This paradox can be related to both gambling activities and investment but for better emphasis, I am going to dwell on investment because when it comes to trading and investing, we would have to encounter more luck as compared to our skill growth and perfection, with patience, humility and a nack for the right process.
This however is learnt with time commitment, discipline and consistency.
Your opinion is welcomed!
Luck is not something I really do lay emphasis on as it regards trading, I do not seel the luck idea with trading a.d investment and that is because these are skill based and you need to put in the work, to the best of my knowledge, skill based things are usually not often dependent on luck neither are they expected to be carried out haphazardly, you can not be random with trading and investment and get as lucky as you would if you are applying same to and with gambling. It is always best and most profitable if you are trading or gambling based off your skill set, that way you define your activities enough that if there be any issues related, you will definitely know where to make corrections with your skill set but it is quite different with gambling, in all I believe so well that luck has a very low stake with trading and investing than it does with gambling, evidently the frequency of occurrence of luck in gambling is mostly higher and bigger than that we see with trading and investing because they are fsr more skill based.
The paradox does not diminish skill; it only indicates that as the level of skill increases, luck and variance weigh more heavily on the results. Having access to good information and the necessary tools makes it possible to enhance skills, which would lead to better risk management, discipline, consistency, and emotional control. All of this would not guarantee short-term profits, but it would increase the probability of success in the long term. Thus, skill would not be eliminating luck; on the contrary, over time it would tilt it in one’s favor.