Mopar has an ungodly amount of power on the forum that he shouldn’t. He contributes to the space but also heavily controls & manipulates it. He is deeply involved with the inner network and operations here. Influential in a negative way. He has caused more people to be silent or leave the forum than he has green trust. I have firsthand accounts from former members and firsthand accounts from great members who ignore his bad behavior. Members here fear to cross him. He threatens access to escrow to anyone he deems.
I want to address this comment and its blatant lie/exaggerations
1. Mopar has an ungodly amount of power on the forum that he shouldn’t.
--- zero power, I am no moderator or admin.
2. He contributes to the space but also heavily controls & manipulates it.
--- zero control and zero manipulation - I don't do things like leave false retaliatory negative trusts (Kazkaz27 has done so repeatedly - even saying so in his negative trusts) nor do I send PM's stating I will remove mine if they remove theirs (that is manipulation or an attempt at it - something else Kazkaz27 has done numerous times).
3. He is deeply involved with the inner network and operations here.
--- zero involvement with "inner network and operations" - not even sure what this implies.
4. Influential in a negative way.
--- I only try to influence in a positive way - pointing out improper things such as selling private keys, retaliatory actions, high price to actual value, false and fake listings, scammers etc -- I do not recall trying to influence anyone to do any wrong or invalid behavior on the forums.
5. He has caused more people to be silent or leave the forum than he has green trust. I have firsthand accounts from former members and firsthand accounts from great members who ignore his bad behavior.
--- I asked for a list, Kazkaz27 gave 2 names - both of which have not left the forums (one of which I helped sign up on the forums) so not sure who the other 80 plus people who left "because" of me are. My guess a made up number.
6. Members here fear to cross him.
--- people here do not fear me lol - if they did, I would not have the red negs from scammers and those who disagree.
7. He threatens access to escrow to anyone he deems.
--- I have refused to work for a few people - that is correct, maybe 3 or 4. But I never threatened them nor am I the only one who does escrow - there are a dozen others who do as well. No one loses anything if I refuse to work with them. Any service I offer is offered by others as well.
basically it is a feedback full of lies and one left of retaliation. This whole thread was made based on a lie that anonymousminer and I were the same person as clearly stated in the first line of the OP.
it also uses "references" to claim I am engaged in fraudulent activities.
1. giving and receiving merit between anonymousminer and myself - I have given anonymous miner 32 merit across 17 occasions - anonymous has given me 35 merit across 26 occasions - not a huge amount considering Kazkaz27 has given his friend Caribbean treasures 130 merit across 41 occasions and has also received 161 across 31 occasions from Caribbean Treasures. If our 30 some odd merit is reason for calling us fraudulent and scammers then what is it when its over 130 merit between 2 friends?
2. claims I engage in fraudulent activities such as the Titan Mint fiasco - I have no involvement with Tim - I actually helped track him down (the same guy who accused me of being part of the scam blasted me for sharing Tim's information). Their references about my "fraudulent" activities include doing group buys for ballet wallets (ballet was also accused of being Chinese spies by the same user who said I was helping Tim scam). The same user also accused me of receiving stolen funds - because I redeemed several Titan coins when Tim presented a plan to reimburse - did this user tag anyone else who also did the same as receiving stolen funds? no - why? because the user is attacking me not them...
3. mentions some fincen case against me - the case number mentioned 883150 - per google: FinCEN enforcement actions, 883150 points to a significant case involving major bank AML failures, specifically related to the BSA and SAR reporting. Yea not me.
I can refute all these false claims but it really is not necessary - they are made up out of spite and out of retaliation - simply because I do not like their selling of private keys nor do I like their character - they present as a scammer and a liar. Someone here to fleece the community. I have maintained that is my opinion and voiced concerns where I saw fit. I left one negative due to the key selling and one neutral because of the walls of AI slop that was 90% erroneous. For this I have 3 negatives and 1 neutral (the neutral was originally a negative left out of retaliation that they later acknowledged as such and changed to a neutral). They have offered to remove them all if I remove mine - shows great conviction behind those red trusts - right?
The user kazkaz27 has proven their lack of value and worth. I will ignore this thread and anything else by them moving forward.