We should talk about decisions, and about mistakes when they are truly mistakes. They may seem like simple things, but distinguishing them helps to better channel concepts and opinions. In that sense, decisions (or decision-making) entail responsibilities and, consequently, liabilities.
It was my decision not to enter Bitcoin in its early stages. I always joke that I have a Twitter account from 2009, when I should have had an account here on the forum instead. The former didn’t change my life, but surely an account here on the forum would have. That’s not a mistake; it’s circumstantial.
Anyway, the point is that many complain they didn’t get into bitcoin in time, while others want to become “investors” overnight. They come up with ideas about dollar-cost averaging, taking “x” percentage of their income and putting it into bitcoin, etc. But the reality is that the goal is to understand Bitcoin, support it, and above all, trust it.
Bitcoin didn’t reach its current price because everyone thinks like you (OP); it’s because people believed in something (that something was the Bitcoin)
So, OP, have you read the Bitcoin white paper? Do you understand its premises? That’s more important than simply being an investor. If everyone only becomes an investor (and yes, investors are needed), Bitcoin could go to hell. Investors usually have confidence only in the short term.
Understand me: if you choose to be an investor, that’s your decision, but not thinking about being a HODLer could be a mistake.

That’s all for now; a short thought.
Speaking of decisions, I decided to start 2026 with my first post on one of the most distinguished boards of this forum, the same place where I began writing my first posts in English.