HAHAHA! This fucking hooligan, who takes any piece of totally biased information to try to confirm what he already thinks.
I love you so much FMC, what would I do without you on this forum?

I miss long-winded arguments like in the old days so much
Yes, numbers speak for themselves in terms of cutting public spending, reducing regulations, and lowering taxes always works. What doesn't work is for lazy people who expect the government to give them money without working.
If the FREE MARKETS agreed with you the peso wouldn't be experiencing its biggest drop throughout any 3 years of a presidency in Argentina.
Argentina is experiencing some of the world worst stagflation right now. It's up there with Iran and Venezuela.
Also, how free markety is Trump carving a $20b bailout package for the Argentinian gov?
It's simple economics really. Reduced government spending causes the economy to contract. The numbers on that metric also don't lie. The Argentinian economy has yet to expand from 2017 numbers in USD and even contracted 2% from 2023 to 2024. Given the ongoing economic collapse caused by Milei, Argentina's government needs yet another cash injection to keep even its basic functions afloat.

It's clear Milei's plan doesn't work. No matter how many times austerity is attempted it will not work.
There's however a way to see things under which Miley would have been considered wildly successful. If Milei's plan was to fast track a complete collapse of the state and make himself obsolete in the process, he would have been surprisingly successful.
Funnily enough he would have been faster at making a full government apparatus collapse than any south American revolutionaries. Even the Cuban revolutionary war lasted more than 5 years while Milei's collapse would have been less than 3 years from taking power. Sadly or not he now gets a lifeline to stay in power with Trump's bailout.