Do you think if casinos removed all bonuses they will permit multiple accounts?

[uchegod-21]

What do you think about this?

The only reason the casinos restrict gamblers from having multiple accounts is to prevent them from cheating the system, so yes I think some greedy casinos will encourage gamblers to have multiple accounts. Except the the gambling laws and regulations restricts casinos from allowing such by making it a punishable offence.

[Mpamaegbu]

Do you strongly believe with me that if all those bonuses are being removable from the gambling site they could permits people using multiple accounts to gamble?
<snipped>

What do you think about this?

But of course, that's obvious why they do limit people. They don't want a few bettors having advantage of the bonuses. Where the money is, there's bound to be laws to streamline activities. Take for instance this forum, it wasn't as strict as it's today until earning from signature campaigns/bounties became a part of it. In the past, I think account sales wasn't even an issue but today it's.

Personally, I feel that anyone creating more than one account in the same casino has a negative intentions because you can use one account to bet and enjoy the fun.

I'm not sure it could be for that reason. Sometimes one gets to create different accounts for specific purpose to suit what slot or games one wants to attach to that account. Cexs encourage it. I don't see why gambling sites shouldn't.

Casino frowns at this because it will encourage money laundering or illicit activities whereby, the funds will be split into two or three accounts of the same person making it difficult to connect that all the accounts belongs to one same person.

Even a single account is enough to commit such an illicit act if that's the intention. All that's needed is to ferry the cash gradually in and then move it out as scheduled as they gamble on a daily or weekly.

[purple_sparkles]

I think that if casinos were seriously suffering or incurring losses because someone has multiple accounts, this would have been tracked and stopped a long time ago. Since this hardly has any significant impact on a casino’s overall profit, it’s all very conditional. In general, I think casinos are not really interested in restricting the number of accounts per player. Essentially, it doesn’t matter to them whether a person plays from one account or several. Bonuses are distributed anyway to maintain players’ interest, both for opening an account and periodically to encourage people to return to the game.

[centrum]

Since its not all the casinos that does not support for this, it is necessary that we understand the terms and condition of a casino before using them, so that we are not going to be surprised after been caught unexpectedly, i don't know what others sees in the aspect of multi accounting, but since its all about individual choice, we should know if our platform support for it or not.

even if a casino removes all types of bonuses it is still very unlikely that it will allow the use of multiple accounts. this is because multi accounting is not only about bonus abuse but is also connected to fair play security and the casino’s internal policies. most casinos want each player to use only a single account so that risk control and transaction monitoring remain simple and effective. even without bonuses using multiple accounts can be considered a violation of the rules and may result in account suspension or confiscation of funds. therefore before treating multi accounting as a personal choice it is essential to carefully read the platform’s terms and conditions. this greatly reduces the chances of facing unexpected problems.

[Hatchy]

What do you think about this?

Aside from the cheating, I really don't see any reason why someone would want to create a second account on one casino.osy of these bonus are meant to help attract new users to playing on their casinos, but many people just abused everything.. if the sign up bonus is removed, it would affect their business a lot. Theres literally nothing that can be done to this extent but to not allow the creation of two accounts using same IP. Though there's this error I find when it comes to IP on casino which is that when people share same WiFi, the literally have same IP and a group of friends can possibly be in the same house and share same WiFi and play on one casino.. they should be a way to counter this..

[Zigabel]

Bonuses may be amongst one of the Reasons but I don't see it as the main or only  reason.  Some people may not really care about  those Bonuses and so they will not see it as a reason to not create multiple accounts, one of the Reasons I believe is strongly the case is to avoid using their platforms for some activities they will not tolerate that are mostly financial related, some persons may want to use the casinos  as a platform to carry out some financially related activities that the casino may not want to be associated with and ine best way to get that done very well will be with the creation of multiple accounts, this is my bets guess.

[9ja Amaka]

I think that if casinos were seriously suffering or incurring losses because someone has multiple accounts, this would have been tracked and stopped a long time ago. Since this hardly has any significant impact on a casino’s overall profit, it’s all very conditional. In general, I think casinos are not really interested in restricting the number of accounts per player. Essentially, it doesn’t matter to them whether a person plays from one account or several. Bonuses are distributed anyway to maintain players’ interest, both for opening an account and periodically to encourage people to return to the game.

Someone can have multiple accounts in the forum, yet he wont be caught. They can use different identity, different documents to verify the account but it will be operated by one person. In case, you dont know, most persons fake identity to create multiple accounts in the forum, and that is as a result of weak KYC detector. Every gambling platform need to use up to date software in verifying KYC. If not most KYC will be forged.

You got it wrong again. Casino restricts numbers of players to avoid abuse of bonuses and many other things.

[icebar]

Casino platform offers a lot of bonuses to attract gamblers. Now if someone creates a multi-account then he can only benefit by using the bonus offers which is a big loss for the casino. Because they provide a lot of bonuses for newbies so that newbies stay connected to that platform for that bonus but if someone wants to misuse that opportunity, he will not be able to do that rather his gambling account will face problems. But I must agree with you that if the bonuses are canceled then if someone creates multiple accounts then I think there will be no restrictions. But my question is why create multiple accounts? In the casino business, to survive at the top of the competition, bonuses must always be given and there must be all kinds of technology to stop multi accounts so that the user cannot abuse it.

[lionheart78]

What do you think about this?

Well, the restriction of multiple account is because the casino is protecting their platform from being exploited by people with ill intentions.  If what you say happens, no promotions, bonuses, referral rewards, and just a plain gambling site, then yes, I think the casino won't be implementing multiple account restrictions.  The purpose why it was implemented were non-existent anyway so there is no need for this kind of regulation.

[Btcdeybodi]

Of course anywhere there is a free money people would likely compromise it, and if there is not strict adherence to the rules you could see people doing dubious things just to make sure they have everything to themselves, and again I don't think if casinos could still be allowed the use of multiple accounts.

Casino bonuses are not free as you think, they are not withdrawable except you use the bonus to stake a bet and win. Regardless of the fact that casinos restricts using multiple account but there are people who still outsmart them by using VPNs. Whether casinos allow multiple accounts or not, there will still be those who will cheat them without their knowledge.

On my opinion, it could be that someone could have a correct score and have to bet severally on their with other accounts to reck them down. So, whatever that is done illegally could warrant sanctions from the gamble site, and these are the case which casino do love to handle so that they wouldn't be that allows you to have your both winning from the gambling sites.

This is just a shallow thinking because casinos allows multiple bets containing same events and even if they don't allow betting a particular bet many times, you can still make use of other casinos and bet as many slips as you wish. It's mostly in cases that involves cheating that a casino can sanction or block someone's accounts otherwise you can stake many bets from a single account.

[Fortify]

To me I have to reason that the main reason why casinos are not allowing double or multiple accounts on their sites is as a result of if their welcome bonus, referral bonus, and whatever bonuses..
Do you strongly believe with me that if all those bonuses are being removable from the gambling site they could permits people using multiple accounts to gamble? Take example with trading account, most of the exchange that doesn't have any sign up bonus, or even ref bonuses permit the use of multiple accounts, do you think if such is implemented to gambling they would automatically permit people sharing the same Internet protocol (IP) or even sharing the same data or using one hotspot? Aside cheating on bonuses I do not see any reason why gambling site should be restricting people, knowing too well that their aim is to make profits from users and not to stop them from getting as many accounts as they could do.

What do you think about this?

It's just a pointless question to ask. Nobody needs more than one account, yet you completely ignore that point and skirt around it. There is absolutely no reason you might want to create or switch accounts on a casino unless you are trying to abuse it in some way. It also creates inefficiency and makes it harder to validate KYC, so there is no incentive for a casino to support it. Why not actually suggest something useful that could be gained from allowing multiple accounts? Your point about shared IP addresses is completely moot because casinos already work around that situation every day and while the odd person might be wrongly caught up in a sweep it is not a general issue.

[$crypto$]

The reason why the casino does not allow many is because the player is against the croupier, the casino does not want to lose especially if there is abuse from the game of course they prevent this way --- different from the exchange which is allowed many accounts the traders are not against the exchange but the exchange seeks profit from every orderbook trading activity or other withdrawals.

[SOKO-DEKE]

Yes, I agree with you op that it may be because of bonuses that gambling companies are not allowing multiple accounts by a single person. However, even those who are registering multiple accounts do so because of the bonuses given. If there were no bonuses, people would stop registering multiple accounts.

Even without the bonus, some casinos would have fewer registrations on their sites, because it is the bonuses that always make people register on certain casino sites. After they stop making use of the bonuses, they abandon the account unless they have more bonuses ahead that will be rewarding to those accounts that are still active.Bonuses are a very big tactic that casino companies use to attract customers, and that is one of the reasons that gambling companies can never stop giving bonuses from time to time.

[yudi09]

If casinos allow multiple accounts to be registered even though there are no more bonuses, I think casinos are opening a door that will ultimately cause problems for them.
Casinos have ways of detecting fraud committed by accounts that are deliberately created for the purpose of cheating. Registering more than one account will not be easy because it will cause problems when making transactions. If casinos request KYC, that's where I think cheaters won't be able to get away with it.

[Tungbulu]

It's what that shouldn't be surprising to you perhaps you're a responsible person who is principled with habit of not breaking rules but you should know that there are persons who don't care about rule breaking, creating many accounts in one casino doesn't seem like anything for them what they care for is  to earn all bonuses accumulatively with all that accounts. They even lodge all those accounts into contest to increase their winning chances against other participants.

That’s right, no matter how transparent and vivid the rules are, there’ll always be those who don’t respect them. People resort to creating of several accounts simply because of the bonuses and benefit from contests multiple times, potentially increasing their chances. Although this might actually work for a while but that doesn’t mean it is the best way to approach things like this, only that not everyone cares about fairness.

[Yorubek]

The reason why the casino does not allow many is because the player is against the croupier, the casino does not want to lose especially if there is abuse from the game of course they prevent this way --- different from the exchange which is allowed many accounts the traders are not against the exchange but the exchange seeks profit from every orderbook trading activity or other withdrawals.

Yes, if the casino declares validity on multiple accounts, the casino will be more likely to lose money, the casino never wants its chances of losing money to increase, the casino will not do anything that will increase its chances of losing money compared to its profits. If the casino completely shuts down the bonus process, then maybe it can give a person the opportunity to use multiple accounts. But I think the casino will never activate this process because they will give different bonuses to a customer so that the gambler is encouraged to bet more on that site, the casino will never allow a person to use multiple accounts, this will increase its loss

[coolcoinz]

As long as people are cheating at poker tables with multiple accounts they will never allow this. There's just too many exploits.

Sure, they could KYC you and find that you have more than one account, but they they'd have to restrict you from double logging. They'd need people to monitor accounts and make sure people have only 1 active login, but then they'd have to ban both accounts if they happen to be logged at the same time? That's shady because on many casinos you don't logout when you close the site, you have to manually click that. So imagine a situation where you lost connection and shut the device down for the day. Next day you come back but use the other account, forgetting that your first account might still be logged in. Should you get banned for that? Who is going to determine if you were actively playing on both accounts or just 1? It's easier to just allow 1 account in the first place.

[Hazink]

The only reason the casinos restrict gamblers from having multiple accounts is to prevent them from cheating the system, so yes I think some greedy casinos will encourage gamblers to have multiple accounts. Except the the gambling laws and regulations restricts casinos from allowing such by making it a punishable offence.

And what benefit will it be to the casino if they allowed users to have multiple accounts? It's still the same money which the user could have spent when they have one account that they will share and spend it on other accounts, so it still all boils down to the same benefit for them and not the casino being greedy. Gamblers, through bonus abuse, are the ones of more advantage to multiple account.

[letteredhub]

It's what that shouldn't be surprising to you perhaps you're a responsible person who is principled with habit of not breaking rules but you should know that there are persons who don't care about rule breaking, creating many accounts in one casino doesn't seem like anything for them what they care for is  to earn all bonuses accumulatively with all that accounts. They even lodge all those accounts into contest to increase their winning chances against other participants.

That’s right, no matter how transparent and vivid the rules are, there’ll always be those who don’t respect them. People resort to creating of several accounts simply because of the bonuses and benefit from contests multiple times, potentially increasing their chances. Although this might actually work for a while but that doesn’t mean it is the best way to approach things like this, only that not everyone cares about fairness.

Of course this works for a while for them because there would always be a mistake at some point where the casino would uncover their illegalities they perform with all of the accounts and flag them, seizing every funds and finally banning them. Some would be so foolish that they actually want to protest about it by trying to deny and that's where we see in the scam accusation board some of those invalid allegations protesting against unfair ban by a casino just to attract community sympathy.

[death69]

Casinos are operating under insane regulatory pressure. Suffocating levels of oversight depending on the jurisdiction. They need to know at all times exactly who is playing. Not because they are concerned about you taking advantage of a welcome bonus twice (annoying but whatever), but because licensing authorities require proof of responsible gambling measures.

Self-exclusion programs. Loss limits. Cooling-off periods. All of that goes to hell when the players can simply just open another account.

And there is the fraud angle too which honest might be bigger than bonuses. People running payment scams, testing stolen credit cards, laundering money through casino deposits and withdrawals... Multiple accounts make all of that exponentially easier. Exchanges do not face the same pressure as nobody's asking them to stop you overtrading yourself into bankruptcy (maybe they should but that is different).

So even your hypothetical no-bonus world? The multiple account rule probably remains. It is just not about what we think it is about.