Zilobet.com | Fully mathematical football predictions platform powered by AI

[kidosneh]

Introducing ZiloBet, a football prediction and analysis platform that is currently in its early public phase.

ZiloBet was built as a data-driven system for analyzing football matches, with the aim of providing structured insights rather than promoting direct real-money betting. The platform focuses on how predictions are formed, how risk is represented, and how users can interact with football data in a transparent way.

Below is a breakdown of the main components and how they work.

Match analysis and prediction logic
ZiloBet generates match predictions using a combination of historical team form, recent results, goal patterns, and bookmaker odds structure. These inputs are processed to produce outcome probabilities across common markets such as 1X2, over/under goals, and both teams to score. The intent is not to claim certainty, but to summarize multiple data points into a consistent analytical output.

Confidence scoring system
Each prediction is accompanied by a confidence score. This score is designed to represent relative reliability based on data alignment, not guaranteed success. Higher confidence scores generally indicate stronger agreement between form trends and market signals, while lower scores indicate higher uncertainty. This allows users to differentiate between higher-risk and lower-risk scenarios.

Categorized picks (bankers, specials, goals, BTTS)
The platform groups predictions into categories such as bankers, specials, over goals, and BTTS. These categories are not arbitrary labels. They are derived from confidence thresholds and market-specific logic. For example, banker picks represent selections with stronger statistical support, while specials may highlight value opportunities or less common market conditions.

Smart bet slip generator
ZiloBet includes a configurable bet slip generator that allows users to generate multiple match selections based on their own criteria. Users can define parameters such as minimum confidence level, market type, and number of matches. The system then filters available predictions to produce a slip that matches those constraints. This feature is intended to demonstrate how different filters affect overall risk.

Free-to-play engagement mechanics
Rather than requiring deposits, the platform includes free engagement mechanics where users can earn in-app credits through activity and participation. These credits are used to interact with features on the platform and are designed for experimentation and learning, not financial gain. This approach allows users to explore prediction behavior without monetary pressure.

Mobile-first web architecture
ZiloBet is built as a mobile-first web application, optimized for performance, clarity, and scalability. The interface prioritizes fast loading, structured presentation of data, and minimal friction when navigating between matches, leagues, and prediction categories.

Purpose and direction
ZiloBet is intended as an analytical and educational layer for football enthusiasts who are interested in how predictions are constructed and how risk can be represented numerically. It is not positioned as a betting operator, and it does not attempt to replace bookmakers or guarantee outcomes.

Feedback and discussion
The platform is still under active development. Feedback is particularly welcome on prediction methodology, confidence modeling, categorization logic, and overall system design. Input from users with interest in data analysis, modeling, or sports analytics is especially valuable at this stage.

Disclaimer:

ZiloBet does not provide financial or betting advice. All predictions are probabilistic and should not be interpreted as guarantees. Football matches involve inherent uncertainty. The platform does not require or promote real-money wagering, and any in-app credits or engagement features are intended solely for entertainment, testing, and educational purposes. Users are responsible for how they interpret and apply any information provided.

Thank you for reading. I’m happy to answer questions or discuss the technical ideas behind the project.

[SenseiBitcoin]

Hello,

I tested more than 20 prediction sites on football, basketball, hockey : Your idea is good but you arrive too late.
Furthermore, the choice on the predictions proposed is insufficient.
Many prediction sites offer this and offer a lot of choice for example on over 0.5 HT (half time), over 1.5HT, over 2.5HT. If you stay at BTTS, over 2.5 and over 1.5 you won't get far.
If you want to stand out, also do it on basketball and hockey on the under/over and not just on the 1 X 2 or the 1 or 2.
I remain open if you want to discuss it.

[kidosneh]

Hi, thank you so much for the very helpful insight.
You are actually some what right, the market is very saturated and many other platforms already offers the bet markets I offered on zilobet.
But actually, I am still working on adding other markets such as the ones you mentioned especially HT over 0.5, and also HT Draw.
The Smart bet slip generator on the web app is also getting new markets inclusion.

Over the next coming weeks, I'll be working on adding these features one at a time and introduce them as soon as they're ready.
It might take time because the Algo needs extensive A/B testing and structural data integrity verifications before it becomes a thing and final feature.
But anyways, good point buddy, and thanks, once again.

[fikrett]

Welcome back, I guess.

Are you a rep of Zilo?

[adultcrypto]

Hello,

I tested more than 20 prediction sites on football, basketball, hockey : Your idea is good but you arrive too late.
Furthermore, the choice on the predictions proposed is insufficient.
Many prediction sites offer this and offer a lot of choice for example on over 0.5 HT (half time), over 1.5HT, over 2.5HT. If you stay at BTTS, over 2.5 and over 1.5 you won't get far.
If you want to stand out, also do it on basketball and hockey on the under/over and not just on the 1 X 2 or the 1 or 2.
I remain open if you want to discuss it.

I don't agree with you on this because BTS and Totals are some of the easiest options to get in football prediction. A lot of bettors go with those options and they are super successful. Experience has thought me that 3ways and over 1.5 are the safest bets, far safer than the HT predictions you referenced. There are many occasions in which matches play goalless in first have and over 4 goals come out in full time. However, betting is organised in a way that the harder the option, the higher the odd, what will set you apart is being able to master what you do, draw a plan and stick with that plan.

[CryptSafe]

Welcome to Bitcointalk platform.  I had to peruse your website to see for myself what you have to offer. I noticed you have no KYC on your terms and conditions,  which likely means you are a KYC free casino correct me if I am wrong I couldn't see your licence  and lastly, I do not really fancy the fact that I will visit your website and ads wouldn't allow me have a view of your casino
You should be able to control that so it doesn't scares away potential visitors and also I noticed the ads seems not too clear as they all looking funny though.

[kidosneh]

Welcome back, I guess.

Are you a rep of Zilo?

Thank you.
No, I am the actual developer of the web app.
I created it as a tool to help punters and bettors get premium insights and spot pattern anomalies which would otherwise be hard to do manually.
It's one of the numerous web tools that I created and publish for free use.

[kidosneh]

Welcome to Bitcointalk platform.  I had to peruse your website to see for myself what you have to offer. I noticed you have no KYC on your terms and conditions,  which likely means you are a KYC free casino correct me if I am wrong I couldn't see your licence  and lastly, I do not really fancy the fact that I will visit your website and ads wouldn't allow me have a view of your casino
You should be able to control that so it doesn't scares away potential visitors and also I noticed the ads seems not too clear as they all looking funny though.

Hi there, thanks for your observations and inputs.
Actually, the website isn't a casino, that's why you found no 'KYC' option on the web app.
We do not accept wager of any sort and do not offer gambling services.
Rather, the web app is just a website where anyone can find football predictions done mathematically using my proprietary algorithm aided by AI.
It's sophisticated so technically I won't be able to go into much details on how the Algo makes it picks.
So friend, thanks for taking out of your time to check the web app out.
If you frequently bet on soccer/football matches, the web app is a great companion tool that will help you make better inform decisions when placing bets on your favourite bookies.
The web app has a very helpful tool we termed as 'Smart bet slip builder'. What this does primarily is to help you, within a fraction of a time, scan, compile and filter from a potent list of matches with potentials and high probability of winning.
Just as you would normally use match stats to forecast your games, the same thing is being done by this tool but just that this time, it goes deeper than just the superficial match history that are mostly available to retail bettors.
And as for the ads, apologies but that's the only way the app can stay free for everyone to use. Since I am not charging any fees to use this tools, there has to be a way to generate some revenue to keep paying for web resources.
Gracias

[kidosneh]

Hello,

I tested more than 20 prediction sites on football, basketball, hockey : Your idea is good but you arrive too late.
Furthermore, the choice on the predictions proposed is insufficient.
Many prediction sites offer this and offer a lot of choice for example on over 0.5 HT (half time), over 1.5HT, over 2.5HT. If you stay at BTTS, over 2.5 and over 1.5 you won't get far.
If you want to stand out, also do it on basketball and hockey on the under/over and not just on the 1 X 2 or the 1 or 2.
I remain open if you want to discuss it.

I don't agree with you on this because BTS and Totals are some of the easiest options to get in football prediction. A lot of bettors go with those options and they are super successful. Experience has thought me that 3ways and over 1.5 are the safest bets, far safer than the HT predictions you referenced. There are many occasions in which matches play goalless in first have and over 4 goals come out in full time. However, betting is organised in a way that the harder the option, the higher the odd, what will set you apart is being able to master what you do, draw a plan and stick with that plan.

Good point.
Both of you are right in your regards. Just as you have pointed out that most punters go with these goal lines and 3-way options more often than other markets, these markets mostly seem to be the safest but most times than not, one can not accurately be sure that at least 1 out of all the available selections (if accumulator type of bet) won't do otherwise, or if a team (in case of a single type of bet) won't underperform on that day.
Statistically, your statement carries more elements of reality in the sense that, more than 80% of daily matches ends up with goals >2, while ~30 percent of these games ends their HT goalless.

Football is very unpredictable and requires a very precise set of identification skills to truly unlock what pays and what won't. What will occur and what won't either.
As for the HT 0.5, some punters just simply prefer this as the threshold of the goals needed is quite small compared to O1.5 albeit must occur within a shorter time span.

I'm thinking of adding a statistics page where users of zilobet can view extensive stats of each league covering areas of goals, HT draws, bookings, home/away stats and more. This will further help narrowing the barrier of obscure patterns amongst teams/leagues as takes the forecasting a step more deeper.

[SenseiBitcoin]

Hello,

I tested more than 20 prediction sites on football, basketball, hockey : Your idea is good but you arrive too late.
Furthermore, the choice on the predictions proposed is insufficient.
Many prediction sites offer this and offer a lot of choice for example on over 0.5 HT (half time), over 1.5HT, over 2.5HT. If you stay at BTTS, over 2.5 and over 1.5 you won't get far.
If you want to stand out, also do it on basketball and hockey on the under/over and not just on the 1 X 2 or the 1 or 2.
I remain open if you want to discuss it.

I don't agree with you on this because BTS and Totals are some of the easiest options to get in football prediction. A lot of bettors go with those options and they are super successful. Experience has thought me that 3ways and over 1.5 are the safest bets, far safer than the HT predictions you referenced. There are many occasions in which matches play goalless in first have and over 4 goals come out in full time. However, betting is organised in a way that the harder the option, the higher the odd, what will set you apart is being able to master what you do, draw a plan and stick with that plan.

The safest bets dont exist...
For prediction site i say you must have more choice that all
And for the 3 ways : its the devil ...i prefer bet over HT or matches