~
My personal question - how will the US government access this wallet even If they win the case to confiscate the bitcoin?
So, the coins havent moved since 2020, which probably means they already arrested the criminal and confiscated everything they found related to the case. They likely already have the private key or seed phrase. Thats usually how it goes in such cases. The news is about the lawsuit to get permanent ownership of the coins, but they usually seize the wallets first and keep it quiet. They wouldnt file the forfeiture lawsuit if the Bitcoin wasnt already in a government-controlled wallet.
Yeah, according to the news, the coins hasn't moved since 2020, and what you said is actually making good sense, it's very possible they must have possibly gained access into the wallet already and right now, what they are doing is to simply acquire the legal right to own and be able to spend the coins...
But then this leaves behind questions like...
- when was the criminals behind this stolen coins arrested and prosecuted?, is it possible they arrested and prosecuted the criminals off media? That is - without the media being aware?
- if they had had access to this wallet all along, don't you also think that they would have filed this lawsuit to claim the coin earlier than now?
My personal question - how will the US government access this wallet even If they win the case to confiscate the bitcoin?
The funds are already in the possession of the US government, according to the
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and the Justice Department’s National Security Division also filed today a civil forfeiture complaint against approximately 127,271 Bitcoin, currently worth approximately $15 billion, that are proceeds and instrumentalities of the defendant’s fraud and money laundering schemes, and were previously stored in unhosted cryptocurrency wallets whose private keys the defendant had in his possession. Those funds (the Defendant Cryptocurrency) are presently in the custody of the U.S. government.
If he is found guilty, I wish he gets the maximum sentence, which is 40 years are according to the article. He didn't just scam people, but he was involved in human trafficking and forced labour, which is technically slaving. Seizing the money without him facing maximum sentence wouldn't be enough justice if he is actually guilty. He had humans living like prisoners and living a luxurious lifestyle off the backs of "slaves". People like that shouldn't be shown any mercy because he had no mercy or sympathy whatsoever for the people he frauded nor the people he used as slaves.
Thanks for this information, it came in while I was still typing the above response..
I can see you included a source link but it's not displayed on your comment, please check for errors and reshare, I will love to read the whole article. 🙏