[ASTER] AsterDEX Speculation

[buy-IOTA]

This isn't a bet on technology. This is a bet on CZ. You're not investing in a superior DEX; you're trading the narrative that the most powerful man in crypto is about to put his full weight behind a project. It could absolutely moon, but it's a high-stakes game. It's the beloved indie developer (Hyperliquid) versus the AAA studio with a huge budget but maybe less soul (AsterDEX).

It's going to be a fascinating battle to watch, that's for sure. Good luck out there, guys.

[Delver]

cz launched this trash to rug everyone ! same as trump coin

[asriloni]

An update from Aster. The dev is now implementing the automatic buy back mechanism, and it's already deployed in a specific contract address. My view on this is that a good plan for long term. The announcement of this buyback mechanism don't give impact to the price. However, long term projection will be bullish as team will allocate 20% - 40% range from daily fees collected by platform for buy back purpose.

However, it may take years before we will see the real impact from this buyback mechanism. this reminds me with BNB when Binance announced its token mechanism. Deflationary token often have steady up chart in long term.

Any opinion in this?

[tokeweed]

^  Oof...  They could've timed their announcement better imho.  This sort of thing is good when the sentiment is slightly bullish - full on bullish.

I mean buy backs are good but looking at Hyperliquid, the HL community is starting to learn that buy backs don't really matter as far as price goes.  Hyperliquid is buying back with 97% of fees that the protocol generates but it still is down more than 50% from the highs.

Edit:  Typos

[Juse14]

^ This only increases speculation and drives adoption due to hype, although in the long term it may affect the coin's true value. Honestly, they're late in doing this. It should have been the right time when they were getting a lot of buzz and starting to be noticed as a competitor to HYperliquid, and it would have definitely boosted their coin's price.
From the purchase allocation perspective, what Hyperliquid is doing is much better. Will they do the same thing as the burn? It's possible, or did I miss it?

The price dropped because holders/buyers were selling. It can't be denied that entering a bear market will drive selling in any coin or token. I think because of the high $Hype, buyers were selling, especially those who got it from Airdrops, they were definitely maximizing their profits before entering a bear market.

[tokeweed]

^  The only guys saying that Aster is starting to be a serious competitor to Hyperliquid are Aster users and CZ's goons.    Hyperliquid still remains to be the leader in perps DEX's and people should realize that they did it without any support from the guys like CZ and it didn't take any outside investment from investors.  They are funded with their own money and have an 11 man team which is relatively small if we consider how huge Hyperliquid has become.

And it doesn't have a marketing team.  Lol.  Everything bit of 'marketing' has been a community effort. 

[Juse14]

^ I agree if there was no CZ behind the AsterDEX project it would not be what it is today, seeing how their developers lost, roadmaps, tokenomics, services, features, network and also the community is better Hyperliquid because indeed the Hyperliquid community grew naturally, I will never doubt that a lot of Hyperliquid maxi without the push of developers or marketing team, it was born from the community for the community.
There is another product that is said to compete with Hyperliquid, Lighter, but I don't see it as a big threat to Hyperliquid's dominance even though it is better than Aster, what do you think about Lighter?

[asriloni]

^  Oof...  They could've timed their announcement better imho.  This sort of thing is good when the sentiment is slightly bullish - full on bullish.

I mean buy backs are good but looking at Hyperliquid, the HL community is starting to learn that buy backs don't really matter as far as price goes.  Hyperliquid is buying back with 97% of fees that the protocol generates but it still is down more than 50% from the highs.

Edit:  Typos

The problem is lacking of innovation. It makes people are so reluctant in holding their HL even there was burning mechanism that is still going on. Burning mechanism is good, but it must not be the only thing that the token relied with.

Let's take a look at BNB. They did burn mechanism quarterly, yet they also develop so many utilities for their own coin. The innovation such as Launchpad, Launchpool, Hodler airdrop and many more  makes holders keep staying.

I hope these perp developers will learn if utilities are things that makes people keep believing in the token.