I've brushed it somewhere, quite a long time ago, that I'm too lazy to dig it up and quote myself, so I'll just explain again.
Rollbit utilize an approach to handle each dispute their player have by channeling them all into one department: their compliance. To invite the player to raise the dispute, as well as to get their compliance to inspect the account and address the issue, they send a uniform message, regardless of the actual breach of ToS you do [or didn't do]: multi-acc detection.
Hope that clarify things.
This?
I think it'll be useless at this point, for me to reach Razer with OP's username. What OP showed is the textbook template of Rollbit's default response that needs to be refined [a dire need, if I may add my personal opinion]. Reaching Razer with this case will only send me a predictable answer to "please ask the player to write to compliance@rollbit.com."
So, OP, just write to
compliance@rollbit.com, then wait for a couple of days or weeks. When you got a reply from them asking for your general info and consent, that'll indicate that your case is in their queue.
I still wonder why they are not just straight forward with those who complain. If there is a dispute regarding multiple accounts, why keep them running in circles instead of just telling them to write to compliance straight up
There was a more lengthy and gentle explanation than that, but that above will do, LMAO.
About why they can't just "straight forward", uhh, it's a headache of explanation, but Razer explained it back then to me, I think about five or six complaints later after he explained to me the reason they "withdraw themselves from the forum". Summarized, it's a blanket statement with some basis that [arguably] hold some truth to it. It'll urge players to write to compliance, and compliance will then sort things out according to the exact violation the player did.
I've tried to get Razer to get his compliance team to make a more tailored and personal "invitation" and "closing statement" too, I'm giving up on that.