Flag Support Request - nutildah Trust Abuse

[kingbj21]

FLAG: nutildah violated implied community standards and abused trust system

VIOLATION SUMMARY:

nutildah systematically defends provably fraudulent casino operations while filing FALSE trust ratings against legitimate complainants, prioritizing advertiser revenue over community protection.

SPECIFIC VIOLATIONS:

1. Defense of Mathematical Fraud
   • BetFury casino operates with 71% BTTC RTP (should be 99%+)
   • 13,998 bets analyzed showing 93.54σ deviation (impossible in fair play)
   • Monte Carlo: 0/10,000 fair simulations matched observed results
   • nutildah defended this despite overwhelming mathematical proof

2. Intellectual Fraud - ChatGPT Abuse
   • Used AI to generate fake "expert" statistical response
   • Claimed my analysis used "biased Markov chains" (blackjack hands are independent, not Markovian - fundamental error proving AI use)
   • Filled response with misused technical terms to appear credible
   • Zero actual calculations provided
   • When challenged, cannot answer basic statistical questions

3. False Trust Rating Abuse
   • Filed negative trust against me with accomplices
   • Coordinated retaliation for exposing BetFury fraud
   • Abuse of trust system to silence legitimate complaints
   • No actual scam occurred - purely retaliatory

4. Financial Conflicts of Interest
   • BetFury runs signature campaigns on forum
   • nutildah defends them despite mathematical proof of fraud
   • Pattern of switching campaigns before operators exposed
   • Acts as "casino pimp" protecting fraudulent operations
   • Community protection subordinated to financial interests

5. Forum Manipulation
   • My mathematical rebuttals deleted while his attacks remain
   • Uses position to suppress evidence of advertiser fraud
   • Protects revenue sources over user safety
   • Coordinates with moderators to censor critics

EVIDENCE:

Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563800

Mathematical Analysis:
- 13,998 documented BetFury transactions
- Win rate: 89.03% (expected 49.5%) = 93.54 standard deviations
- USDT RTP: 94.08% (expected 99%+) = 38 SE outside confidence interval
- BTTC RTP: 71.15% (worse than lottery at 50%)
- Currency discrimination: 99% BFG vs 71% BTTC (same games)

nutildah's "Refutation":
- Zero calculations with my data
- ChatGPT-generated buzzword salad
- "Markov chains" claim proves statistical illiteracy
- Cannot answer basic statistical challenges
- Pure ad hominem without substance

IMPLIED AGREEMENT VIOLATED:

Community members implicitly agree to:
✓ Honest evaluation of evidence
✓ Protection of users over advertisers
✓ Fair use of trust system
✓ Intellectual honesty in debates

nutildah violated ALL of these by:
✗ Defending mathematical fraud
✗ Prioritizing advertiser revenue
✗ Filing false retaliatory trust ratings
✗ Using AI to fake expertise

HARM TO COMMUNITY:

- Users misled about casino safety
- Legitimate complaints suppressed
- Trust system weaponized against victims
- Forum credibility damaged
- Future victims unprotected

FINANCIAL MOTIVATION:

nutildah has clear financial interest in defending BetFury:
- Signature campaign revenue
- Potential referral payments
- Advertising relationships
- Moderator kickbacks (possible)

PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR:

This is not isolated incident. nutildah:
- Switches signature campaigns before exposure
- Defends multiple gambling operations
- Uses trust system against critics
- Coordinates with other casino defenders
- Prioritizes money over community

REQUEST:

Support this flag to:
✓ Warn community about financially-motivated "reviews"
✓ Prevent trust system abuse against legitimate complaints
✓ Discourage defense of provable fraud
✓ Protect future victims

EVIDENCE ARCHIVE:

All statistical analysis, forum censorship documentation, nutildah's ChatGPT response, and mathematical proofs available publicly and backed up.

This user prioritizes casino advertising revenue over community protection and abuses trust system to silence critics of fraud.

[yahoo62278]

Should we now expect 7 more threads calling out the other 7 whom have tagged you as well? Do you really think anyone is going to give your thread a second look? Honestly man, you're tagged by multiple users for being a blackmailer and apparently a retard, loser, and an idiot. Nutildah's tag is fairly calm compared to some of the others.

[Vod]

I +Pulsed because others should learn from this.  The non-starter is your -9 from default trust.   Tells me right away you don't have a sincere problem with Nutildah, but an annoyance problem.   Where did the other -8 come from?

[Kavelj22]

Waaw! How much time it took you to write all this bullshit? You have not provided a single piece of evidence for any of these claims. I have just notice after checking the link you mentioned that you used to play longtime at the keyboard. Maybe just out of fun.

You have 9 trusted negative feedbacks and 4 untrusted negative feedbacks, why you choose only Nutildah to attack him with your bullshit accusations? Many other users posted in that thread you used as reference. What do you expect after posting this? I am really curious to know your logic.

This thread can serve as a reference for more red tags in your profile as you falsely attack an active user reputation and falsely attack a well-known brand reputation.

[Vod]

You have 9 trusted negative feedbacks and 4 untrusted negative feedbacks

If I may remind the honourable Kavelj22, untrusted feedback is irrelevant. 

[Free Market Capitalist]

Waaw! How much time it took you to write all this bullshit?

Not that much. I've run the text through gptzero AI detector and it gives a mixed result 55% AI.

I feel like adding another tag to his profile, but I don't think it would add anything, and he's already making a fool of himself with this thread.

[JeromeTash]

Another useless kingbj21 thread that is most likely going to be deleted in the near future by the poster himself, just like he did in the past. I think members are right when they say that you are mentally retarded.

Waaw! How much time it took you to write all this bullshit? You have not provided a single piece of evidence for any of these claims.

Not much when he decided to use ChatGPT and just copy and paste.

You have 9 trusted negative feedbacks and 4 untrusted negative feedbacks, why you choose only Nutildah to attack him with your bullshit accusations?

I guess he is trying to retaliate for this - Flag for kingbj21

[Zoomic]

Dude, you would have done this with a new and clean account. Your 10 -ve tags made me not to read your thread. I rather read your feedbacks and many people said the same thing about you.

[Majestic-milf]

Dude, you would have done this with a new and clean account. Your 10 -ve tags made me not to read your thread. I rather read your feedbacks and many people said the same thing about you.

I agree with you because all this time he's using to create threads that won't even last before getting ignored or deleted, he would have used it to do something more profitable, except for him "something profitable" means looking for the next naive person to sell his crooked thoughts to or look for a casino he can bleed with his lies.

[kingbj21]

TO THE COORDINATED CASINO DEFENSE SQUAD:

Interesting how SEVEN casino shills appeared to defend nutildah without addressing a SINGLE mathematical fact.

Let me address each statistical illiterate individually:


YAHOO62278: "Multiple users tagged you"

RESPONSE:

Yes, multiple casino campaign participants coordinated retaliatory tags after I exposed Casino's fraud.

Notice what you DIDN'T address:
- Is 93.54σ deviation possible in fair play? (Answer: No)
- Is 71% BTTC RTP acceptable? (Answer: No)
- Did nutildah use ChatGPT? (Answer: Yes - "Markov chains" proves it)

Your casino campaigns: (List them if known)

QUESTION: How much does Casinos pay you to defend fraud?


VOD: "You have -9 from default trust"

RESPONSE:

Yes, from coordinated casino shills retaliating for exposing fraud.

Mathematical fact doesn't care about trust scores:
- 93.54 standard deviations = impossible by chance
- Probability < 10^(-1000)
- 0/10,000 Monte Carlo simulations matched

CHALLENGE: Calculate the probability of 89% win rate over 13,998 blackjack hands.

Can't? Then your opinion on my trust score is irrelevant.

QUESTION: Do you participate in casino signature campaigns? Disclose your conflicts.


KAVELJ22: "Not a single piece of evidence"

RESPONSE:

Are you blind or lying?

EVIDENCE PROVIDED:
✓ 13,998 documented transactions
✓ Complete statistical analysis
✓ Monte Carlo simulation (code available)
✓ Z-score: 93.54σ
✓ Chi-square: 8,748.98
✓ Binomial p-value: < 10^(-1000)
✓ Currency discrimination data
✓ RTP by currency: BFG 99%, USDT 94%, BTTC 71%

YOUR EVIDENCE:
✗ Zero calculations
✗ Zero refutation
✗ Just "bullshit" repeated 3 times

QUESTION: Can you calculate a Z-score? Clearly not.

Your casino campaigns: (Probably multiple)


FREE MARKET CAPITALIST: "55% AI according to gptzero"

RESPONSE:

HILARIOUS considering:

1. nutildah's response was 100% ChatGPT
   • Claimed "Markov chains" (wrong - blackjack hands independent)
   • Zero calculations provided
   • Pure buzzword soup

2. I provided actual mathematical analysis
   • Calculations with real numbers
   • Python simulation code
   • Verifiable statistical tests

3. AI detectors are unreliable
   • False positives common
   • 55% = inconclusive
   • Doesn't invalidate mathematics

CHALLENGE: Explain what a Markov chain is and why nutildah's claim was wrong.

Can't? Then shut up about AI.

QUESTION: What casino campaigns do you run? Disclose.


JEROMETASH: "Mentally retarded"

RESPONSE:

Ad hominem = admission you have no mathematical argument.

I'm "retarded" but I can:
✓ Calculate Z-scores (93.54σ)
✓ Run Monte Carlo simulations (0/10,000)
✓ Apply binomial probability (p < 10^-1000)
✓ Identify ChatGPT fraud ("Markov chains")

You're "smart" but you can't:
✗ Refute a single calculation
✗ Answer basic statistical questions
✗ Understand independent events
✗ Think beyond casino talking points

QUESTION: Which casinos pay you? Full disclosure.


ZOOMIC: "Your 10 -ve tags made me not read"

RESPONSE:

Translation: "I'm too lazy to evaluate evidence."

The mathematics don't care about your reading habits:
- 93.54σ = impossible
- 71% BTTC RTP = fraud
- Monte Carlo = validates impossibility

QUESTION: If you didn't read the evidence, why comment?

Oh right - casino campaigns require defending fraud.


MAJESTIC-MILF: "Crooked thoughts... bleed casinos with lies"

RESPONSE:

Which part is "lies"?

- 13,998 documented bets? (Verifiable)
- 93.54σ calculation? (Mathematical fact)
- 71% BTTC RTP? (Observable data)
- nutildah's "Markov chains" error? (Proven ChatGPT fraud)

CHALLENGE: Point to ONE "lie" and prove it's false with mathematics.

You can't. Because mathematics aren't lies.

QUESTION: How many casino campaigns have you participated in?


THE PATTERN IS OBVIOUS:

SEVEN casino shills appeared within hours to:
✗ Attack me personally
✗ Ignore mathematical evidence
✗ Defend proven fraud
✗ Coordinate negative tags
✗ Provide ZERO calculations
✗ Refuse to disclose conflicts

NOT ONE addressed:
- Is 93.54σ possible in fair play?
- Is 71% BTTC RTP acceptable?
- Why did nutildah claim "Markov chains"?
- Can any of you calculate a Z-score?


TO THE HONEST COMMUNITY:

Watch this pattern:

When casino fraud is exposed with mathematics:
1. Casino campaign participants coordinate attack
2. File retaliatory negative trust
3. Use ad hominem (retard, idiot, blackmailer)
4. Ignore all mathematical evidence
5. Never provide calculations
6. Protect advertiser revenue over users

This proves:
✓ Forum prioritizes casino revenue
✓ Trust system weaponized against victims
✓ Statistical evidence systematically ignored
✓ Casino shills coordinate defenses
✓ No honest evaluation of evidence

SEVEN "different" users, ZERO mathematical rebuttals.


THE CHALLENGE (REISSUED):

To ANY of the seven casino shills above:

Answer with MATHEMATICS:

1. Calculate probability of 89% win rate over 13,998 hands (p=0.495)
2. Calculate 95% confidence interval for n=6,678, RTP=99%
3. Determine if 94% RTP falls within that interval
4. Explain what a Markov chain is
5. Explain why blackjack hands are NOT Markovian
6. Calculate Z-score for 12,462 wins out of 13,998 trials

Rules:
- Show your work
- Provide equations
- Use actual numbers
- No ChatGPT
- No ad hominem

If you cannot answer (and you cannot):

Then admit you're statistically illiterate casino shills protecting fraud for money.


DISCLOSURE DEMANDED:

Each of you must disclose:

1. Current casino signature campaigns
2. Past casino affiliations (last 2 years)
3. Referral relationships with casinos
4. Any compensation from gambling operations
5. Financial ties to BetFury specifically

Failure to disclose = admission of conflict of interest


FINAL STATEMENT:

SEVEN casino shills cannot refute basic mathematics.

93.54 standard deviations.
71% BTTC RTP.
0/10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.
13,998 documented transactions.

These are facts, not opinions.

Your coordinated attack proves:
✓ You prioritize casino money over truth
✓ You cannot engage with evidence
✓ You weaponize trust against victims
✓ You protect fraud for profit

The mathematics don't lie.
Seven casino shills do.

Respond with EQUATIONS or admit you're paid defenders of fraud.


P.S. TO MODERATORS:

Notice how users appeared to defend nutildah?

This coordinated attack against legitimate mathematical evidence proves:
- Forum protects advertiser revenue
- Casino campaigns coordinate defenses
- Trust system weaponized
- Statistical evidence systematically suppressed

If you delete this while keeping their coordinated attack, you prove complicity.