A good analyst may not mean a good trader

[ScamViruS]

A good analyst has market knowledge and knows how to analyze the market. To be a good trader, it is important to have market knowledge, a trader must have enough intelligence to make the right decisions at the right time. A good analyst can research the market well, which can lead to profits if he or she becomes a trader and has the ability to make instant decisions. Because a trader has to make decisions based on market conditions, they have to take advantage of market opportunities quickly to take advantage of the market.

With good knowledge, you'll do your best, and one way to achieve the best results is through thorough analysis, which leads to being a good trader. You're right: knowledge is crucial in trading. Simply going about it without sufficient knowledge is tantamount to relying on luck, while knowledge and analysis can significantly increase your chances of success. It's foolish to do so without any knowledge at all.

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

[|MINER|]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

I would like to agree with you but at the same time I would like to ask this question that who is actually called a good analyst? Those who are experts in trading analysis such as fundamental analysis and technical analysis are called analysts, right?
So my point is that if a good analyst may not mean a good trader, then who would actually be a good trader? A trader can understand the market situation through market analysis and take trades accordingly, although there is a matter of emotion here, even in that case, checking the market situation through technical analysis and fundamental license falls within this,

[junder]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

Ya having knowledge is one way to minimize the risk of loss. Even if the results are disappointing, don't feel like a failure, as that's perfectly normal. At least we've done our best with the knowledge we have. Thinking that our knowledge is still lacking is a good mindset, so returning to learning is the right choice, not giving up. After all, learning anything these days is quite easy using the internet.

[Out of mind]

I thought of this today few hours ago and I decided to also include it as one of the topics I will post today on this forum.

What if someone is good in analyses and he is an analyst, can such person be losing while trading?

Or a good analyst will prefer swing trading and holding than scalping and day trading which are the riskiest trading types?

If you can use some or more people as an example in your post, I will really appreciate that.

Even a good trading analyst will face losses because during trading, the market is volatile at times. Trading is not an easy task, it is very difficult, experience and skills are very important, analysis alone will not suffice. The market can move towards a decline in any situation and a good trading expert can face losses. So I think it is less risky to be a holder than to trade, moreover, I prefer holding for a long time. There is a risk of losing money in trading, but there is much less in investing.

[Zanab247]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

Ya having knowledge is one way to minimize the risk of loss. Even if the results are disappointing, don't feel like a failure, as that's perfectly normal. At least we've done our best with the knowledge we have. Thinking that our knowledge is still lacking is a good mindset, so returning to learning is the right choice, not giving up.

Knowledge is very important in anything we are doing in real life, because for people to know you as a good analyst in trading show that other traders around you have feel your impact and your results you have achieved so far from crypto trading. A good analyst will never allow his losses to be higher than his profits, because he knows how to follow the right direction to make sure he is not part of those that will experience loss in the market.

Internet have helped many people to upgrade in their careers to achieve their goals easily, because they don't  have to depend on their mentors before they can get the answer they want to succeed in crypto trading this days.

[ScamViruS]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

I would like to agree with you but at the same time I would like to ask this question that who is actually called a good analyst? Those who are experts in trading analysis such as fundamental analysis and technical analysis are called analysts, right?
So my point is that if a good analyst may not mean a good trader, then who would actually be a good trader? A trader can understand the market situation through market analysis and take trades accordingly, although there is a matter of emotion here, even in that case, checking the market situation through technical analysis and fundamental license falls within this,

Even a good analyst can face losses if he or she trades in the market. Even if you can analyze the market perfectly, if you are unable to make quick decisions, an unexpected incident may occur in the market, which can lead to big losses. I have seen many analysts I know who understand the market well and can make assumptions about market trends. But I have seen them make losses. They often face losses due to the market being unpredictable and due to not being able to make the right decisions at the right time despite being a good analyst.

[ChocolateBitcoinK]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

I would like to agree with you but at the same time I would like to ask this question that who is actually called a good analyst? Those who are experts in trading analysis such as fundamental analysis and technical analysis are called analysts, right?
So my point is that if a good analyst may not mean a good trader, then who would actually be a good trader? A trader can understand the market situation through market analysis and take trades accordingly, although there is a matter of emotion here, even in that case, checking the market situation through technical analysis and fundamental license falls within this,

Even a good analyst can face losses if he or she trades in the market. Even if you can analyze the market perfectly, if you are unable to make quick decisions, an unexpected incident may occur in the market, which can lead to big losses. I have seen many analysts I know who understand the market well and can make assumptions about market trends. But I have seen them make losses. They often face losses due to the market being unpredictable and due to not being able to make the right decisions at the right time despite being a good analyst.

It will happen to anyone, there is no guarantee, no matter how skilled you are, no matter how well you research and make decisions, there will always be the possibility of loss. No one can ever trade completely without loss, he may be profitable most of the time but he must face losses at some point, this is a reality that we have to accept, there will be the possibility of loss but despite this we have to acquire the skills to sustain ourselves and recover.

[ScamViruS]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long. Therefore, to trade professionally, a trader must have very good trading knowledge.

I would like to agree with you but at the same time I would like to ask this question that who is actually called a good analyst? Those who are experts in trading analysis such as fundamental analysis and technical analysis are called analysts, right?
So my point is that if a good analyst may not mean a good trader, then who would actually be a good trader? A trader can understand the market situation through market analysis and take trades accordingly, although there is a matter of emotion here, even in that case, checking the market situation through technical analysis and fundamental license falls within this,

Even a good analyst can face losses if he or she trades in the market. Even if you can analyze the market perfectly, if you are unable to make quick decisions, an unexpected incident may occur in the market, which can lead to big losses. I have seen many analysts I know who understand the market well and can make assumptions about market trends. But I have seen them make losses. They often face losses due to the market being unpredictable and due to not being able to make the right decisions at the right time despite being a good analyst.

It will happen to anyone, there is no guarantee, no matter how skilled you are, no matter how well you research and make decisions, there will always be the possibility of loss. No one can ever trade completely without loss, he may be profitable most of the time but he must face losses at some point, this is a reality that we have to accept, there will be the possibility of loss but despite this we have to acquire the skills to sustain ourselves and recover.

This is the main point here. Even a highly skilled person can trade in the market and see losses. Just because he is a good analyst does not guarantee that he will be able to profit from all the trades he takes. This is actually not possible in reality, the market runs on its own rules, but sometimes even highly skilled analysts can be fooled by the market and make the wrong decisions. Trading knowledge and skills help a trader to predict the next movement of the market, but they do not guarantee that all decisions will be correct. Knowledge and skills are always considered effective, but they can also fail. So an analyst always wants to learn from the market, they never become overconfident and boast about their skills.

[tvplus006]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long...

I think it's more realistic to see a good trader as an analyst than an analyst as a trader. Not everyone with good theoretical knowledge can achieve success in practice. There is an opinion that those who could not profit from their knowledge in practice go to earn money as a teacher.

[junder]

Knowledge is very important in anything we are doing in real life, because for people to know you as a good analyst in trading show that other traders around you have feel your impact and your results you have achieved so far from crypto trading. A good analyst will never allow his losses to be higher than his profits, because he knows how to follow the right direction to make sure he is not part of those that will experience loss in the market.

Internet have helped many people to upgrade in their careers to achieve their goals easily, because they don't  have to depend on their mentors before they can get the answer they want to succeed in crypto trading this days.

Of course, knowledge is crucial in trading, even in matters outside of trading, such as business. When starting a business, you should have clear knowledge and a clear goal to avoid losses from mistakes. Having this knowledge is key to ensuring everything runs smoothly, whether trading or anything else.
There was a time when trading was booming in my community, to the point where a close friend of mine even paid money to join a group that claimed to offer VIP access because it offered special training. Unfortunately, he's now completely lost interest in trading and is now familiar with gambling.

[|MINER|]

Even a good analyst can face losses if he or she trades in the market. Even if you can analyze the market perfectly, if you are unable to make quick decisions, an unexpected incident may occur in the market, which can lead to big losses. I have seen many analysts I know who understand the market well and can make assumptions about market trends. But I have seen them make losses. They often face losses due to the market being unpredictable and due to not being able to make the right decisions at the right time despite being a good analyst.

In short, human nature means the right to emotion, and creatures that have emotions are more likely and more likely to make mistakes. If we consider this from this point of view, it is not a big fact that professional traders make losses, but the important thing here is that if professional traders who have trading analysis skills ever make a mistake and lose in trading, then later they can use their analysis skills again to recover their losses, but those who don't have trading knowledge or analysis skill those peoples are actually doing gambling instead of trading with the human lives.
So if a person want to do trading they must have the knowlege about the market if they don't want to be in lose.

[pliego]

Even a good analyst can face losses if he or she trades in the market. Even if you can analyze the market perfectly, if you are unable to make quick decisions, an unexpected incident may occur in the market, which can lead to big losses. I have seen many analysts I know who understand the market well and can make assumptions about market trends. But I have seen them make losses. They often face losses due to the market being unpredictable and due to not being able to make the right decisions at the right time despite being a good analyst.

In short, human nature means the right to emotion, and creatures that have emotions are more likely and more likely to make mistakes. If we consider this from this point of view, it is not a big fact that professional traders make losses, but the important thing here is that if professional traders who have trading analysis skills ever make a mistake and lose in trading, then later they can use their analysis skills again to recover their losses, but those who don't have trading knowledge or analysis skill those peoples are actually doing gambling instead of trading with the human lives.
So if a person want to do trading they must have the knowlege about the market if they don't want to be in lose.

Seen this firsthand. The best traders I know lose regularly, but their losses are small and planned. The difference between trading and gambling is exactly what you said: having a system to recover, not hoping for luck to flip things around

[lornadane]

Absolutely, a good analyst can still be a bad trader. Analysis is about being right, trading is about making money. You can read the market perfectly and still lose if entries, exits, position sizing, or emotions are off. Trading adds execution and psychology on top of analysis, and that’s where many analysts struggle.

[batang_bitcoin]

Seen this firsthand. The best traders I know lose regularly, but their losses are small and planned. The difference between trading and gambling is exactly what you said: having a system to recover, not hoping for luck to flip things around

Best traders will have no skip in losses but you're right, they can minimize it and they know how to act upon it if they have lost a trade in a day. They're not as emotional as the others who keeps on trading even if they've been into so much losses. Discipline is the key there and they have it, they know if they're a winner for that trade and when they're not, they'll stop as soon as possible because that's part of the strategy for them that makes them a good trader. A good analyst usually don't trade and only uses it either to make contents out of it and sell it to the newbies who are looking for trading lessons. That's what I mostly see from these good analysts because they understand the market and the terms of it.

[Hyphen(-)]

Absolutely, a good analyst can still be a bad trader. Analysis is about being right, trading is about making money. You can read the market perfectly and still lose if entries, exits, position sizing, or emotions are off. Trading adds execution and psychology on top of analysis, and that’s where many analysts struggle.

That can be the case but I think if you are a good analyst, to get your point of entry and exist will not be your problem because that’s the reason why you are a good analyst, you have the ability to predict what can happen and you will know when to exist.

The only thing I see as a reason for them not to be good traders is emotions; to control your emotion is always difficult, so you can be a good analyst and have no mind to take risk or your emotions keep controlling you, if that is happening g you can not be a good trader because you will always be afraid to lose your money.

[Adbitco]

The market are so unpredictable and because I have came across some people who are that pro in trading back then when the entire crypto space weren't this stiff in terms of new projects launching and listing almost every day if not every 30-1 hr time, people gives information from various platform just be vigilant with their trade, more when it comes of listing on reputed exchange such as Binance where they had already given their announcement on when to list you would see people fund their trading account and still end up no making the profits they want. There people who may analyzed the market with possibility that they are going to make such amount in trading but they wouldn't know how manipulative the market could be where they could end up losing the entire fund have already funded. Being a good analyst doesn't guaranteed a successful trading.

[Tinubu]

I totally agree..it's just like "Knowing a plan" and "executing the plan"..both are entirely different...

The topic really struck me because I've had an experience very similar some years back..after all my studying and analysis I saw that the market would come back good....after it crashed for some reasons...I had everything required to make an investment..but when it was time to buy,i couldn't..I found myself holding back..still wanted to be sure..and by the time i was ready, the profit was no longer there..

I felt I could relate to the topic.. because i analyzed well but couldn't trade well..after that experience I learnt to take out emotions as long as trading is concerned..and it has helped me a lot

[bounceback]

...

I think it's more realistic to see a good trader as an analyst than an analyst as a trader. Not everyone with good theoretical knowledge can achieve success in practice. There is an opinion that those who could not profit from their knowledge in practice go to earn money as a teacher.

Experience is more important than knowledge. People who have knowledge may not necessarily be able to apply the theories they have learned correctly when adapting directly to the market, but for experienced people, they are certainly able to execute correctly when facing market movements because experienced people usually make previous failures as lessons for future success, so I agree with you that a good trader can certainly be a reliable analyst because when experienced people become analysts, they know the right momentum to execute based on experiences that they may often encounter in the market.

[ScamViruS]

Good trading knowledge is the most effective way to make profits in the market. A good trader has a sufficient amount of technical and fundamental knowledge, which allows them to make decisions according to market conditions.That's why having good knowledge is considered effective for making money. Traders who trade randomly without proper market analysis cannot survive in the market for long...

I think it's more realistic to see a good trader as an analyst than an analyst as a trader. Not everyone with good theoretical knowledge can achieve success in practice. There is an opinion that those who could not profit from their knowledge in practice go to earn money as a teacher.

Real experience is always more effective, and a trader is constantly learning from his past experience, and that real experience is definitely more effective than theoretical experience in getting better results from the market. Because a good analyst can research the market for others and give lectures about the next trend in the market. But that doesn't mean he will trade in the market. Because a good teacher shows others the right path.

[aysha9853]

Being a good analyst does not automatically make you a good trader, analysis is about probabilities but trading is about execution and emotions.