Top 4 most recognised users in bitcointalk and statistics of register and ban us

[Riginac111]

Most of us have been in the forum three, four and six years but we don't know the top (4) or top (10) recognised users of the forum, Talk more of knowing the statistics of the total numbers of Registered users and ban and daily active user of the forum, i know that many people will feel less concern to know this, and many will say that knowing all this i mentioned, it will not add values to their profile

But for me it's important to know about the existence of forum and also how many people that is in forum, both weekly and monthly and annually, i think this will help to know if some of the forum numbers is reducing or increasing, but I know that everyday forum numbers of users get increased, I know that some people will think that what I have mentioned here it suppose to be work of the staffs, but I think that is not the truth.

 Here come the statistics of total numbers of Bitcointalk user in 2026, Total numbers of Ban users, And total numbers of Daily active users

•Total numbers of Registered users = 3.7 million

• Total numbers of Banned users, approximately = 3 million

• Total numbers of  banned users, approximately = 700,000

•  Total numbers of Daily active users, approximately = 300,000 and above

• Total numbers of users who visit the forum monthly, approximately =  1.6 million

This is a research i carried out to evaluate the statistics of Bitcointalk user Source   According to my research using bpip.org to identify the top most recognised users of Bitcointalk, from the day Bitcointalk was launched till date, here come to the results of my first research.

Top(4) recognised Bitcointalk users from total numbers of 3.7 million Registered users  
 
(1) Theymos
(2) OgNasty
(3) Philipma1957
(4) LoyceV

1• Theymos is the first recognised user of Bitcointalk and first active user of Bitcointalk, but is not the most merited user, that is to show us how transparent and lenient is forum and it's principles, this is another indication to let us know that Bitcointalk data formation remains unchanged and it can't  be manipulate, Here come the bpip image..




2. OgNasty, according the research it appears that OgNasty is the second most recognised users of Bitcointalk, and i don't think everyone will be aware of this if not this research, and people that will be aware that is the 2nd most recognised user, people will not know him as most recognised user, but is not most merited or most trusted..Here come the bpip image...




3.Philipma1957, This is a clear evidence to let us know that Bitcointalk information doesn't die, Philipma1957 is the 3rd user in bitcointalk that is being recognised and without bpip image don't think so many of us would have know this information, without making this research, I do think that after Theymos the next user in line is LoyceV, but not knowing that OgNasty come second for Bitcointalk recognition and third by Philipma1957.Here come the bpip image




4. LoyceV, This is the one I had in mind that would have being the second after Theymos, but bpip.org proved me wrong, so times you need to conclude with your instincts, without this research I won't have know that they are other users Bitcointalk recognised first before LoyceV, the functions of LoyceV in bitcointalk made some of us to rate him higher than others, and we are going to be rating him higher because of his activities, in bitcointalk, his the 4th most recognised user and 2nd most earned merits and 34th most trusted...Here come the bpip image

 
I don't know if I would have obtain permission before posting a users bpip.org profile, I'm pleading if it's against the rules and regulations of bitcointalk i ask for forgiveness, I made this thread for reference purposes, for people who dont know about the volume of people that registered in the bitcointalk annually and the top 4 most recognised bitcointalk users to know...I also urge anyone who have time to make a research to list most top 6, from 6 to 10 most recognised users of Bitcointalk.

[JollyGood]

It cannot go unnoticed that the thread you created seems more to be about finding a way to get merits rather than be informative in any capacity.

If all of that data you have posted is readily available via the BPIP website anyway, what are you trying to achieve here? It really does seem to be a tactic on your part to have created this thread with the intention of trying to get merits.

[_act_]

If you mean active users, I can agree with you, but if you mean general, I do not agree with you. These are the list of most recognized people that have account on Bitcointalk that I think are most recognized:

Satoshi Nakamoto
Theymos
Sirius
Laszlo Hanyecz
Hal Finney

For active user, I will choose

Theymos
LoyceV
Cyrus
DdmrDdmr

[Riginac111]

It cannot go unnoticed that the thread you created seems more to be about finding a way to get merits rather than be informative in any capacity.

If all of that data you have posted is readily available via the BPIP website anyway, what are you trying to achieve here? It really does seem to be a tactic on your part to have created this thread with the intention of trying to get merits.

You understand the thread wrong way, the reason I created the thread is self explanatory as I said from the beginning, you can check other of my threads, not only this one, many people do not know the statistics of Bitcointalk user, what brought this thread is to know how many people is in bitcointalk, I was searching for it in Google just like that, so i after I find out the total numbers, I research of the most recognised user to the millions of people who register in bitcointalk on a daily bases, what the thread is teaching is statistics of Bitcointalk registered users and data information.

If you mean active users, I can agree with you, but if you mean general, I do not agree with you. These are the list of most recognized people that have account on Bitcointalk that I think are most recognized:

Satoshi Nakamoto
Theymos
Sirius
Laszlo Hanyecz
Hal Finney

if you disagree with me, you can use bpip.org to check most recognised users in the forum.

[JollyGood]

After reading your post history, it seems clear you have almost nothing to contribute to the forum and trying to increase post count in order to join campaigns. What statement can you make to reply to the members that have left neutral feedback for you because they deem you to be a "Low value poster" and "Typical spammer"?

Free Market Capitalist: Reference Low value poster.
lovesmayfamilis: Reference Typical spammer

You understand the thread wrong way, the reason I created the thread is self explanatory as I said from the beginning, you can check other of my threads, not only this one, many people do not know the statistics of Bitcointalk user, what brought this thread is to know how many people is in bitcointalk, I was searching for it in Google just like that, so i after I find out the total numbers, I research of the most recognised user to the millions of people who register in bitcointalk on a daily bases, what the thread is teaching is statistics of Bitcointalk registered users and data information.

[xLays]

It cannot go unnoticed that the thread you created seems more to be about finding a way to get merits rather than be informative in any capacity.

I guess it is obvious and that is what I noticed too, but Man let this user/people be happy. lol Not every post needs to be attacked or criticized right away. If it is not allowed, then report to moderator and let them decide if this thread should be locked.
There is nothing wrong with sometimes choosing to be kind to others instead of being judgmental. Forum would feel better if people show more understanding rather than always looking for mistakes.. ✌️

[_act_]

if you disagree with me, you can use bpip.org to check most recognised users in the forum.

I am not saying I disagree with you. This is what I posted:

If you mean active users, I can agree with you

Bpip is full of active users, but the inactive people that I mentioned will always have their names remembered on this forum, unlike many active users now that the names may not be known anymore after some years if they become inactive.

I know you are referring to bpip.org, so I agree with you but bpip has a way it makes that conclusion, being active is there.

Example is DdmrDdmr that I mentioned, he is no more active on this forum also, but I just included him for the stat he is updating. Not that I can be right or not right but that is based on my opinion. I did not say I do not agree with what you posted.

[JollyGood]

I agree, I genuinely hope this member is happy just as are other members of the forum. The post is not one that should be reported to a moderator nor did I imply that.

Having said that, if he ever has aspirations of removing the feedback on his account from the two members stating "Low value poster" and "Typical spammer", a gentle nudge in the right direction is probably a good thing for him (and is probably overdue).

I guess it is obvious and that is what I noticed too, but Man let this user/people be happy. lol Not every post needs to be attacked or criticized right away. If it is not allowed, then report to moderator and let them decide if this thread should be locked.
There is nothing wrong with sometimes choosing to be kind to others instead of being judgmental. Forum would feel better if people show more understanding rather than always looking for mistakes.. ✌️

[examplens]

if you disagree with me, you can use bpip.org to check most recognised users in the forum.

bpip.org is publicly available to everyone, and the largest number of forum members know about it and use it in some way. Now it is quite unclear why you opened this thread just to pass on some information from bpip.org. Do you see the essence of what you wanted to show here? I don't see.

[LoyceV]

4. LoyceV, This is the one I had in mind that would have being the second after Theymos, but bpip.org proved me wrong

BPIP's definition of "Most Recognized" included one third Activity. That's really hard to beat if you didn't register in the first years of the forum.