While we wait for Ballet to ship out remaining 2 coin sets in the Three wise monkey series.
We are fortunate to do another collab with them which will have unique designs and never before seen/made pattern (neither by us nor by Ballet and so far from what we see no one in the community has used such designs).
We have few questions to the collectors(and innovation lovers) for this new series:
1. Do you prefer coins should be silver metal or copper?
2. Coins should be 100 coins per set (i.e. 100 of design 1, 100 of design 2 and 100 of design3) or 200 per design so 600 total?
3. Only funded or buyer funded?
Anything else positive which can help please let us know.
Note: This is a self-moderated topic, off-topic comments will be deleted
Thank you
These are some good questions potentially interesting for other makers, too.
If you think about what makes a collectible worth noting, I think most will come to similar conclusions:
- a unique aspect that ideally has some relation to the topic (in this case on the forum it's crypto, rare metals, coins, trust etc.)
- rareness
- art. [now obviously you can always argue what counts as art and what does not. with all the AI slop it's now even harder to find the real stuff. and yes, I believe an artist can take advantage of AI and still produce "real" (whatever that is) art, but it's dangerous territory and I would say most cases have crossed the border to no-art-but-AI-slop territory very quickly /end-of-ramble]
So to answer your question:
1. silver and gilded silver
2. 100 or below sounds great - if you have a massive platform larger quantities are fine (see Satori 1.0, Cas, old Lealana stuff) but usually anything above the 150, 200 mark seems like a quick money-grab and seems misplaced for this small community here
3. buyer assembled (I love loaded crypto collectibles but can count the amount of makers I would trust on probably one hand - so let us print our own private keys and attach the security hologram ourselves)