Vitalic Buterin endorces core 30?

[PepeLapiu2]

https://www.btcc.com/en-CA/amp/square/CryptotimesIO/1074972

Vitalic Buterin, creator of Ethereum sides with core in the spam debacle.
I guess we shouldn't be too surprised since weirdo Vitalic thinks child p**n possession should be legal.
If I were the core dictator, I would call Vitalic and ask him to endorce Knots instead, as to make Knots look bad, not core.

How much more evidence do you guys need to see core 30 is spamware and core needs to go?

Join the fight, run a Knots node:
https://bitcoinknots.org/

[PostQuantumBTC]

I can never ever run Bitcoin Knots because it is too centralized, it will be a bad future for bitcoin.

I prefer Bitcoin Core.

[PepeLapiu2]

I can never ever run Bitcoin Knots because it is too centralized, it will be a bad future for bitcoin.

I prefer Bitcoin Core.

Too centralized? All that Knots does is take the core implementation and adds filters to it so that YOU can decide what to put in your mempool. All the filters in Knots are user configurable it a separate user friendly interface.

Core has only one filter, which they are trying to blow open. And it's not user friendly to try and change it. It requires you to edit settings files. No gui provided. Because they hope you won't bother to research how to change it.

Knots puts the node in power. Core refuses to allow you the ability to configure your own node.

Core thinks Bitcoin is nothing more than "just a database".

[headingnorth]

Vitalik Buterin once made a tweet that supported the legalization of ch**d porn.

Link

Is it a coincidence Vitalik is now endorsing Core 30 which opens the door to spamming bitcoin with such illicit garbage?
I think not.

Core devs better hope that it doesn't get spammed with CSAM or else there is a good chance they will be going to prison.
Which is where they belong IMO.

[NotATether]

Why would we care about what Vitalik thinks about Bitcoin? This is not his chain.

Discussion with the proponents, stakeholders and users of Bitcoin are what's more relevant to us.

[PepeLapiu2]

Why would we care about what Vitalik thinks about Bitcoin? This is not his chain.

My point is that when a centralized shitcoin creator backs core, that should tell you something about core. It's like a pedophile recommending a babysitter for you.

Discussion with the proponents, stakeholders and users of Bitcoin are what's more relevant to us.

Well, the proponent in question here (core) is endorsed by a pedophile scamcoin shitcoiner.