oooo (OOOO) - First Modular Omnichain Protocol with AI Automation

[NewDotDeal]

New Coin: oooo $OOOO
CA: 0xf0a28bddac9d3045c95bf57df033e80685d881c0

What Does oooo Do?
* It turns plain-language cross-chain intent into automated execution so users do not need to manually bridge or swap.
* It connects 60+ blockchains through a modular omnichain interoperability layer to reduce fragmentation.
* It optimizes cross-chain routes in real time to target better rates, lower fees, and faster settlement.

What to Know Before You Buy oooo?
* It is positioning as an AI-powered interoperability leader as multi-chain usage keeps expanding.
* It offers utility like governance, staking with revenue sharing, and fee discounts tied to real protocol use.
* It shows strong traction and ecosystem reach with high wallet activity and broad chain support.

TL;DR:
1. AI omnichain intent protocol
2. Connects 60+ blockchains
3. Utility token, real adoption

For more information about oooo,
https://new.deal/cryptocurrencies/oooo/

[flapduck]

AI +omnichain+ 60plus chains is basically the 2026 marketing flavor of the month, so I'm automatically skeptical... but I'm still curious if there's real engineering behind it.

I skimmed your docs and the interesting part is the message-delivery stack you describe (endpoints/event listener, a "security checker + encryptor", an "omni-bus", then a "modular verifier network" that ultimately decides what gets delivered cross-chain).

That verifier network is the whole trust model, so it'd help a lot if you spell out who runs it today, what the quorum assumptions are, how it's permissioned (or not), and what happens under the classic bridge failure modes (reorgs, compromised verifier keys, front-run games, emergency stops, etc.).

[BattleDog]

The AI omnichain intent pitch always makes me ask one question first: where does the user's safety actually live when the intent gets translated into concrete calls? If the AI piece is doing anything beyond dumb routing, you really want it boxed into a deterministic and auditable translator that spits out exact calldata the wallet can show, because the last thing anyone needs is an LLM-shaped black box deciding what your funds do on 6 different chains because you wrote "swap and bridge" in plain English.

And on the verifier side, 60+ chains sounds impressive until you remember cross-chain security usually collapses to the weakest link in the set. If the verifier network is basically a signature committee, just call it that and tell us how keys rotate, what the bonding/slashing looks like, and what happens on reorgs or chain halts.

A lot of bridge disasters weren't actually any sort of "clever hacks", they were more like boring edge cases plus an overconfident trust model.