Should a player be ban for winning so much

[GideonGono]

This is a crap policy imposed by most of the casinos. A player should not be banned nor penalized for winning big. First of all those people who are hitting big specially on sports betting spent time studying game/player patterns and that is hard work and them winning big is a result of their hard work unless its the other way around like if they win due to match fixing, inside betting etc.

Why would you penalize someone who risk their own money to win?

As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

This has become very common in the past few years not just in sports but also in esports. Lets take Jontay Porter for example risking his career for betting on himself. This type of bans are 100% rightful.

[Rabata]

~snip~

If gamblers are not being banned for losing alot, then they shouldn't also be banned when they winn alot, especially when such a gambler is not cheating or maybe exploiting the system.... If a gambler is winning too much they, these betting companies can simply lower the stake limits in such a way that they wouldn't be ruined financially, instead of banning the person as if he committed some kind of crime.

There can be misconception to this being ban for winning too, before any of such should be done there should be a clear reason for doing that specially and not just because the gambler won too much, winning so much only is not enough reason for a gambler to be ban but rather if there is any form of cheating or exploiting the system then it is very much understandable, if a gambler is not being ban for lossing too much why should he be ban for winning too honestly there is a mismatch somewhere and of course will need a proper clarification.

If a gambling site bans a player after winning, then it is definitely not reasonable. The reason for banning the player must be shown. A gambler is not banned when he loses, but when he is lucky, he is being banned. I think this is completely unfair. If such a complaint is made, the site should be informed. Because those sites that do this to gamblers without any reason can be considered scams. Gamblers should also carefully read the ToS. If the gambler is at fault, then there is no point in blaming the gambling site.

[Salahmu]

I was on my social and I saw a content about gamers who got banned by sport betting companies because they won too much a particular gamer that has won over hundred million dollars in sport betting was very interesting.
Gamers wants to win and sport betting companies don’t want to lose that is why it’s gambling one against the other.

I no that if I ask you the name of the betting company that does that it will be non other but local betting companies because they're the company that have such believe, were they expecting all the gamblers to keep losing while they get more richer from there money?, wining a lot of money is not all about getting it from an unrecognized way, such betting company deserves to be brought on the public if they can prove to the person what he did to warant it. Although this could be a way they use in avoiding his continues wining from them so that he wouldn't send them out of the market.

[Porfirii]

There are many reasons why the casino administration may prohibit a player from visiting their casino.And I can assume that most cases of such bans are related to violations of the player, as a result of which he is blacklisted. And in such cases, it is easier for a player to say that he was banned for often winning than to admit to violating the rules.

If the player commits a foul and gets banned it's normal and it should be, But there are players who don't commit a foul and win up to $11.5 million
but then get banned in some casinos in their area for winning too often.

Mikki Mase was a pro poker player who won millions of dollars from a vegas casino and was later banned for cheating,
even though he was just playing his best at the poker table.

If the best poker players like Mikki are then banned for winning too often and threatening the bankruptcy of the casino,
then it is necessary to clarify what the maximum win is for each player and whether the ban does not violate the rights of a consumer.

-snip-

It's like saying,  you have your way of cheating because it is impossible to keep winning over and over again and yet we just can't prove it, and to safe our business you need to go.

This is very funny but I still can't blame the casino for saving their business, when you start winning too much don't forget that the money is all coming out from the casino's balance, at the point on you are no longer friendly to them.

It is just business, and the only way they keep the business running is by hoping that many gamblers keep on losing money, this is something that some gambler still don't understand.

Yes, in cases like these it can make sense to ban certain gamblers even without clear proof. Poker is a a game where skill plays a major role, and still is improbable to keep wining over certain threshold because you usually end competing with people of your same level. So, when a player smashes certain stats, it can be luck, it can be outstanding skills, or that he is cheating, for example, due to an agreement with other players or staff.

But in cases when a gambler just has very good luck and wins a big jackpot in a game based on chance, it doesn't make much sense to ban him. Why don't just cap the max bet instead, like the OP said? because it seems that doing this goes against the casinos' interests.

[AmaGold70]

A player shouldn't be banned from playing if they are playing fair and square and as a matter of fact no player should be ban for winning too much because when they were losing their money on the same casino site they were not banned from playing but when they start winning the casino think they are losing money and such casino should be avoided because they are not being fair and they lack business etiquette too, anyone that is risking their own money to gamble on a casino site has the right to win as many times because that is why there is a casino site to gamble in the first place. It's a shame that casinos enjoy it when you lose money to them but don't enjoy it when you win back your money multiple times.

[sotelorene]

~snip~

If gamblers are not being banned for losing alot, then they shouldn't also be banned when they winn alot, especially when such a gambler is not cheating or maybe exploiting the system.... If a gambler is winning too much they, these betting companies can simply lower the stake limits in such a way that they wouldn't be ruined financially, instead of banning the person as if he committed some kind of crime.

There can be misconception to this being ban for winning too, before any of such should be done there should be a clear reason for doing that specially and not just because the gambler won too much, winning so much only is not enough reason for a gambler to be ban but rather if there is any form of cheating or exploiting the system then it is very much understandable, if a gambler is not being ban for lossing too much why should he be ban for winning too honestly there is a mismatch somewhere and of course will need a proper clarification.

If a gambling site bans a player after winning, then it is definitely not reasonable. The reason for banning the player must be shown. A gambler is not banned when he loses, but when he is lucky, he is being banned. I think this is completely unfair. If such a complaint is made, the site should be informed. Because those sites that do this to gamblers without any reason can be considered scams. Gamblers should also carefully read the ToS. If the gambler is at fault, then there is no point in blaming the gambling site.

Exactly, there are so many factors that can make a casino ban a gambler and they Includes; if the gambler cheated to win a huge amount of money, if the site is a scam etc. now in the first case if someone use a cheat to win a huge amount of money in a Casino site and the Casino finds out, they have all the right to ban the gambler as far as the  gambler cheated or they won't pay that particular money and I think that is best thing to do Instead of banning and secondly if the person doesn't cheat and the site is a scam site they will not pay the person in fact they can even delete the details of the person and deny the person access.

[dimonstration]

A player shouldn't be banned from playing if they are playing fair and square and as a matter of fact no player should be ban for winning too much because when they were losing their money on the same casino site they were not banned from playing but when they start winning the casino think they are losing money and such casino should be avoided because they are not being fair and they lack business etiquette too, anyone that is risking their own money to gamble on a casino site has the right to win as many times because that is why there is a casino site to gamble in the first place. It's a shame that casinos enjoy it when you lose money to them but don't enjoy it when you win back your money multiple times.

Casino doesn’t outright ban a player that winning too much after having a lucky streak while they a losing streak record in the past.

Most of the gamblers that being banned for winning are those who have high accuracy on their bets. Either they use value bets or other method to spot a pick with favorable odds for them.

Those players are not lucky rather they are playing in a very calculated way so casino doesn’t have room for profit on their bets in the long run which is why they are banned.

[tvplus006]

...Mikki Mase was a pro poker player who won millions of dollars from a vegas casino and was later banned for cheating,
even though he was just playing his best at the poker table. ..

We cannot change the rules according to which the casino can ban any player from playing at the casino, even if he does not violate the rules. A good example of this is the card counters in Blackjack, although there is no rule that a player cannot count cards, the casino identifies such players and puts them on the blacklist.

[lizarder]

a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

I'm sure he was blocked not for the reason of being able to achieve big wins due to his ability to read the game in gambling activities because every casino does not limit the amount of this limit and if this happens, maybe the casino is clearly a fraud. Any Casino that has a good reputation will not block people without a clear reason unless the user himself makes a mistake that does not comply with the terms and conditions implemented by the casino.

They should not be prohibited if the winnings are obtained fairly and do not violate casino rules and that is why a gambler before deciding to choose a casino must first read the terms and conditions so that they do not feel disadvantaged when involved in it.

[Versatile_choice]

If a gambling site bans a player after winning, then it is definitely not reasonable. The reason for banning the player must be shown. A gambler is not banned when he loses, but when he is lucky, he is being banned. I think this is completely unfair. If such a complaint is made, the site should be informed. Because those sites that do this to gamblers without any reason can be considered scams. Gamblers should also carefully read the ToS. If the gambler is at fault, then there is no point in blaming the gambling site.

You're right most casinos might have a reason for doing that but what could possibly be thier reason? Because those rules set by Casinos is not even something one would violate so easily without getting a warning from the casino, because I remember going beyond the maximum pay out of a casino while I was making my bet and I was told that I should reduce my stake our remove some events as the potential wining is beyond the maximum pay out so I had to remove some events. so this is how a reputable casino is supposed to act, I must say that I haven't seen a casino banning gamblers for wining too much, any casino that will try such is obviously a scam casino.

[goldkingcoiner]

I was on my social and I saw a content about gamers who got banned by sport betting companies because they won too much a particular gamer that has won over hundred million dollars in sport betting was very interesting.
Gamers wants to win and sport betting companies don’t want to lose that is why it’s gambling one against the other.

 a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

Any player that gets unfairly banned because of their large winnings does not deserve such treatment,
especially if they did nothing which violates the terms and conditions of the casino.

Any casino that bans winners, or worse; withholds their winnings is basically a scam casino and should be avoided at all costs.

[dimonstration]

-snip-

I think a long streak of big wins is very rare, and in the end it could even cause a casino to go bankrupt. In some casinos, maximum bet limits are applied for certain games, with the aim of limiting their potential losses while also limiting the amount a bettor can lose. From a gambler perspective, restricting the amount they can win is certainly frustrating, since casinos usually profit more often. On the other hand, casinos also impose minimum betting limits, which shows that they actually seek large profits.

Some gambler manage to have long winning streak through betting only with value bets. This gives them an edge on most of their bets since they are having an odds that exceeds the statistically probability of their bets.

Max bet is not always working to control their losses since profitable players usually place multiple bets to spread their limits.

This case is truly very rare but there’s some user that manage to be consistent like this and do it to multiple casino once they are restricted/ban.

[centrum]

A player shouldn't be banned from playing if they are playing fair and square and as a matter of fact no player should be ban for winning too much because when they were losing their money on the same casino site they were not banned from playing but when they start winning the casino think they are losing money and such casino should be avoided because they are not being fair and they lack business etiquette too, anyone that is risking their own money to gamble on a casino site has the right to win as many times because that is why there is a casino site to gamble in the first place. It's a shame that casinos enjoy it when you lose money to them but don't enjoy it when you win back your money multiple times.

this has not happened to me so far. the sites where i gamble have good security. a gambler can never win continuously. if a gambler keeps winning again and again then it depends on his luck. it happens sometimes but it has never happened to me. and if a gambling site bans someone for winning in a row then that site should be avoided and others should be warned. because if they ban your id all the money will go to the casino site and they will never return it. that is normal. compared to online gambling physical gambling meaning going to a casino is better if the chances of winning are higher. there you do not have the fear of losing money in that way. sometimes i go to a casino to gamble when i do not feel good playing online.

[Frankolala]

Any player that gets unfairly banned because of their large winnings does not deserve such treatment,
especially if they did nothing which violates the terms and conditions of the casino.

Any casino that bans winners, or worse; withholds their winnings is basically a scam casino and should be avoided at all costs.

These is how most of the casinos are. After you must have won huge amounts of money more than twice, they start monitoring your account and if it happens that you win big again, they'll pay you but ban your account or restrict your account to a limited amount of money that you can bet with. Don't you think that these casinos are smart and don't want to run out of business. However, you can just go open an account with a different casino.

[terrific]

I will put myself in the position of the casino owners. I'm a businessman and I don't want my business to dry asap.
And that's why if I see consistent players that have been winning with so much money, I'll try to limit their wins through limits per day of how much they can win.
If it becomes consistent and they still keep on winning, that's the time that I'd probably ban them and there's no more coming back if it's costing me too much money.

[tvplus006]

...Poker is a a game where skill plays a major role, and still is improbable to keep wining over certain threshold because you usually end competing with people of your same level. So, when a player smashes certain stats, it can be luck, it can be outstanding skills, or that he is cheating, for example, due to an agreement with other players or staff...

If we consider classic poker, where players play against players, the casino cannot suffer a loss, no matter how the players cheat, since it acts only as an organizer, receiving a commission for this. The exception to this rule is, for example, Casino Hold'em, where the player plays against the casino and, accordingly, in this case, the casino can lose large amounts of money, although it originally has a house edge.

[mvdheuvel1983]

Any player that gets unfairly banned because of their large winnings does not deserve such treatment,
especially if they did nothing which violates the terms and conditions of the casino.

Any casino that bans winners, or worse; withholds their winnings is basically a scam casino and should be avoided at all costs.

These is how most of the casinos are. After you must have won huge amounts of money more than twice, they start monitoring your account and if it happens that you win big again, they'll pay you but ban your account or restrict your account to a limited amount of money that you can bet with. Don't you think that these casinos are smart and don't want to run out of business. However, you can just go open an account with a different casino.

The casinos can actually ban the account of customers they find out that is always gambling with huge amount of money and winning on weekly basis but they will not just ban the account for winning they will monitor and investigate if the customer is cheating on the casino if they don find any fault from the customer they will use KYC to know if it is the original owner of the accounts that is using it and if they do not find anything to hold the account and the money won in it they will do everything to make sure they ban the account so that the customer I'll not run them down. The customers may not be lucky to win always in a different casino especially if they have studied the casino they were winning regularly.

[Webutxo]

a gambler who is not cheating but winning with his powers of reading the game that gambler should not be banned, I know that before a gambler can be banned because of winning that gambler must have been winning very high amount against the betting platform. As I researched this I noticed that the ban is not enforced because some banned gamblers use another person who gambles big to place bet for them, big players like Floyd Mayweather has been allegedly used by banned gamblers.

Reducing the amount that can be staked by high winning and staking gamblers on the sport betting company is better than to ban players because they win too much.

If a gambler is cheating, the casino will know that you are cheating. No serious casino will banned or suspend your account because you are winning  unless they find you uncomfortable and they don't you to be the only person going home without their money. Some casino also have habit of returning users stake money and ask them to remove their money nicely from the casino bit I see it as wickedness, unprofessionalism and broke of customers right.

If the casino doesn't want you again, you can leave but what they don't have the right is to deny you of your money. If you know about them, get a lawyer and sue them to collect your money unless it's written on their terms and conditions but sometimes there are some laws that protect customers right in the court, if the court ask them to pay then they are going to pay without hesitation.

[Juse14]

Big wins for visitors are always a big loss for bookmakers, and this is clearly seen as a threat, especially if someone can win consistently. So they look for ways to limit players who win too often.

However, if a visitor plays honestly, without manipulation, multiple accounts, or data manipulation, there's really no valid reason for a casino or sportsbook to expel or ban them.

Unfortunately, some bookmakers take the shortcut of blocking or limiting bets on overly competent players to maintain their profits. And this often raises ethical issues—since the player hasn't done anything wrong.

Ideally, if they feel they're losing too much, simply reduce their betting limits or implement reasonable monitoring mechanisms, rather than outright blocking them.

[DiMarxist]

This has become very common in the past few years not just in sports but also in esports. Lets take Jontay Porter for example risking his career for betting on himself. This type of bans are 100% rightful.

This should not be a policy in a casino, and if the casino can't pay a large amount, they should not operate in the public or internationally and if they will operate, they have to tell the public the limit they can pay each gambler and the winning of each player should not exceed a certain amount. With that, gamblers in such Casino would know that they are gambling with a limited payout and they also gamble with a limited resources but whereby the casino allows gamblers to play with big amount and when they win and they got ban, that is fully unacceptable and it is a strategy of scamming gamblers.