I know which provider is used by Wasabi/Peach and several other services, but I don't know this provider well enough to give a definitive answer, as in this particular case, they use an API and NDA. In this particular case, @btc_aml_bot doesn't store or process data, so it only displays the transaction rating as a percentage, plus text and color blocks (trusted/suspicious/dangerous sources), and a mini-recommendation after checks.
However, the limited functionality is also reflected in the price, as @btc_aml_bot's checks fee is below the market average. Prices from services like amlbot.com are significantly higher, even though they don't provide more information than do. In any case, providers generally use roughly the same data pool and cross information, so I'm almost certain that in this particular case, there is no significant difference between the different AML bots.
The only question is the price for the services.
It ends up being the fairest price, without a doubt.
Since it provides roughly the same level of information as more expensive services, it ends up being a better service.
What I "criticize" about these analysis services is that people pay and don't receive information about what actually happened that should have been flagged.
But this already reduces that cost, while providing the same information.
Thanks for sharing. I'll keep an eye out for it.
