These are all your topics and only the 4 that I marked with red arrows are the ones that are locked while all the topics in the green rectangle are pretty much on the same subject with more or less similar content, so they can all be considered duplicates and what you are doing to be considered spamming, hence the reason why they got locked...
Something you repeated in the Meta board as well (the 2 topics on top).

If you had stuck to one or two topics, and kept the discussions clean there your 4 topics would have never gotten locked.
I'm bumping this thread since OP intentionally continue to create thread with similar topic or discuss same thing. I created the list that shows link and thread title. When it's not obvious from thread title, i include snipped thread. If i use bitlist.co link, it means the thread is deleted, most likely by moderator.
Mainly about about BIP 110https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5586000.0 Exposing more coretard hypocrisy!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5585574.0 The BIP110 watch thread!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5585356.0 The new Ver's Bcash: Knots/BIP110 or core?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5584529.0 Best break down of BIP110
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5583787.0 Re: Knots/BIP110 designed to fork off?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5582273.0 Will BIP110 confiscate your coin?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5581508.0 Will BIP110 confiscate coin?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579958.0 Your objection to BIP110 ??
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579484.0 Your objections to BIP110 ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578079.0 Your objections to BIP110?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5575199.0 What would Satoshi say about BIP110?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5568335.0 Google Mailing list reply to Greg Maxwell
Partly about BIP 110https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5582760.0 More questions for Greg Maxwell.
When asked under what conditions BIP110 would confiscate your coin, Greg replied with this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5582589.0 More questions for Greg Maxwell
When asked under what conditions BIP110 would confiscate your coin, Greg replied with this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55807680 Here is how I would do a stealth 51% attack on bitcoin.
This is one of the reasons we need to start fighting spam. Run Knots, run BIP110, reject spam today.
Mainly about spam TXhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5580600.0 Questions for Greg Maxwell
First Question:
Do you disagree with Satoshi? Do you think miner fees should be the only measure against spam?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577361.0 Are the miner fees really the only filter we need?
So in this whole spam war, and for the last 5 years since this spam attack started, we've been told over and over that Bitcoin doesn't need any spam filters. That the miner fees are the only filter needed to filter out spam.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569189.0 Why spam is so dangerous?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5565336.0 Filters work! Prove me wrong!
So we've been told that filters don't work. And the main evidence for this claim is that spammers can go around the filters.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563933.0 The present threat to bitcoin -YOU
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563687.0 How filters actually work!!
Your filter is similar to a speed bump that pops up only for the miner who puts spam in his block. But if you are the only one to run this filter, the speed bump will be more like a grain of rice. If enough nodes are applying the same filter, the speed bump becomes significant.
https://bitlist.co/topic/5562762 Blocks full of absolute shit!
https://bitlist.co/topic/5562761 So what is spam anyways?
https://bitlist.co/topic/5562646 Will the fee market push away spammers?
https://bitlist.co/topic/5562641 Do filters work at censoring spam?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5516209.0 Those %$@#& ordinals, how popular are they?
Mainly about Bitcoin Core and spam TXhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577802.0 The contrast is astonishing! Read the room, coretards.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5569677.0 Bitcoin's new Core sanctioned use case.
But none of that is required since core 30. Because, by blowing up the op_returm filter, core made file sharing a supported and sanctioned use case of bitcoin.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5565720.0 Core - "pro-spam" VS "harm reduction"
https://bitlist.co/topic/5562750 Vitalic Buterin endorces core 30?
How much more evidence do you guys need to see core 30 is spamware and core needs to go?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5562381.0 Core and spam debate - easy explanation
https://bitlist.co/topic/5562166 Two facts about core devs and spam
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5565125.0 Core dev Murch deciding policy?
So in the following video you can watch Murch (core dev) explain the core side of the current spam war. I invite you to watch it before you keep reading:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5564850.0 Core spam timeline
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5564230.0 core devs changed the definition of bitcoin?
The core devs changed the definition of bitcoin just before the current mass attack of spam started:
https://bitlist.co/topic/5561890 Question for the core supporters.
So what legit user do you think is going to use op_return blown up to 100,000 bytes?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5561786.0 Am I rigth about the core/spam thing?