kaza.bet - By Gamblers for Gamblers

[KazaBet]

Just checked the site out and it appears that my region is restricted which is odd since that's a pretty rare thing for me. The ANN itself doesn't really look appealing anyway and I believe there's no sportsbook here which makes it even less appealing to me.

I suggest restricting less countries since y'all are an offshore site after all and not some heavily regulated site.

Can you write or DM me your region? Thanks.

Sportsbook will come. It wasn't a high priority for launching, especially since this part of the year doesn't have major sports events.

[KazaBet]

I can't find sportbet as part of the games in your site. Don't kazabet have sportbet because it brings more traffic to the casinos. Adding sportbet WI ll be good if you don't have so that gamblers will feel comfortable when using your site because itvhas everything they're looking for in a casino. However, I understand that you guys are new and with time, sportbet will be added.

You are in the right place to promote your brand because this is the biggest crypto community worldwide. It will be good to run a signature campaign here in the forum to make your brand more visible.

Welcome to the forum.

Sportsbook is planned and will be rolled out, it just was not a priority for the initial launch.
We're looking at a couple of sportsbook providers. Any suggestions which ones are the most popular among crypto community here? We've seen Betby sportsbook repeatedly among crypto casinos, but also a few other providers.

We’ve been around crypto since 2013

Why is your domain registered in 2025? I am surprised with to see the opposite but let us see what you will post about it.

Is this not your domain?

Domain: kaza.bet
Registered On: 2025-06-24
Expires On: 2026-06-24
Updated On: 2025-06-29

Why 2025 when you posted that the gambling site has been existing since 2913?

I don't think that's what the OP meant and he said it's launching in 2025... but he has experience from 2013 as an employee and gambler as mentioned in post #3.

Maybe OP has been a gambling professional until he decided to launch this casino... but why no social media when they list it under the site?

We started with social media activity back in October. However, we got our accounts restricted because we didn't follow the content guidelines properly. Then, we appealed and decided to wait till we get the Anjouan igaming license to prevent this from happening again. Now all seems fine and we're ready to kick off and test engagement across various platforms (tiktok, insta, telegram, x, quest campaigns).

You are welcome to the largest bitcoin forum in the world. And there are enough gamblers here to use your Casino if you are doing the right thing. And what are the right thing to do here,  active here to respond to complains from participants of the casino, your withdrawal is good and no delay. Deposit is good without delay and withdrawal is the most important thing to build your reputation. I visit the casino and I must say, I was not impressed because the games on the home page looks like PS1 games.

Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and see where they will head into.

However, upon checking their registration, it shows like this



So I don't know if there is indeed reg no. like 000000000 or is it just a placeholder for now while taking care of this aspect of business?

And need to consider their kyc requirements here -

The registration entry you’re referring to was a temporary placeholder during corporate setup. We have meanwhile completed the corporate and licensing process, and secured the Anjouan iGaming License. The website has been updated with correct data, and the live license seal is visible too:
https://verification.anjouangamingboard.org/validate?domain=kaza.bet&seal_id=bf97ee3f3048331f2d93d338a1573006afba6102da2dcf743f948b9e3c7f6726d4fe5b3219bccc15f7dfaff25363f4a8&stamp=afa1ce0b9cdc9d84e288a8866a2891a3
Our KYC requirements are very comparable to other licensed crypto casinos. We require basic/light KYC upon signup. Any additional KYC is non-standard.

We are players and users in this space before anything else. 
We’ve been around crypto since 2013, went to 50+ conferences, survived every hype cycle, rug, miracle pump and dump, so we figured…

Why not build the crypto casino we actually want to play and gamble on?

Kazabet is a next-gen crypto casino built for gamblers, by gamblers. 
We know the trends, we know what players want — and we built it ourselves.

So you have been in the crypto and gambling industry since 2013, which means you must have a lot of knowledge about crypto and gambling. But I'm just wondering why you entered this industry too late? And tell us what you are going to solve in the gambling industry; there should be differences between your platform compared with others. Does the slogan 'by the gambler for the gamblers' mean just the platform created by the gamblers' team? Then I would say most of the gambling sites would use the same slogan, because I assume most gambling platforms are created by gamblers as well.

Do you really know what gamblers want and the trends? Then it seems you are asking for KYC that hasn't been welcomed by gamblers. People like crypto gambling sites and want to avoid KYC documents, but it's not expected from you according to your base slogan. Also, the platform does not seem licensed yet; I'm not sure if you have applied for it.

I’m actually impressed that a casino that started way back in 2013 is still operating until now. The competition is really tough, so it’s not easy to survive this long unless the casino is competitive enough on its own.

Most probably they meant to be active in crypto and gambling since 2013, not about launching the project. So I am not impressed at all, because as I said, gambling sites are usually launched by gamblers; unless they are gamblers, they have to struggle to run the site. Can't only depend on the developers.

Hey, good points. There’s actually a huge number (probably 50%+) of licensed and unlicensed crypto casinos launched in the last couple of years where the founders come from completely different backgrounds, not casino, not crypto, not even Web3. You see VCs, private investors, dev teams, KOLs and influencers jumping in. What usually happens is they launch a brand without any real playbook. No solid marketing strategy, no proper bonus setup or gamification, and weak risk and fraud management. So they fund the initial bankroll and outsource everything else for a fee. It sounds nice in theory, but in reality it kills agility, makes it hard to react to player feedback and market changes, and hurts profitability. At the end of the day, you need a knowledgeable in-house team to run a casino properly. That only comes from understanding player behavior and making the experience rewarding and entertaining. Honestly, I don’t think most of these casinos have enough experience to really run the show. Easy to say, not easy to execute!

Regarding KYC and licensing, I addressed that above. Short version: we got the license in the meantime, and we don’t ask for documents as part of the standard KYC.

I can't find sportbet as part of the games in your site. Don't kazabet have sportbet because it brings more traffic to the casinos. Adding sportbet WI ll be good if you don't have so that gamblers will feel comfortable when using your site because itvhas everything they're looking for in a casino. However, I understand that you guys are new and with time, sportbet will be added.

I don't think they will add it yet, though it's one of the things I'm looking at and also a provably fair games or original games. UI wise I do like your UI, all the information are available and easily accessible and it's clear. Just like what other people are saying, are you planning to add more in the platform such as sports betting? As what your catch phrase said, I hope you would consider adding original games and sports betting. Got also curious with your $KAZA token, will every user who place bet would earn that? I think maybe you could add some information about your token too on the site.

Anyway, great start! Welcome to the Bitcointalk forum, Kaza.bet!

Thanks for the feedback. House Originals and sportsbook are coming next. Then we want to launch crypto futures trading. Provably fair content already exists, but it's not on-chain provability (like luckio), if that's what you're referring to. We’re scaling deliberately.
$KAZA is part of a mid-term ecosystem plan, details will be shared once fully finalized. We have a simple and fair plan how to distribute the token. We're iterating the RLB, SHFL and a few other tokenomic models.
Appreciate the welcome.

[DYING_S0UL]

Hey there kaza.bet, just a quick question, are you guys a VPN friendly platform? (Assuming you are since you guys recently acquired a licence), but best if you clarify this, just to make sure.

Because I couldn't find anything related to this anywhere in your ANN, nor in your terms and condition page (Or maybe i wasn't looking hard enough). And to be honest you guys have a massive T&C to begin with. I doubt whether anyone reads this much policies. I won't, because it already got me confused. I prefer a rather simple t&c.

[Odusko]

We’ve been around crypto since 2013

Why is your domain registered in 2025? I am surprised with to see the opposite but let us see what you will post about it.

Is this not your domain?

Domain: kaza.bet
Registered On: 2025-06-24
Expires On: 2026-06-24
Updated On: 2025-06-29

Why 2025 when you posted that the gambling site has been existing since 2013?

What we can observe is that the ops may have over stated the times and year of operation, confusing 2025 which is the official start up of casino,  to mean 2013 when they actually set out to become a group of gambler's, that is the best I can make out his statement, hope they come around to clarify things as time progresses.

[Koadharber]

Hey there kaza.bet, just a quick question, are you guys a VPN friendly platform? (Assuming you are since you guys recently acquired a licence), but best if you clarify this, just to make sure.

Because I couldn't find anything related to this anywhere in your ANN, nor in your terms and condition page (Or maybe i wasn't looking hard enough). And to be honest you guys have a massive T&C to begin with. I doubt whether anyone reads this much policies. I won't, because it already got me confused. I prefer a rather simple t&c.

If you do tend to hover into their terms the safe to assume that this one doesnt allow VPN yet you would definitely be having some problems when it comes to verification once issues been raised.

The documents that the user provided shall be not approved because:

address/Name on documents don't match with account name/address;
illegible documents or copies;

Source: https://kaza.bet/info/kyc

[DYING_S0UL]

snip

If you do tend to hover into their terms the safe to assume that this one doesnt allow VPN yet you would definitely be having some problems when it comes to verification once issues been raised.

It is not my habit to ignore the terms and condition policies. Whenever I visit a casino platform, the first thing I always do is, check their T&C page. This one was no exception. I did check it, hovered around it, but it was so massive or should I say spread out that I simply couldn't find the condition regarding VPN's. So I thought of asking it here directly. That was the case. Btw, I am aware of the consequences of not reading the T&C.

[mikel_012]

Hey there kaza.bet, just a quick question, are you guys a VPN friendly platform? (Assuming you are since you guys recently acquired a licence), but best if you clarify this, just to make sure.

Because I couldn't find anything related to this anywhere in your ANN, nor in your terms and condition page (Or maybe i wasn't looking hard enough). And to be honest you guys have a massive T&C to begin with. I doubt whether anyone reads this much policies. I won't, because it already got me confused. I prefer a rather simple t&c.

If you do tend to hover into their terms the safe to assume that this one doesnt allow VPN yet you would definitely be having some problems when it comes to verification once issues been raised.

The documents that the user provided shall be not approved because:

address/Name on documents don't match with account name/address;
illegible documents or copies;

Source: https://kaza.bet/info/kyc

This is only an issue if you use a different country on the VPN. But you can be from Brazil and use a VPN from Brazil just to get privacy and hide your IP, how the address will not match this way? One thing is to use a VPN for privacy with the same country and another is to use a VPN to pretend to be from another country because your country is blocked.

[Yamifoud]

Short version: we got the license in the meantime, and we don’t ask for documents as part of the standard KYC.

I hope it is all done that way because many casinos started just asking for the basic KYC, but later on, when someone wins a big amount, they ask for additional documents for verification. This is one reason why many gamblers hate them. But aside from that, rules must be clear, and transparency also matters a lot.

And I hope this BTT forum helps your platform be known to the community. But I tell you that this is not easy due to the market competition.

[KazaBet]

Welcome to the forum Kaza.bet

The announcement thread looks simple yet effective. I assume you are already consulting with someone who has experience with the forum. I am judging based on your announcement thread design, and I see that you have already received the Copper membership. It appears that the casino is relatively new, and it doesn't have many players listed on its website. I am saying this because the 'all bets' tab actually shows the bet of only one user, and it is pretty quiet.

Regardless of your connection with any campaign manager, I would suggest that you to stay around and build a good reputation. You should consider running some promotional campaigns. If you need any help, don't hesitate to reach out.

Appreciate the warm welcome and the honest feedback.

You’re right, we are new, and reputation here is earned over time. We’re here for the long run, staying active, listening, and letting consistency speak louder than promotions. Campaigns will come when the foundation is solid.

Wanted to see things for myself about the website Kazabet and this was what I experienced in the image as uploaded.

Which makes me to ask, are there rules against accessing your website using VPN? Secondly, can you kindly tell us if there are countries restricted from accessing your website or is dew to VPN use, and what are those countries?

Anyways, your website name reminds me of somewhere East.

I tried to search their terms about countries restriction but unfortunately I cant find specific terms about it, I mean they do not mention which countries are restricted.
However their term which is related to this case is as quoted below:

3.3. You are a resident in a jurisdiction that allows gambling. You are not a resident of any country in which access to online gambling to its residents or to any person within such country is prohibited. It is your sole responsibility to ensure that your use of the service is legal.

3.4. You may not use a VPN, proxy or similar services or devices that mask or manipulate the identification of your real location.

As understood, the term #3.3 leaves the risk of gambling from any jurisdiction in the hand of the players. Very professional. And the term after is plain about the casino position on VPN etc. I appreciate the effort panjul07.

Is your country prohibit gambling, that's why you get the warning message that this casino is not providing service to users from your IP?
Anyway, my country is strictly against gambling but surprisingly I can access this casino without the warning as you get (I'm not using VPN).

No, my country laws do not prohibits gambling. I'm stunned how you can access and I am unable to.  Is a new casino they still have much on their plate to work on.

Access is geo-restricted in the following jurisdictions: Australia, France, Austria, Netherlands, Great Britain, United States, Spain, India, Germany, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, and Russia.
The use of VPNs is not actively monitored or restricted. There would need to be a clear pattern indicating fraud and misuse in order to consider taking any action. We do not operate a specific VPN policy.

We are players and users in this space before anything else. 
We’ve been around crypto since 2013, went to 50+ conferences, survived every hype cycle, rug, miracle pump and dump, so we figured…

Why not build the crypto casino we actually want to play and gamble on?

Kazabet is a next-gen crypto casino built for gamblers, by gamblers. 
We know the trends, we know what players want — and we built it ourselves.

So you have been in the crypto and gambling industry since 2013, which means you must have a lot of knowledge about crypto and gambling. But I'm just wondering why you entered this industry too late? And tell us what you are going to solve in the gambling industry; there should be differences between your platform compared with others. Does the slogan 'by the gambler for the gamblers' mean just the platform created by the gamblers' team? Then I would say most of the gambling sites would use the same slogan, because I assume most gambling platforms are created by gamblers as well.

Do you really know what gamblers want and the trends? Then it seems you are asking for KYC that hasn't been welcomed by gamblers. People like crypto gambling sites and want to avoid KYC documents, but it's not expected from you according to your base slogan. Also, the platform does not seem licensed yet; I'm not sure if you have applied for it.

I’m actually impressed that a casino that started way back in 2013 is still operating until now. The competition is really tough, so it’s not easy to survive this long unless the casino is competitive enough on its own.

Most probably they meant to be active in crypto and gambling since 2013, not about launching the project. So I am not impressed at all, because as I said, gambling sites are usually launched by gamblers; unless they are gamblers, they have to struggle to run the site. Can't only depend on the developers.

Our KYC requirements are very comparable to other licensed crypto casinos. We require basic/light KYC upon signup. Any additional KYC is non-standard.

I can't find sportbet as part of the games in your site. Don't kazabet have sportbet because it brings more traffic to the casinos. Adding sportbet WI ll be good if you don't have so that gamblers will feel comfortable when using your site because itvhas everything they're looking for in a casino. However, I understand that you guys are new and with time, sportbet will be added.

I don't think they will add it yet, though it's one of the things I'm looking at and also a provably fair games or original games. UI wise I do like your UI, all the information are available and easily accessible and it's clear. Just like what other people are saying, are you planning to add more in the platform such as sports betting? As what your catch phrase said, I hope you would consider adding original games and sports betting. Got also curious with your $KAZA token, will every user who place bet would earn that? I think maybe you could add some information about your token too on the site.

Anyway, great start! Welcome to the Bitcointalk forum, Kaza.bet!

Appreciate the feedback.

Original content and sportsbook are both planned, but not part of the initial rollout, we’re expanding deliberately. UI clarity and core gameplay experience come first.

$KAZA is part of a longer-term ecosystem vision. Token utility and mechanics will be shared once fully finalized to avoid speculation. But brings great benefits!

I registered on your website. I liked Mental 2 the most. I have always liked haunted type games but I never expected to find such a haunted game on a betting site, I really enjoyed playing it. The theme and music were amazing. Please add more games of this type.

Appreciate the feedback, glad you enjoyed it!

Are there any slot providers or specific titles you feel are missing on KazaBet? Always open to community input.

I liked Mental 2 the most. I have always liked haunted type games but I never expected to find such a haunted game on a betting site, I really enjoyed playing it. The theme and music were amazing. Please add more games of this type.

Your words sound like a kid who just got his favorite gift.

Looks like you just discovered NoLimit! They have so many crazy slots with all kinds of bonus boosts & bonus buys. But be careful with those... these things can easily go out of control if you don't know what you are doing, so take it slowly. Since you liked Mental, you can try Possessed, Serial, and maybe Book of Shadows... And don't forget to check other providers as well... There are so many good ones.

Another casino with a planned airdrop... But is there anything really new here? And is there anything that makes this casino better than others?

We’re not positioning ourselves as “reinventing gambling.” Our focus is execution, clean UX, transparent operations, and long-term reliability. New platforms aren’t proven by claims, but by consistency over time.

Welcome to the Bitcointalk platform, mate. Glad you found your way here. I am sceptical of your registration and operational license. I will need an elaborate explanation on it precisely because you can not be demanding for KYC information, and yet your operational license is not clear to us.
I tried accessing your social media account, but there is nothing as such as it does not exist, which means there is no x account with such a name. I will advise you to be transparent because, from all the responses I am seeing here, it does not speak well of you, and it will be very bad for you to start on such a step here. Remember, you have a reputation to hold onto, and so it will be nice to be open and transparent here.

Skepticism is natural here, and transparency is built with facts, not volume.

For clarity: Kaza.bet is officially licensed under the Anjouan iGaming License and operates within the applicable regulatory framework. KYC is applied only where required by regulation, not as a blanket policy.

As for visibility: “Actions speak louder than words.” We focus on delivering a compliant, functional product rather than maintaining empty channels. That said, our X account is live and active here:
https://x.com/kaza_bet

Additional third-party listings are in progress, CasinoGuru and AskGamblers are coming next, soon!

Reputation here isn’t claimed, it’s earned. We’re focused on execution and consistency, and we’ll let time do the talking.

[KazaBet]

First of all, you are welcome back to the forum and I hope that all that is written on this thread are actually true.
There are hundreds of players here and if you are crypto minded with lot of features and games, you can gain the heart of players here and make us lover of the Kaza.bet users. I like trying new casinos especially the ones that have good games for players.

Appreciate that.

We agree, good games and fair treatment go a long way.

[KazaBet]

Short version: we got the license in the meantime, and we don’t ask for documents as part of the standard KYC.

I hope it is all done that way because many casinos started just asking for the basic KYC, but later on, when someone wins a big amount, they ask for additional documents for verification. This is one reason why many gamblers hate them. But aside from that, rules must be clear, and transparency also matters a lot.

And I hope this BTT forum helps your platform be known to the community. But I tell you that this is not easy due to the market competition.

Hey, I completely understand your point about additional verification requests when someone hits a big win. Happened to me too. We don’t intend to do this on the casino side, but we would trigger additional KYC on the sportsbook side for a new user who places a large bet on an obscure league ("Vietnamese 2nd female volleyball league" as an example, lol).
Do you have any examples of KYC policies from other casinos that are transparent and clearly written? Thanks & we’re happy to improve our KYC policy.

[BuckyLucky]

Very clean UI and smooth website. Simple but also good looking. Hope the best.

[Yamifoud]

Short version: we got the license in the meantime, and we don’t ask for documents as part of the standard KYC.

I hope it is all done that way because many casinos started just asking for the basic KYC, but later on, when someone wins a big amount, they ask for additional documents for verification. This is one reason why many gamblers hate them. But aside from that, rules must be clear, and transparency also matters a lot.

And I hope this BTT forum helps your platform be known to the community. But I tell you that this is not easy due to the market competition.

Hey, I completely understand your point about additional verification requests when someone hits a big win. Happened to me too. We don’t intend to do this on the casino side, but we would trigger additional KYC on the sportsbook side for a new user who places a large bet on an obscure league ("Vietnamese 2nd female volleyball league" as an example, lol).
Do you have any examples of KYC policies from other casinos that are transparent and clearly written? Thanks & we’re happy to improve our KYC policy.

So you mean that you can flag an account anytime it's betting huge? If that is the case, it should be stated in the ToS. Otherwise, this may surprise the gambler, who may assume the basic KYC is sufficient.

For fraud or money laundering? That is perhaps a valid reason to ask for documents and freeze their account (if possible). Of course, I understand the stance of casinos to prevent this kind of activity.

Anyway, it is pretty impressive that kaza.bet is very responsive and willing to listen to things that help to improve the site. Keep it that way.

[UmerIdrees]

Hey, I completely understand your point about additional verification requests when someone hits a big win. Happened to me too. We don’t intend to do this on the casino side, but we would trigger additional KYC on the sportsbook side for a new user who places a large bet on an obscure league ("Vietnamese 2nd female volleyball league" as an example, lol).
Do you have any examples of KYC policies from other casinos that are transparent and clearly written? Thanks & we’re happy to improve our KYC policy.

Every casino has their own KYC policy and you do not need to know what they offer. Its just that they are KYC compliant or are non-KYC casino. Its easy for the KYC enabled casino policies, as the gamblers know that they have to do the KYC either at signup or at the time of first withdrawal.

However when it comes to the NON-KYC casino, its hard to find a casino who is completey transparent with their policies. When you read thieir policy it usually wriiten that they do not ask for KYC but under special circumstances, they may ask for the document. One of those circumstances could be withdrawing the high wins too, we never know 

[mikel_012]

Hey, I completely understand your point about additional verification requests when someone hits a big win. Happened to me too. We don’t intend to do this on the casino side, but we would trigger additional KYC on the sportsbook side for a new user who places a large bet on an obscure league ("Vietnamese 2nd female volleyball league" as an example, lol).
Do you have any examples of KYC policies from other casinos that are transparent and clearly written? Thanks & we’re happy to improve our KYC policy.

Every casino has their own KYC policy and you do not need to know what they offer. Its just that they are KYC compliant or are non-KYC casino. Its easy for the KYC enabled casino policies, as the gamblers know that they have to do the KYC either at signup or at the time of first withdrawal.

However when it comes to the NON-KYC casino, its hard to find a casino who is completey transparent with their policies. When you read thieir policy it usually wriiten that they do not ask for KYC but under special circumstances, they may ask for the document. One of those circumstances could be withdrawing the high wins too, we never know 

The problem is that many people abuse casinos so they need to protect themselves with KYC. The best casino for me would never ask for KYC unless I do what KazaBet said and bet a big amount on an obscure league. I only bet in big leagues like UEFA and LaLiga so in this case I would be surprised if any additional KYC was requested and if this was the case they should be considered a normal KYC casino since bets like this are normal and done by everybody.