Gambling. As far as I know there is no gambling Casino that allows you win often than the other, Maybe you might just be probably lucky to win on several occasions but doesn't make it special from others. Of course I know that some casino might be tricky like a thread created recently about how casino will allow you win big and require you to do kyc with some confidential documents, Which is not fair. but hardly such for things to happens. but we cant capitalize on that and see it like those type of casino has more wining opportunity. Infact I don't think I like any of Both situation if such thing somehow happens. I better not gamble atol.

[Felicity_Tide]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

I see no reason to use a service that would give me a hard time while attempting to make my own withdrawal from my own wins. Centralized services have given me a lot of problems in the past, and I have tried to avoid a very few that could be avoidable in my own best way, so I doubt if I would see myself using such service for profitable reasons. Besides, why trouble me with KYC during withdrawal and not during deposit ?. You can see how funny some of these casinos can be as they're trying to play smart.

I would prefer to stick with a non KYC casino, that offers a stress free withdrawal when needed without causing headache.

[Derekfunds]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

So long as I am winning and the strict KYC doesn't stop me from withdrawing or cashing out my game then I'm cool and better with that casino remember, everyone reason for playing Casino is to make more  money or profit so even if the KYC is so strict, if I can be able to withdraw my money I'm good to go because it is better to be winning and taking time for the money to be cash out than playing and losing even though it will look annoying for stressing someone before cashing out. But winning in casino is not even easy to start with because it is majorly a game of luck because you will just make a random selection.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

I think every casino allows the same chance of winning except for the scam casinos that doesn't even want players to win as much as they lose but if by chance or coincidentally I find a casino that is offering more wins than another casino, I will go for that casino and disregard every minor issues it may have. Perhaps, some non kyc casinos are not too trust worthy.

[yhiaali3]

While I'm not convinced that one casino can win you more than another, I personally prefer privacy over a large profit. Luck is the same at any casino.

Privacy is very important to the crypto community. As long as you say the casino is very secure and doesn't require KYC, I'd definitely prefer it over another casino that does. In a casino that maintains privacy, you can operate freely without fear of government surveillance.

[silpersurfer]

What a ridiculous question. How do we know that casinos without KYC can provide more winnings to their visitors than those that implement a KYC system? The house always has an advantage over its visitors; that's a definite rule that applies to every casino.

Compared to casinos that don't implement a KYC system, I prefer casinos that implement KYC, because they usually have official licenses and are accountable to their customers. The biggest concern when playing at a casino that doesn't implement a KYC system is that the casino doesn't have a license, and there's the possibility of fraud. Even if someone wins big, they can't withdraw the winnings to their personal account.

[OgNasty]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

I would prefer to gamble at a casino that has strict KYC implementation.  I think this is the hands down easy choice.  I would worry that if I were playing at a casino that skated around the KYC rules, even if I won big it wouldn't work out for some reason.  Either the site would disappear before letting me cash out, they would demand KYC info that maybe I couldn't provide and that's why I was gambling there, resulting in me not getting cashed out.  There could also be government interference or accusations of trying to evade taxes.  Easier to be legit and have no worries.

[Bluedrem]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Profit and security are two important things for me. When I bet at a casino, I always hope to win. But sometimes it doesn't happen, but like me, everyone bets to win. I don't want to lose my money at a casino. The safety of my money is also important there. There are many casino platforms that don't require KYC from gamblers, but later when gamblers win a lot of money, they face various problems in withdrawing it. So those who are used to betting big should bet on KYC approved casino sites. And those who bet small amounts can bet on non-KYC casino platforms to keep their identity secret.

[Helena Yu]

Only 0.001% people will say they prefer the second one.

We've heard many people complain if they win big, but the casino didn't allow them to withdraw their money because they're asking KYC. Guess what? most people will submit their KYC in order to withdraw their winnings.

If I'm in that situation, I will also do the same thing.

[rachael9385]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Both are important but I think that first option Is more preferable. Getting big wins from a casino with strict KYC implementation is what everyone would go for expect you are not being straight forward with the informations that you provide. The point of a casino having a strict KYC implementation is to ensure safety and security. When you end up winning those large amounts you are sure that your account can't be compromised or hacked

[Iroh]

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

A lot of people gamble in hopes of winning big. Given that option, it wouldn't be surprising to have lots of people opt in to provide details to complete the KYC process as long as they could win big.
I read a reply earlier on the thread about the ability to withdraw your funds and i thought he made a good point. The ability to withdraw whatever funds you win safely without any hassle involved would largely sway people on the casino to play with.
It may surprise you on the number of people that are very willing to submit whatever documents that's required in hopes of winning some money. With folks like that, it's profit over privacy.

[JunaidAzizi]

It's the same thing(like in both cases you will get the lowest profits) , bro. If I am winning a lot in a casino regularly, but that casino follows KYC strictly and makes hurdles in payouts, cutting taxes and much more, then the amount I leave with is not satisfactory. On the other hand, if a casino gives me rare wins but I am free in payouts and from taxes, then I will definitely go for it to avoid coming under the scrutiny of the government and people. Everyone has their own choice, but I think non KYC casinos give more chances to win, but it's too risky.

[Oasisman]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Well, in my case, I don't think I needed privacy, considering how low the amount I am allocating to gambling is. So, that means I'm gonna have to favor making a profit over privacy. Of course, I'm gonna deal with the most trusted and established casino to avoid the risks of getting your information sold to any cyber criminal. But then again, I don't think I'm gonna be one of their best target after looking at my account and gambling activities lol.

[SOKO-DEKE]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

I don't always gamble to win big in a casino because I gamble for fun, not expecting much from it. So, for me, I prefer a casino where I can win a little and withdraw my funds without too much stress or a complicated KYC process. It's not just about privacy it's also because I don’t like the way some casinos treat their customers, especially when they win a large amount of money. That’s usually when they start requesting unnecessary or hard-to-get documents. So, the best option for me is to play at casinos that don’t require KYC.

[robelneo]

Would you rather play in a casino where you win a lot and big ones too but has strict KYC implementation and is a headache to actually cash out from or play in a casino with no KYC, totally private and secure but doesn’t let you win a lot?

No casino will decline your payout if you abide by their rules. If the casino is reputable, you will eventually get your payout, so I choose the former over the latter. We want to have fun, but its a good feeling if you have a good chance to win huge money part of a great experience in gambling.

I know that in casinos, there’s not much difference between rates of winning because it’s random but hypothetically which one is more important for you? Profit or Privacy?

Both are good, but I can trust my privacy if the casino is reputable, so my priority is reputation and a good chance to win.