@Dogedegen. If Microstrategy will do their first significant sale of bitcoin from their treasury, I reckon I have a new name for Michael Saylor heheeh. Instead of calling him Michael the Saylormoon, we should begin calling him Michael Sellor heheheeheh!
That is quite a nickname.

Basically, the snake oil salesman said blah, blah, blah again.
Really, you had to take it this far? Out of all the people running around and doing things in this space, you are trying to label him the same way as the likes of Roger Ver or Vitalik?

That is, if he doesn't change his mind again, because he has changed his mind so often on fundamental issues that if he does it again, it wouldn't be surprising. Now he says he would do it when the Bitcoin stash is on profit (until recently, he wouldn't have been able to) and to pay dividends. But once that door is open, you can't be sure he won't sell at a loss to raise cash, or that instead of paying dividends, he won't come up with some other idea.
While we can agree on the riskiness of the current operation, I can not believe when you write these things. The basic of business administration or management theory states that businesses must be agile and adapt as soon as possible. If they consider what they have been doing to be wrong and try to adapt, you want to make it seem like they are being bad people.
What should they do in your view if they believe that their current strategy or decisions are no no longer correct? Should they persist in the error even though they now believe otherwise so that do not publicly look like they have changed their mind? What should they do? Answer this question precisely please.