✅ b1ack Exchange - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | $20,000 Escrow

[b1ack]

Due to some other deal I had with OP, I had to send back 0.105 BTC to OP. Unfortunately, the wallet I use dont have coin control feature (it's a Hardware wallet, I never knew about the non existence of the feature) and it automatically spent input from the escrow address. Regardless, I'm still holding the same amount (the rest is in another addy).

The escrow funds are safe and still held by Little Mouse. We've just cancelled our agreement with Little Mouse as our signature campaign manager - nothing more.


This is a bit off-topic since it was a private arrangement, but for transparency: we're now looking for a new campaign manager.

[AB de Royse777]

This would'nt be possible without the help of all the legendary and experienced people from this forum.

This place has long history and many brands made at the top after starting their venture from this community. Primedice is a great example. Since 2013 to 8th October 2025 seems more than a decade and the brand was at the top for long time until the management shifted their focus to Stake.com.

This is a bit off-topic since it was a private arrangement, but for transparency: we're now looking for a new campaign manager.

Little Mouse was more than capable to manage your campaign. This must be a strategic decision?

[dkbit98]

Due to some other deal I had with OP, I had to send back 0.105 BTC to OP. Unfortunately, the wallet I use dont have coin control feature (it's a Hardware wallet, I never knew about the non existence of the feature) and it automatically spent input from the escrow address. Regardless, I'm still holding the same amount (the rest is in another addy).

Don't tell me you used Safepal hardware wallet or some other closed source crap like Tangem?
Trezor wallet is much better, with open source code, and it has coin control that can be use with Trezor Suite or with Electrum wallet.
In 2026 I would not use any wallet with coin control.

[b1ack]

DAI is already here!  

In fact, it's difficult to overestimate this news, as it is primarily aimed at those who are accustomed to maintaining complete control over any of their funds (considering that stablecoin management companies continue to block user accounts).

[hugeblack]

DAI is already here!  

It is good to see that some of the suggestions have already been implemented.

About those AML scores:
Look, you got three totally different scores (55%, 60%, 88%) from different checkers - that just proves how random this whole thing is.

Since no one complained, that's fine, but the reason for the high AML of my transaction was that the address had many inputs/outputs. AML risk can be reduced by sending coins through many intermediate addresses.

In the case of losing your ID, can you add the deposit address or deposit txid + receiving address? Revealing the ID from the deposit address alone will greatly reduce privacy.

Lost your ID? — Enter your deposit address or deposit txid (24h limit)

What's the next thing on your list?

[examplens]

About those AML scores:
Look, you got three totally different scores (55%, 60%, 88%) from different checkers - that just proves how random this whole thing is.

Since no one complained, that's fine, but the reason for the high AML of my transaction was that the address had many inputs/outputs. AML risk can be reduced by sending coins through many intermediate addresses.

It is clear that truly no-KYC exchanges have a problem with the coins they receive in the exchange, and that they will receive coins with a high AML risk score. Later, the same coins can end up with a completely innocent user.
To make it clear that @b1ack is aware of this problem, an explanation or warning in the FAQ section would probably be useful. Maybe even under the exchange widget, info that you do not guarantee a low AML score, and that everyone should do their own check.

[b1ack]

Friends, we're happy to announce that we've added USDT (ERC20).

Regarding the recent comments - like we said, AML is just an bullshit and it is not real , and we have personally also checked the coins for AML reports and they were accepted without any issues. And we have also new address sendings and stuff etc . and if you talk about aml, 50-70% of coins are all marked as High risk AML coins , the only valid option is that the exchanges can block any coins they want if they don't have an proper SOF.

As for the tracking with deposit id or address, there are countless transactions in the blockchain and this feature does not reduces your privacy, you are the same person asking to use an no-kyc exchange and then using an regulated exchange (that's irony), if they want privacy, they know how to not use CEXs. and this option is only applicable for the first 24 hours of the exchange , after that it is not impossible, I cannot just like make changes on individual requests and concerns , I need to take the whole user base context and those earlier comments about losing the swap id, gave us this idea to add it.

[SamReomo]

Friends, we're happy to announce that we've added USDT (ERC20).

Regarding the recent comments - like we said, AML is just an bullshit and it is not real , and we have personally also checked the coins for AML reports and they were accepted without any issues. And we have also new address sendings and stuff etc . and if you talk about aml, 50-70% of coins are all marked as High risk AML coins , the only valid option is that the exchanges can block any coins they want if they don't have an proper SOF.

Good to hear that USDT  ERC20 is now available on the site but it's first time hearing that coins with High AML also get accepted in exchanges and the ones owing those coins won't have any issue by using even a centralized exchanges. As far as I know reputed exchanges might not accept high AML coins as they fear the authorities.

However, it's true that AML might alone may not be enough to show if coins are dirty coins. So it means that the coins that have high AML can be swaped on the exchange without any issue? If that's the case then won't the ones who get those same coins get any issues when they want to use those coins on centralized exchanges? To be honest, people fear to lose their trading accounts that they've on exchanges and that's why such concern will always be there.

[OcTradism]

Good to hear that USDT  ERC20 is now available on the site but it's first time hearing that coins with High AML also get accepted in exchanges and the ones owing those coins won't have any issue by using even a centralized exchanges. As far as I know reputed exchanges might not accept high AML coins as they fear the authorities.

However, it's true that AML might alone may not be enough to show if coins are dirty coins. So it means that the coins that have high AML can be swaped on the exchange without any issue? If that's the case then won't the ones who get those same coins get any issues when they want to use those coins on centralized exchanges? To be honest, people fear to lose their trading accounts that they've on exchanges and that's why such concern will always be there.

If you are very careful, you will move your USDT on ERC20 to different wallets, and can use low tier exchanges for it, before using your USDT on ERC20 as funding your destinating account on a Tier 1 centralized exchange. It will takes time and it will also take more transaction fees by moving your USDT around but if you prioritize safety of your fund, it's worth to do some extra transactions.

[tabas]

I was about to test b1ack but the minimum for bitcoin deposit is 0.0003BTC. Is it possible to lower it down to even at least equal to $10 or not? Because the others that I've used have that minimum as much as 0.00013BTC. Also, is it possible that upon choosing which crypto to exchange it won't require to load the page during the selection of sending/receiving? I am not trying to be demanding but those are just a suggestion. Well, thanks to b1ack because I've got a new choice to do instaswaps.

[Forsyth Jones]

Due to some other deal I had with OP, I had to send back 0.105 BTC to OP. Unfortunately, the wallet I use dont have coin control feature (it's a Hardware wallet, I never knew about the non existence of the feature) and it automatically spent input from the escrow address. Regardless, I'm still holding the same amount (the rest is in another addy).

Don't tell me you used Safepal hardware wallet or some other closed source crap like Tangem?
Trezor wallet is much better, with open source code, and it has coin control that can be use with Trezor Suite or with Electrum wallet.
In 2026 I would not use any wallet with coin control.

I also considered that possibility, because most of the popular hardware wallets out there have coin_control feature in their native software. In any case, they're probably compatible with Electrum, which has advanced features like coin_control where you can "freeze" the address/utxo (to avoid accidentally spending from that address). So, if the native software of these wallets doesn't have coin_control, you can simply connect it to Electrum (or Sparrow).


Regarding the high AML scores for some, it's something I expect from freekyc services. Most times I've used no-KYC exchanges, I've received UTXOs with scores of 50-60%. There's not much we can do, the way is try your luck or use another service to exchange coins for the same ones with lower AML (like mixer) if you're afraid of them being blocked. We might think AML is all bullshit, but unfortunately, our coins can get blocked on centralized platforms for any reason their AML software indicates. Unfortunately, this is a reality that many cannot ignore. I also think this whole AML issue is bullshit and shouldn't exist.

It's worth remembering that I've received coins with considerably high AML scores of 50-60% from licensed exchanges as well, which makes me think that if you do AML checks on UTXOs received from licensed exchanges, at least some of your UTXOs will show a high AML percentage, and you'll be afraid to spend those UTXOs. So yes, you can receive coins with high AML even from licensed exchanges.

Regarding b1exch.io (or simply black exchange), the name, similar to a well-known similar service in this community, already triggered nostalgia, happiness, and sadness at the same time (remembering that such a service no longer exists due to persecution). I welcome you, I really liked the website's interface and the detailed information at the time of the exchange. I will be happy to test the exchange sometime soon. I'm very happy that several similar services are emerging, after the shutdown of eXch, we were orphaned from this for a long time.

Oh, and congrats on starting your sig campaign! I hope you build your name and a large community on Bitcointalk. Do you also have a thread on altcoinstalks?

[Zoomic]

b1exch.io is a fully automated exchange that accepts .Bitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, Ethereum, DAI ' USDT. and exchanges take minutes. Financial privacy is not a crime, but rather a matter of basic common sense. No registration is required, and there are no logs or JavaScript. Feedback is welcome!

I am very glad for this... I have visited the exchange and I will start using it. Financial privacy is not a crime and I believe b1exch, especially from the choice of the coins they exchange, you will know they are here not only for the business but also to defend privacy.  This actually makes me remember eXch...

[Husna QA]

I tried accessing two b1ack Exchange website links using different devices:

https://b1exch.io/ via Firefox Focus (smartphone), and
http://blckexcrpdmau6y7teqxmf6yiyg7xn7qlphjeaxgyimxokz623w4tmqd.onion/ via Tor Browser (desktop PC).

Unfortunately, the clearweb link seems to be experiencing an issue (host error) when I tried to access it.



On the other hand, the Tor mirror was accessible after completing two CAPTCHA tasks.

Below are some impressions I had while using b1ack Exchange, along with a few questions and requests that the b1ack Exchange development team might want to consider.

◌ Honestly, I feel that the font size used on the b1ack Exchange website is a bit too small. The layout seems more optimized for smartphones and feels less comfortable on desktop PCs. That said, the overall instructions and menus are still fairly clear.
◌ The number of crypto assets available for swapping is still quite limited. However, for me personally, as a BTC and Monero user, it’s already more than sufficient.
◌ When the coin selection list is open, it would be more intuitive if it automatically minimized when clicking anywhere else on the page, rather than requiring the user to click the menu again to close it.
◌ The fee information is presented clearly and transparently.
◌ The refund address feature is also very helpful. However, when a swap fails and the BTC deposit address and the BTC refund address are different, I initially wondered whether this mechanism would resemble a mixer.
◌ As is well known, Monero addresses are quite long, are there any plans to add a feature that allows users to scan addresses via QR code?

I recently swapped BTC for Monero. The process requires three blockchain confirmations before the swap is processed. My transaction took approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes from the first confirmation to the moment the Monero arrived in my wallet.





Overall, I am satisfied with the outcome. The only drawback is the length of the waiting period, due to the requirement for three Bitcoin confirmations, plus the time needed to send Monero to the wallet.

[Peanutswar]

Good day ito b1ack exchange fam!

I want to share that I translated your ANN thread to our local Pilipinas.

✅ b1ack Exchange - Mabilisang palitan | Walang KYC | $20,000 Escrow

Hoping to get added to your OP translation part @b1ack and @icopress

[PX-Z]

Just looking for some clarification.

b1exch advertises no logs and no js, but the site seems to be using Cloudflare.

Since CF usually logs basic connection data (IP, timestamps, request info) for security, how does this align with the "no logs" claim? Is it meant as "no internal logs" only?

Also, does the site stay fully usable without js if CF challenges are triggered?

Btw, i really like the very simple black design of the site.

[Ambatman]

This reminds me of exch, hopefully we don't get disappointed
Noticed your service from the other forum and I'd like some clarification.
I understand the essence of the refund address but won't it be exploited
Like a user purposely sends below the minimum amount adds a refund destination
(which they hiddenly want to send the fund to)
And they are refunded which helps them meet the criteria of privacy
And at a cheaper rate.




I read about Hugeblack review on AML score and I believe you might downplayed it a little bit
Even if there existing tainted coin is bogus and exchanges imposed
Many would still pick having a coin an exchange consider clean than the other way around.
Yeah their scores are subjective but 2:3 in favour of green is better than 3:3 all red.

[Smartvirus]

It’s a very simple site I’ll give it that much but, a little something I find a bit unease is how the site keeps opening a new page for every click you do on the platform. That isn’t really nice from the developers and I’m assuming I’m not just the only one experiencing this.

Like, having to click the menu and click on swap, rather than redirecting right back to the home page where you have all that, it opens a new page entirely on your browser.

[TryNinja]

This reminds me of exch, hopefully we don't get disappointed
Noticed your service from the other forum and I'd like some clarification.
I understand the essence of the refund address but won't it be exploited
Like a user purposely sends below the minimum amount adds a refund destination
(which they hiddenly want to send the fund to)
And they are refunded which helps them meet the criteria of privacy
And at a cheaper rate.

Already answered you over there, so reposting it here for other to see...

The refund comes from the deposit address you sent the coins to, so you receive the exact same coins back (minus fees).

From my review:

-snip-

Playing with the refunds...

I created another session BTC -> LTC and sent ‎0.001 BTC.

After your system detected the transaction (but still with not confirmations), I asked for a refund. Just 1 minute later I received the refund on my wallet from the unconfirmed parent that I sent before that. Very quick and efficient, since this leaves to space for someone trying to abuse your system by asking for a refund just to double spend the deposit.

But what happens if I double spend the tx *before* asking for a refund? Well, I tested it out.

- Order created, 0.0006 BTC -> 51.78 USDT (TRC20).
- I sent the BTC, waited for blexch to detect.
- Then I double spent the tx.
- After the double spend tx was confirmed, I requested a refund and received the message "No funds available for refund"... no luck (and good job).

-snip-

[Zoomic]

This reminds me of exch, hopefully we don't get disappointed
Noticed your service from the other forum and I'd like some clarification.
I understand the essence of the refund address but won't it be exploited
Like a user purposely sends below the minimum amount adds a refund destination
(which they hiddenly want to send the fund to)
And they are refunded which helps them meet the criteria of privacy
And at a cheaper rate.

A refunded coin hasn't tangled with the privacy system, it's just like returning your deposit back to you.

[Numeral]

It was mentioned above that an error occurs when accessing the website https://b1exch.io/. However, I was able to successfully load the website in Google Chrome on Windows 11. It is worth noting that the verification process when logging into the website takes a little longer than on other websites, meaning I had to wait before I was allowed to access the website. If you don't change your IP address, the site starts to load quickly after refreshing the page. The mirror site https://blexch.io/ loads quickly right away. Yes, there is also a Cloudflare verification, but the response to loading is more responsive. I can't comment on the TOR version yet, as I don't even have the appropriate browser to download it.