Nice job cleaning the forum, my take on this is that, if there are evidence already established as done already,  then all the remaining accounts deserved the same tag as the individual behind the accounts is confirmed to be one and have abuse campaign rules by enrolling two accounts.

Tagging the accounts is one thing but another set back will be how effective campaign managers act to validate DTs judgement, because some of those red tagged accounts are still actively participating in campaigns, without being removed for violating same managers rules.

Soft plead,  that campaigns managers should act to complement the efforts of DT1 helping to clean the forum of greedy campaigns abusers and accounts farmers.

If you are referring this campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2135573.0,
this campaign DID NOT have any rule for preventing alt accounts from participating.

So by moral, they had not breached any rule with respect to that campaign.

Rampagoe004 just got removed from the campaign that he was in by Hhampuz. Good work, tags must definitely be given to all these accounts regularly.

---

With so many abusers, accounts and threads I find it a bit hard to navigate around to follow up later on with cases. I know about this thread "Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2025 Q4) [MODERATED]" but I don't think it is that useful for efficient tracking. It would be nice to have an overview table with accounts and last dates of activity. Somebody could probably write up a simple bot that reports old alts that wake up based on the list of those are reported there .