Should a player be ban for winning so much

[Patikno]

I was on my social and I saw a content about gamers who got banned by sport betting companies because they won too much a particular gamer that has won over hundred million dollars in sport betting was very interesting.
Gamers wants to win and sport betting companies don’t want to lose that is why it’s gambling one against the other.

 a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

It is kinda weird when a casino bans a player simply for "Winning too much". If someone is banned for winning a lot by cheating, then that is normal, because they have broken the rules. Winning too much fairly at a casino is something anyone can achieve, and it is a reward for courage and luck. If the casino bans players for just that one reason, then I don't think the casino can be called a "fair casino", it is as if they want their users to only lose, or only win a little. So, I don't think casinos should ban users who win too much without cheating. By the way, I am grateful that the casinos that cooperate well with this beloved forum have never experienced such cases, and I hope that continues to be the case. Cmiiw.

[maydna]

A player who wins so much shouldn't be banned especially if they don't cheat. Casinos should be responsible for paying winners. If they ban the player, they may face problems if the player sues them. It is a risk for the casinos so they must be concerned about this and prepare the money.

We know there are bad casinos that will not pay the winner. They will say they don't have much money so that is why the casinos must have limitations on the amount that the player can win. That should not break their capital limit and they can still runs their business.

[Samlucky O]

A Gambler should not be ban for winning so much, but However the casino or sport betting company are looking out to making profit, so if eventually a Gambler has been wining back to back in millions, they might decide to ban him expecialy if they feel that his cheating. Well I haven't heard of this before but in my community I heard sometime ago that if a Gambler wins so much that it affected the company they will shutdown instead of baning the gambler. But in this case reverse is the case.

[Oshio-man]

Sometimes when gamblers are winning too much, it create a big fear in the mind of the gambling owners because some of the owners have not seen a steady winning from their gambling since they created the center for gambling, sometimes the gambling owners can banned some gamblers that will disobey rules and regulations that governed the gambling and the gamblers, banned is what gamblers don't want to hear or see in their gambling because there are different games in all gambling center and there are some games easy for gamblers to maintain winning while there are some center in gambling that is causing gamblers losses, but anything that will make both winners and losers to disobey the rules they can be banned not to gamble in the gambling center.

[retreat]

They shouldn't be banned simply for winning too much. It's simply illogical to ban them when they haven't done anything wrong. Unless they cheat or violate casino rules, then the casino can legally ban the user's account. But if they don't do anything, it's pure greed from the casino to ban winning players simply because they're profitable, and that's a dishonest business practice that can actually tarnish the casino's reputation.

What casinos should do is limit the maximum bet amount or restrict certain games for overly profitable players, instead of banning their accounts outright. This approach makes more sense because it doesn't violate any rules, while still benefiting the casino and not appearing arbitrary to the players.

[Oluwa-btc]

My opinions is that No, they should not be allowed to restrict people from playing simply because they are winning too much and they do not want to lose money, when they will take as much money from you if you keep losing. If they want a player to stop playing an alternative solution will be to give them an offer which is attractive and they willingly stop playing. There is very little chance someone wins an amount that puts them at a loss overtime, so they do not really need the extra protection.

The reality is casinos can and do restrict players for winning too much. This is more popular with physical casinos but could be done online too.

- Jay -

To an extent,I thought this action was only effective in unregulated casinos but to my greatest surprise now, even regulated casinos restricts gambler for winning so much.Should I call that envy?.. LOL. Even skilled gamblers may get limited or banned  not because they win too much,but because they beat the casino’s math.My friend usually say Casinos don’t like sharp players,that they prefer casual gamblers who only bring predictable profit.And I'm yet to figure out how true that statement is because I'm not longer surprised.😁

[Shinpako09]

I've watched different short videos before saying he got banned from a physical casino for winning continuously in a card game. I don’t know if it's true since I have no way to verify it, but I doubt it. In crypto casinos, I haven't heard of anyone getting banned for consistently winning, whether in casino games or sports betting. If you look at the HR tab, you’ll see a lot of high rollers every day, both winning and losing. I believe they shouldn’t ban someone for winning too much. They should just use it for promotion instead.

[casey15]

I do not think a player should be ban for winning too much.. the criteria for banning a player is if caught cheating. If the player wins are totally fair and are based on the gambling rule, then he deserves it. The player may just be so lucky at that point so it doesn't mean he should get banned.

[UmerIdrees]

It is kinda weird when a casino bans a player simply for "Winning too much". If someone is banned for winning a lot by cheating, then that is normal, because they have broken the rules. Winning too much fairly at a casino is something anyone can achieve, and it is a reward for courage and luck. If the casino bans players for just that one reason, then I don't think the casino can be called a "fair casino", it is as if they want their users to only lose, or only win a little. So, I don't think casinos should ban users who win too much without cheating. By the way, I am grateful that the casinos that cooperate well with this beloved forum have never experienced such cases, and I hope that continues to be the case. Cmiiw.

Yup, it is the luck of the player that he won too much and why the casinos are unhappy about it ?

When gamblers lose too much, then no one talks about them. We don't hear voices that the gambling casino should be banned because a player has lost a lot of money. So why here when the player is on a winning side, he needs to be banned? Only to protect the casino's money  This is a very wired demand indeed.

[Pandu Geddon]

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

It seems I’ve read that there have been some cases discussed in this forum related to this. Bettors who win big are not banned from placing bets, but they get restrictions on the maximum amount they can wager. So bettors cannot bet large amounts as they usually would.

But honestly, it would be strange if every time someone bets, they put down a large sum of money and win substantial amounts regularly. It’s not impossible, but casinos would definitely suspect signs of cheating based on the bettor’s behavior.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Casinos have their limits in betting, And i experienced it so many time not accepting my bets because the amount of bets on that target has reached its limit.
So why they will ban a player winning big if they have the limits ? Casino wants money from the people but banning because they won big is not a good gesture,
Well if they ban me i dont care as long as they will give me my money and winnings, i will just go to another casino.

[Ishicryptic]

A gambler is not supposed to be banned because they won too much, the casino cannot ban them for losing too much, it won't be fair to collect huge loses but not be willing to payout huge wins. But from a business angle I can understand if a casino is no longer comfortable with a consistent big winner, they won't like such customers to be patronizing their business. Casinos makes profit from gamblers loses and if winnings begins to be more than loses they will go bankrupt eventually. I can understand if they ban such an account after crediting the huge win of the gambler. But a reputable casino that is making turnover will pay a big win because they know that they will recover it.

[Bitcoin.com97]

I was on my social and I saw a content about gamers who got banned by sport betting companies because they won too much a particular gamer that has won over hundred million dollars in sport betting was very interesting.
Gamers wants to win and sport betting companies don’t want to lose that is why it’s gambling one against the other.

 a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

It’s actually rare like I haven’t heard about sport betting companies banned anyone because of winning, they already set a limit, which you can’t go above it , if there limit is 120million there is no way you can exceed that amount , because that is what they can afford to pay , and if so many people was able to win a lot , all they only do is waste sometime to pay off which may take a week or more but definitely they will pay you your money , I  think there are other reasons why they banned peoples account, maybe if you violate their rules and regulations, anyways it could be that different betting companies and there policies but I’m talking about the once I know and how they operate.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

No, a player should not be banned from playing because they won a huge amount, if a sport boom does that, I won't have to trust them unless they already stated in their terms and conditions that when someone wins too much they will banned the person, it even sound funny and reading that, no body might want to play there. I know that some bookies can only limit the staking amount of the bettor if he or she is winning a huge amount always, but banning the playing is not a good sign to even trust the bookie or casino. Some reputable casinos on this forum doesn't do that, maybe they can place a limit but not ban the player.

[DubemIfedigbo001]

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

My interest in this case is this, were they paid their winnings before being restricted or did the casino ban their account and restrict them from withdrawing their winnings?

If they were restricted after withdrawing their winnings, then it can be called disengaging on fair grounds but if the casino refused to pay them despite winning and not cheating, then the casino is scam and should be avoided.

I don't think a casino would want you to reduce the amount you stake, maybe a better option if providing a winning limit and not allowing you stake any game with pot. Winning higher than the limit.

[Yablee0]

I was on my social and I saw a content about gamers who got banned by sport betting companies because they won too much a particular gamer that has won over hundred million dollars in sport betting was very interesting.
Gamers wants to win and sport betting companies don’t want to lose that is why it’s gambling one against the other.

 a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

Am still trying to understand how possible it is or does it really make any sense for a betting company to ban a player all because he wins alot, this is the very first time am hearing such and it makes no sense to me because it seems the betting platform is against the progress of their customers.

However, am pretty sure that when they (betting companies) were collecting from the gamblers everything was cool and fine but now that things has turned a bit in favour of the gambler it has become a problem anyway it's fine is for every gamblers to know their stand and a better approach in balling.

[Etranger]

They shouldn't be banned simply for winning too much. It's simply illogical to ban them when they haven't done anything wrong. Unless they cheat or violate casino rules, then the casino can legally ban the user's account. But if they don't do anything, it's pure greed from the casino to ban winning players simply because they're profitable, and that's a dishonest business practice that can actually tarnish the casino's reputation.

What casinos should do is limit the maximum bet amount or restrict certain games for overly profitable players, instead of banning their accounts outright. This approach makes more sense because it doesn't violate any rules, while still benefiting the casino and not appearing arbitrary to the players.

The question here is when exactly the casino blocks a player who hits a big win. Is it at the moment they try to withdraw the money? If so, then this really looks like a violation of rules on the casino’s side. There were a few such cases discussed on the forum before, and it caused a huge wave of dissatisfaction. The casino only loses from such actions because its reputation gets damaged. On the contrary, the casino should not block the player’s account and should not prevent them from withdrawing their winnings. If everything goes smoothly, the player may return and play again. Any attempt to interfere will only result in losing a valuable client.

[swogerino]

I was on my social and I saw a content about gamers who got banned by sport betting companies because they won too much a particular gamer that has won over hundred million dollars in sport betting was very interesting.
Gamers wants to win and sport betting companies don’t want to lose that is why it’s gambling one against the other.

 a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

Most casinos and sport bookies have already put in place the maximum amount that you can bet. The ban is not a solution for winning players to remove them from the casino as they are very few compared to losers which are crushing majority in such places. The reputable casinos in crypto though I have never seen such case in all these years, shady casinos then can do anything but reputable ones I never heard such a story. In fact quite the opposite I have seen half million dollars withdrawal processed the same business day that it was asked. Congrats to that guy winning 100 million dollars as is the first time I hear about such huge win in sport betting.

[Orpichukwu]

I do not think a player should be ban for winning too much.. the criteria for banning a player is if caught cheating. If the player wins are totally fair and are based on the gambling rule, then he deserves it. The player may just be so lucky at that point so it doesn't mean he should get banned.

If the casinos are going to be fair enough, then banning someone who is winning too much should not be in their mind; instead, they should celebrate such a person and even use them for promotion, telling others that it's possible to actually win instead of being scared of being bankrupted by them and sending them out from the casino.

[|MINER|]

I actually doubt what the real story is because reputable casinos never ban players for winning big amounts, rather casinos that engage in such activities can be called scammers.
And what actually happens in reality is that gamblers bet on the same match at multiple casinos or sportsbooks at the same time but balance it out where they make a confirmed profit. There is a name for this type of gambling method, although I can't remember the name at the moment. However, it is against the terms of the sportbookies, which results in those gamblers being banned from the casinos. Maybe something like this happened here or the casinos are cheating.