Do you use "tipsters" when placing your bets?

[Anayochukwu]

To be honest any gambler that normally rely on tipsters is not gambling because those people are just doing what you doing, and sometimes you might get an accurate prediction than them, and the most annoying part of it is that most of them are using this to money from many gamblers, then at last you found yourself losing the game. I don't think I have ever used any tipsters before and I will not even try it because I don't see anything special in using someone else's tipsters that I'm even more better than.

[Wind_FURY]

Why use tipsters? There's AI now.

Honestly, I've never tried using a tipster, and I won't pay anything just to give me his own predictions while I can also do the same. In the case of AI, I only use it for information. It's actually faster than manually using Google with histories, records, and injuries of players on the teams that I will bet for and their opponents.

I would really be careful with tipsters. Their agenda is mostly free of service once or twice but next to that will be a payment needed. Some of them will get lucky in the first two bets but that's actually just a guess from the tipster himself.

Actually, that indeed would help the user collect data, run that data, and make an accurate statistical analysis for the user. That sort of research procedure would actually make the whole operation more fun for the user.

What are the best A.I. services are good for this sort of research? I will try gambling in sports in YEET.com's new sports-betting service.

 

[Crypt0Gore]

Of course, every player on a football team has their own thoughts and mood for the game. I've been thinking about this for a long time and came to the conclusion that we're incapable of understanding what's going on inside them. They're likely even taking to the field with their own problems and injuries, and they don't know how they'll react in any given situation. However, if AI continues to develop rapidly, it could conduct such a thorough analysis and produce even average data that could be used to place bets and beat the other 99% of players. This would completely change the world of betting.

They are too many I guess, it would be different and easy to read if it only takes a player or two to play on a football field with ref present and also the coaches, but the higher numbers of players will get you good, there is no way to know what's happening in the head of all the players.

Too much is at risk here and that is why relaxing and enjoying the game is all that I care about, with small money risk on the table it is no brainier rather than having a near heart attack because I place a bet on a sport game.

Everyone will pick what works for them, if tipster is your thing there is only one way to find out, results and results only, if the results are similar to when you are not using tipsters there is no point in using tipsters.

[SFR10]

Ready to share your opinion?

I've never used such services that take the fun out of sports betting ^{[I do it for fun and genuinely enjoy researching different things before placing my bets (IMO, these kinds of services are the equivalent of knowing where your enemies are in an FPS game)]}.
^{- About AI usage in the future, even with a larger set of data, they could still inaccurately analyze & interpret some things, so I'd never rely on their services as well!}

[TastyChillySauce00]

Do you use "tipsters" when placing your bets?

Those people defending "tipsters" in the topic are laughable. Those "tipsters" especially if you see them in forums such as BitcoinTalk are just the same sort of people as those "traders" who always give their "tips", but without any sort of record to back up their "qualification".

Plus those people, if indeed they are profitable, does everyone actually believe that they will sell their "tips" in the forum?

I could not more agree with you. Kinda weird to see people defended tipsters, and put the desire of their money to the tipster hand. Meanwhile, they can betting by thsemselves alone without paying the fees.

Some even argued if a bettor has no time, then can use tipster. What the hell is wrong with them. I'd be ready my money to be wasted on AI's prediction instead of tipster. The reason is i only need to pay my lose without the need to pay the fees to the tipster.  
Beside that like you said if tipster is really accurate in predicting the result, they might be millionaire before us.  

[dunfida]

Do you use "tipsters" when placing your bets?

Those people defending "tipsters" in the topic are laughable. Those "tipsters" especially if you see them in forums such as BitcoinTalk are just the same sort of people as those "traders" who always give their "tips", but without any sort of record to back up their "qualification".

Plus those people, if indeed they are profitable, does everyone actually believe that they will sell their "tips" in the forum?

I could not more agree with you. Kinda weird to see people defended tipsters, and put the desire of their money to the tipster hand. Meanwhile, they can betting by thsemselves alone without paying the fees.

Some even argued if a bettor has no time, then can use tipster. What the hell is wrong with them. I'd be ready my money to be wasted on AI's prediction instead of tipster. The reason is i only need to pay my lose without the need to pay the fees to the tipster.  
Beside that like you said if tipster is really accurate in predicting the result, they might be millionaire before us.  

Tipsters are honestly one of the oldest tricks in the book when it comes to gambling scams they sell the illusion of certainty in a field built entirely on probability what’s funny is that if someone actually had a formula for guaranteed wins they’d be quietly making money not selling predictions in some telegram group or random forum thread.

Most of these so called tipsters rely on vague predictions or edited records to make themselves look accurate they’ll post ten tips to ten different people and then promote only the ones that hit claiming they have a 90 percent success rate it’s pure marketing psychology the reality is if they were truly profitable they’d be betting themselves not wasting time convincing strangers to pay for picks. The argument that busy bettors can “outsource” decisions to tipsters makes no sense either if you don’t have time to research games properly the solution isn’t to hand your money to someone else it’s to skip gambling until you can approach it responsibly at least when you lose on your own you’re learning something when you lose following a fake expert you’re just paying tuition for nothing.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Why use tipsters? There's AI now.

Honestly, I've never tried using a tipster, and I won't pay anything just to give me his own predictions while I can also do the same. In the case of AI, I only use it for information. It's actually faster than manually using Google with histories, records, and injuries of players on the teams that I will bet for and their opponents.

I would really be careful with tipsters. Their agenda is mostly free of service once or twice but next to that will be a payment needed. Some of them will get lucky in the first two bets but that's actually just a guess from the tipster himself.

Agreed, instead of using tipster the bettor can use AI for finding informations quickly and still make a good prediction. What if the tipsters are using AI to make predictions and deceive people to pay for those tips, meanwhile the person paying for the tips can use the AI by themselves 
I don't trust tipsters than myself and I have not used tipsters too, especially the ones that wants you to pay for subscription.

[Localhostspeed]

To be honest any gambler that normally rely on tipsters is not gambling because those people are just doing what you doing, and sometimes you might get an accurate prediction than them, and the most annoying part of it is that most of them are using this to money from many gamblers, then at last you found yourself losing the game. I don't think I have ever used any tipsters before and I will not even try it because I don't see anything special in using someone else's tipsters that I'm even more better than.

There are questions that we need to ask about this tipster. I'm not sure if the casinos are using AI to recommend predictions or they are doing it based on the games other gamblers has selected and played. There is no single casino that is gong to support this idea of recommendation of what is going to give them loss, if people are making money from it, they will stop recommending it for people and this more reason why it should be avoided by all means.

If casino is tipping you that you are going to win, know that you are not winning anything because they are going to be making more pay out. On my own advice, if you don't know how to bet, don't get started it's better to quit than br using this features. They are not may not be profitable, even if They are using AI I'm not sure in this level of technology of AI improvement that we have now this wil be able to sustain us with accurate predictions about bets.

[bakasabo]

Why use tipsters? There's AI now.

Honestly, I've never tried using a tipster, and I won't pay anything just to give me his own predictions while I can also do the same. In the case of AI, I only use it for information. It's actually faster than manually using Google with histories, records, and injuries of players on the teams that I will bet for and their opponents.

I would really be careful with tipsters. Their agenda is mostly free of service once or twice but next to that will be a payment needed. Some of them will get lucky in the first two bets but that's actually just a guess from the tipster himself.

Agreed, instead of using tipster the bettor can use AI for finding informations quickly and still make a good prediction. What if the tipsters are using AI to make predictions and deceive people to pay for those tips, meanwhile the person paying for the tips can use the AI by themselves 
I don't trust tipsters than myself and I have not used tipsters too, especially the ones that wants you to pay for subscription.

I also would not use tipster when AI give more information and it is usually more detailed. Tipster will tell you want you ask or what you want to hear, AI answer will include links or hints for something extra.

I dont understand tipster role in general. They are Robin Hoods of gambling? Who help poor (gambler) to take more from rich (casino). I always question why tipsters share knowledge for small payment instead of using their knowledge to enrich themselves only. Because the more they help, the more bets will be made and the odds will be changed into less profitable.

[Oluwa-btc]

If you start using tipsters to place your bet, it means that ain't enjoying the fun in gambling and you are kust throwing away your money without any clue of what you are doing. I prefer to lose my bet based on my own mistakes. I will be sad to lose my bet because I copied someone else's prediction. Luck is what matters the most when gambling and not tipsters.

Tipsters can be used as a source of information,this may save you time and offer insights you might not be able to find on your own.As much as I know,most tipsters even loose frequently that's why you have to do several evaluations and research yourself without relying much on tipsters; it's not a guarantee to win.Only use tipsters correctly as a tool not shortcut to wins.

[rachael9385]

I have few reasons why I do not need to use tipster for placing bets on sports betting, they are:

• I do not play sports betting much so it does not worth to pay for tipster
• Once I want to bet on sports, I do not bet big amount maybe few bucks only so it is not reasonable to pay tipster just for small bets
• Lets say I'm a big bettor, should I risk my money on bets made by tipster? Better to place bets based on our own analysis

A lot of people feel safe with paying tipsters to get predictions they even stake large amounts of money just because they feel like as long as they paid to get those games they are sure but it might not really turn out the way they expect it to go. Losing such a bet is going to be very painful because it is going to become a double loss, you end up losing your stake and then the amount paid to get the game

[Wind_FURY]

Do you use "tipsters" when placing your bets?

Those people defending "tipsters" in the topic are laughable. Those "tipsters" especially if you see them in forums such as BitcoinTalk are just the same sort of people as those "traders" who always give their "tips", but without any sort of record to back up their "qualification".

Plus those people, if indeed they are profitable, does everyone actually believe that they will sell their "tips" in the forum?

I could not more agree with you. Kinda weird to see people defended tipsters, and put the desire of their money to the tipster hand. Meanwhile, they can betting by thsemselves alone without paying the fees.

Some even argued if a bettor has no time, then can use tipster. What the hell is wrong with them. I'd be ready my money to be wasted on AI's prediction instead of tipster. The reason is i only need to pay my lose without the need to pay the fees to the tipster.  

Beside that like you said if tipster is really accurate in predicting the result, they might be millionaire before us.  

Haha. Plus at least using A.I. and trying to build a good prompt to get consistent winning predictions is a good intellectual challenge like how pleb/hobby traders try to learn and apply trading strategies even if they know they are going to lose.

There's no challenge and learning if a person merely uses a tipster's service, and because it's hard to become a winning gambler in sports-betting, those "tipsters" might be frauds.

[dunfida]

To be honest any gambler that normally rely on tipsters is not gambling because those people are just doing what you doing, and sometimes you might get an accurate prediction than them, and the most annoying part of it is that most of them are using this to money from many gamblers, then at last you found yourself losing the game. I don't think I have ever used any tipsters before and I will not even try it because I don't see anything special in using someone else's tipsters that I'm even more better than.

There are questions that we need to ask about this tipster. I'm not sure if the casinos are using AI to recommend predictions or they are doing it based on the games other gamblers has selected and played. There is no single casino that is gong to support this idea of recommendation of what is going to give them loss, if people are making money from it, they will stop recommending it for people and this more reason why it should be avoided by all means.

If casino is tipping you that you are going to win, know that you are not winning anything because they are going to be making more pay out. On my own advice, if you don't know how to bet, don't get started it's better to quit than br using this features. They are not may not be profitable, even if They are using AI I'm not sure in this level of technology of AI improvement that we have now this wil be able to sustain us with accurate predictions about bets.

Relying on tipsters to make gambling decisions is like handing over your wallet and hoping someone else manages it better than you most of these so called tipsters are only repeating what everyone else can already see they check recent stats or look at the odds and then make guesses dressed up as professional analysis some even sell these predictions which is crazy because if they were really that good they’d be using the tips themselves instead of selling them to others.

Casinos and betting platforms would never promote or support something that consistently makes players win because their business depends on losses so whether the tips come from algorithms AI systems or human predictions there will always be a bias that leans towards the house winning ai can analyze data but it still can’t predict the randomness of sports outcomes or casino games with perfect accuracy. Depending on tipsters removes the learning part of gambling where you analyze games yourself understand odds and develop discipline if you can’t make your own picks it’s better to stay away from gambling altogether rather than lose money following someone else’s unreliable advice the smartest gamblers are the ones who understand that gambling is unpredictable and that no tip or system can beat luck or probability in the long run.

[Distinctin]

Why use tipsters? There's AI now.

Honestly, I've never tried using a tipster, and I won't pay anything just to give me his own predictions while I can also do the same. In the case of AI, I only use it for information. It's actually faster than manually using Google with histories, records, and injuries of players on the teams that I will bet for and their opponents.

I would really be careful with tipsters. Their agenda is mostly free of service once or twice but next to that will be a payment needed. Some of them will get lucky in the first two bets but that's actually just a guess from the tipster himself.

That is how AI is meant to be. But if we talk about using them for betting, we need to analyze the data first before agreeing or disagreeing with its recommendation. But in regard to the tipster, I've found there is someone who can be trusted. Most of them are just asking for money, and for me, it is not worthy enough. Yes, we'd rather make our own. And this is not just being right, but some kind of trusting ourselves as well.

Besides, whether we like it or not, this won't change the outcome of our bets.

[Versatile_choice]

For me I would rather go for AI Prediction than making use tipsters because I lost count of how many times I make used of tipsters and non of thier Predictions work out for me, most of the times I feel that they are just making those Predictions to fail gamblers and also promote the betting companies. who knows if they are working with any of these bet companies because most of the tipsters usually drop thier bookings and then ask you to click thier link and sign up to that betting site so that you can be able to place your bet, you see they are the ones chosing where you would make your bet. i have experienced this more than 3 times from different tipsters then I got convinced that maybe they get paid to fail people or maybe to get people to join a particular platform  since they don't have all it takes to make it look foreign then they decided to come up with such strategy.

[Botnake]

Haha. Plus at least using A.I. and trying to build a good prompt to get consistent winning predictions is a good intellectual challenge like how pleb/hobby traders try to learn and apply trading strategies even if they know they are going to lose.

There's no challenge and learning if a person merely uses a tipster's service, and because it's hard to become a winning gambler in sports-betting, those "tipsters" might be frauds.

This seems like the best answer. Tipsters don’t guarantee wins, they just throw a bit of info to support why their picks are made. With AI, it’s different because you can ask anything you want, so you’re actually learning in the process. Over time you might develop the skill yourself, with AI just helping you, not something you fully rely on.

[Wind_FURY]

Haha. Plus at least using A.I. and trying to build a good prompt to get consistent winning predictions is a good intellectual challenge like how pleb/hobby traders try to learn and apply trading strategies even if they know they are going to lose.

There's no challenge and learning if a person merely uses a tipster's service, and because it's hard to become a winning gambler in sports-betting, those "tipsters" might be frauds.

This seems like the best answer. Tipsters don’t guarantee wins, they just throw a bit of info to support why their picks are made.

Although very rare, there might be those moments when you discover an actual winning tipster. BUT, they are very rare. Always remember that. Most of them are fraudsters like those "traders" that share their "charts" and their "predictions".

With AI, it’s different because you can ask anything you want, so you’re actually learning in the process. Over time you might develop the skill yourself, with AI just helping you, not something you fully rely on.

  👍

Plus you could also use A.I. to find the information that's useful for you in your research, instead of using A.I. to make everything easier for you.

[tabas]

Haha. Plus at least using A.I. and trying to build a good prompt to get consistent winning predictions is a good intellectual challenge like how pleb/hobby traders try to learn and apply trading strategies even if they know they are going to lose.

There's no challenge and learning if a person merely uses a tipster's service, and because it's hard to become a winning gambler in sports-betting, those "tipsters" might be frauds.

This seems like the best answer. Tipsters don’t guarantee wins, they just throw a bit of info to support why their picks are made. With AI, it’s different because you can ask anything you want, so you’re actually learning in the process. Over time you might develop the skill yourself, with AI just helping you, not something you fully rely on.

It's all about the prompt that we're going to do with it and it's going to give a response that we might like. And this kind of tipster, we don't have to pay anything with it and although there's no guarantee as well that it will be a good one. At least with this kind of help as a tipster through an AI, we know that there is no one to blame if it doesn't go well. And you're right, we're also developing a skill and that's about prompting an AI and being specific with the information that we're asking about it and for it to provide what we're asking exactly.

[Numeral]

There are certainly many factors that influence the outcome. However, the divorce and birth of a child that you mentioned are very rare events for an athlete; such an event may only happen once in a lifetime. When it comes to injuries, professional athletes suffer them much more often. Over the course of their careers, they may experience several serious injuries and a large number of minor injuries. But information about injuries (if they are not serious) does not always reach the public, which is understandable, because no one wants to give their opponent more information before a match.

What bothers me most about tipsters is that they can pretend to be experts when in reality they are not. For example, it would be reasonable to pay for real expertise, but paying for information from AI is a waste of time and money.

[wiss19]

Haha. Plus at least using A.I. and trying to build a good prompt to get consistent winning predictions is a good intellectual challenge like how pleb/hobby traders try to learn and apply trading strategies even if they know they are going to lose.

There's no challenge and learning if a person merely uses a tipster's service, and because it's hard to become a winning gambler in sports-betting, those "tipsters" might be frauds.

This seems like the best answer. Tipsters don’t guarantee wins, they just throw a bit of info to support why their picks are made. With AI, it’s different because you can ask anything you want, so you’re actually learning in the process. Over time you might develop the skill yourself, with AI just helping you, not something you fully rely on.

Future is going to be AI still it's never been guaranteed to be having wins with this because still need many things to be done by own because using AI is just like having tipster which is giving things for bookies favour always bringing matches which are having good chance of hype they bring wrong data and predictions which never give good results.

Sometimes back, many peoples were having strong arguments about tipsters but suddenly things gone on wrong side and peoples lost funds which gave them serious blow and then never have same attraction like this. Doing own work and having good search always pay back better even it's not easy for all still it's good way of having betting which done by own. AI is currently on good hype but never match with self analysis.