SINGLE BETTING IS WITH LESSER RISK THAN ACCUMULATED GAMES

[mindrust]

Combination bets make it almost impossible to win. I don’t really combines more than 2 bets most of the time. Single bet works better for me. It is also quite tiring to wait for the ending of all those games. When it is one game, it is much easier to track the bet result. I used to make combo bets when I was much younger but I lost my interest over time. I lost my greed too I think. Nowadays I am playing for fun mostly and it doesn’t make me much of a difference if i make a bet on one game or five of them combined. Either way I get the same fun but single bet is much faster. That way I have more time to accomplish more important stuff too instead of tracking my bets for hours.

[boyptc]

so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game

Of course, there's so much more risk in taking games than just staying to one or a couple of them. Because the amount that you'd be risking isn't that much too.

we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Winning constant is ideal but we can't do that often.

Gambling is a game of chances and you'll not know when you'll be consistent but if it comes, then stay on it. But not to break the bubble, one should also expect that it might not happen often.

[Pi-network314159]

Well it might be true that single bet looks less Risker than an cumulated games but that doesn't mean that Single bet is sure than accumulated game. Both are risky. Sometimes single bet win and sometimes it lose. Likewise accumulator games win and lose. All are just based on luck. Sometimes rich guys also bet huge amount on single bet and lose at once and no body is talking about that.  In fact no game is sure no matter how simple it looks because you might be betting and hoping to win because it looks simple but you end up losing more than win.

[AVE5]

I agree to all you said but saying that only the poor compiles too many games in the slip all because to make it bigly. Although I agree with you that the essence of picking too many of games to bet on a single slip is to increase their returns if they wins but does that real matter? I am think we shoul accept it as their personal betting strategies which may be about financial management.
I don't know if you're aware that those that bets on single games on single slips bets stakes higher still to increase their returns since the odds as low? So about them, who do we give the remark as a responsible gambler? I also think being proud of being a rich gambler is an attribute of lack of financial managements because While betting in the long term we're also liable to loose higher. We all just bets according to affordable risks.

[Ryu_Ar1]

Isn't it obvious from the start. single bet will have lower risk and better odds because it's just about our predictions being right or wrong where the ratio can be 50:50 here will be very much different from betting on multi bets where the risk is the more bets entered for multi then the greater the risk.

But in this case the risk is proportional to the result because the risk is large then the return when winning is also greater and we know that the more bets we enter in multi then the odds we have will be much greater so in this case some gamblers including me still like multi bets even though the risk is higher.

[Hazink]

Single bets also have their own advantage which is what you posted but accumulated bets have their own advantages and one of them is using lower amount of money to bet.

If you are betting that way, then you are reducing your risk and also increasing the amount of time which you could use the money you budget. This is one thing many don't understand.

All games carry almost equal risk. We just have to go for the one that will favour us the most or based on what you target just like some people have targeted potential amount for winning.

[Wiwo]

Accumulated games are not risky unless you use high amount of money for it. I can decide to use $1 for accumulated games instead of using $5 for a single game. If I lose the accumulated bet, $1 is nothing to me.

Single bets also have their own advantage which is what you posted but accumulated bets have their own advantages and one of them is using lower amount of money to bet.

My recent experiment between single bets and multiple games bet selections have pointed out that what you said is the truth about betting and any bet is as risky as the other which is why we need to apply caution and use minimal amount to bet of any bet since we have the same tendency of losing, so the amount in bet is what determines the difference in the two form of bets selections,  sport betting can be risky sometimes since one can easily get carried away to stake high amount based on the confidence that they build via they information on the various teams, so financial control is very important to stay at safe zone.

[lombok]

Single bets also have their own advantage which is what you posted but accumulated bets have their own advantages and one of them is using lower amount of money to bet.

If you are betting that way, then you are reducing your risk and also increasing the amount of time which you could use the money you budget. This is one thing many don't understand.

All games carry almost equal risk. We just have to go for the one that will favour us the most or based on what you target just like some people have targeted potential amount for winning.

Using a well computed betting strategy provides us with a chance to survive longer when there is a stiff competition. I know you have learnt the importance of budgeting so as to lengthen your bankroll after every playing session. The next step will be to select a sensible win goal to prevent a total loss because of unreasonable greed. To be able to control the most profitable game spaces is to be on schedule and be on the personal financial stability line.

[Mindyspace]

What you said makes perfect sense. Many people want to get rich quick and end up betting on several games at the same time, greatly increasing the risk of losing everything. Focusing on smaller, conscious bets really helps control losses and makes gambling safer, less stressful, and even more fun. In the end, the key is not to let the ambition to win big interfere with control and enjoyment.

Because balance leads to awareness.

[Cointxz]

..

It depends on the preference of gambler on how they want to enjoy gambling. Low bankroll players usually preferred to bet on huge odds with small stake since that’s the only affordable bet for them to win huge amount out of small stake.

However, not all low bankroll players play like this some just want to play safe and bet steady with small amount on small odds game.

Which is why I said it’s based on player preference on how they will enjoy gambling.

[348Judah]

This is all about our various choices when gambling, some like to play a single bet, while in other cases, some gamblers will prefer playing parlay, but when we look at the conditions that surrounds either of the decisions to play, we could deduce that the risk involved is one thing we must first consider together with the amount we are going to stake, which the chances of losing is almost the same regardless of which option we choose to play.

[Jaycoinz]

I have tried both and I must say that it is better to play single betting but if you are going to be able to withstand the hurdles that comes with this you should have enough money to spare because single betting is better when you stake valuable amounts of money to get high value profits. Winning accumulated bets is difficult and can be very frustrating because it is rare to win huge odds with small amounts

[Gozie51]

so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

You have a point with single betting and that is what most gamblers that I know are betting and winning from. It is easier to focuse on few games or even one game at a time than cluster of games just because you want to take the advantage of accumulation of games and the bonus but at the end of it, one of them or two will not be successful and you start regretting. I prefer single games no doubt.

However, you have to put the words in your post very well so that people can make coherent sense from what you are saying.

[Raflesia]

Actually in this case for those people whose economic quality is below average they are not too much in spending money (if calculated nominally) but they often do it because it is not uncommon for them to continue playing when they have money that they can bet in the hope that they can get better returns to support their lives.

On the other hand adrenaline becomes a differentiating situation in this case because sometimes multi bets have more adrenaline that makes us sometimes more motivated than single bets even though the main reason is obviously back to money because in the end multi bets will be much more profitable than single bets.
But is that wrong? Of course not because every gambler must know the risks and when they are in multi which does provide a much greater return but the risks that will be faced are also clearly greater than single.

[aysha9853]

Singles are definitely safer, but I don’t think it’s only rich vs poor thinking it’s more about mindset and patience many people know accumulators are risky and still play them because they chase that lucky hit if someone wants steady results, singles make more sense

[TopT3ns]

Actually in this case for those people whose economic quality is below average they are not too much in spending money (if calculated nominally) but they often do it because it is not uncommon for them to continue playing when they have money that they can bet in the hope that they can get better returns to support their lives.

On the other hand adrenaline becomes a differentiating situation in this case because sometimes multi bets have more adrenaline that makes us sometimes more motivated than single bets even though the main reason is obviously back to money because in the end multi bets will be much more profitable than single bets.
But is that wrong? Of course not because every gambler must know the risks and when they are in multi which does provide a much greater return but the risks that will be faced are also clearly greater than single.

Our passion to find a quick way out of dismal financial situations is evidenced by the decision to make numerous profits by numerous bets. I believe that the massive heartbeat of being exposed to high risks is what makes this activity have more life. You demonstrate that every people always has their own calculations in calculating the boundaries of courage which it is ready to go in the name of its future. To the extent as we know of the possible rewards and losses, that course is a life choice.

[Cyber_warrior]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Most gamblers don’t involve themselves in our single game, most of them do pick multiple games in their bet so that your odds is going to me much, and your potential win is going to be much also. Most people do believe in high odds, because they know that’s when they going to high jackpot, but they don’t know the risk involved in it.

As a gambler we are not suppose to be so greedy, it’s better to win small than not to win at all, the odds in single bet might just be smaller than that of multiple bet, but if you the way people lose in multiple bets, it’s just better to go for little odds and win often.

[Darker45]

While I strongly agree that it's a wrong mindset to pursue richness through gambling, the other way isn't necessarily to just place a bet on a single game. It's always up to your analysis. If you're confident of a number of bets, the option is always there to bundle them together in a multi-bet. That isn't necessarily irresponsible. If you think one match is considerably riskier than the rest, then you can remove it and bet on it separately. In the end, it's always your analysis that matters. And being responsible to your bankroll, too.

[alegotardo]

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

Yes, that is a fact... single bets have less variance than accumulators bets, less risk and are better suited for players with a more conservative betting style.

Bookmakers know this, and that is why they calculate the odds of accumulator bets by multiplying them as more bets is accumulated. This encourages players... the prize increases exponentially, but very few people actually win. Sites much prefer bettors to make parlays rather than individual bets.

I prefer to maintain consistency and bankroll discipline... risking small amounts per bet (1% to 5%).

I prefer to accept that slow growth is better than the possibility and risks of getting rich overnight... accumulator bets are good for those who want more entertainment without worrying about expenses, but for those who aim to "survive" for longer, single bets are always preferable.

[vanesha]

That’s right, this is the same as trading in crypto. In gambling psychology, emotional control is something that must be mastered because it directly relates to the assets being played. What you said about many people playing to make a lot of money but instead losing money is true. They play without strategy, preparation, or mental discipline—only hoping to win and get rich. In gambling, that is not enough.