Bitcoin Below $87,500: Why the ETF Story Has a Darker Side

[havok1998]

The Institutional Revolution That's Making Crypto Less Independent

As of December 27, 2025, Bitcoin is trading at $87,305, down nearly 9% since the start of December and well below its November highs of $105,909. The narrative around Bitcoin ETFs has changed dramatically. What was supposed to be a victory for cryptocurrency has revealed an uncomfortable truth: institutional adoption may have transformed Bitcoin into something it was never meant to be.

The Current Reality: ETF Flows Turning Negative

BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) was hailed as a game-changer. In 2024, it attracted $50 billion in a single year, the most successful ETF launch in history. By 2025, Bitcoin ETFs collectively pulled in $6.96 billion in inflows. But the momentum has collapsed.

According to VanEck's December 2025 analysis, Bitcoin ETP investors are now retreating. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded consecutive days of net withdrawals in December. While institutions briefly stepped in to buy the dip in mid-December, adding 42,000 Bitcoin to their reserves, the overall trend is unmistakable: institutional enthusiasm is fading.
​
Why? The answer reveals something investors haven't wanted to admit.

The Financialization Problem: Bitcoin Is Now Correlated With Stocks

Here's the critical issue that nobody talks about.

Before Bitcoin ETFs existed, Bitcoin behaved independently. When stocks crashed, Bitcoin often held steady or even rose. Investors who wanted portfolio diversification bought Bitcoin precisely because it wasn't correlated with equities.

After ETF approval, that changed completely.

Bitcoin now moves with technology stocks. It responds to Federal Reserve policy announcements. It's become a "risk-on" asset, meaning when investors get nervous, they sell Bitcoin alongside their equity positions. Bitcoin's correlation with the S&P 500 has reached levels never seen before ETF approval.

The December 2025 selloff illustrates this perfectly. Bitcoin fell 9% this month alongside concerns about interest rate cuts, geopolitical tensions between America and Venezuela, and broader uncertainty in global markets. It behaved like a growth stock, not like a diversifying asset.
​
The Data Tells the Story

As of December 27, Bitcoin's 30-day volatility reached 45%, the highest level since April 2025. The 30-day RSI (relative strength index) bottomed at 32 on November 22, suggesting extreme oversold conditions. Bitcoin perpetual futures basis rates collapsed to 3.7% annualized, indicating diminished appetite for speculation among leverage traders.
​
More importantly, onchain metrics are deteriorating. According to VanEck's mid-December analysis, Bitcoin's network hash rate dropped 4%, the sharpest decline since April 2024. This is historically a bullish contrarian signal, but it also means miners are capitulating from the network.

Daily transaction fees plummeted 14% month-over-month in dollar terms. The number of new addresses created slowed. These aren't signs of a thriving ecosystem. These are signs of contraction.

What Institutional Adoption Actually Cost

This is the uncomfortable part of the story that people in the crypto industry don't want to discuss openly.

Institutional investors didn't buy Bitcoin because they believed in decentralized money or financial sovereignty. They bought Bitcoin because it appeared to be an uncorrelated asset that could enhance portfolio returns. Once Bitcoin became easy to trade through ETFs, it lost what made it special.

Institutions treat Bitcoin like any other equity derivative. They allocate according to Modern Portfolio Theory, rebalance quarterly, and sell when asset correlations spike. They brought capital and legitimacy. But they also transformed Bitcoin from an ideological movement into a financial product.

The irony is brutal: Bitcoin became mainstream the moment it stopped being alternative.

The Miner Capitulation Signal: What Comes Next

The 4% drop in network hash rate is significant. Historically, when miners capitulate en masse, it signals the market has reached capitulation levels from which recoveries often begin. This could mean Bitcoin is setting up for a recovery.

But recovery to what level? MicroStrategy announced on December 24 that it secured shareholder approval to accumulate 210,000 Bitcoins by 2027, which would represent 1% of total Bitcoin supply. This kind of institutional buying pressure could push Bitcoin higher.
​
However, with $30.3 billion in Bitcoin options expiring on December 27 at 8:00 AM UTC, most call options positioned above the current price are facing guaranteed losses. The options market is not pricing in an immediate rally.
​
The Real Question: Is Bitcoin Still Bitcoin?

The original Bitcoin whitepaper described a "peer-to-peer electronic cash system," decentralized and independent of traditional finance. Today, Bitcoin's price is determined primarily by macroeconomic factors like Fed policy and equity market sentiment, not by adoption as a payment system or currency.

Bitcoin has become a financial instrument, not a monetary revolution.

ETFs didn't cause this transformation, but they accelerated it. They made Bitcoin accessible to institutional capital. They also made Bitcoin subject to the same market dynamics that govern all financial assets.

My Analysis: The ETF Paradox

The Bitcoin ETF approval was marketed as a victory. Technically, it was. Institutionally, it was. But philosophically, it may have been a defeat.

Cryptocurrency was supposed to be independent of traditional financial systems. ETFs brought Bitcoin into those systems, gained capital flows, and lost independence. The cost-benefit calculation depends on what you believe Bitcoin should be.

If you view Bitcoin as digital gold or a hedge against inflation, the ETF story is positive. Institutional adoption validates the asset class and provides liquidity.

If you view Bitcoin as a monetary rebellion against centralized banking, the ETF story is complicated. Bitcoin is now managed by the same institutions it was meant to disrupt.

The Bottom Line

As of December 27, 2025, Bitcoin sits below $87,500 because institutional enthusiasm has faded. The ETF narrative that promised unlimited capital flows has proven insufficient to sustain a rally without underlying adoption growth.
​
Bitcoin's future depends on whether that capital returns or whether the market has finally priced in the reality: Bitcoin is no longer alternative. It's establishment.

The question for investors is whether that transformation is positive or negative. The data suggests it's neither entirely good nor entirely bad. It's simply different.

And sometimes, transformation costs more than it's worth.

What Do You Actually Think? (Would be interesting to get some opinions/views)

- Did you invest in Bitcoin thinking it was a rebellion against traditional finance, only to watch it become part of that very system?
- Or do you see institutional adoption as the validation Bitcoin needed to become a real store of value?

[OgNasty]

I understand the criticism about Bitcoin no longer being a tool for freedom, but the ETFs aren’t all bad. I think they can be good to pride income by selling out of the money covered call options or utilizing funds like BTCI. I don’t do either, but it is good to have the options available that spot BTC doesn’t provide.

[havok1998]

I understand the criticism about Bitcoin no longer being a tool for freedom, but the ETFs aren’t all bad. I think they can be good to pride income by selling out of the money covered call options or utilizing funds like BTCI. I don’t do either, but it is good to have the options available that spot BTC doesn’t provide.

You've made an excellent point, and honestly, you're spot on about the utility ETFs bring to the table. Covered calls and income-generating strategies like BTCI are genuinely valuable tools that spot Bitcoin simply can't offer. For investors looking to optimize returns and create passive income streams, these products are a game-changer.

That said, there's a beautiful irony here worth noting: the very efficiency and income potential that make ETFs so attractive are also the mechanisms that transformed Bitcoin from a monetary revolution into just another financial instrument. The tools that let you maximize returns are the same tools that tied Bitcoin's fate to traditional markets. So, you're right that ETFs are excellent for finance, but that excellence came at a philosophical cost. Bitcoin gained institutional credibility and financial utility but lost the independence it was designed to have.

This was indeed a great insight , would definitely love to hear more of such views from other people.

[STT]

Mainstream basically represents leverage and they expect a yield yet BTC has no yield just a cost for the ETF though I expect that is quite low for most.  What they lack most is patience, comparatively vs other assets BTC is not the performance they had desired in an immediate sense thats no surprise to me.  
   The amount of hype unwinding is a perfectly normal process, I would personally advise anyone to avoid leverage and just hold on.   Dont over speculate or buy more BTC then required, I think the world is just too greedy to realize the true use of BTC is not for the overnight get rich scenario.

[havok1998]

Mainstream basically represents leverage and they expect a yield yet BTC has no yield just a cost for the ETF though I expect that is quite low for most.  What they lack most is patience, comparatively vs other assets BTC is not the performance they had desired in an immediate sense thats no surprise to me.  
   The amount of hype unwinding is a perfectly normal process, I would personally advise anyone to avoid leverage and just hold on.   Dont over speculate or buy more BTC then required, I think the world is just too greedy to realize the true use of BTC is not for the overnight get rich scenario.

Couldn't agree more. Wall Street wants yields and fast wins, but Bitcoin's about patience and holding strong, not quick cash. Those low ETF fees (like 0.25% for BlackRock) lure them in, but they bail when it doesn't pump like stocks.

Love your advice: skip the leverage, buy what you can chill with, and just hold. The world is too hooked on get-rich-quick to see Bitcoin's real strength, a shield against money printing. More folks need your long-game vibe.