Need explain, whoever you are here also what the consequences.

[Witch hunting]

This reputation thread is becoming increasingly interesting for me to follow, and now I have a question since I'm new here.

What if someone sends ETH gas fees to a hidden spot address, and the sender is proven to be using the same address even though they participated in different campaigns. I mean, they use one address, but if we look there, two account owners appear.

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183095.msg52418821#msg52418821
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3334864.msg35495728#msg35495728

Transaction Hash: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf2d1f2e2f51b72210d411a0e466c2548299575e334ed7f351adc4b4ec3769006

The problem is that the ones who receive the ETH gas fee are also public figures here. What are the sanctions? Will all three of them be punished?

[Awaklara]

The problem is that the ones who receive the ETH gas fee are also public figures here. What are the sanctions? Will all three of them be punished?

Don't think about sanctions first. You need to understand the forum rules, as well as the campaign rules from each manager, so you will know which rules the accounts you are referring to have violated. 

More importantly, gather and present stronger evidence. Gas fee transaction evidence might serve as a clue to connected accounts, but you also need to provide additional proof. We know P2P is not prohibited, as well as owning multiple accounts on the forum. If they do not violate campaign or forum rules, you will only provide a neutral tag to indicate the relationship between accounts. 

But I’m confused about the two accounts you mentioned with that transaction evidence. One account has already been banned, while the other is inactive because it was caught earlier.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

This reputation thread is becoming increasingly interesting for me to follow, and now I have a question since I'm new here.

What if someone sends ETH gas fees to a hidden spot address, and the sender is proven to be using the same address even though they participated in different campaigns. I mean, they use one address, but if we look there, two account owners appear.

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183095.msg52418821#msg52418821
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3334864.msg35495728#msg35495728

Transaction Hash: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf2d1f2e2f51b72210d411a0e466c2548299575e334ed7f351adc4b4ec3769006

The problem is that the ones who receive the ETH gas fee are also public figures here. What are the sanctions? Will all three of them be punished?

I can not figure out which address is in question?
Only blockchain transactions can not be a good reference of evidence to find account connections. Members on this forum do exchange between them more often, there are no wrong in it.

I am curious to know what makes a user a public figure 😁?

[yahoo62278]

I feel like you're trying to educate yourself on how to avoid being caught in the future with cheating campaigns. Hence the brand new account with absolutely 0 reason to need to hide behind an alt.

The users that go looking for connections have a pretty high success rate, yes they may get 1 wrong, but it's fairly rare. My opinion, don't do shady shit and you'd have no worries.

[AakZaki]

-snip-

But I’m confused about the two accounts you mentioned with that transaction evidence. One account has already been banned, while the other is inactive because it was caught earlier.

I guess OP wants to show this Bro, the same wallet is used by two accounts

angel750 - 0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99
oleganpetro - 0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99

ERC20 Aдpec:0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99

Proof of Authentication  
Campaign: ...  telegram, facebook,Twitter,Medium,Linkedin,  youtube        
ERC-20 Wallet Address  0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99

Maybe OP didn't realize that angel750's account had been Banned, because maybe OP saw that there was no RedTrust in his account, he thought DT didn't pay attention to it, even though the Moderator was the one who punished him with Banned. 
Meanwhile, in the oleganpetro account, RedTrust is clearly visible.

[Witch hunting]

I am curious to know what makes a user a public figure 😁?

If AakZaki's search pattern is that easy, just paste the ETH address at https://bitlist.co/addresses and the user will immediately appear. But this is very different, even though we paste the recipient's address, the figure of the person can be seen.

I feel like you're trying to educate yourself on how to avoid being caught in the future with cheating campaigns. Hence the brand new account with absolutely 0 reason to need to hide behind an alt.

The users that go looking for connections have a pretty high success rate, yes they may get 1 wrong, but it's fairly rare. My opinion, don't do shady shit and you'd have no worries.

Oh, sir, that might be too far for me. I'm still at the lowest level, and it'll take a long time to get there. There's no express train, and everything takes time. But I'm not interested because it's too sweet and not good for me, and I'm not a third-world citizen, as someone often says in various threads.

[JollyGood]

That seems to be the entire premise behind creating this thread.

I recently posted about another newbie account creating a thread with a wall of text asking for newbies to be given a chance and not be suspected of any wrongdoing. A couple of months ago the number of threads that were created in the Reputation board over a short period highlighting the connections between several accounts (and whether anything suspicious or nefarious had taken place between them) led to many being removed from campaigns and many receiving tags. As a result, the account farmers are trying to leave less clues behind.

Overall, it does make it difficult to connect accounts but eventually some can be linked. For example, just when we thought we would probably not connect another naim027 account to his farm, the God Of Thunder aka Learn Bitcoin account was comprehensively exposed as another naim027 account.

I feel like you're trying to educate yourself on how to avoid being caught in the future with cheating campaigns. Hence the brand new account with absolutely 0 reason to need to hide behind an alt.

The users that go looking for connections have a pretty high success rate, yes they may get 1 wrong, but it's fairly rare. My opinion, don't do shady shit and you'd have no worries.

[YOSHIE]

Need explain, whoever you are here also what the consequences.

In the world of investigations and investigations, we need some valid evidence to accuse the person concerned so that they become a suspect.
Connecting them with ETH transactions, maybe it could be said to be evidence, but it is not strong, but if the suspect has other transactions such as BTC transactions and several other transactions, several times it might be used as evidence, because BTC does not require gas like ETH case. if they are not proven by other social media.


But in the case of the user you mentioned, of course the consequences are deserved and fair, as far as I know @KTChampions, have shown a lot of evidence for them not only transactions, they are also connected to social media, addresses and others.
Proof 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195644.msg53212130#msg53212130

And Proof 2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195644.msg53206609#msg53206609

So, it is quite clear that the evidence obtained by @KTChampions proves them wrong in this case.

Reference post:

lidya76
oleganpetro
angel750 banned bpip
marek23 banned bpip

[Witch hunting]

In the world of investigations and investigations, we need some valid evidence to accuse the person concerned so that they become a suspect.

Sir, you've been very wise in explaining this to me. Thank you in advance, and I've read and understand the consequences of providing incorrect information during the review, whether in the forum or in real-world applications.

However, I think it's very easy to find. we can see it after opening the link above and then see the path sent From: 0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99 and the recipient address is clearly written there To:
0x18263aE991F26a19FbC7EB344D042251baDDc619

Connecting them with ETH transactions, maybe it could be said to be evidence, but it is not strong, but if the suspect has other transactions such as BTC transactions and several other transactions, several times it might be used as evidence, because BTC does not require gas like ETH case. if they are not proven by other social media.

Note: Why can't anyone track this address using other methods besides the options I've mentioned above?

If only using https://bitlist.co/addresses might be difficult, or perhaps AakZaki might be able to help. When I read his post history on the local forum, AakZaki is already skilled and like a reliable detective in handling various cases, with a high success rate.

But I’m confused about the two accounts you mentioned with that transaction evidence. One account has already been banned, while the other is inactive because it was caught earlier.

That's right, and you don't need to be confused anymore. Mr. YOSHIE has explained it and Mr. AakZaki has also broken it down. What's confusing is why the address I highlighted in black and bold above is so secure.

Also, if you want to see where the money is going, just click on the search bar, specifically the 6th line from the top, and scroll down to the address ETH 0x......0bC.

Maybe OP didn't realize that angel750's account had been Banned, because maybe OP saw that there was no RedTrust in his account, he thought DT didn't pay attention to it, even though the Moderator was the one who punished him with Banned.  
Meanwhile, in the oleganpetro account, RedTrust is clearly visible.

I've noticed that. If the data is found by you then the Searching files

Code:

userID,9016822,username,0x18263aE991F26a19FbC7EB344D042251baDDc619

You can try that one first and will be easy to find.

[AakZaki]

-snip-

I've noticed that. If the data is found by you then the Searching files

Code:

userID,9016822,username,0x18263aE991F26a19FbC7EB344D042251baDDc619

You can try that one first and will be easy to find.

First I would say that this forum creates those userIDs in sequence and continues to increase the number according to the new account that has just been created.
So I think you made it up to write userID,9016822 or did you type it wrong? because the one I see the account created about 20 minutes ago still shows userID,3742978

So In search everywhere I'm sure no one will find userID,9016822

Code:

userID, 3742975
userID, 3742976
userID, 3742977
userID, 3742978 = 20 minutes ago

[Witch hunting]

First I would say that this forum creates those userIDs in sequence and continues to increase the number according to the new account that has just been created.
So I think you made it up to write userID,9016822 or did you type it wrong? because the one I see the account created about 20 minutes ago still shows userID,3742978

So In search everywhere I'm sure no one will find userID,9016822

Code:

userID, 3742975
userID, 3742976
userID, 3742977
userID, 3742978 = 20 minutes ago

That's not the user ID, sir, it's the number of the block in which the transaction is recorded or the confirmation block as described in this screenshot https://prnt.sc/op2hTCnlQiyB.

If you get the user ID, you can also get the username, which is not visible at https://bitlist.co/addresses. So, the format will include all userID, msgID, username, addressstring ✅