Largest Connected Account Farm: 2 Accounts Building Positive Trust via Loans

[hugeblack]

I will add negative trust. If the payment address change to Shasan's address is agreed upon, I will temporarily change it to neutral.

It's neutral now.

[Xiestar]

Connection between this accounts is obvious, and it's interesting that one of the members quickly decided to the same thing for OP with counter attack.
Someone said that attack is the best defense, but not to in all cases

He has a valid point tho. The OP is using this same circumstantial evidence such as having a same wallet address transaction as way to connect accounts then using the same locality as way to connect them.

If OP have a circumstantial evidence too of being connected to other user on same local member I believe this should be consider fairly. This OP account just suddenly becomes an multiple account buster out of nowhere right after being inactive and the same manner to Minor Miner resurface again.

@Jollygood @hosemary might look in to this account. Normally cheaters always hate other cheaters too.

[Satofan44]

If OP have a circumstantial evidence too of being connected to other user on same local member I believe this should be consider fairly. This OP account just suddenly becomes an multiple account buster out of nowhere right after being inactive and the same manner to Minor Miner resurface again.

@Jollygood @hosemary might look in to this account. Normally cheaters always hate other cheaters too.

Fuck off pajeet. Normally cheaters here stay quiet and in their lane so that they don't attract attention. As you can see, most local board abusers are staying within their own groups and barely venture out to where they shouldn't. The connection here is accurate, there is nothing to doubt. Trying to raise the standard of evidence in defense of random farmers and shitposters indicates that you too are cheating in some or many ways here.  

I will add negative trust. If the payment address change to Shasan's address is agreed upon, I will temporarily change it to neutral.

It's neutral now.

If you return it to negative later and others add some ratings too, then I doubt that the next user will act honestly when this happens. It is clear to me that Shasan's service is a cesspool of farmers and scammers. Mind sharing what is the plan here? Surely they won't get away with this solely for repaying a loan?

[Xiestar]

If OP have a circumstantial evidence too of being connected to other user on same local member I believe this should be consider fairly. This OP account just suddenly becomes an multiple account buster out of nowhere right after being inactive and the same manner to Minor Miner resurface again.

@Jollygood @hosemary might look in to this account. Normally cheaters always hate other cheaters too.

Fuck off pajeet. Normally cheaters here stay quiet and in their lane so that they don't attract attention. As you can see, most local board abusers are staying within their own groups and barely venture out to where they shouldn't. The connection here is accurate, there is nothing to doubt. Trying to raise the standard of evidence in defense of random farmers and shitposters indicates that you too are cheating in some or many ways here.  

Hmmm, maybe you’re the real jeetz here coz you are earning on signature campaign by posting derogatory content while some DT seems love it and give you + trust as sign of respect. Trust system is rigged. Lmfao.

I’m not defending the connection here, what I’m suggesting is the OP itself has some connection too which is raised by the user he is being accused with same evidence of transaction connection.

How come that he is exempted on this rules? Double standard? A simple reasoning that he is P2P merchant will erase all allegations of any possible multiple account connected to this user.

This double standard is very popular in the forum that’s why merit whoring is rampant.



PS: I don’t like you giving me a negative tag, I’ve been posting like this for a long time. You are using trust system like your delulu diary.

Shame to DT that still giving you positive trust. They are promoting toxic attitude to the community while this was supposed to be a community friendly. This user can express his opinion on constructive criticism way not like a savage. “Grow a thick skin” said by user that think this action is normal.

[Satofan44]

Hmmm, maybe you’re the real jeetz here coz you are earning on signature campaign by posting derogatory content while some DT seems love it and give you + trust as sign of respect. Trust system is rigged. Lmfao.

Yet here you are defending scammers and farmers, while I am doing God's work by taking money away from them. DT members do not love me, they are just countering abusive negative and neutrals on me.

I’m not defending the connection here, what I’m suggesting is the OP itself has some connection too which is raised by the user he is being accused with same evidence of transaction connection.

OP has proof which can be provided to back up his claims, furthermore he has a long-standing history and reputation here. The accused users lack everything, they are random farmers and shitposters. Therefore their claims require a higher level of evidence and scrutiny. This has nothing to do with bias, evidence and credibility are evaluated this way in any serious investigation or legal setting. This way of handling credibility is quite common,  but you are too dumb and biased to know that.

How come that he is exempted on this rules? Double standard? A simple reasoning that he is P2P merchant will erase all allegations of any possible multiple account connected to this user.

This double standard is very popular in the forum that’s why merit whoring is rampant.

Welcome to this forum. If you cared at all for double standards, this is the last thread where you would start. This means that you either do not really care about double standards or that you have malicious motives.

Shame to DT that still giving you positive trust. They are promoting toxic attitude to the community while this was supposed to be a community friendly. This user can express his opinion on constructive criticism way not like a savage. “Grow a thick skin” said by user that think this action is normal.

You have no real opinions, you are consistently defending random and shady individuals here. Meanwhile you remain silent on well-documented scam cases such as God of Pajeets or the other scammer AB de Royse777, never in favor of users being busted.  Perfectly normal distribution of behavior and posts. Your "strategy", if it can be called that, could work if everyone here had the pattern recognition of a toddler.

[Xiestar]

Hmmm, maybe you’re the real jeetz here coz you are earning on signature campaign by posting derogatory content while some DT seems love it and give you + trust as sign of respect. Trust system is rigged. Lmfao.

Yet here you are defending scammers and farmers, while I am doing God's work by taking money away from them. DT members do not love me, they are just countering abusive negative and neutrals on me.

So it means they support your abusive behavior. I’m not defending scammers. I’m only trying to be reasonable and fair since all the judgement here in the forum is always one-sided like this one.

How come the circumstantial is not applicable to this user?

I’m not defending the connection here, what I’m suggesting is the OP itself has some connection too which is raised by the user he is being accused with same evidence of transaction connection.

OP has proof which can be provided to back up his claims, furthermore he has a long-standing history and reputation here. The accused users lack everything, they are random farmers and shitposters. Their claims require a higher level of evidence and scrutiny. This has nothing to do with bias, evidence and credibility are evaluated this way in any serious investigation or legal setting. This way of handling credibility is quite common,  but you are too dumb and biased to know that.

Again, I’m not saying his accusations are wrong. You can point out to me where did I argue that. The OP previous reputation is not through multiple account busting. He suddenly change to this career when he came back active.

He might be busting alt to enroll his own alts assuming he is already not the real owner of this account.

How come that he is exempted on this rules? Double standard? A simple reasoning that he is P2P merchant will erase all allegations of any possible multiple account connected to this user.

This double standard is very popular in the forum that’s why merit whoring is rampant.

Welcome to this forum. If you cared at all for double standards, this is the last thread where you would start. This means that you either do not really care about double standards or that you have malicious motives.

I always care about the double standard that’s why my opinion is not one-sided.

Shame to DT that still giving you positive trust. They are promoting toxic attitude to the community while this was supposed to be a community friendly. This user can express his opinion on constructive criticism way not like a savage. “Grow a thick skin” said by user that think this action is normal.

You have no real opinions, you are consistently defending random and shady individuals here. Meanwhile you remain silent on well-documented scam cases such as God of Pajeets or the other scammer AB de Royse777.  Perfectly normal distribution of behavior and posts.

Because there’s nothing to argue with that topic. I don’t see any wrong decision on that case since the evidence is solid against God of Thunder through same wallet connection. I always respect Jollygood action.

It seems you can post in a very calm and reasonable way yet you always choose violence when you have an opportunity to lash out. Is this some kind of fetish?

[Satofan44]

I’m only trying to be reasonable and fair since all the judgement here in the forum is always one-sided like this one.

Always defending farmers, spammers and scammers is not being "reasonable".

How come the circumstantial is not applicable to this user?

It has been explained to you, yet you refuse to see it. You can't convict someone such as nutildah, JollyGood, suchmoon and so forth with the same weak evidence as some random shitposter. They have established reputation and behavior, which gives them high credibility. The random nobodies do not have anything. This is how the world works, it is not about "bias" it is about credibility and existing evidence. Bias is something else, for example when DT members refrain from tagging a campaign manager because he may enroll them in a campaign in the future.

Again, I’m not saying his accusations are wrong. You can point out to me where did I argue that. The OP previous reputation is not through multiple account busting. He suddenly change to this career when he came back active.

He might be busting alt to enroll his own alts assuming he is already not the real owner of this account.

His "busting" is one part of the story. He's an established member when considering many aspects. Perhaps compared to the users that I mentioned he would be lower tier, but compared to the users that are accused he is very high. If you wanted to be analytical and do some work instead of defending random scammers, you can make a tiered ranking of notable members around here. The users that are accused here are complete random 3rd world shitposters that even post in a very similar way. Take a look at their posting history. Just look at Xcode7, completely generic short shitposts. The biggest post he posted is the one that is a dumb "counter-accusation" against OP.

For the Champions League, I think it will be different, especially in the knockout stages, where the team's mentality is the most influential, and it is clear that Liverpool is experiencing performance problems this season, but we can also see that this is slowly starting to be fixed by Arne Slot, so I believe that Liverpool has the opportunity to be better so they cannot be underestimated in the Champions League competition this season.

I'm sure what happened last year will certainly be a lesson for Inter Milan so that this season will not be repeated. And I see that for this season there is a possibility for Inter Milan to win the title as long as they can maintain consistency because for several teams this season have almost the same quality, so it will be determined by which team can maintain consistent performance. However, we must admit that this season's Serie A is much fiercer and more competitive.

The he went to so much effort to make a counter-accusation instead of writing a proper defense just further shows me that he is malicious an indeed guilty. Everything adds up, just use your brain.

Because there’s nothing to argue with that topic. I don’t see any wrong decision on that case since the evidence is solid against God of Thunder through same wallet connection. I always respect Jollygood action.

I don't believe you, and similarly to the accused, you have nothing in your history to back up your claims -- even if they are about yourself in this case. If you had at least made a few cases of busting users yourself, I may be able to believe you. I don't blame you if you don't though, I have not made such a cases myself.

It seems you can post in a very calm and reasonable way yet you always choose violence when you have an opportunity to lash out. Is this some kind of fetish?

Why should I spend extra energy to be nice and friendly to complete retards or posts that are fully retarded? We would be all better off if most of those did not write posts or were not here at all (better yet, if they didn't exist at all as humans in the first place). One part of development for a human is efficiency. However for some being violent takes more energy, so the opposite would be true for them. Maybe lovesmayfamilis or LauraV would be examples of that, but they have their own different flaws too. Whatever approach you take, generally it is going to have some flaws or downsides (and obviously so does mine).