Jollygood spamming with low quality

[Bokuno11]

Why are you people allow jollygood to spam.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855;sa=showPosts
He come online to make make rubbish post in gambling board more than 13 in one day when is near time to pay him for campaign.

[Charles-Tim]

No evidence from the first page of his  post history.

If you think he spammed, you can edit your topic on this thread and added the posts where he spammed. Or you can just post it, we would see it.

For now, I do not see him spamming with his first 20 posts. I think that is enough to know if someone is spamming or not.

[Bokuno11]

He make 13 post a day to when is campaign will end and he vanish till day of payment  and make one to complete it. He is posting spam to complete post count for campaign.

[BitMaxz]

We have a report button; why not use it instead of making a thread like this?
You can explain it how his post spam and let moderators handle it.

He make 13 post a day to when is campaign will end and he vanish till day of payment  and make one to complete it. He is posting spam to complete post count for campaign.

Newly registered account?
Why not use your alt account instead to make a thread here?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

1.  JG isn't known to be a spammer nor even a shitposter, and what is it you expect people to do?  Click on the link you provided to his post history to search for whatever posts they think you might be referring to?

2.  The tone of this thread is infantile and smacks of jealousy. 

3.  OP, your grasp of English appears to be absolute ass.  I don't trust your judgement regarding JG's posts in the gambling section.

4.  Speaking of the gambling section, you created this thread to call out a single member for allegedly 'spamming' in a section where 9/10 (or fractionally more) posts are written by members in gambling-related signature campaigns and most of which are absolute crap?  That's evidence for point #3, but the point here is that this thread isn't necessary.

5.  You're asking the community why we people allow JG to spam; did you just fall off the bitcointalk turnip truck or something?  That's not how things work here.  If he was violating a rule, you'd report it to the mods.  If he was making low-quality posts, you'd contact his campaign manager.  Starting a thread in Reputation is the wrong way to approach a post quality issue unless it's serious.

[nutildah]

My thinking is OP probably already tried to "rat" JG out to his campaign manager, who didn't respond, because obviously JG is not a spammer by any conceivable standard, especially in the Gambling section. Regardless of whether or not that happened, I'm almost certain OP's other account(s) already got tagged by JG and this is his form of revenge.

The bar for what is considered "not rubbish" is exceedingly low in the Gambling section and JG's posts soar far above it compared to most other posters.

[LoyceV]

1.  JG isn't known to be a spammer nor even a shitposter

But he is known to tag and exclude many users, which, if I'd have to guess, might very well be the real reason why OP created this topic.

[Stalker22]

He make 13 post a day to when is campaign will end and he vanish till day of payment  and make one to complete it. He is posting spam to complete post count for campaign.

There is no forum rule that dictates how many posts per day a user is allowed to make.  If you think someone is spamming, let the forum moderators handle it.  If its about campaign rules, get in touch with their campaign manager.  I think JG has been a member here for a while and is well-known.  People may not agree with everything he says, but I dont think many people see him as a spammer.

[OgNasty]

[KingsDen]

Why are you people allow jollygood to spam.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855;sa=showPosts
He come online to make make rubbish post in gambling board more than 13 in one day when is near time to pay him for campaign.

If your reason for saying that he is a spammer is that JG made 13 posts in a day, I don't think that the reason is genuine. There's no forum rule stated how many posts one should make in a day. If the person is not post bursting, and their discussion is on point, you could make as much posts as you can.

Making more than or upto 20 posts is something that some stake participants do. There's nothing bad if they can do it without releasingow value posts.

So, if you see his individual spam posts, report to the moderator and you could leave him a neutral tag for spamming if you think he is a spammer. But sorry, the neutral tag will not be able to show.

[yahoo62278]

So basically you were tagged and you thought in your head that you'll show JG? The community doesn't seem to care too much for your accusation. Just lock the thread and go on with your day while it's a no harm no foul situation.

[khaled0111]

Why are you people allow jollygood to spam.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855;sa=showPosts
He come online to make make rubbish post in gambling board more than 13 in one day when is near time to pay him for campaign.

First of all, why are you people + verb + ing. So, instead of allow, you should have used allowing = this is basic english English.

This is a free-speech forum. JollyGood can make as many posts as he sees fit, 1, 10, or 100 per day, it’s up to him. There is a report button below each post that you can use if you think any of his posts is are irrelevant.

You remind me of someone… can’t remember his name… well, a friendly advice: such intimidation attempts don’t work here..

[Vod]

Why are you people allow jollygood to spam.

I looked and could not see anything wrong.   Many people do what you describe.  It doesn't mean they are spamming; they may have legitimate comments to make on each post.   Most of us spend more time reading than reading and replying.  It's easy to read new posts if you have a spare 30 seconds, but your personal contributions pile up in your head throughout the day.   How much free time after all your side hustles and personal commitments do you have for bitcointalk?  

It comes down to you not understanding how JG uses his time, and with your cowardice I assume it happens a lot.

[DireWolfM14]

There are a lot of high ranking accounts here who's posts aren't worth reading.  Even when they are on topic they don't add anything new to the discussion, nor contribute in a meaningful way.  I've learned to filter through and ignore them, it's the serene way to dealing with it.  And I'm not pointing out JG in particular, everybody has their own way of using this site, and everybody has their own taste when reading posts.  YMMV.

As for burst posting, that's between him and his campaign manager.  It's also his campaign manager's job to decide if his posts are low quality.

1.  JG isn't known to be a spammer nor even a shitposter

But he is known to tag and exclude many users, which, if I'd have to guess, might very well be the real reason why OP created this topic.

Trends do tend to repeat, and this wouldn't be the first time a random newbie accused a DT member of (fill in the blank.)

...this is basic english English.

...if you think any of his posts is are irrelevant.

Well, this is embarrassing. 

Many people who's first language is English are barely literate, and on this site they are a minority.  I suggest giving a lot slack to those who are not native speakers of English.

[khaled0111]

Well, this is embarrassing.  

Not really!
Thank you for correcting my mistakes
Can you pass me that filter? That would be great!

[mindrust]

Jollygood did nothing wrong.

So what if he excluded and tagged a thousand forum users? I say it is well deserved.

If you don’t have the courage to show up with your main account, that means your exclusion/neg rate/flag was also well deserved since you can’t even defend your position anymore.

Go cry somewhere else.

[SupItsJTTV]

I agree with this and he has either some alts or friends accounts that always jump on this bandwagon too. It isn’t hard to see which ones they are as common sense can’t be taught to retards.

[DireWolfM14]

Thank you for correcting my mistakes

You're welcome.  Inshallah I'll start posting in the Arabic boards once my confidence level is a bit higher.  So far I've been afraid I'll need lots of correction, so maybe you can help.   

Can you pass me that filter? That would be great!

You can't get there from here. 

[lovesmayfamilis]

Dude, did you spend two days planning your revenge and choosing the account you'll use to accuse JG?

Bokuno        October 04, 2025, 02:12:24 PM
Bokuno11    Today at 12:18:34 AM

[PowerGlove]

Many people who's whose first language is English are barely literate, and on this site they are a minority.

FTFY. Otherwise, you're saying: "Many people who is/has first language is ..."

(I'm just busting your balls. When I read my own post history, I find lots of little things that I'm embarrassed by, but, I've slowly learned to just leave them be rather than edit every mistake and obsess about it. After all, this is supposed to be a place for humans to talk about stuff, not a writing proficiency exam. I mean, it's always nice to read something that's both interesting/original and well-written, but, I'd take the former over the latter any day of the week: I'd much rather absorb original/non-obvious thoughts written in comically broken "Engrish" than synthetic/obvious thoughts written in zero-defect English.)

I've learned to filter through and ignore them, it's the serene way to dealing with it.

Yup. The more time I spend on the forum, the harder I find it to force myself to read posts (compared to just skipping over most of them and stopping on the names that I know won't let me down). The overall signal-to-noise ratio is so ass that it reminds me a little of how certain programming languages (like APL) are jokingly labeled "write-only" languages (as in, Bitcointalk is really good at collecting written thoughts that often won't be read/understood by anyone besides maybe the person sharing them).

(Back to ball-busting mode: "it's the serene way to dealing with it" sounds odd to my ear. I think "way of dealing" or "way to deal" would work better. But, like I said, it's not important: I'm just being pedantic, and I know what you meant. Also, I'm no English professor, so, maybe I'm mistaken.)