the other side of banning gambling

[Onyeeze]

I think there are many sensitive issues here, such as religious sentiments and also the culture of that country or that region. For example, considering that the cultures and religious customs of Western and Middle Eastern or Asian countries are very different, gambling in one area is considered bad and gambling in another area is considered normal.

On the one hand, just as many people will lose their jobs if gambling is banned, many addicted persons or many young people will be freed from gambling addiction. Just as gambling brings revenue to the government on one hand, on the other hand, gambling bankrupts the people and, if taken in total, causes losses to the country. Now, the situation of a country is at this stage, the government of that country can take its own decisions based on that.

actually gambling brings a revenue for the government especially those country government that does not joke with tax, but today effect of gambling is very condemnable to humans,from my own way of understanding, gambling has destroyed many home and also renders some people homeless because then we are hoping that with gambling there will become extra rich, so I think if government should ban gambling it will not cause any harm to anybody rather it will reduce some expenses from people and relief some people from spending on necessarily

[Crypto Library]

actually gambling brings a revenue for the government especially those country government that does not joke with tax, but today effect of gambling is very condemnable to humans,from my own way of understanding, gambling has destroyed many home and also renders some people homeless because then we are hoping that with gambling there will become extra rich, so I think if government should ban gambling it will not cause any harm to anybody rather it will reduce some expenses from people and relief some people from spending on necessarily

You have actually raised another important point. The gambling industry mainly brings good tax reviews for the government in those countries where the government is strict about collecting taxes. But if we talk about third world countries, then due to corruption there, it is seen that many people skip government taxes. In this case, I think gambling sites evade taxes better.
So it is also very easy to understand that taking gambling to those countries will do more harm than good to the economy of the country, especially if the youth there are more addicted to gambling.

[LUCKMCFLY]

This may be different for some people. Personally, I say this: every country has its governments, some are better than others, but it must be considered that each government is different and wants different things. Talking about this in general is complicated , it's much easier when talking about a specific country Perhaps in the United Kingdom they don't view casino games favorably.

[MRY]

This may be different for some people. Personally, I say this: every country has its governments, some are better than others, but it must be considered that each government is different and wants different things. Talking about this in general is complicated , it's much easier when talking about a specific country Perhaps in the United Kingdom they don't view casino games favorably.

The attitudes of governments to the activities of casinos are usually connected to the way of preservation of social stability keeping in mind long-term cultural value. It is possible to observe that every country works out regulations depending on the local interests, and, therefore, the model applied in a particular region might not be suitable in another. We also believe that negotiations are more dedicated when we are discussing a particular country. We observe the UK using stringent laws to make sure that gambling does not result in riskiness to a high level and therefore the perception of the masses tends to adhere to the regulations that are established by the relevant authorities.

[Onyeeze]

actually gambling brings a revenue for the government especially those country government that does not joke with tax, but today effect of gambling is very condemnable to humans,from my own way of understanding, gambling has destroyed many home and also renders some people homeless because then we are hoping that with gambling there will become extra rich, so I think if government should ban gambling it will not cause any harm to anybody rather it will reduce some expenses from people and relief some people from spending on necessarily

You have actually raised another important point. The gambling industry mainly brings good tax reviews for the government in those countries where the government is strict about collecting taxes. But if we talk about third world countries, then due to corruption there, it is seen that many people skip government taxes. In this case, I think gambling sites evade taxes better.
So it is also very easy to understand that taking gambling to those countries will do more harm than good to the economy of the country, especially if the youth there are more addicted to gambling.

actually gambling brings revenue to the government and that is why many country is interested for any gambling web or platform that is into in their country should have operating license so any gambling website who is operating without license is the one that they are interested of banning because they are not benefiting from such a particular gambling, so that is why I some countries government raise alarm to stop some illegal operating gambling, because there are no benefiting from it once a country is benefiting from gambling that gambling platform will not be disturbed by the government any longer

[reefsea]

This may be different for some people. Personally, I say this: every country has its governments, some are better than others, but it must be considered that each government is different and wants different things. Talking about this in general is complicated , it's much easier when talking about a specific country Perhaps in the United Kingdom they don't view casino games favorably.

What the government does is solely for their own benefit and to limit the harm to their people from these conditions.
So with this condition, it is clear that every government will do according to the conditions that occur in the country they lead in this case because after all they know what they do will still be considered as an interest for their country, including in policies in gambling.

When governments in developed countries may see gambling as a very good source because apart from the condition of the economic growth of the people is quite good, they also realize that in the end this will be profitable if it is under their legal authority, unlike countries that are still underdeveloped where the minimum wage is small and the living conditions of the people are still very difficult. When gambling is relaxed, it can actually burden most of its citizens so it is quite natural that there will be conditions where legality is a little stricter.

[Crypto Library]

actually gambling brings revenue to the government and that is why many country is interested for any gambling web or platform that is into in their country should have operating license so any gambling website who is operating without license is the one that they are interested of banning because they are not benefiting from such a particular gambling, so that is why I some countries government raise alarm to stop some illegal operating gambling, because there are no benefiting from it once a country is benefiting from gambling that gambling platform will not be disturbed by the government any longer

I won't disagree with you because there are many countries where they get a huge tax from the gambling industry, so they don't ban gambling.

However, in those countries where there are laws but no implementation of the law, especially third world countries and developing countries, I don't think that if gambling is introduced and they can collect a lot of taxes, if I talk about my country, ordinary people can evade income tax by paying some bribes, in that case, big gambling sites can evade it even better. And this government does not have the resources to catch them. Considering that, I think it is better to ban gambling in these countries.

[danadc]

However, in those countries where there are laws but no implementation of the law, especially third world countries and developing countries, I don't think that if gambling is introduced and they can collect a lot of taxes, if I talk about my country, ordinary people can evade income tax by paying some bribes, in that case, big gambling sites can evade it even better. And this government does not have the resources to catch them. Considering that, I think it is better to ban gambling in these countries.

In third world countries, or the one I left, casinos are accepted because they ask casino owners for money to operate, but they don't just ask for an initial fee they ask monthly or weekly , or they establish a quota that must be paid to the government.

The government will always take a cut from casinos and businesses of this type. The casinos can operate well, but only with that "vaccine."

[Crypto Library]

In third world countries, or the one I left, casinos are accepted because they ask casino owners for money to operate, but they don't just ask for an initial fee they ask monthly or weekly , or they establish a quota that must be paid to the government.

The government will always take a cut from casinos and businesses of this type. The casinos can operate well, but only with that "vaccine."

This is not only in your country or the country you left but also in most third countries, the same common scenario is seen. However, in my opinion, if the government had taken taxes from casinos to run the government in a legal way, then the matter would have been different.

But I have seen many cases where even after the government declared casinos illegal, the government's MPs or ministers take bribes from illegal casinos and allow them to operate, which is basically not accepted by the government. It is used by some individuals or groups for their own private interests, which is not of any use to the country or the people.

[ejikeme24]

actually gambling brings a revenue for the government especially those country government that does not joke with tax, but today effect of gambling is very condemnable to humans,from my own way of understanding, gambling has destroyed many home and also renders some people homeless because then we are hoping that with gambling there will become extra rich, so I think if government should ban gambling it will not cause any harm to anybody rather it will reduce some expenses from people and relief some people from spending on necessarily

You're right gambling has done so many things both good and bad because i can't capitalize on the negative side but I would also acknowledge that gambling has helped most people from one way and the other even though the beneficiaries are very few but I will still admit that. And truly the bad side of gambling is more alarming because it has led people into doing something they never imagined in their entire life but they just see themselves doing that thing that they never thought nor imagine of doing due to frustration caused by gambling, so gambling  have put most people into a very big mess which some people is already tied up by gambling so banning gambling can relief some gamblers in some stress and also affect those that are gambling for fun.

[Juse14]

All has to be fair, and it is perfectly accurate – generally, good profits in terms of job creation and the economy. The case in point: thousands of people are employed in betting shops and casinos across the country – an undeniable fact. However, this in no way warrants overlooking the problems that problem gambling brings into people’s lives, in some cases from financial problems to family issues to mental health tribulations.

Such governments appear always more risk-focused. They know that such gambling addiction, debt, and impulsive action social harms also entail significant economic impacts in terms of rehabilitation costs, law enforcement, social problems, and lost productivity. Hence even though it is profit-making, they feel the compulsion to restrict it through heavy taxation or tight regulation.

They really do not forget that gambling is a legitimate and money-making business, but they must weigh both ends: the economic benefits and the social harms.

[Sonia_123]

when lawmakers discuss about anything with regards to gambling or casinos, they usually focus on its effects on gamblers so they always reason that it is always valid to ban gambling or discourage it because it will make gambling less prevalent in their countries but what the lawmakers do not take into consideration is that behind these casinos are also normal citizens who are trying to make money by building businesses or working


why is it that the authorities often do not consider or acknowledge gambling as a real or legitimate profitable industry that drives the economy and helps thousands of people in their livelihood?

It is because of their jealousy and self-centeredness because if casino owners happens to be part of them, they will look for all means to promote and legalize gambling in the country without reasoning if it has side effect or not,  remember if politicians are not involved in anything profitable and don't have the access of a genuine income that is profitable and cannot politize it then it becomes a very big problem to them and so they feels like it's not supposed to exist, without minding the economic benefits it brings to the economy or individuals that gambles responsibly.