I would like to know your thoughts about the user Satofan44

[AB de Royse777]

It's been long I showed interest in reputation :-D



I noticed him (Satofan44) from the red feedback he left on my trust page which interested me to check his sent feedback history. To my surprise it seems I am not alone but there are a lot of respected members are in his negative list. Upgrade00, BADecker, dkbit98, Shishir99, alani123, zasad@, Wind_FURY are some common name everyone knows. Here we have the whole list and his feedback.





One thing is sure that this user has good understanding with JG. Anyway, let me know your thoughts about the user. The feedback he left to users don't matter unless he has a change of being in the DT list though but my concern is what chances does he have to be in your Trust list if you have one (now or in the future)?

With a ~ or without a ~?

[AB de Royse777]

Looks like in around 5 months he picked up the understanding of forum feature very well. In fact, in a few weeks (first on 2025-06-16 and 2nd on 2025-06-22) he understood how to use the trust feedback. Which one is his main account?

[Hazink]

The feedback he left to users don't matter unless he has a change of being in the DT list though but my concern is what chances does he have to be in your Trust list if you have one (now or in the future)?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548233.20

The said user was once in DT2 but was later demoted _removed , probably due to his incorrect use of the trust rating. His chances of getting back might be if he changed his ways and got people to trust him again.

[Mahiyammahi]

As far as I know he has a pretty decent knowledge about Bitcoin Technical sector.but he is a bit aggressive on forum . Previously  a DT1 member kept him in trust list and without having the proper knowledge he tagged a reputated user. It's like Tagging a user is a common thing to him. Which yahoo62278 also mentioned I saw. But the guy Satofan44 has pretty good knowledge in bitcoin and his writing style is also good which is only thing impressive. I hope he would consider giving his feedback more carefully

[_act_]

Satofan was in DT2 before, I think he was included by joker_josue but he was removed after he noticed how bad he is giving people negative tags.

I left him a neutral tag because I saw how bad he is in giving people red tag but he later retaliated by giving me neutral tag but later maybe he smoked and changed it to negative feedback.

One thing is sure that this user has good understanding with JG. Anyway, let me know your thoughts about the user. The feedback he left to users don't matter unless he has a change of being in the DT list though but my concern is what chances does he have to be in your Trust list if you have one (now or in the future)?

With a ~ or without a ~?

He is a very good poster, he is good in technical discussions but it is good for people to give him neutral tags that he is bad in giving people tags. I did that some months ago.

His feedbacks will remain useless even if it appears on my on my profile just as other bad ones are useless because I did nothing wrong.

[logfiles]

I saw how quickly he created a trust flag the other day on a thread that was still based on speculation and on going through his trust wall, I then realized the kind of member he was. The one that seems to be too excited to dish out the reds, even where not necessary.

All I know is I have seen this kind of thing play out before. It always ends up with someone having a completely ruined account at the end of the day and there is no coming back out of that.

He is a very good poster, he is good in technical discussions but it is good for people to give him neutral tags that he is bad in giving people tags. I did that some months ago.

His feedbacks will remain useless even if it appears on my on my profile just as other bad ones are useless because I did nothing wrong.

The best thing to do is to exclude him from the trust list because the feedback he sends out to people can not be trusted. I see some members have already done that.

[Ivystar5]

I have come across the user many times in the Development and Technical Discussion board where heade so many valid contributions that I personally consider expertly smart but then he is quick to anger I guess, I have also noticed that he disagrees with opinions which considers not correct aggressively and hence since the trust system is the only place he could express anger, there you go with those trust he gave, especially negative regardless of who it is and the person reputation already.

Good post, smart but not quality to handle DT because abuse will be flooded more than it has already been noticed.

[lovesmayfamilis]

He's a completely negative person, in my opinion, something I've written about repeatedly. You can be very knowledgeable about Bitcoin, but refrain from bragging about it or insulting people, especially regarding sensitive topics like race; there are many diverse individuals here. However, this character regularly insults users, which, in my opinion, is completely unacceptable. And while I don't ignore him, no matter how useful his posts are, they are scrolled through without reading. Tolerance isn't something he's known for. He's been on my distrust list for quite some time now ~.

[Shishir99]

He is just a piece of shit. One positive aspect is that he has some technical knowledge. Otherwise, he is a worse version of a BSV troll. I suspect it is the alternative account of the BSV troll. Since they were banned from their main account and likely from some other alternative accounts, he decided to create a new account and make some money this time. But unfortunately, the trolls actually cannot hide their actual behaviour, no matter how hard they try.

The DT members should exclude him and never let him enter the DT network. I think I tried to talk to him in another thread where he abused the feedback system, and then he decided to leave a negative feedback on my profile. LOL.

[Satofan44]

I am not part of this default trust network, why does this matter then? I have been told it does not matter, but now you are telling me otherwise. Make up your mind.

Upgrade00, BADecker, dkbit98, Shishir99, alani123, zasad@, Wind_FURY are some common name everyone knows. Here we have the whole list and his feedback.

These people post misinformation or spam all the time. Once you find someone like d5000 in the recipients of my feedback then you can contact me about it.

The best thing to do is to exclude him from the trust list because the feedback he sends out to people can not be trusted. I see some members have already done that.

Whatever preserves your income, I got you baby.  

If someone retaliates after recommending me to remove a feedback and I don't do it, would that be blackmail? I guess it depends on what your username is.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I saw how quickly he created a trust flag the other day on a thread that was still based on speculation and on going through his trust wall, I then realized the kind of member he was. The one that seems to be too excited to dish out the reds, even where not necessary.

I also excluded him from my list when he too lightly created a flag against Royse777 just because he had been absent from the forum for a few days. In the end, the only one who supported it was him (not just because of the flag, I also looked at the feedback).

I am not part of this default trust network, why does this matter then?

What we are discussing is precisely why you are not in DT. It is not the most important topic in the forum, that's for sure, but that section is a legitimate place to discuss such things.

[Satofan44]

I also excluded him from my list when he too lightly created a flag against Royse777 just because he had been absent from the forum for a few days. In the end, the only one who supported it was him (not just because of the flag, I also looked at the feedback).

That event shows all my alleged experience indeed, I hope my main account is knows how to use flags better. I withdrew support I think. It seems that the status quo here does not care if someone gets scammed through facilitation as long as they get to continue participating in signature campaigns. There's nothing that I can do about this, it is how things are here.

I am not part of this default trust network, why does this matter then?

What we are discussing is precisely why you are not in DT. It is not the most important topic in the forum, that's for sure, but that section is a legitimate place to discuss such things.

I don't get it. I am not someone here. I am unknown in terms of reputation, as unknown as most users just without the spamming aspect of the majority. Why does it matter? Should we open topics on every random member, troll and so on?

[Don Pedro Dinero]

That event shows all my alleged experience indeed, I hope my main account is knows how to use flags better. I withdrew support I think. It seems that the status quo here does not care if someone gets scammed through facilitation as long as they get to continue participating in signature campaigns. There's nothing that I can do about this, it is how things are here.

You don't express yourself very well, so I don't quite understand you. Are you saying that there has been a scam and that all of us who haven't supported the flag are somehow complicit because we are participating in signature campaigns?

I don't get it. I am not someone here. I am unknown in terms of reputation, as unknown as most users just without the spamming aspect of the majority. Why does it matter? Should we open topics on every random member, troll and so on?

You can open any threads you want as long as they are relevant (otherwise they may be dealt with by moderators). Another thing is the engagement you get. You might open a thread about another forum user here and not get many responses, or most of them may be contrary to what you think. But as for opening threads, if you want, you can open one about me, the OP, trolls or whoever you want.

[Satofan44]

You don't express yourself very well, so I don't quite understand you. Are you saying that there has been a scam and that all of us who haven't supported the flag are somehow complicit because we are participating in signature campaigns?

AB de Royse777 implied that I have a main account in his second post because of my alleged experience in using the feedback system, I was referring to that. For the other part, did not AB de Royse777 represent a mixer who scammed a user? There are no consequences for facilitating scams here depending on who does it.

You can open any threads you want as long as they are relevant (otherwise they may be dealt with by moderators). Another thing is the engagement you get. You might open a thread about another forum user here and not get many responses, or most of them may be contrary to what you think. But as for opening threads, if you want, you can open one about me, the OP, trolls or whoever you want.

I don't see the benefit of doing that, but thanks.

Many people of the status quo here are extremely biased and abusive of their positions. Whether it is merit sources or default trust members or whatever, the same applies.

However, this character regularly insults users, which, in my opinion, is completely unacceptable. And while I don't ignore him, no matter how useful his posts are, they are scrolled through without reading. Tolerance isn't something he's known for. He's been on my distrust list for quite some time now ~.

I am sure you would say the same to G. Maxwell.   He often doesn't hold his punches either, but he's just a much better writer.

The only dick pick lover in Bitcoin seems to be PepeLapiu2 -- apparently the rainbow hair dye got to his brain and every post is about dick pics.

He would be an example of an objective merit giver. We disagree on several points throughout many threads, I even made some negative statements about him recently for which I got the equivalent of a slap in the face in written form. He still merited me on a good post afterwards.  

[Btcdeybodi]

As far as i know, the user in question is a knowledgeable forum member which is why he has earned many merits just within 5 months of forum registration. However, i have seen many posts where he continuously trolls and criticize forum members both reputable and non reputable and what i can just say is that he is a very temperamental person but do we really need to pay attention to his sent feedback? Hell no, it won't appear in the default trust since he was removed from DT2 after @joker_josue who included him in his trust list later removed him as a result of too many complaints by users about how he was handling his DT2 power to tag accounts unnecessary. Right now, i can see that he has also sent a neutral feedback to @Lovesmayfamilis. With his activity in trolling and tagging forum members unnecessary, i doubt if anyone (DT1 inclusive) will ever include him in their trust list for him to have the privilege of using the default trust.

[Satofan44]

As far as i know, the user in question is a knowledgeable forum member which is why he has earned many merits just within 5 months of forum registration. However, i have seen many posts where he continuously trolls and criticize forum members both reputable and non reputable and what i can just say is that he is a very temperamental person but do we really need to pay attention to his sent feedback? Hell no, it won't appear in the default trust since he was removed from DT2 after @joker_josue who included him in his trust list later removed him as a result of too many complaints by users about how he was handling his DT2 power to tag accounts unnecessary.  With his activity in trolling and tagging forum members unnecessary, i doubt if anyone (DT1 inclusive) will ever include him in their trust list for him to have the privilege of using the default trust.

There is not even 1 instance of me trolling anywhere, I don't do trolling. Please refrain from making up lies to sabotage my account according to the forum rules. The rest is accurate enough.  

Right now, i can see that he has also sent a neutral feedback to @Lovesmayfamilis.

It is as accurate as it could be. Prove me wrong.

[yahoo62278]

As far as I know he has a pretty decent knowledge about Bitcoin Technical sector.but he is a bit aggressive on forum . Previously  a DT1 member kept him in trust list and without having the proper knowledge he tagged a reputated user. It's like Tagging a user is a common thing to him. Which yahoo62278 also mentioned I saw. But the guy Satofan44 has pretty good knowledge in bitcoin and his writing style is also good which is only thing impressive. I hope he would consider giving his feedback more carefully

I think you are giving false information here, I don't recall mentioning anything about said users tagging practices. I made a snide comment about the users reasons for being here and left it at that.

As far as the user themselves is concerned, they appear to be knowledgeable about bitcoin and technical aspects but lack patience when it comes to reputation issues. I barely have interaction with the account, so I cannot really say much more based on my limited knowledge.

This feels like a fishing expedition to be honest and I'm not really a fan. I don't love the shoot first ask questions later approach. Most of you know who digs deep into profiles so rather then make a thread questioning if someone is an alt(which is legal), do a private investigation. If something is found then make a post to garner support. Seems like that would be a more appropriate way to go about this.

If it's about the way he acted fast and created a flag, reputation issues, then ~ them and ignore, problem solved. Attacking each other solves nothing without more. Maybe he's learning, maybe he's not. Gotta wait n see how they grow.

[Btcdeybodi]

As far as i know, the user in question is a knowledgeable forum member which is why he has earned many merits just within 5 months of forum registration. However, i have seen many posts where he continuously trolls and criticize forum members both reputable and non reputable and what i can just say is that he is a very temperamental person but do we really need to pay attention to his sent feedback? Hell no, it won't appear in the default trust since he was removed from DT2 after @joker_josue who included him in his trust list later removed him as a result of too many complaints by users about how he was handling his DT2 power to tag accounts unnecessary.  With his activity in trolling and tagging forum members unnecessary, i doubt if anyone (DT1 inclusive) will ever include him in their trust list for him to have the privilege of using the default trust.

There is not even 1 instance of me trolling anywhere, I don't do trolling. Please refrain from making up lies to sabotage my account according to the forum rules.

Like seriously? you don't troll right. I never wanted to show posts of where you troll a forum member but since you said am making up lies, if your statement below is not trolling then tell me what it is please

This is misinformation, not even close to why merit was created for the forum. Before merit introduction, the forum was full of low quality posts and spams. Only activity and post was required to rank up and it was easy then to get to a new rank, as a single line of spam post can give you activity to rank up.

You're brain damaged. The try hard attempt to get some merit wouldn't be so obvious were it not for the fact that you completely missed the point.  

[Satofan44]

If it's about the way he acted fast and created a flag, reputation issues, then ~ them and ignore, problem solved. Attacking each other solves nothing without more. Maybe he's learning, maybe he's not. Gotta wait n see how they grow.

He opened this thread shortly after privately recommending me to remove the negative feedback. Very trustworthy behavior I recon, right?  

Like seriously? you don't troll right. I never wanted to show posts of where you troll a forum member but since you said am making up lies, if your statement below is not trolling then tell me what it is please

This is misinformation, not even close to why merit was created for the forum. Before merit introduction, the forum was full of low quality posts and spams. Only activity and post was required to rank up and it was easy then to get to a new rank, as a single line of spam post can give you activity to rank up.

You're brain damaged. The try hard attempt to get some merit wouldn't be so obvious were it not for the fact that you completely missed the point.  

An insult is not the same as trolling and neither is exposing someone for writing a bad post. Get back to the dictionary before making such accusation. A lot of the posts from the people coming from 3rd world countries are extremely desperate attempts at farming merit. Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not work. If you want to farm merit just stay in your local boards, there are plenty of corrupt people there.

[Btcdeybodi]

Like seriously? you don't troll right. I never wanted to show posts of where you troll a forum member but since you said am making up lies, if your statement below is not trolling then tell me what it is please

This is misinformation, not even close to why merit was created for the forum. Before merit introduction, the forum was full of low quality posts and spams. Only activity and post was required to rank up and it was easy then to get to a new rank, as a single line of spam post can give you activity to rank up.

You're brain damaged. The try hard attempt to get some merit wouldn't be so obvious were it not for the fact that you completely missed the point.  

An insult is not the same as trolling and neither is exposing someone for writing a bad post. Get back to the dictionary before making such accusation. A lot of the posts from the people coming from 3rd world countries are extremely desperate attempts at farming merit. Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not work. If you want to farm merit just stay in your local boards, there are plenty of corrupt people there.

Okay let us assume that an insult is not same as trolling, but why the insult when you are completely wrong about what you know nothing about. Talking about third world countries, how does it correlates to our discussion here? so replying to your baseless claims that am making up lies against you have now become part of farming merits right? the last time i checked, most of my merits are not earned in my local board and forget the fact that i called you a knowledgeable user but some of your posts deserves the trashcan because they are either off-topics, trolling, insults and cyberbullying because telling someone who has spent years in the forum before you that ''his brain is damaged'' was uncalled for, are you a medical doctor to tell someone ''you're brain damaged'', What insolence