The Final settlement for the conflict between Russia and Ukraine

[Ucy]

As the conflict in Ukraine (which started around 2014 before the intervention of Russia in February 2022) gradually comes to an end, we wish to state clearly that the People or Regions who voted to join or became part of Russia through democratic means, which happened after (or was as a result of) the violent hijack of Ukraine by pro European forces which the new Russia regions do not recognize as legitimate authority nor want to be part of, for the right reasons, such as unreasonable coup against constituted authority, anti-Russia stands of Europe, the open promotion of immoral freedom of choice by the entity that controls Europe and other kinds of immoral practices.
We fully recognize the right of a Nation or Society to secede or be free, if the right is based on self preservation from destructive culture in its former union, and even preservation from possible attacks, annihilation, persecution, identity change in the union for not accepting the destructive culture. And this right is more accepted if the seceding nation can stand on its own or be protected by another nation with similar culture, or nation that finds its culture acceptable.


The remaining regions that equally want to secede but are still under the control of Ukraine could be allowed to remain part of Ukraine if the right to be exempted from destructive culture will be fully respected, with no further threats to the regions, otherwise they are allowed to be independent or be part of Russia, and any further attempt to prevent them would be punished or not tolerated.

In regards to "security guarantee" for Ukraine, any force that seek to provide the guarantee must be supervised by a neutral force/forces to prevent potential abuses against Ukraine or Russia. Any attempt to abuse it will be severely punished — the abusing force will be exposed, sanctioned and removed from their positions.
This force could be station in Ukraine to serve as the security guarantor.


We hoped that the Russia Ukraine issue was resolved by USA through her President (Donald Trump) so that it'll be on record that he and USA played a major role, but it seems this responsibility is too much for the President to handle even though he has done quite OK, so we decided to intervene while remaining within the path taken by the President to resolve the conflict, but without including certain contentious part.



It's important to note that once this settlement pronouncement goes into force, starting from today, no nation, region, company, organization, entity etc should reject it. The new reality, that is part of the settlement (for example Donbass being part of Russia) must not be ignored or rejected, otherwise the company, region, nation, etc will be administered by people/authority who will implement it.


*Glory be to our CREATOR for making this possible.

[LTU_btc]

Do we really need another topic about war in Ukraine? Why you didn't posted this in one of already existing topics? And I'm wondering what make you to think that this war comes to an end? Because there is no signs that it can end soon. There was lot of expectations that Trump will end it, but he failed.

As the conflict in Ukraine (which started around 2014 before the intervention of Russia in February 2022) gradually comes to an end, we wish to state clearly that the People or Regions who voted to join or became part of Russia through democratic means, which happened after (or was as a result of) the violent hijack of Ukraine by pro European forces which the new Russia regions do not recognize as legitimate authority nor want to be part of, for the right reasons, such as unreasonable coup against constituted authority, anti-Russia stands of Europe, the open promotion of immoral freedom of choice by the entity that controls Europe and other kinds of immoral practices.

You contradict yourself here. You're implying that in 2014 happened ''unreasonable coup against constituted authority'' and at the same time you're saying that ''People or Regions who voted to join or became part of Russia through democratic means'', what actually goes against Constitution of Ukraine by all means.

In regards to "security guarantee" for Ukraine, any force that seek to provide the guarantee must be supervised by a neutral force/forces to prevent potential abuses against Ukraine or Russia. Any attempt to abuse it will be severely punished — the abusing force will be exposed, sanctioned and removed from their positions.
This force could be station in Ukraine to serve as the security guarantor.

I'm wondering what country can be accepted as neutral. Offcourse that Russia won't accept any NATO country to provide security guarantees for Ukraine. Same can be said about China, just from otherside.

[BADecker]

^^^ Good thing nobody forces anybody to jump into any post.

Ukraine contradicts itself. It says in its constitution that its lands cannot be taken away from it. Yet it agrees with the UN that people of any region can form their own government, breaking away from a parent government if necessary.

Trump has bent over backwards to let the US be the neutral country. Putin even went to Alaska to show that he is working for peace. All that Zelensky has been doing is to ask for more armaments in his meetings with Trump. Z doesn't want peace. He wants the Ukraine constitution to rule over the UN.

Of course, Z is taking some of his cues from Western Europe. But his warmongering is even worse than theirs. By ruling over the UN, he wants to take over the world.

[Xal0lex]

Do we really need another topic about war in Ukraine? Why you didn't posted this in one of already existing topics?

I agree.