Wars and money funding

[Mansory22022]

Wars will be stop before economic crash.

Before the big guys knows wars will be over they take out their funds of the markets and military industry.

Wars are nothing about personal wars are just bullish for the markets assets and commodites.
But before the huge economic crash off course they take out money.

We have on fact economic crash by 2029 so that means the smart money need to cash out their money in pockets and be out of the markets 2027 -2028 allready always before wars stops the smart money always exit from the markets.
Before gold and other assets commodities prices fall they take out their funds , when wars will be over it means bear Market and end of the bull Market.

[BIT-BENDER]

when wars will be over it means bear Market and end of the bull Market.

You were completely disoriented and very hard to understand the words you are mixing. Maybe English is not your first language.
I highlighted this part of your post because it was the best  read able part of your thread.
Firstly which of the war? There are different wars happening and some are trying to come to an end with the cease fire news. War has a negative effects on the economy of the countries at war and even to beneficiaries of those countries.

[The Cryptovator]

Wars will be stop before economic crash.

Before the big guys knows wars will be over they take out their funds of the markets and military industry.

Wars are nothing about personal wars are just bullish for the markets assets and commodites.
But before the huge economic crash off course they take out money.

What kind of war are you talking about? Is it an economic war, like the US applying tariffs to China, or are you talking about a physical war, like Russia vs Ukraine? In both cases I won't agree with you. The war doesn't pump the economy anyway, whether it's physical or economical. War always destroys; in physical war, it destroys both economy and wealth, whereas economic war just destroys the economy. Both wars are currently running; I don't think economic conditions are too good due to war.

If you are talking about crypto, then the recent crash happened due to US tariffs against China. It means the war destroyed the economy. Including crypto, even the gold price was dumped hard, though later it recovered. But still we are seeing the market keep dumping due to tariffs. I believe if the war ended, then we may discover a real bull market. So I am totally against your thoughts.

[boyptc]

We have on fact economic crash by 2029 so that means the smart money need to cash out their money in pockets and be out of the markets 2027 -2028 allready always before wars stops the smart money always exit from the markets.

Are you a time traveler for you to say this? I tell you that one probably has an idea of what might[ but that doesn't guarantee them that their prediction might actually happen.

That's still far from now and a lot of things can change from the window of that period.

Before gold and other assets commodities prices fall they take out their funds , when wars will be over it means bear Market and end of the bull Market.

As much as we want to see wars end, I don't think that the leaders who has started it all will ever get satisfied of stopping them just as you've said.

[SUPERSAIAN]

I'm not sure what the OP is trying to say exactly. He's referring to 2027-2028, and he's making a big deal out of these years. Look at world history, wars always begin and end, it's cyclical. We want wars to end. Perhaps they'll end completely in the future, no one knows. We just hope so. Let wars end, and national economies recover and stabilize. Everyone wants to see only progressive people and countries in the future.

[Asiska02]

I'm not sure what the OP is trying to say exactly. He's referring to 2027-2028, and he's making a big deal out of these years. Look at world history, wars always begin and end, it's cyclical. We want wars to end. Perhaps they'll end completely in the future, no one knows. We just hope so. Let wars end, and national economies recover and stabilize. Everyone wants to see only progressive people and countries in the future.

Wars coming to an end will not be something we will see coming easily. When humanity begins to learn from past records of wars and where it has lead us till day, prioritizing unity and cooperation amongst ourselves should be the most important goal we all should be looking forward to. Competition amongst us breeds wars but peace doesn’t just come out automatically, this can be nurtured through awareness in the society, diplomatic dialogues and so on. Humanity prevails over all and ones we’re able to have that first in mind, we will come a long way living together in peace and harmony rather than embracing wars between ourselves at every dispute we have.

[AmoreJaz]

I'm not sure what the OP is trying to say exactly. He's referring to 2027-2028, and he's making a big deal out of these years. Look at world history, wars always begin and end, it's cyclical. We want wars to end. Perhaps they'll end completely in the future, no one knows. We just hope so. Let wars end, and national economies recover and stabilize. Everyone wants to see only progressive people and countries in the future.

Wars won't stop up until there are government officials who don't want to back down because of their ego.

[abhiseshakana]

Wars will be stop before economic crash.

If we learn from US history, war is a solution to crises. Even by participating in World War II, the US emerged completely from the Great Depression of 1929–1939. In the history of classical industrial capitalism (1900–1970), war was not destruction, but rather accelerated economic evolution. War actually functioned as an economic reset because the economic structure was based on the real production of steel, weapons, logistics, and manual labor.

In the 1980s, in the era of financial capitalism, where the primary source of wealth was no longer factories, but liquidity and monetary confidence, war became a burden on the system, not its savior. War costs (budget deficits + public debt) would depress currency values, leading to rising inflation, rising interest rates, stock market crashes, global investor withdrawals, recession, and the threat of systemic crash.

In the current era of digital capitalism and energy, war serves as an instrument of geopolitical control and energy redistribution, which must be managed to prevent global crises. In the current era, major military wars are only permitted when they strengthen global financial control. If war benefits the military-industrial complex, it will be facilitated, but if it threatens the global financial system, it will be immediately halted.

The world today tends to prefer measured confrontation, a war that manipulates the economy (sanctions, tariffs, proxies, cyber) and fights over future value chains (energy, semiconductors, AI) rather than a total war that risks triggering the collapse of the global financial system because when the financial economy becomes the center of value, monetary stability becomes the highest priority; therefore, wars will be stopped (or diverted) before an economic crash remains the most reasonable rule of the game, although accidents and geopolitical anomalies remain possible.

[Agbe]

OP reading your thread made me to be curious 🧐 about you, and looking at your profile it seems that you have been on the forum for over a year now so I suppose you should have learned the basics of creating a thread. The essence of creating a is for you to pass a message so that others can learn but going by your thread you really needs to work on your if you expect to grow on the forum because going by the title of your thread I was expecting to learn something new but going by your thread I can't find something that I can place my hands on.

[ZeroVinsonN]

OP reading your thread made me to be curious 🧐 about you, and looking at your profile it seems that you have been on the forum for over a year now so I suppose you should have learned the basics of creating a thread. The essence of creating a is for you to pass a message so that others can learn but going by your thread you really needs to work on your if you expect to grow on the forum because going by the title of your thread I was expecting to learn something new but going by your thread I can't find something that I can place my hands on.

OP probably isn't English or at least is not from an English speaking nation and he doesn't know much of it, I'm not even sure I can claim to understand a single thing out of what was written there and I was hoping someone else here did but it seems we are all in the same position right now, with how captivating the title of the thread was I had actually hoped to get some credible information from it but I got nothing at all.
OP, maybe it's best if you get a better handle on you English before creating a thread in English or you could get a translator and just write in your own language, a good translator will certainly reproduce it in a more understandable manner than this.

[tsaroz]

But it could also be something different. The economy of the world is going on a downturn, the demands are decreasing, the factories are running at low capacity, the investors are not getting their ROI. One way to boost the economy is war.
These day's war is more about gadgets than actual foot infantry, Russia and Ukraine are exchanging drones and missiles, the drone making factories in China are getting busy, so are the missile making factories in the west, the war keeps fueling the economy. The war is good for most of the participants specially who produces weapons. And for the countries who spends more and don't earn from it, they'll go into economic recession followed by political turmoil like France.

[slapper]

The timing chain you are proposing (war ends -> bear market -> economic crash) is predicated upon the assumption that markets care more about geopolitical resolution than they care about liquidity conditions, which historically isn't true. 2008 had no war ending. 1987 had no war ending. They had leverage that was unwinding at a rate that was greater than that of central banks printing.

Your smart money leaves before wars end pattern may seem true since you are pattern matching on selective data. Defense contractors do turnover capital, yes. However, pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and index allocators (who all outnumber defense spending) do not move according to war/peace binaries. They change depending on the yield curves, inflation expectations, and the tightening or easing of the Fed.

Assuming that everybody knows the crash will happen in 2029, why would smart money not get out of the market until 2027? Why not 2026? Or now? As soon as a crash becomes consensus, the crash will either occur instantly (as capital is fleeing in advance) or not occur at all (because it is already priced in). You cannot have future crashes which are widely-known. The outcome is altered by the very knowledge.

It is not a fixed schedule that you may be feeling but an increasing systemic weakness. That is real. But weakness does not keep time. It operates on surprises that no one anticipates.

[Fortify]

Wars will be stop before economic crash.

Before the big guys knows wars will be over they take out their funds of the markets and military industry.

Wars are nothing about personal wars are just bullish for the markets assets and commodites.
But before the huge economic crash off course they take out money.

We have on fact economic crash by 2029 so that means the smart money need to cash out their money in pockets and be out of the markets 2027 -2028 allready always before wars stops the smart money always exit from the markets.
Before gold and other assets commodities prices fall they take out their funds , when wars will be over it means bear Market and end of the bull Market.

You sound absolutely clueless about how the world work, you seem to think everything is ordered and transitions smoothly. Picking random years out of the future to claim this is when there will be a crash with no intelligent insight is not helpful in the slightest. You seem to think that every rich person knows every other rich person and that they all work in tandem, when the reality is they will react to markets crashing in the same chaotic way - sell when things start looking really bad. Many big company owners are simply incapable of liquidating fast, they often have to give months of warning when they want to sell large stock positions in publicly traded companies, yet economic disaster can unravel wealth way faster than that. Nobody can predict what will spur the next economic disaster, as they tend never to be like past ones.

[Emeraldo]

War sometimes can be a way to peace, at the end of every war one person always has an edge over the other which means that one person feels the impact of the war more than the other but however a lot happens that things can not remain inplace after every war, by this am talking about communal war.