I think this is also the reason, because I’ve done the same thing before. I reported a thread where I knew the event was already finished, similar to the OP’s case. I reported it as an ended event after several days, since there was no longer any need for discussion and most of the replies were just repetitive. My report was considered good report..
It's pretty self-explanatory. The thread served its purpose, (...)
Sorry, but that level of explanation is pretty dumb. How do you determine whether the thread has served its purpose? This was not a purely advertisement topic, which would serve its purpose after the event took place, but it was created for a discussion around the event. Often times the most interesting things happen after the event (reports of injuries, money made, excuses for losing, potential rematches, disqualifications after drug testing, follow-up stories etc).
If there's a problem with spammy posts, I believe mods can impose penalties on notorious spammers and/or delete pure spam posts. Locking a thread on the assumption that there will definitely be nothing interesting to discuss is mind-boggling as no one can know that. And what if mod was wrong and there is something worthy of further discussion? Are we supposed to start a separate post-event discussion thread?
Anyhow, if this is some sort of new rule, it's not too much to ask for mods to state it somewhere in a pinned post.
I was wondering, when a topic gets locked by a moderator, is it not possible for the original author to unlock it again? I mean does OP have no power to override it, or the lock is absoulote until the moderators unlocked it again?
Nope, I can't unlock it. This is what I'm getting:
