Why not use the trading strategy?

[Su-asa]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

I don't really know what to say in this because I don't normally have successful trades all the time, I mostly get plenty winning when I gamble than profits when trading. Trading is not my thing but I can bost than I get more luck when I gamble. However there are other people to like me, who don't know how to trade but knows how to gamble and make something out of it most of the time. Actually there are still people who are happy to win below 10% on gamble, the thing is that many people are greedy and want to wreck the house through their bets.

[Proty]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

most at times I think it is greed that is actually responsible for this attitude. Traders always have this mindset that or believe that the market can possibly go against them while on the other hand gambler's doesn't really see things this way. Most of them do believe on there chances of winning and they fail to understand that gambling is a game of luck. Seeing gambling as a means of making money or gambling when one is so much in need of money can also attribute to this.

[topbitcoin]

Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

Even if the strategy employed is quite sound it's important to remember that gambling is inherently uncertain as our assumptions and plans can fail due to bad luck.
While this is certainly possible targeting a win in every gamble even in a single bet can be difficult to achieve.

This strategy may be feasible for some but it can also be devastating when our plans (such as winning 10 percent of our total capital) are met with the opposite outcome in our gambling. We continually strive to maintain our strategy which only worsens the situation becoming obsessed with profit without considering the losses we've already incurred in a single gambling session.

[Mighty97]

You just pointed out the major difference. Trading focuses on consistent, smaller profits, but gambling usually chases huge payouts, leading to great risk and failure. Applying mindset of trading to sport betting, focusing on profits that is achievable and risk management,  this may be able to increase your success.

[Localhostspeed]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

You can open a risky trade with $100 and make $2 profit and then close the position immediately but you can't do the same with gambling because casino don't have an option to do that. What they have is cashout but the feature isn't like trading where you can remove your money immediately, it's work based on how the game is going at that particular time, if the casino see that it's not favoring you at that time, you wouldn't be able to cashout any money.

In any game you are betting on, just make sure that what you are risking is what you can afford to lose and let the potential profit be 2x or more of what you are risking. If what you are risking is more than what you are getting then that's a catastrophe betting lifestyle. You will burn your hands quickly than you will think and you are likely going to become an addicted type of person. Trading can be gambling but gambling can never be trading.

[SOKO-DEKE]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

The point is that there is no sure odd in sports betting. In fact, I would say there’s no sure odd in gambling in general. What’s the point of someone risking $100 just to win $10? It’s better for them to risk a higher percentage in case they get lucky.Since gambling also relies on luck, it’s very possible for someone who gambles with the aim of winning even a small percentage of their capital not to win several times in a row. However, because there never any assurance, it’s better to always gamble with only small amounts that we can afford to lose.In fact, I have seen someone bet $50 to win $57 by choosing a small odd and they still lost the game. So, it’s better not to see gambling as a way of making money, or else someone may regret it later.

[rachael9385]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

I think that if gamblers start thinking more like traders they would gamble responsibly.  Of course not everyone gambler engage in reckless gambling but most gamblers are guilty of this because they chase losses and stake amounts of money they cant afford to lose.am although the principles of betting and trading are different but they have somw similarities. Most gamblers cant be satisfied with small wins like traders

[Derekfunds]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

You are making sense but at same time you are speaking for yourself and not for everybody, because not all traders will enter a trade with $100 and be aiming 5-10% of their capital. These means you are still a newbie or beginner because great traders don't even use $100 what's $100 and you will be expecting $110 that is very small for some traders and they will see it as a joke. same thing in betting, you think it is everyone that play to win small, there are stages in all these things, your target may be another person's starting point. when I started gambling I was gambling with a little amount of money and sometimes I expect small money and sometimes I expect big money depending but I have grown pass that stage.

[Cyber_warrior]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.

Greediness is why most people are not making money in gambling, I know gambling is kind of risky, but if you are a gambler, and you learn to be satisfied with the little which you are having, then you going to be winning frequently, and your loss is going to reduce, but everyone wants to win big, and that’s why they hardly win and lose more.

If you are a gambler, you should be satisfied with little profits, you shouldn’t aim for big amount always because you won’t really be winning, and the higher the odds, the higher chances that you are going to lose, but if you pick little odds, your win will be low, but you have higher chances that you going to be winning, so if you are satisfied with little earnings, then you won’t really have much problem when you are gambling.

[suzanne5223]

Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

I believe the only reason some gamblers never treat gambling in the model you explain is because of FOMO, the next big win, due to the low winning of the previous game, and one funny thing about gambling is that it will expose your level of greed with risk management.
Gambling is just like forex trading; if you don't manage your risk well, you'll empty your bankroll. But this is different when it comes to trading, if you prioritize BTC, there's a high chance of securing your investment if you don't go for the futures.

[Ivystar5]

One thing you must know that most of the time even odds that over 5% or 10% you will probably loss than win so it doesn't matter if you follow the trading strategy and most of the people who gamble in the highest population are poor people so they want to double everything they have but the rich only look at little profit but risk huge amounts so the difference is very clear, Just know that people will  it  use that kind of likely of making little day by day, the power of compounding effect is not used in gambling.

Trading would take effort and resources to really become successful on this journey. It is not a one-night task that you can do and learn all the strategies overnight.

Yes of course, trading strategies needs practices and mastering to be able to use them and probably become successful in it, just like op said, if one can use the patterns of trading one must them probably try several times before being successful with the little increase op suggest is perfect fit gambling. However, I will still remain on a solid ground that thous they are two different things all together one can get lucky so easily in gambling but not in trading. Yet the power of compounding effect is strong to make you recover or do better than just gambling chasing a big bag without achieving.

[Odogwu-Blockchain]

In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

I posted this recently also about James Wynn:

He lost over $164 million in just few hours.

He lost because he sold or that's the amount that was liquidated?, remember in crypto, the value of your assets only reduced when prices declined not the quantity of your asset, so James Wynn didn't loss if he refused to sell.

That's how I perceive it to be though

[ScamViruS]

In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

I posted this recently also about James Wynn:

He lost over $164 million in just few hours.

He lost because he sold or that's the amount that was liquidated?, remember in crypto, the value of your assets only reduced when prices declined not the quantity of your asset, so James Wynn didn't loss if he refused to sell.

That's how I perceive it to be though

James Wynn was a high leverage trader, he treated trading like gambling, he put his funds at risk to make huge gains and was liquidated. If he had used the big capital he earned through high leverage trading to trade spot and buy coins, he wouldn't have lost all his funds. In fact, whether it's gambling or trading, when greed dominates someone, the risk of losing those funds increases significantly.

[Crypto Library]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

Becuase in gambling it could make any help I am talking about the strategy because it depends on the luck no matter how good your stategy looks like no one can ensure your profit on the trading I am talking about the spot trading there even you face loss you will not gonna lose your fund at once but in gambling even you are taking the 5% percent profit in gambling it wouldn't gonna save you from the whole fund if your luck wasn't in your favour.

So don't take gambling that much serious so that you can generate a stable profit from this take it as the entertainment source.

[goldkingcoiner]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

That is exactly the strategy that I use.

I decide on a max winning as well as a max losing amount. IF you win/lose X % then you go home. That way I can enjoy my winnings if I win X% amount or if I lose X% of the gambling funds, I go home instead of gambling until it is all gone.

But when most people gamble, they do not seem to care about strategy and risk aversion. They seem to want to lose all their money as fast as possible.

[JiiBs]

Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

You are most certainly not far from reason. Gamblers obviously don’t consider making 10 percent of their stakes a win and there is a reason for this. Most gamblers don’t go huge in their bets. You wouldn’t find a lot of persons very willing to gamble away $100 on 1.10 which usually looks like a safe bet. Still, such odds aren’t favored by gamblers, it never seems worth the risk given how, you could lose all before you know it and the same doesn’t go with trading since, you can watch and take quick decisions before it’s all lost.

[JunaidAzizi]

There are two psychological differences between a gambler and a trader. A gambler's mindset in betting is "All or Nothing," while a trader's is "Every Win is a Win." For a trader, every single win that comes at the end of any trade is a win. He goes in with a full plan and risk management, while on the other side, a gambler's mindset is a get rich quick game. For him, a small percentage of profits is boring because he has already decided in his mind that he has to be either rich or nothing. That's why small profits do not satisfy him, and he ends up with no money, while a trader, at the end of the day, grabs handsome profits in his hand.

[I_Anime]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

Trading is different from gambling , trading risk is way easier to manage compared to that of gambling. The stuff is that you just have to be contented with what you have or win in both trading and gambling. Cause is better to win little than to win none , so no matter small just appreciate it will help to build a proper mindset will also add to your risk management improving it in one way or the other.

[KTChampions]

If I enter a trade with $100 and eventually exits the trade with $110, I will be happy that I made $10 profit, which is 10% of my capital.
But in gambling, especially sports betting, I cannot use $100 and try to win $110. I will just aim to win even more that 100% of my capital and that is the reason most gamblers fail.
Why not use the trading approach and make 5%, 10% profits in each bet. If we apply this method, we are going to win more than 70% of our bets.
In trading we are okay with small wins, but in gambling the case is different. Why?

Where did you get all these assumptions as knowledge? Many "traders" enter trades with 50x leverage and either take their profits or liquidate within a minute. Meanwhile, a ton of bettors place "safe" bets at odds of 1.10 and are happy. Or they make bolder bets, but as soon as the odds go their way, they cash out and take minimal profits. So everything you're discussing is already being used in both markets, people use a wide range of strategies in both trading and betting.

[ejikeme24]

most at times I think it is greed that is actually responsible for this attitude. Traders always have this mindset that or believe that the market can possibly go against them while on the other hand gambler's doesn't really see things this way. Most of them do believe on there chances of winning and they fail to understand that gambling is a game of luck. Seeing gambling as a means of making money or gambling when one is so much in need of money can also attribute to this.

Your point is valid, in trading there's nothing like potential return. Your potential return is just the one you're cashing out because in trading we don't normally wait to the final stage because you don't know if the market will keep surging more or it will start sinking from there. almost the same thing applicable to gamble when your game is ongoing and you where giving the opportunity to Cash out, some people can decide to hold on for a little so that it will double before hitting the cash out botton and sometimes in the process of waiting to double then you may likely see a different thing at this point you will start regretting. But in all gambling can never be compared with trading there's a big difference between the both since alot of people have come to discover that trading does not require greediness so that is why they don't miss out chance at any given time.