Michael Saylor Signals Another Bitcoin Buy

[Victoria01]

Michael Saylor has posted his usual orange dots again, and for anyone who has followed him for years, this is a familiar sign. Most times, those dots show up shortly before Strategy adds more Bitcoin to its holdings.

Data from saylortracker shows the company has now completed 89 Bitcoin purchases, holding about 660,624 BTC, currently valued close to $59 billion. Their average entry price is around $74,000 per BTC, and they are still sitting on roughly an 11% unrealized gain. Between December 1 and 8 alone, Strategy bought another 10,624 BTC at an average price of about $90,615, pushing their holdings to over 3% of Bitcoin’s total supply.

What makes this interesting is the timing. This signal is coming during BingX’s Weekly Featured Trading Championship, now in its second phase. Market moves like this don’t usually happen by accident. They favor traders who are prepared and paying attention.

Events like this reward consistency and smart positioning, not random trades. Since 2020, Strategy has continued to accumulate Bitcoin using share issuance and debt, treating BTC as a long-term treasury asset. So far this year, that approach has produced a Bitcoin yield of over 24%.

Trading isn’t only about charts. Fundamentals matter too. The question is how well traders can use moments like this to position themselves and stay competitive.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Have to admire his conviction, he’s either going to be one of the richest guys in the world in 10-15 years or he’s going to have lost his investors and himself a hell of a lot of money. I hope for the former as I am obviously also heavily invested in Bitcoin. I hope for a much better performance in the future than what 2025 has given us.

[Z-tight]

What makes this interesting is the timing. This signal is coming during BingX’s Weekly Featured Trading Championship, now in its second phase.

Your thread started off in one way and ended up in a different one. Why is this trading competition interesting in relation to the topic and i don't see why it was included in this post. But checking your post history, you mention BingX a lot, do you shill for them?

Saylor's and strategy's position concerning BTC is not going to change, that is very obvious for all to see. It does not matter the situation of the market, they keep accumulating. If you are a long term BTC holder, it is normal not to care too much about what the current price is, it is about the long run and the future BTC 'promises'.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Have to admire his conviction, he’s either going to be one of the richest guys in the world in 10-15 years or he’s going to have lost his investors and himself a hell of a lot of money.

I admire his conviction as well. It takes balls to do what he's doing.

It's an extremely smart playbook. Strategy is essentially a black hole that will attract capital until either the system deliberately attacks it and Saylor cannot defend it in any way (such as recently with MSCI fomo) or until all systemic locked capital has been absorbed. The smart part is that if other companies realize that bitcoin is essential, and adopt the bitcoin standard, or try to mimic Saylor's strategy, that pumps the bitcoin price and increases Strategy's market cap, which in return allows it to borrow in even better rates. It's extremely difficult to beat him now that he's got the first mover advantage.

[moneystery]

Trading isn’t only about charts. Fundamentals matter too. The question is how well traders can use moments like this to position themselves and stay competitive.

What he did was basically investment, not trading. He has put so much money on it and his investment in Bitcoin is so large that it makes him one of the entities that holds so much bitcoin. What he is doing now is a form of confidence in the fundamentals of bitcoin-- that he believes Bitcoin is a long-term asset and that it will continue to grow in the future. He is one of the many figures who truly believes in Bitcoin, and I think what he is doing now is a great example for all of us to continue to believe and invest consistently in Bitcoin.

[Frankolala]

Trading isn’t only about charts. Fundamentals matter too. The question is how well traders can use moments like this to position themselves and stay competitive.

What he did was basically investment, not trading. He has put so much money on it and his investment in Bitcoin is so large that it makes him one of the entities that holds so much bitcoin. What he is doing now is a form of confidence in the fundamentals of bitcoin-- that he believes Bitcoin is a long-term asset and that it will continue to grow in the future. He is one of the many figures who truly believes in Bitcoin, and I think what he is doing now is a great example for all of us to continue to believe and invest consistently in Bitcoin.

Michael Saylor has been a good role model to a lot of bitcoin enthusiasts with his continuous bitcoin purchase for the past four years. If you want to talk about any company with the highest bitcoin hodlings, Strategy is number one. I have learned a lot from him because I like his confidence in bitcoin.

[_act_]

Trading isn’t only about charts. Fundamentals matter too. The question is how well traders can use moments like this to position themselves and stay competitive.

This thread is about how Micheal Saylor is continuously buying bitcoin, but at the end you changed it to something about trading. This is completely contradictory. Maybe you do not know the difference between continuous buying ,(and holding bitcoin) and trading. They are both completely different, you can read about both online. Micheal Saylor is a holder and not a trader. Trading is also very risky.

[uchegod-21]

Now, we should all agree that it is okay for Michael Saylor to be considered a role model for those who are DCAing but do not have much confidence in what they are doing. Here is someone who has been very consistent since he started DCAing. Saylor has invested heavily in accumulating Bitcoin. One thing to take note of is that he isn’t waiting for the perfect dip; he is only focused on consistency and a long-term journey.

Comparing him to traders is somehow misleading. These two use different strategies. Saylor isn’t trying to outsmart the market the way traders do. He is simply committing capital consistently, believing that volatility will be in his favor at the end of his long-term investment journey.

[FirmWars]

There are so many predictions that 2026 will be a year of another bull run, I'm not surprised to see that saylor bought more Bitcoin at $90k but I also admire his courage just like someone mentioned. The followers whom he is a role model to must have also follow his call and bought more Bitcoin but if peradventure the price drops to $50k next years, I hope that these followers can also be strong enough to hold until a bull market when the price has gotten to there intended sell price.

[coolcoinz]

Have to admire his conviction, he’s either going to be one of the richest guys in the world in 10-15 years or he’s going to have lost his investors and himself a hell of a lot of money. I hope for the former as I am obviously also heavily invested in Bitcoin. I hope for a much better performance in the future than what 2025 has given us.

Life is short. You have to make a bet at some point or you sentence yourself to slow death. Most large companies made that bet at some point. I've recently listened to an interview with Nvidia CEO and he said that they were almost bankrupt and tok a gamble on a new chip, sending it to production without testing because they had no money for it and it somehow worked and had no major bugs. IMO the bet on bitcoin is smart, just that Saylor is going all or nothing because it's too late for him to go slow when there's so many companies and countries interested in this. I dare to say if you get into bitcoin now you're pretty late so you either invest big money, or you have to take a gamble by taking a loan or using leverage.

[Botnake]

Good news, but honestly it’s not really new anymore since they’ve been buying regardless of market conditions. Bullish or bearish, they’ve been consistent with their goal to keep accumulating.

Because of that, they actually help strengthen the market and reduce manipulation, just based on how much Bitcoin they’re holding now. They clearly have no plans of stopping. Staying at the top as the #1 US company holding the most Bitcoin says a lot. And it’s not just about owning it, they’re showing the real way to invest, which is to HODL.

[Zaguru12]

Because of that, they actually help strengthen the market and reduce manipulation, just based on how much Bitcoin they’re holding now. They clearly have no plans of stopping. Staying at the top as the #1 US company holding the most Bitcoin says a lot. And it’s not just about owning it, they’re showing the real way to invest, which is to HODL.

I don’t understand what you mean by they actually stops manipulation, it is not that there is a single buyer with lots of bitcoin on them that they are buying from to say this. Manipulation would be stop if lots of people continue to buy.

For me I think that Saylor like lots of us already everything on bitcoin and not only because we think it could grow in profits but because we have strong conviction that it will stay like that and adoption rate will definitely continue to increase and as such it’s actually good reading about Saylor continuing to spread awareness of what he believes in

[JuxtaposeLife]

...Saylor isn't trading, he's just leveraging a terrifying amount of debt...

While I agree with most of your post, this part I felt compelled to push back on a bit. The phrase “terrifying amount of debt” sounds large in nominal terms (billions), but it misses the proportion of that debt to the collateral backing it. They have something like $35-40B unencumbered bitcoin on their balance sheet.

At current levels, Strategy’s balance sheet looks much closer to a ~20% loan-to-value structure than some reckless, maxed-out leverage play. In plain terms, it’s like putting 80% down on a house and financing the remaining 20%. In that scenario, the lender is not really in danger unless the house drops more than 80% in value and stays there long enough that the borrower can’t service the modest portion they did finance - they can just keep making payments though and keep the house. On top of that, the company’s issuances are corporate debt and preferreds without margin calls, not brokerage leverage. There’s no “liquidate at 50%” clause hanging over them. As long as Bitcoin doesn’t collapse to the low-five-figure range and then grind sideways there for years, the structure is actually quite conservative compared to what most people imagine when they hear “billions in debt.” which seems to be pushed by the banking sector in general. Many have latched onto that just assuming there is reckless leverage here...

The way I see it, Saylor isn’t just “leveraging up to gamble”; he’s building a bridge between fixed-income capital and Bitcoin. Bond and preferred holders stay in their comfort zone (collecting yield in fiat terms) while Strategy quietly vacuum-cleans that capital into BTC on the other side. This is good for everyone in Bitcoin... as long as Bitcoin succeeds, Strategy just speeds up it's adoption and forces banking to move towards Bitcoin to back fixed income.

Cold storage Bitcoin with no liabilities is obviously the purest and best position, I'm not advocating for a position in this company (though I hold a modest one, full disclosure). But I can still appreciate how Strategy is exposing just how fragile much of the traditional fixed-income world is: coupon streams resting on political discretion and money printing, versus a balance sheet increasingly anchored to a strictly scarce asset. From that angle, the strategy looks less like a reckless bet and more like a deliberately engineered on-ramp from legacy debt markets into a harder form of collateral.

[LogitechMouse]

---
What makes this interesting is the timing. This signal is coming during BingX’s Weekly Featured Trading Championship, now in its second phase. Market moves like this don’t usually happen by accident. They favor traders who are prepared and paying attention.

Events like this reward consistency and smart positioning, not random trades. Since 2020, Strategy has continued to accumulate Bitcoin using share issuance and debt, treating BTC as a long-term treasury asset. So far this year, that approach has produced a Bitcoin yield of over 24%.

Trading isn’t only about charts. Fundamentals matter too. The question is how well traders can use moments like this to position themselves and stay competitive.

Well, a lowkey advertising of an exchange yet again just like what Bitget did in the past. A lowkey shiller.

Anyway, Saylor has been doing this for a long time, and just for context, him and other institutions buying those Bitcoin doesn't have an effect towards the price - opposite to what we think it is. It will only have an effect if they bought on an exchange which they not and they bought it OTC. The effect that it will have is only when they sell their Bitcoin holdings which is a bad thing. Well, despite of MSTR stock price plummeting ever since the price of Bitcoin went down as well, he don't care about it, and will still raise more money to buy more Bitcoin.

I'm afraid that in the next 1-2 decades he will sell those Bitcoins. Yes, he's a big supporter of Bitcoin, but he's a businessman and businessman thinks about profits so at some point, he will sell those and it will have a negative effect towards the market.

[nelson4lov]

We're fine with Bitcoin as long as the price stays above Saylor's entry. I feel like there would be plenty of cascading events that could lead to even more bloodbath in bitcoin and overall market prices if we tank below his entry and he is then forced to sell. That's just btw. I try to approach things like this with optimism that it would end well in the end—for Saylor's conviction as well Bitcoin holders.

[JuxtaposeLife]

We're fine with Bitcoin as long as the price stays above Saylor's entry. I feel like there would be plenty of cascading events that could lead to even more bloodbath in bitcoin and overall market prices if we tank below his entry and he is then forced to sell. That's just btw. I try to approach things like this with optimism that it would end well in the end—for Saylor's conviction as well Bitcoin holders.

This, again is another common misunderstanding. The vast majority of the Bitcoin Strategy holds is unencumbered, meaning they simply control/own it outright. Only a minority of the stack (on the order of ~20%) is associated with debt or preferred structures. That’s why their headline average buy price around $74k is a bit misleading when you’re thinking in terms of “forced selling.”

For the value of their BTC to even equal the face value of their obligations, you’re talking about a Bitcoin price somewhere down in the mid-teens (roughly $14k just as a ballpark). In other words, there is a very large buffer between here and any scenario where the balance sheet is upside-down. And even then, this is corporate debt and preferred equity, not broker margin... there’s no automatic liquidation trigger just because spot trades below some line on a chart.

[Darker45]

The timing isn't interesting at all. Saylor has already been doing this for quite a while. He's been posting his orange tracker on Sundays. The purchase usually happens on the next day. He's into DCA.

Surely, he isn't posting the signal in time for a shitty centralized exchange's event. It's not even a top-tier exchange. Saylor probably hasn't heard of it. And he most likely doesn't care. He's not joining it, anyway. Although there's indeed an overlap of events, it doesn't have any meaning or connection at all.

[CryptoYar]

Michael Saylor has bought Bitcoin shows how his orange dots are quiet but clear sign that company will soon be adding to its huge BTC holdings which now is more than 660,000 BTC, or controls more than 3 per cent of total amount. Long term plan of company since 2020 is that it treats BTC as extra money, and it will be paid for by selling company parts and taking on debt, which has worked very well.  To traders, these big buys are not by chance, they show high belief in idea of Bitcoin and are key good sign, that is, traders who have studied this pattern and put themselves in good spot are ones who will benefit most, which proves that successful trading is not about looking at price graphs but about understanding big market things.

[btcwoot]

what is the world coming to when we are tracking orange dots as buy signs?

[Fiatless]

Your thread started off in one way and ended up in a different one. Why is this trading competition interesting in relation to the topic and i don't see why it was included in this post. But checking your post history, you mention BingX a lot, do you shill for them?

OP feels that traders could take advantage of Strategy's Bitcoin purchase to make trading decisions. You are correct, OP might be indirectly promoting the mentioned platform. Stractegy has become a pacecetter for many organisation and hopefully Saylor will keep accumulating.