✅ b1exch.to - Instant Auto Exchange | NO KYC | Escrow 0.2 BTC

[PX-Z]

We are planning to make this our primary domain. While .io will still be active with redirect to .to domain.

I don't understand why it was necessary to register b1exch in the domain zone of the state of Tonga. Why don't you consider registering in a domain zone .exchange that, in my opinion, would be most suitable for b1exch. I have now checked and see that the b1exch.exchange domain is available for registration.

It's not all about the domain extension (.to) but about the registrar as well since registrars offer different domain extensions. Namecheap offers .to as well which is based on US. Where different legal pressure levels exists. And i guess US and EU have less to no influence on this registry (tonicregistry), say there is a sanction from Europool or BKA from german just like other mixers and eXch.
In fact its better to have more mirrors of the platform, so .exchange still possible but registrars should be considered.

[examplens]

We are planning to make this our primary domain. While .io will still be active with redirect to .to domain.

I don't understand why it was necessary to register b1exch in the domain zone of the state of Tonga. Why don't you consider registering in a domain zone .exchange that, in my opinion, would be most suitable for b1exch. I have now checked and see that the b1exch.exchange domain is available for registration.

It's not all about the domain extension (.to) but about the registrar as well since registrars offer different domain extensions. Namecheap offers .to as well which is based on US. Where different legal pressure levels exists. And i guess US and EU have less to no influence on this registry (tonicregistry), say there is a sanction from Europool or BKA from german just like other mixers and eXch.
In fact its better to have more mirrors of the platform, so .exchange still possible but registrars should be considered.

Exactly this. The bottom line is who manages some TLD, and for services that are under constant pressure like b1exch, it is preferable that it is not under the authority of ICANN or some rigorous registrar.
Your domain is much safer if the country of Tongo is responsible for it, than some UK registrar under the authority of ICANN, and that is specifically the difference between .to and .exchange tld

[Zaguru12]

Hi b1ack.. How long will it usually take you to top up your liquidity? I've been waiting for more than 40 minutes, your Liquidity for USDT (TRC-20) is almost empty left at 7.61$, shouldn't you balance Liquidity USDT (ERC-20) and USDT (TRC-20). I see that your USDT (ERC-20) is very fat, what should not be made 50%-50% or whatever it is up to you, the most important thing is that the liquidity does not run out.

I think this is as a result of USDT (TRC-20) pool been used more and that of USDT (ERC-20) not been employed by many.

You can try it out now though

[Lakai01]

Exactly this. The bottom line is who manages some TLD, and for services that are under constant pressure like b1exch, it is preferable that it is not under the authority of ICANN or some rigorous registrar.
Your domain is much safer if the country of Tongo is responsible for it, than some UK registrar under the authority of ICANN, and that is specifically the difference between .to and .exchange tld

I agree with you; a registrar in Tongo is significantly better for crypto-related services such as b1exch, as you are not at the mercy of the registrar deciding whether or not to take your domain offline—for whatever reason.

Whether the domain ends with .exchange or .to is usually irrelevant to the end customer anyway. In the crypto sector in particular, you are confronted with many different domain extensions, especially when working with services that offer many different aliases, such as gambling platforms.

The use of Tor/Onion is also commonplace “with us,” where this concept of domain extensions does not exist anyway.

I would therefore not worry too much about the extension and certainly not take any risks by changing registrars for a specific extension.

[b1ack]

Hi b1ack.. How long will it usually take you to top up your liquidity? I've been waiting for more than 40 minutes, your Liquidity for USDT (TRC-20) is almost empty left at 7.61$, shouldn't you balance Liquidity USDT (ERC-20) and USDT (TRC-20). I see that your USDT (ERC-20) is very fat, what should not be made 50%-50% or whatever it is up to you, the most important thing is that the liquidity does not run out.


You should remember that you are holding a competition that involves a pairing category, so if one of your liquidity is not there how can someone complete a pairing that has empty liquidity.

I also see a lot of requests about adding networks in addition to TRC20 and ERC20, why don't you also provide them? is that contrary to the "Est. Processing Fees" you apply?
Because the cheaper the network fee will make your customers comfortable and not provide additional fees to your platform, right? haha

Sorry, this is just a question and at the same time my honest review. 

I saw your swap was successful, welcome to the Frenzy

Hi Bro.. Can you please re-check the spreadset, I think there is a mistake there.

If the liquidity is low , it will take only extra 10-20 minutes to process your order.
You can go ahead and place the swap, It will be processed.

[joker_josue]

Exactly this. The bottom line is who manages some TLD, and for services that are under constant pressure like b1exch, it is preferable that it is not under the authority of ICANN or some rigorous registrar.
Your domain is much safer if the country of Tongo is responsible for it, than some UK registrar under the authority of ICANN, and that is specifically the difference between .to and .exchange tld

I agree with you; a registrar in Tongo is significantly better for crypto-related services such as b1exch, as you are not at the mercy of the registrar deciding whether or not to take your domain offline—for whatever reason.

Whether the domain ends with .exchange or .to is usually irrelevant to the end customer anyway. In the crypto sector in particular, you are confronted with many different domain extensions, especially when working with services that offer many different aliases, such as gambling platforms.

You guys are confusing things a bit.

ICANN has no authority over the domains; they only handle the technical management and create the rules for everything to function. Domain name management companies, including those managing country-specific domains, must be registered there. Only then can they function worldwide. Otherwise, nobody would be able to access the site.

Therefore, the ".to" domain is also subject to ICANN rules.

The difference lies in the domain operator. There are two types of operator: corporate and national.

The ".exchange" domain, a gTLD (gendered top-level domain), is operated by the company Donuts (Spring Falls, LLC). It must comply with the laws and regulations of the authorities in the country where it is based.
The ".to" domain, a ccTLD (country-code top-level domain), is operated by the Tonga Network Information Center (Tonic), under the authority of the Government of Tonga. It is therefore subject to the authorities of Tonga.

In this specific case, the difference is that it is easier for EU or US authorities to request and have it accepted to block the ".exchange" domain than to request and have it accepted in the case of ".to".

[The Cryptovator]

If the liquidity is low , it will take only extra 10-20 minutes to process your order.
You can go ahead and place the swap, It will be processed.

Confusing, he has been waiting for 40 minutes to refill. Does it mean you will refill within 20 minutes upon placing an order on a priority basis? However, it's good to see users have been trusting your platform and swapping coins since it seems liquidity sometimes becomes lower, lol. However, I don't think this is an issue regarding liquidity; it's likely temporary.

So how about adding more networks or chain as we can see more users requesting that? On the other hand, won't it be nice if you add a few more solid exchange directions based on user demand? So you would get more users.

[b1ack]

If the liquidity is low , it will take only extra 10-20 minutes to process your order.
You can go ahead and place the swap, It will be processed.

Confusing, he has been waiting for 40 minutes to refill. Does it mean you will refill within 20 minutes upon placing an order on a priority basis? However, it's good to see users have been trusting your platform and swapping coins since it seems liquidity sometimes becomes lower, lol. However, I don't think this is an issue regarding liquidity; it's likely temporary.

So how about adding more networks or chain as we can see more users requesting that? On the other hand, won't it be nice if you add a few more solid exchange directions based on user demand? So you would get more users.

Whenever a chain has low liquidity, our backup reserves kick in within 10-20 minutes.

I understand we need to add more chains, but adding chains from scratch requires extensive work:

Proper testing and research
Setting up nodes for each blockchain
Creating new wallet infrastructure
Establishing backup reserves
Configuring exchange and swap mechanisms
Implementing monitoring systems
Making sure new chains are bulletproof against crypto attacks and blockchain exploits
Adding a chain seems easy, but in reality, it's very complex. One mistake, one loose end, could result in losses of millions.

We're being careful and methodical to protect user funds.

[Zaguru12]

Sorry please I am the only one having issue with the Monerica link for b1exch

[b1ack]

Sorry please I am the only one having issue with the Monerica link for b1exch

We are checking.

[cryptofrka]

Hi Bro.. Can you please re-check the spreadset, I think there is a mistake there.

Hey there, it can happen if we're currently entering, rechecking or if we simply forget to sort it at one particular moment.
It's OK now, and will surely be OK most of the time considering that the idea is that we sort the leaderboard after every entry. If we do forget once in a while, when we enter the next one it will be corrected.

Happy to see you're enjoying the contest, you're attacking all categories

[TryNinja]

Some good news for those asking for more pairs... seems like SOL is coming soon.

[AakZaki]

Hey there, it can happen if we're currently entering, rechecking or if we simply forget to sort it at one particular moment.
It's OK now, and will surely be OK most of the time considering that the idea is that we sort the leaderboard after every entry. If we do forget once in a while, when we enter the next one it will be corrected.

Happy to see you're enjoying the contest, you're attacking all categories

Yes, Precisely that I will help correct if there is an input error, because I also participate in it. If I didn't participate maybe I wouldn't have done it, which is why I want this competition to run as it should including calculations in it.

For NeuroticFish, it seems that there has not been a replacement in the pairing section. Shouldn't that be 1 pair?
On the spreadset it is still written 2 pairs 

[TryNinja]

A very interesting situation today.

I sent 0.015 BTC in a BTC -> DAI (ERC20) transaction to receive $1329 DAI.

Everything was alright, the btc had 2 out of 3 confirmations, and suddenly, I receive a notification that I received 293 DAI. I thought to myself that this couldn't be right. Checking the order, I saw that the order was partially filled and the remaining would need to be refunded to my BTC address.

I checked the BTC price and it had dropped like a rock, so maybe that was it. A very unlucky timing where the transaction was going through while a big price swing happened.

Anyways, this shows the importancy or using your own wallet to receive the coins. Imagine you're paying an invoice directly and the processor only receives $300 out of the $1300...

Maybe b1ack can comment more about this situation. I can share the order ID if needed. Code: E804



@cryptofrka does my received 293 DAI count for the swap frenzy competition?

[b1ack]

A very interesting situation today.

I sent 0.015 BTC in a BTC -> DAI (ERC20) transaction to receive $1329 DAI.

Everything was alright, the btc had 2 out of 3 confirmations, and suddenly, I receive a notification that I received 293 DAI. I thought to myself that this couldn't be right. Checking the order, I saw that the order was partially filled and the remaining would need to be refunded to my BTC address.

I checked the BTC price and it had dropped like a rock, so maybe that was it. A very unlucky timing where the transaction was going through while a big price swing happened.

Anyways, this shows the importancy or using your own wallet to receive the coins. Imagine you're paying an invoice directly and the processor only receives $300 out of the $1300...

Maybe b1ack can comment more about this situation. I can share the order ID if needed. Code: E804



@cryptofrka does my received 293 DAI count for the swap frenzy competition?

You did 2 deposit transactions
And most of the time , if there delay in the second transaction , we might even reject it and proceed for refund if it was confirmed late than the first transaction and the swap is at almost complete stage.

Your protection was set at 2%, but the market price dropped during processing, so the swap was cancelled and refunded to you.

In these cases, you just need to:

Do the swap again, OR
Set a higher protection percentage
Important: Setting higher protection does NOT mean higher fees will be charged. It just means if the market rate shifts, your swap will still process as long as it stays within your tolerance level.

There were no other issues with your swap - this was purely price movement beyond your 2% protection.

About refund addresses:

We agree that people should use their own wallets. Even if they depend on another service for receiving, we can still refund them to their provided refund address. We always recommend users provide a refund address during the swap quote step.

As for the bug , Let us investigate it more and try to findout the exact reason of what might have happened.

[TryNinja]

You did 2 deposit transactions
And most of the time , if there delay in the second transaction , we might even reject it and proceed for refund if it was confirmed late than the first transaction and the swap is at almost complete stage.

Actually, I didn't.

I'll DM you the order id + transaction.

I sent ‎0,02012476 BTC in one transaction. I even have a screenshot of the original screen.

Then something happened and my order details changed to 2 deposits:

0.0001999 BTC
0.01548281 BTC

Neither of those were made by me, they look like a thorchain transaction since there is a random OP_RETURN as an output.

edit: There are 0,00444205 BTC missing, which probably got converted into the $293 DAI.

[cryptofrka]

@cryptofrka does my received 293 DAI count for the swap frenzy competition?

Yeah, it should - still follows all the required steps. Can you prove it without sharing wallets?
The SS you attached has initially requested values so we obviously can't use that one.

Yes, Precisely that I will help correct if there is an input error, because I also participate in it. If I didn't participate maybe I wouldn't have done it, which is why I want this competition to run as it should including calculations in it.

For NeuroticFish, it seems that there has not been a replacement in the pairing section. Shouldn't that be 1 pair?
On the spreadset it is still written 2 pairs 

Any help is appreciated for sure.

The usual process is that whenever we receive a new input, we check across all parameters (volume, number of total swaps, number of different pairs).
That means that if we made a mistake for NeuroticFish, we will probably not see/correct it before his next swap.

However, we do a final round of checks (separately - Trofo does his and I do mine and then we cross-reference) at the end of each week - so some things we do fix immediately and some things can take a while.

We'd go crazy if we checked the whole spreadsheet after every input
There is also an automated checking method, so it will be 3 control mechanisms in place later tonight.

It's the middle of the first period, the more we get closer to the deadline the more checks we will make. Neurotic's placement doesn't really influence anything at this point in time so his result isn't part of any midweek checks.

[Smartvirus]

I tried testing the b1exch service today and was met with a couple of challenges, at first I felt it was my internet service but, I discovered that other sites and pages I was operating were opening swiftly and so, I switched browser and the loading time was greatly reduced.

As observed, the safari browser presents a little difficulty and loads forever while trying to access the exchange as opposed to other browsers.


Trying out its service, I used the minimum allowed for a BTC to USDT (TRC20) network and upon initiating the transaction, it took almost 2 minutes to be noted deposit on webpage while it was awaiting confirmation. On average the entire procedure which included deposit, confirmation, exchange and complete was processed in about 10minutes.

Though the transaction was completed, it appears I’m not getting funded as,
Service fee was 3% ($0.84) of the original BTC0.0004 ($27.88) sent,
Processing fee (Exchange + Network) cost $27.04 which leaves you with nothing!

I got credited twice and I wasn’t expecting any transaction on the said wallet and can’t explain it being an exchange address.

First deposit came in the amount of $17.64
Second deposit was in the amount $25.

Leaving me with a balance of $42.6 for a transaction that was worth $27.88 (including fees).

What’s the obvious error here or there is something else at play?

[joker_josue]

~~

Suggestion for the file:
Include a field with the date/time of the last update.

This makes it easier for everyone to know when the file was last updated.
If you already have it, I'm sorry, I haven't found it yet.

[SamReomo]

First deposit came in the amount of $17.64
Second deposit was in the amount $25.

Leaving me with a balance of $42.6 for a transaction that was worth $27.88 (including fees).

What’s the obvious error here or there is something else at play?

Something might not be working properly and they should get a fix for that. That seems like a bug to me and it should be fixed. There're some people who might misuse that bug to take advantage of the exchange. I hope b1exch will read your comment and do something about it.